ターゲットプロシリーズは、過去にTarget Pro GT-X51（ターゲットプロGT-X51）とTarget Pro GT-H47（ターゲットプロGT-H47）をレビューさせていただきました。この2枚は非常に打球感が良くて、硬度の割にくい込みが良さと扱いやすさを感じたラバーになります。ただし回転量がやや不足気味で、ターゲットプロGT-H47ではテナジー05より劣る、ターゲットプロGT-X51では回転量は高いが扱いにくいと感じた次第です。扱いやすさと打球感の良さは抜群に良いのと、スポンジの色が硬度で異なるのが触っていて楽しいラバーでした。
一方、近年の進化型ポストテナジーラバーは、シートを薄くできる技術（おそらくくい込みの良い新スポンジ）を組み合わせることで、回転量と打球感を損なうことなく高性能なラバーとなってきており、ターゲットプロXDシリーズも、高くなっている分、かなり性能の高さを感じるラバーに仕上がっていると想像して購入しました。逆にドイツ製ラバーに見られた癖球（ボールの回転量が揃いにくい）といったことが減ってきているようにも思います。 今回のTarget Pro XD-47.5（ターゲットプロXD-47.5）は、既にレビューしているTarget Pro XD-52.5（ターゲットプロXD-52.5）をより扱いやすくしたようなラバーだと思って購入しました。今までは同じラケットで試打してきたのですが、XD52.5はインナーカーボンラケットでも十分に扱いやすかったので、今回のXD-47.5はアウターカーボンで試打することにしました。どこまで扱いやすくなっているのか、楽しみです。
公表性能値
cornilleau（コニヨール）さんの公表性能値を示します。
Target Pro XD-52.5（ターゲットプロXD-52.5）はcornilleauのラバーの中で最もスピン性能もスピード性能も高いスピン系テンションラバーということがよく分かります。また性能や使いやすさとある程度の相関を示す、硬度計による硬度比較を下記に示します。
さてこのR45について、kastuo000はなんとなくですが、R48で相当シートもスポンジも柔らかいものになっていたので、R45ではスポンジ硬度は45°しかないので、シートを硬くするのではないか、となんとく想像しておりました。要はシートの硬い軟テンション系ラバーということですね。シートの硬い軟テンションラバーは、実は既に人気を博している（おそらくヨーロッパで特に人気の）売れセンのカテゴリーのラバーだと思います。katsuo000が確認しているシートの硬い軟テンション系ラバーは、TIBHAR（ティバー）さんのEvolution EL-S（エヴォリューションEL-S）、Joola（ヨーラ）さんのRhyzer Pro 45（ライザープロ45）、XIOM（エクシオン）さんのVega X（ヴェガX）などになります。どのラバーもシートが硬く、上手に扱えば高い回転性能を発揮してくれるラバーですね。それでいてスポンジは柔らかいのでくい込ませやすく初-中級者層向けの非常に扱いやすいラバーといえるでしょう。ただ上級者層になってくると、シートだけでボールをこすったり捉えたりしようとしたときにスリップすることがあるので、好みがわかれるラバーでもあると思います。今回のR45も、硬度計で硬度を計ると明らかにシートが硬く、要はシートの硬い軟テンション系のラザンター、というのがR45の立ち位置と言えると思いました。このR45について、androのパンフレットでは次のように紹介しています。
We would like to review Rosena, one of Butterfly (Tamasu)’s signature products. To talk about Rosena, I think it starts with Tenergy. The release of the world standard Tenergy 05 dates back to now, about 13 years ago, in April 2008. Tenergy 05, which still wants the name of the world standard even after more than 10 years have passed due to the prohibition of post-processing with organic solvents, has become an existence that can not be talked about without it when thinking about table tennis. Considering the features of this Tenergy series as katsuo000 as of 2021, I think it will be as follows.
Features of Tenergy series
・High spin performance
・High speed performance
・Weight light
I think that the characteristics of the Tenergy series as described above are largely due to Butterfly’s unique sponge. The sponge used in the Tenergy series is an orange sponge called Spring Sponge, and the bubbles in the sponge have a closed cell structure, and it seems that they are able to show high performance. This spring sponge is a technology that differentiates it from other competing table tennis makers with only Butterfly technology. While other competing table tennis makers basically outsource rubber manufacturing, Butterfly, despite being a table tennis maker, owns a sponge manufacturing factory and is trying to differentiate itself. Because of this spring sponge, Tenergy can produce high performance, but due to the fact that it costs research and development in addition to resale and counterfeiting, it has become an open price and it is almost double the price compared to other rubbers. It can be said that it is also a (bad) feature. However, there is no doubt that the usage rate of top players is high and it is the world standard. In addition to Tenergy 05, which has the highest usage rate of the top players and high rotation performance, Tenergy 64, which has high speed performance due to the difference in the top seat, Tenegy 80, which has a good balance of spin and speed, There are 5 types of seats, including the Tenergy 25, which is strong against counters and front teams, and the Power Tenergy 19, which was released the other day. The explanation of each sheet is as follows.
No. 05: 1.7 mm grain spacing is narrow. High rotation performance. No. 25: The height of the 2.65 mm grain is low. Easy to play on the table and counter. No. 64: 1.7 mm wide grain spacing. High speed performance. No. 180: The grain spacing of 1.7 mm is in the middle. The rotation and speed are well balanced. No. 219: 1.5 mm grain spacing is narrow. It is easy to grab the ball well and put out power. As mentioned above, the characteristics of each top sheet are reflected, and there are key phrases such as “Rotation 05”, “Balance 80”, “Speed 64”, “Front 25”, and “Power 19”. It is crowned.
About 13 years ago, after launching Tenergy 05 in April 2008, Butterfly launched Tenergy 25 in November 2008, Tenergy 64 in April 2009, and Tenergy in July 2010. 05 FX (Tenergy 05 FX), Tenergy 25 FX in November 2010, Tenergy 64 FX in November 2011, Tenergy 80 in January 2013, 2014 Tenergy 80 FX in April 2017, Rozena in April 2017, Tenergy 05 Hard, which is a harder version of Tenergy 05 in November 2018, in April 2019. Dignics 05 has been released as a rubber that exceeds tenergy. And in March 2021, when the transition from Tenergy to Dignics was beginning to appear, Tenergy 19 was put on the market. To date, there are 10 types of Tenergy. Each has been sold as a new product, and the fact that Tenergy 05 is still popular is a sign of completion and trust.
Rosena, reviewed on this page, is, so to speak, a cheaper version of Tenergy. Combined with a soft spring sponge, it becomes an easy-to-use tenergy-like rubber. I think it is a popular rubber as a back rubber for intermediate users or as a rubber with a spring sponge for the first time for beginners. In terms of price range, it is cheaper than the signboard rubber of other manufacturers and cheaper than the best-selling rubber, Fastarc G-1 of Nittaku, and the real selling price is fiercely competitive 4,000 It will be a rubber dropped on the circle! For cheaper and better performance than this price, Yasaka’s Rakza series and Rigan, and XIOM’s Vega X and Vega Tour 3,000. Will it be a round rubber? I would like to make a comparison with this area in the future. Recently, a review of Rosena was posted on YouTuber, Goblin’s, but it was quite badly criticized. I think she has some likes and dislikes that don’t meet. I think she feels uncomfortable using hard rubber.
Published performance value
Shows the published performance values of Butterfly.
It may be no exaggeration to say that Rosena is Tenergy 05, which has inferior spin performance in a sense. Actually, I tried it again this time, but I have used thick Rosena in the past. In that impression, I had a strong impression that it was a rubber with low rotational performance. On the other hand, I remember that the shot feeling was certainly the shot feeling of the spring sponge, and the feel was not bad.
Rozena weight and paste
Rosena weighed 48 g. Butterfly’s rubber seems to have a correlation with sponge hardness basically, and the Tenergy FX series has softer sponge hardness and lighter weight. The sponge hardness is 35, which is a little softer than Tenergy, so 48 g is a heavy weight.
Rozena
High Tension rubber
・Sponge thickness: thick (1.9 mm)、extra thick (2.1 mm)
・Spin: 10.80
・Speed: 13.00
・Sponge stiffness: 35
・5,000 yen + tax
・69 g (before cut) → 48 g (after cut)
Three features of Rozena
Recently, I mainly use Tenergy rubber for the back, so I could use it with a good feeling rather than a very strange feeling. To be honest, I could not deny the lack of power, but I still felt that the ease of handling was higher than the Tenergy series and Tenergy FX series! It was a level that I was wondering whether to use it in the main. I think it’s a shield-like rubber for sticking rather than using it as a weapon. If you want to attack, it’s like playing a little at the counter or block using the opponent’s ball to meet. The current candidates for back rubber were Tenergy 05 and Rakza X. Compared to Rakza X, Rakza X tends to be heavier due to individual differences, so it costs around 500 yen, but I felt that I liked Rosena better. Of course, the quality of loop drive and push is higher than that of Rakza X and Tenergy 05, but I think Rosena is better in terms of total balance and ease of handling.
Anyway, various techniques are easy to do!
To be honest, I didn’t expect it so far, but I didn’t have any difficult technology. I felt like I was holding the ball a little too much, but it was very easy to do loop drive, speed drive, block, counter, stop. I personally found it easy to do with blocks, which was pretty easy to do! I felt the flexibility to enter if I hit it. There was a feeling that the entire rubber absorbed the power of the opponent’s ball. The only thing I felt was that when I tried to take the ball with just the seat, it felt like a slip, and I felt that this part was difficult to handle. I felt that it was a rubber that was firmly bitten into the sponge and hit.
The rally of the upper spin gives you a feeling of spring sponge!
At the time of the rally of the upper rotation, by playing while driving and biting while biting in, it was possible to reapply the upper rotation and it felt like it would fit on the opponent’s court, so it was a good impression. With Tenergy 05, I feel like I’m going over or going to the net if I don’t drive more. It is Tenergy 05 that makes it easy to feel the hardness, and if you just hit it, it will be difficult to exert power and you can only get a good ball by flying while rotating firmly. On the other hand, Rosena fits well just by playing, and it may be said that there is a part that seems to be Tenergy 64 or Tenergy 80. I don’t have any definite information about the grain shape of the sheet, but I think it’s a sheet that is closer to 64 or 80. Therefore, it was easy to hit a ball that accelerates while drawing an arc with less energy in the upper rotation rally. I think this arc and acceleration are like spring sponges. I think that being able to put out such a ball is a characteristic of Rosena and a good point.
Bring the ball with good bite!
I think the grain shape of the sheet is close to 64 or 80, but the sponge is a little soft and grips the ball very well. I felt that it was close to Tenergy 05. Therefore, it was easy to hit the loop drive. However, I felt the need to hit while considering the flight distance to some extent because it does not sink completely by rotation, not the feeling that anything can be entered by rotating and flying. This area seems to have different tastes, but I am convinced that it is a spring sponge rubber suitable for beginners and intermediates. I think that the good points of Tenergy 05 and Tenergy 80 (because katsuo000 has never used Tenergy 64) and the desired parts coexist in a well-balanced manner. From this Rosena, I felt that it was a rubber that could be changed to each Tenergy in order to use my own characteristics and frequently used techniques as weapons. On the other hand, I certainly felt disappointed when I wanted the features of Tenergy 05 and the features of Tenergy 64 as they were. Since it is a balanced type, Tenergy 80 may be the closest. I think it is difficult to obtain sharp performance. It’s a very well-balanced rubber, and I thought it could be recommended for Penholder who have to do anything.
Each technics review
Forehand
Light hit You have a ball. I felt that it had a lot of spheres compared to Dignics 05.
Rally drive It’s not particularly difficult to do, but I felt like I was going too far to the foreside because I had a ball. Is this used to it? Since the amount of rotation is the first time when it is bitten in, I felt that it was easy to apply rotation in the upper rotation rally and it could be dropped by rotation. Is this a place like a spring sponge?
Backhand
Light hit It was very easy to do. It was a good impression to have a ball and the rubber absorbs it even if you push it unreasonably, so even if you push it forcibly, it will enter quite a bit. I think this is the one you can count on in the game.
Rally drive Since the backhand is not good at my arm and footwork, the hitting point is easy to move back and forth and it is unstable, but Rosena was very nice with the rubber that absorbs the front and back of the hitting point. The quality may be low, but I was happy that I could get it if I tried to put it in anyway. Also, he was very easy to drive in front of the top of the front team and did not feel bad.
Loop (top spin) drive against back spin Since it has the same ball as Tenergy 05 and Tenergy 05 FX, the ball quality is low, but it feels easy to control. I think that it is a rubber that is easy to make a loop drive of such a connection that connects firmly and attacks the next ball.
Speed drive against back spin It was easy to drive speed because it was good to bite to some extent. Although I can’t expect the ball to sink as much as the Tenergy 05FX, it was a rubber that made me feel like I was hitting it.
Block It was the block that I felt was the best compared to Tenergy 05 and Tenergy 05 FX. It was very easy to do and I was impressed. I think that the sponge is hard and the sheet is insensitive to the rotation of the other party in a good way.
Counter drive I was impressed by the feeling that the counter was stable enough even if I caught the front of the top a little like meat. I think that it is a rubber that is a little difficult to drop by rotation, so on the contrary, I think that it is a rubber that has a meat-like way of hitting. I don’t think that the back is counter-driven by taking the plunge, so I felt that it was a rubber that fits the back in that sense as well.
Stop The only thing I found difficult was the stop. It’s easy to play, so if you don’t touch the ball in a short time, I feel that it’s easy to receive the rotation of the opponent directly.
Push Like the stop, it was difficult to rotate. It was a little difficult to bite in too well and overshoot, or slip on the contrary and make a net mistake.
Chiquita It was easy to give and easy to do. However, I felt that it was not very powerful. If you are looking for power, it will be the Tenergy series.
Comparison with other rubbers (personal impressions)
Spin amount Tenergy 80 FX ＞ Rozena ＞ Evolution MX-P
『ビスカリア SUPER ALC』は、アリレートカーボンのしなやかさを維持しながら、より高い弾みを実現した「スーパーアリレートカーボン」を搭載したラケットです。合板構成などの基本設計は名作『ビスカリア』を踏襲しつつも、振動特性はほぼ変えずに反発特性を高めることに成功しました。 トップ選手のみならず、中～上級者にとってもふさわしい性能を持つこのラケットは、従来のアリレートカーボンがもたらす特徴に加え、さらなる打球の威力を求めたい選手にお勧めです。
この特殊素材を『ビスカリア』と同じ合板構成に組み込むことで、スーパー アリレートカーボンの第１号モデルである『ビスカリア SUPER ALC』が誕生したのです。試打した選手からも「打球感はビスカリアと変わらないが、より威力のある打球が可能」という声が寄せられており、当初の要望に応えるラケットに仕上がりました。
反発特性: 12.1 振動特性: 10.1 ブレードサイズ: 157×150 mm ブレード厚: 5.7 mm 価格: 25,000円 + 税
https://www.butterfly.co.jp/catalog/2022ss/8/
ビスカリアの人気もあり売れそうなラケットです。個人的にはこのスーパーALCをインナーに入れたHarimoto Tomokazu Inner Force Super ALC（張本智和インナーフォースSuper ALC）が発売されたら購入しようと思っているんですよね。ビスカリアと比較してビスカリアSuper ALCとなって0.1 mm薄くなっているので、張本智和インナーフォースSuper ALCのブレード厚さは5.9 mmかな？非常に使ってみたいところです。ちなみに愛工大名電中学の吉山和希選手は特注のインナーSuper ALCつかっているんですよね。いいなー。
https://amzn.to/3I76ING
Falcima（ファルシーマ）
新商品２つ目は、初～中級者用の５枚合板になりますね。バタフライさんは５枚合板のラケットはラインナップが結構充実しています。 ・Falcima（ファルシーマ）New 反発特性: 10.9 振動特性: 9.7 ブレード厚: 6.0 mm ブレード面積: 157×150 mm ・Maze Advance（メイスアドバンス） 反発特性: 10.6 振動特性: 10.2 ブレード厚: 6.7 mm ブレード面積: 157×150 mm ・Petr Korbel（コルベル） 反発特性: 10.6 振動特性: 8.2 ブレード厚: 5.9 mm ブレード面積: 158×152 mm ・Timo Boll J（ティモボルJ） 反発特性: 10.4 振動特性: 10.6 ブレード厚: 6.1 mm ブレード面積: 152×144 mm ・TB5α（TB5アルファ） 反発特性: 11.0 振動特性: 9.5 ブレード厚: 6.4 mm ブレード面積: 158×152 mm ・Xstar V（エクスターV） 反発特性: 10.0 振動特性: 8.2 ブレード厚: 5.6 mm ブレード面積: 158×152 mm
中国製粘着ラバーということで、初めはフォア側で使ってみました。普段使っているOmega VII China Ying（オメガVIIチャイナ影）と比べるとかなり柔らかく感じました。そこで、バック側でどう感じるか試してみたら抜群に扱いやすくて驚きました。ボールをしっかりグリップするし中陣からでもドライブもしやすく非常に好感触でした。球持ちが非常に良いのでループっぽく入れに行くのもやりやすかったです！
