レビュー

Review Omega VII China Ying

Explanation

Review the year’s adhesive tension rubber, Omega VII China Ying. First, let’s take a look at Xiom’s rubber.
Speaking of Xiom rubber, the Vega series, which has increased its presence as a low-priced version of monster rubber, is famous. In particular, Vega Euro is very popular as a rubber used by beginners and intermediate players. In addition, the rubber Vega X, which has recently become a hot topic as the strongest cost performance and has been viewed more than Dignics 09C in this blog, is also a representative rubber of Xiom. Xiom has many high-performance and high-cost rubber.
The Omega series is a top-class rubber for those who want to improve their level while attracting users with this easy-to-use and cost-effective Vega series.
The Omega series has traditionally been a speed-oriented series, with the IV (Four) series combined with Vega’s rotational performance, the V (Five) specializing in rotational performance and grip, and the low arch wire and competitive strength. VII (Seven) large 3 series is still on sale. Not all rubbers have been tried out on katsuo000, but we have tried out representative rubbers centered on the Omega VII series. There are many rubbers with a mad shot feeling as a whole, and if anything, it is an impression that there are many rubbers that give a taste by using it on the fore side. The rubber of the Omega series that I have tried so far was as follows.

・ Vega Tour
The highest performance rubber in Vega. A sponge with an intermediate hardness of 45 ° makes it easy to bite and handle. If it can be bitten and handled, the amount of rotation is as tenacious.
:

・ Vega X
The highest costa rubber in the Vega series released to commemorate the 10th anniversary. Both the seat and sponge are harder than Vega Tour, and I personally feel that the amount of rotation when mastered is more than Vega Tour. Rubber that is easy to do with modern technology such as counter performance. It is also very popular and is rapidly increasing in popularity on this blog.
:

・ Omega V Tour DF
Compared to the Omega VII series, it is a rubber that has a lighter shot feeling, is easier to use, and has a high amount of rotation and grip. The rotation performance is enough like Tenergy 05, and the cost performance is also well reviewed, and it is a good rubber, and it was featured by Yu-san even in the table tennis kingdom. For the weight, the habit of plus alpha and the unique performance feel a little lacking.
:

・ Omega VII Pro
A rubber that is easier to handle than Tenergy 05, yet has power and is easy to handle in the mud, which is not in the Vega series.
:

・ Omega VII Tour
I think it is the highest peak of spin tension in the Omega VII series. It is difficult to maximize the specifications, but if you just use it, you can handle it with a bag. If you can handle it, speed performance and power drive can be said to be the best among spin type tension rubber.
:

・ Omega VII Hyper
A rubber that makes the Omega VII tour more like an adhesive rubber. It is a rubber that can be said to be a spin type tension rubber rather than an adhesive rubber, and it is a rubber that easily produces habit balls. It can be used in the back, but it is difficult to pull it out unless it is in the fore to bring out this high performance and the goodness of the habit ball.
:

For the fore, katsuo000 has used the best rubber such as Hurricane and Dignics 05. To be honest, I haven’t felt any merit compared to those rubbers, and I’m still up to the present. I think that one of the reasons why it is hard to feel the merit is that it is often a mad rubber and it needs power to bite into it. It may be said that it is not a rubber that can be used easily enough to maximize the spin performance. Until now, I haven’t used it continuously, and it may be said that I changed it before reaching the hitting method that was suitable for this rubber. However, there are many rubbers that have a sense of stability even when the way of hitting is not suitable for the rubber, and it will be a rubber series that is easy to handle regardless of the swing.

Published performance value

Let’s compare the published performance values. XIOM is based on Vega Pro from the 2021 catalog value. Both will be posted, so please refer to them.

2020

Since the Omega VII Tour i series has not been announced in 2020, the Omega VII Hyper is treated as the most balanced rubber. Next is the one created from the 2021 pamphlet.

2021

On the other hand, in the 2021 version, the speed and spin of Vega Pro are relative values ​​when it is set to 10. After all, you can see that the OMEGA VII Tour i series has high performance. Omega VII China Shadow emphasizes high spin performance in both 2020 and 2021.

You can see that the Omega VII series is heavy and hard. Omega VII Pro is considered to be easy to handle because it is more difficult than Tenergy 05. On the other hand, the Omega VII Tour, VII Hyper, and VII China Shadows have extraordinary hardness and weight. It can be said that the China shadow is similar to the Dignics 09C in that it is difficult to bite.

Omega VII China Ying Paste and Weight

↑ This white sheet is quite similar to STIGA’s DNA Dragon Grip and Joola’s Rhyzen ZGR. Both are made in Germany and are probably manufactured in a nearby location (factory?). Considering the release date, it may have been this Omega VII China shadow that was actually released earliest. The adhesiveness of the sheet is not very strong, and I think it is a slightly adhesive rubber. It’s a modern adhesive rubber.

After all the rubber of Omega VII is heavy. I have also tried Omega VII Hyper in the past, but the Hyper was 54 g. 57-60 g, which is even heavier than its hyper. .. .. This is a super heavyweight. But isn’t it salvation that it’s not as much as 65g of Nittaku’s Hurricane Pro III Turbo Blue? Also, Virtuoso AC is a little wider than the blade area of ​​the standard racket, so it tends to be heavy. Well, it’s heavy. When I exceed 200 g, I feel heavy and difficult.

Omega VII China Ying
    Tacky tension, Made in Germany
・Sponge Thickness:  2.1 mm, Max
・Speed: 12.5 (Vega Pro as 10) (11.0 from 2020)
・Spin: 17.0 (Vega Pro as 10) (15.5 from 2020)
・Sponge stiffness: 60
・7,000 yen + tax
・85 g (before cut) → 57 - 60 g (after cut 158 x 150 mm)

Three features of Omega VII China Ying

To be honest, I couldn’t handle it. It’s a tremendous rubber. However, it was a rubber that strongly felt the excitement while it could not be handled. My favorite is the library from the middle team. When I lowered the hitting point like a leopard, I felt that it was easy to control the amount of rotation and speed by driving with the ball difficult to lift from below. If you do this with Dignics 05, you will either over-miss or get caught on the net. Also, I think that it is different from Hurricane because it is not completely handled, but it was that even from the middle team, it was possible to get faster than Hurricane. I would like to continue using it for a while.

A monster-like amount of spin and habits! Approaching the Hurricane!

It was also featured in the World Table Tennis Kingdom, but the monster-like amount of rotation and habit of Omega VII China’s shadow is amazing! When I was able to drive with my body firmly in, the ball’s harshness was something I had never seen before! Roughness was rather similar to Rasanter R53, and it was rough so that the lateral rotation remained as it was. I didn’t feel the ball sinking so much, but I think it may not have been handled. It was a rubber that felt the vision that if it could be handled completely, it would be possible to freely perform both speed drive and super-rotating loop drive!
It has a high potential, and I felt that it was the one and only rubber that could approach the leopard if it was handled. Still, the price is cheaper than Hurricane (blue sponge)! This is interesting!

Even though it’s an adhesive (tacky) rubber, it bounces like spin tension rubber!

Although it is an adhesive rubber, what surprised me was its speed performance. Coupled with the fact that I tried it in a small table tennis field, I felt the speed performance was comparable to that of spin-type tension rubber. Because the rubber is hard, it was easy to hit it like playing, but once the speed drive was decided, it was fast enough to punch through. On the other hand, in order to handle it, I also thought that it was necessary to let it bite firmly and spin the ball instead of playing it. I think it has tremendous potential.
Also, because it pops out well, I felt that the racket should be wood or an inner carbon racket. Fore felt that the outer ALC was good for power, but I felt that the outer carbon was too bouncing to take advantage of its characteristic rotational performance. As for the back, I wanted to use Dignics 05 for the inner ALC, so I felt it was just right. However, due to the Omega VII China Ying, Dignics 05 is also harder and easier to feel, so I think it is better to balance it well.

Extremely difficult to handle! Weight measures are essential!

Anyway, it was a rubber that was hard to hit as I imagined, so I could not understand the reason. This is a rampage horse unless it can be used and handled for a long time. Currently, I am thinking of continuing to use it, but first of all, it is heavy, so I am considering how to extend it as a measure against weight. With this, it seems that the upper limit of weight can finally be reduced to the 57 g level. I also decided to take all the side balancers. I am looking forward to seeing what kind of features and performance will come out in the future.

Each technology review

Fore hand

Light hit
I didn’t really care about the light hits. That’s how much it bounces. When the light hits continued, I tried to push the racket forward like pushing the racket, but the ball still goes up and enters. There was a strong sense of discomfort and habit around here as well.

Drive on long balls and rallies
I wasn’t used to it yet, and it was easy to hit it in a way that was suitable for spin-type tension rubber, and when I hit it with a strong impact, I often played it without being able to fully rotate it. The swing speed is still too slow, and I think I haven’t been able to open the surface. The experience of lacking my power and swing speed in the foreground has been a feeling since I started studying for the test when I was in junior high school. I was excited for the first time in 20 years. I want to practice hard and get used to it! Also, I was surprised and felt the high potential that the speed drive was able to hit even from the middle team. I think it is necessary to adjust the spin tension rubber in consideration of the rotation of the opponent, but with this Omega VII China shadow, it was nice to have a feeling of screwing in.

Drive with open face
It seems to be an adhesive rubber, it was easier to speed drive by opening the surface for downward rotation hitting etc. The speed performance was perfect. I want to be able to handle more and add rotation to speed.

Loop (top spin) drive against back spin
It was shallow and easy to drive with a large amount of rotation. However, because it bounces for its hardness, the ball is easy to float, and it was difficult to put out a low loop drive. You will get used to this area.

Speed drive against back spin
This is also easy to get speed, so I almost went flat. If you sink the ball by rotating it firmly, you will get a stable and aggressive speed drive.

Curve / shoot drive
Side spin is also easy to remain, and this area was a pretty good impression. Of course, it is said that it is better to open the surface of the adhesive rubber because it is easier to rotate due to the impact, but I also felt that this rubber could create a new habit by getting caught. Especially in the de library, the taste will come out.

Block
It bounced so it didn’t fall. This also made me feel uncomfortable.

Counter drive
As I get used to it, I feel that I can do the most stable and comfortable counter drive so far.

Stop
This was good! It was easy to cut.

Push
It was easy to cut it and send it low. This alone seemed to be a weapon.

Fore flick
It bounces, but I think it is more stable if it is sunk by rotating it. It was easy to do.

Serve
The number of service ace has increased. As you get used to it, the amount of rotation is very good.

Comparison with other rubbers (personal impressions)

Spin amount
 Hurricane type ≧ Omega VII China Ying > Dignics 09C ≧ Dignics 05

Speed
 Dignics 05 > Omega VII China Ying > Rhyzen ZGR > Hurricane type

Review Omega V Tour DF

Explanation

Korean table tennis maker XIOM is famous for two types of rubber series, the Vega series with good cost performance and the Omega series, which is a high-end model. You sell rackets such as Ice Cream, which other manufacturers do not have. The high-end rubber series Omega series is currently mainly composed of two series, V (five) and VII (seven). Brazilian hard hitter Hugo Calderano has signed a contract with XIOM, and even after changing the equipment, the world tour ranking has risen to a single digit! The Hugo Hyper Axylium and Omega VII Tour used by Calderano are also soaring in popularity. Also, Korean iron wall block and Chiquita Jeoung Youngsik will be using Ice Cream AZXi and Omega VII Pro.

The Omega V Tour DF reviewed on this page is the rubber of the Omega V series. The concept of the OMEGA 5 series is that it has a grip that holds the ball securely, holds the ball firmly, and has a strong arc and a strong amount of rotation. All Omega 5 series are priced at 5,200 yen + tax, but if discounted, they will be available for purchase at the same 3,000 yen level as the Vega series. Although it is a high-end model, it can be said that it is a series with a very good cost performance. There are four types of Omega 5 series on the pamphlet, in addition to the tour DF reviewed this time, Omega V Pro (Omega 5 Pro), soft Omega V Euro DF (Omega 5 Euro DF), Omega V Asia DF with the highest hardness in the series (Omega V Asia DF) Omega 5 Asia DF) is on sale. I will mention Xiom’s rubber, including DF, and its technology.

・MAX AT 4
Technology that applies maximum tension within the scope of official rules.

・ELASTO FUTURA
Comprehensive technology installed in the Omega VII series, Vega Tour, and Vega X. Three special tunings of "CYCLOID", "DYNAMIC FRICTION", and "CARBO SPONGE" are integrated into one rubber, delicate ball touch, unparalleled grip, and epoch-making elasticity. Technology to realize.

・DYNAMIC FRICTION (DF)
Rubber surface processing technology born from snow tires that exert sufficient frictional force even on snow. Technology that firmly grasps a plastic ball with a slippery surface and creates more rotational energy.

・CYCLOID
With technology that increases the probability of the player, the arc line of the ball is naturally high, reduces net mistakes in the block, and the ball enters the opponent's court as deeply as possible, the ratio of the amount of rotation and the flight distance is calculated precisely by the design. Technology that conveys high speed and powerful energy to the drive.

・CARBO SPONGE
Technology to mix carbon particles in sponge. Technology that can interact with the top sheet with the force to firmly grasp the ball and the catapult effect.

・HYPER ELASTO
Technology developed to replace the effect of speed glue, which was banned in 2008. Technology that realizes the shot feeling, hitting sound, flight distance, and rotational force as if used without speed glue. There are variations such as "IMB" with improved acceleration performance and "CST" that pursues the height of the arc line.

・TENSOR
Technology developed by XIOM that has the same tension effect as speed glue. A technology that keeps the structure of rubber molecules taut and semi-permanently. With "TENSOR" rubber, you can easily speed up and spin a ball without using extra effort. Based on this technology, we added our own consideration and arrangement to complete the "HYPER ELASTO" technology.

・BIOS
Similar to "TENSOR", clean rubber manufacturing technology developed by XIOM. Technology that does not generate or mix substances that have an adverse effect on the environment or carcinogens during the manufacturing process. "BIOS" rubber thoroughly eliminates harmful substances, and anyone from manufacturing staff to players who use rubber can use it without worrying about the environment and health. A symbol of high performance and clean rubber.

The Vega X, Vega Tour, and Omega VII series are all rubbers with the same technical symbol, ELASTO FUTURA, and all rubbers are carbon sponge and dynamic friction, so the sponge is black. The seat is a dynamic friction (DF) specification seat and is a rubber with grip. The Omega V Tour DF reviewed this time is also a rubber equipped with DF (Dynamic Friction). The Omega 5 Series is a rubber that was not adopted by DF at the time of sale. After that, it seems that it was sold under the name of DF (Dynamic Friction), which is compatible with plastic balls.
Basically, I think that XIOM’s rubber has no problem with the following image.

Pro: A rubber that is the base of the series.
Euro: Soft and easy to handle.
Asia: Slightly harder than professionals, with an emphasis on rotation.
Tour: The most high-performance and difficult-to-handle rubber in the series that will satisfy top players.

The Omega 5 Tour DF is described in the pamphlet as follows:

A hard-core and robust play companion
    Optimized topsheet and sponge for plastic balls ensure ball grip in any situation. The seat structure, which is densely packed with low grains, creates a firm shot feeling and a fierce spin ball. While having a robust strength that is comparable to the power of the opponent's ball, the effect of the elastic sponge can give a long distance. Unmistakable play and strength-Omega V Tour DF plays an active role as your foreground rubber aiming for hard table tennis.

Published performance value

画像に alt 属性が指定されていません。ファイル名: 7Pro.png
画像に alt 属性が指定されていません。ファイル名: 7Pro_V-X_V-T.png

The OMEGA 5 Tour DF is the highest performing rubber in the OMEGA 5 Series. However, it is worth noting that the Omega 5 Asia DF, which has a harder sponge hardness, has higher performance. Still, the Omega 5 Tour DF has higher performance than rubber other than the Vega Tour. Since it is a rubber crowned with a tour, it was very well balanced and I did not feel any low performance or slippage. Currently, I’m intensively trying out XIOM’s rubber, but eventually I’d like to summarize it. I will write the general comment again after the review of Vega Tour, so thank you.
In 2020, the Omega 5 Tour DF was tested by Yu-san of the World Table Tennis Kingdom in the form of a tool test. It was highly evaluated and was praised for the height of the arc and the high amount of rotation. I wanted to confirm this point, and it was a very exciting trial. Video ↓

Omega 5 Tour DF sticking and weight

From this time, it is posted on Zhang Jike ALC (Zhang Jike ALC).

Omega V Tour DF
    HYPER ELASTO
    TENSOR
    BIOS
    DYNAMIC FRICTION
・Sponge Thickness: 2.0 / max mm
・Speed: 11.0
・Spin: 11.8
・Sponge stiffness: 47.5°
・5,200 yen + tax
・72 g (before cut) → 51 g (after cut)

The weight was over 50 g as expected, but the OMEGA 5 Tour DF had a light feel. Once again, XIOM’s Omega 7 series feels like a heavy, adhesive rubber-like mad shot feeling. On the other hand, although the same ELASTO FUTURA is adopted, Vega Tour and Vega X are not so mad, but the impression of rubber without habit. And I was surprised at the light and light feel of this OMEGA 5 Tour DF. The mud like adhesive rubber, the weight of the ball, and the speed seem to be the characteristics of the Omega 7 series. On the other hand, the Vega Tour, Vega X, and Omega 5 Series seem to be a little heavy, but like rubber such as Tenergy, I felt that the meat and drive were light rubber. I think it’s a rubber that can be used for both the fore and back.

Three features of Omega V Tour DF

I wasn’t impressed by the strength of the arc line as mentioned in the table tennis kingdom, but overall, the amount of rotation, the balance between speed and rotation, ease of handling, and cost performance were very good! I’m pretty confused about my professional use. It’s not that it doesn’t feel like it’s easy to put on the table like Rakza X, but it’s a little weak, but on the other hand, I like the fact that it’s in the same price range as it is easy to put out a ball with a rotation amount higher than Rakza X. It doesn’t have awesome features, but I think it’s a pretty good rubber! I think the best expression is “high-performance spin-type tension rubber without gluing”. I don’t usually glue it, but I think it’s not a rubber that hits with the elasticity of a sponge, but a rubber that spins with a seat and speeds up with the momentum of a racket.

Rally thinking rubber with characteristic spin performance

I felt that the features of the Omega 5 series, the grip that holds the ball securely, the strong arc and the amount of rotation are not Date! Even if I used it with a backhand with a weak impact, I was able to make a loop drive and push that made me feel a high amount of rotation, which was a good feeling. However, I felt that it was a stable amount of rotation rather than the amount of rotation of drastic spin ball, and I felt that it was a rally-thinking rubber that rally with rotation rather than flying with rotation.
As for the shot feeling, the sheet is hard and the sponge is a little softer than the sheet and it feels easy to bite, but I think that it is a rubber that does not bite so much. It is a rubber that is rotated by the frictional force of the sheet, and I feel that it was more like an adhesive rubber. Of course, both the sheet and sponge have a shape similar to that of spin-type tension rubber, so balls like adhesive rubber did not come out. Therefore, I felt that it is a rubber with high manual performance that can make a solid drive and meet, although it is easy to make a rotation or a ball that reflects the technical power as it is, and I can not hit a drive with a surprising amount of rotation. On the other hand, unlike the spring sponge and CYCLOID sponge, it does not have strong expansion and contraction, and it has a slightly stronger arc line than Dignics 05, which can fly while rotating and sink strongly by rotation. I felt that the strength of the pod sinking and the amount of rotation were unsatisfactory (although it was a bit strict comparison).
Compared to the spring sponge Tenergy and CYCLOID’s Omega VII series, I think it was a rubber that was very easy to counter because it had less good bite. This point was also noteworthy.

It’s easy to spin, but it’s easier to do meat!

Since the ball is easy to grip, I felt that it took some getting used to balancing rotation and playing when trying to run while drawing an arc with speed drive. Rather, the speed ball has momentum, so it’s easier to do meat, and I felt that it was better for the ball to run. I felt that it is rare to find a rotating rubber that makes it so easy to meet. I couldn’t try it that much, but I think that meat hitting and angle hitting are stable. If the hitting point drops, you can use it properly as a loop drive. World Standard (World Standard) Tenergy 05 is a rubber that is very difficult to meet, and if you do not have a good sense of angle hitting, it will rotate without permission. I feel that it is a very characteristic rubber that it can be rotated and it is easy to meet when compared to Tenergy.

Excellent rubber that does not slip and can be rotated compared to other XIOM rubbers

After hitting the Omega 7 Series in turn, I tried the Omega 5 Tour DF, so the first impression of the Omega 5 Tour DF was very easy to use. It was easy to handle with a moderate hardness of 47.5 °, yet it did not slip and it took a lot of rotation, so it felt very good. Especially in terms of ball grip, I felt that it was more than Vega X and it was very easy to do loop drive. Even so, the speed drive for meet and upper rotation runs quite a bit, so considering that it is in the same price range, the Omega 5 Tour DF was a rubber that I wanted to hire for my job rather than the Vega X. The Vega X is a rubber that has a harder sheet and a softer sponge than the Omega 5 Tour DF, so when it spins, it will rotate more than the Omega 5 Tour DF, but it is a little slippery (it is not a pain if you get used to it). I think) I feel. Probably the Omega 5 Tour DF is a rubber that ELASTO FUTURA is not adopted, and I felt that the amount of rotation, the elongation of the ball, and the power were a little unsatisfactory. The strength of the maximum expansion and contraction of the entire sponge or rubber is the Omega 5 Tour compared to the Omega 7 Series, Omega VII Tour, Omega VII Hyper, and Vega X. I felt that DF was a little weaker. However, I felt that the Omega 5 Tour DF was just right for me because the part that does not slip is very good and I can not play table tennis that can rather use slip.

Each technology review

Fore hand

Light hit
The ball is fast. However, I felt that the height, strength, and amount of rotation of the arc line were a little weaker than the Dignics 05 that I usually use.

Drive on long balls and rallies
I understand that it is a strict comparison, but even if you fly it with a spin, the ball will sink firmly with the amount of spin, and even if it is an arch line that overshoots, it seems that all of it will land on the table, but this Omega 5 It was difficult to do it with Tour DF. When I realized that I couldn’t do this, I felt that katsuo000 wouldn’t adopt the foreground. Even so, the feel of hitting and spinning was good.

Drive with open face
I don’t feel like the sponge loses. I thought it was a little hard to feel the elasticity of the rubber, but I also thought that the ball would run.

Loop (top spin) drive against back spin
It was a good feeling because I had a ball firmly. As for the shot feeling, I felt that I was able to drive with a high amount of rotation. However, I think the power and weight are a little light.

Speed drive against back spin
It was a rubber with a refreshing feel, and I felt that the arch line was a little low (compared to Dignics 05), but I felt it was a good rubber.

Curve / shoot drive
 There wasn’t much biting of the sponge, and I felt that the bend was weak compared to Vega X.

Block
It was good. The counter is easy to do. Since the sheet is hard and the sponge is also hard, I think that it is a rubber that is not easily affected by rotation for the rubber that rotates.

Counter drive
The seats aren’t stiff, but the counter drive was easy to do. It was a little bit good, so it wasn’t uncommon for me to spin around, but overall I felt that I could hit the ball back with the entire rubber. Rather than an arc line due to rotation, the sponge has little change in both good and bad senses, so I think that any ball can be returned with the same drive.

Stop
It was easy to do! The sheet was hard and stopped firmly.

Push
I was able to cut it firmly without slipping. It was also easy to make an aggressive and fast push.

Fore flick
It was a manual rubber, so it was easy to do.

Service
It was good that it was easy to put out a serve that also took spin.

Back hand

Light hit
It was a little easy to fall. The ball was released quickly, and I felt a little lack of technical skills.

Drive on long balls and rallies
I felt a little stiff on the backhand. However, I think it will be enough if you can use it. I also hit a very strong speed drive in the rally of the upper rotation. However, rather than lifting it from the middle team, it seems that it tends to be a fairly straight speed drive.

Loop (top spin) drive against back spin
It was easy to do. It was a little slippery with Vega X, or it was so soft that it was easy to feel energy loss, but that was not the case with the Omega 5 Tour DF. It was a good feeling because it was easy to put out the amount of rotation that would make the other party’s mistake.

Speed drive against back spin
The arc line is a little low, and the impression is that net mistakes are conspicuous. I felt that the linearity was strong (compared to Dignics).

Curve / shoot drive
Compared to Vega X, Chiquita had a slightly weaker bend.

Block
It was easy to do. However, there were times when I felt that it would fall off with a little hardness.

Counter drive
It was easy to do. I think it’s a good rubber.

Stop
It was good. I felt that it would fall off with a little hardness.

Push
It was easy to cut and it was easy to make a straight line.

Chiquita
 It was easy to make an arc, but it didn’t feel ugly.

Comparison (individual impression)

Spin amount
 Tenergy 05 ≧ Vega X ≧ Omega V Tour DF ≧ Evolution MX-P

Ease of spin
 Vega X ≧ Rasanter R48 > Omega V Tour DF > Dignics 05

Speed
 Dignics 64 > Omega V Tour DF > Vega X

https://amzn.to/3tvNf3n

Review Omega VII Tour

Explanation

This is a review of XIOM’s flagship rubber, the Omega VII Tour. XIOM is a Korean manufacturer, but it also has a solid presence in Japan. Especially for general users, the Vega series rubber may be familiar as a rubber that has been seen once. Vega Euro, Vega Japan, and Vega Asia are the impressions that beginners and intermediates are using as introduction rubbers for spin tensions. In recent years, rubbers that use Dynamic Friction (sheets that do not easily slip) such as Vega Euro DF and Vega Asia DF, which are compatible with plastic balls, are also popular. The Vega series is a rubber for beginners and intermediates, but the rubber that is considered to be the upper model is the Omega series. As of 2020, I think that the Omega V series and the Omega VII series are mainly available. The Omega VII Tour reviewed this time is a rubber that has the highest numerical values ​​in both speed performance and rotation performance among the rubbers of XIOM. It is also used by top players, and seems to be used by Hugo Calderano (Brazil) and Jeoung Young-sik (South Korea), who are in the single digits of the world rankings.

Performance comparison of Omega series

After the sale of the Omega 7 Tour, the Omega VII Hyper and the Omega VII China, which attracted a lot of attention in 2020, also include the light (Guang) and shadow (Ying). Except for Omega 7 Hyper and Omega 7 China, you can see that the Omega 7 Tour has high rotation performance and speed performance. At least the speed performance is the fastest in the Omega series. Also, Omega 7 Hyper is not sticky on the sheet, but is aware of sticky rubber, and Omega 7 China is completely sticky rubber. In other words, the OMEGA 7 Tour can be regarded as the highest peak of spin-type tension rubber in the OMEGA series.

In the explanation of XIOM, a monster rubber that combines a very hard sponge with a sponge hardness of 55 ° and a specially designed sheet in the Omega 7 series, a service that cuts strongly, a stop that stops at will, a changing loop It is said that it is a rubber that is second to none, such as drive, Chiquita, and aggressive power drive. The counter drive does not slip and has a catapult effect that can be doubled.

Omega VII Tour Weight and Paste

Omega  VII Tour
    Dynamic Friction
    Cycloid
    Carbo Sponge
・Sponge thickness:2.0 mm, MAX
・Spin: 13.0
・Speed: 13.0
・Control: 10.0
・Balance: 11.7
・Sponge stiffness: 55
・7,000 yen + tax
・77 g (before cut) → 52 g (after cut)

It’s pretty heavy. I think you will feel that the shot feeling is mad and heavy than the weight on the numbers. I think this area is a part where tastes are likely to differ.

Three features of the Omega VII Tour

It’s hard, but it’s easy to rotate! Even so, the potential is high!

Surprisingly, I think it’s easier to rotate than I expected. I was able to hit the backhand drive enough with my own backhand skill. I think that it is easy to bite into the Omega 7 series in general for its hardness and it is easy to rotate! Also, since the sponge is very hard, I feel that the maximum performance of rotation when the performance of the rubber is maximized is also high! Not only the power drive, but also the loop drive and counter drive, I felt that the technical hurdles at the level of being able to enter the opponent’s court were low with a minimum sense of stability. It’s very easy to use. Still, it feels like you will be able to hit a wonderful ball that is powerful enough to master it. I felt that it was a rare rubber that had both ease of use and high potential.

Anyway, the ball is fast!

I think one of the features of the OMEGA 7 series is its high speed performance. Among the Omega 7 series, the Omega 7 Tour has a fairly hard sponge and rubber weight, so the amount of rotation of the ball and the weight of the ball when the impact is solid are very high. I feel that it is characterized by its high speed performance while having the amount of rotation and weight of the ball. This is a speed rubber like Tenergy 64, and the ball speed is fast, but the amount of rotation of the ball drops, so you feel the power and the amount of rotation are insufficient, but like Tenergy 05. It means that it is a rubber that is easy to produce high speed performance while producing the amount of rotation.

Rally x power!

It’s easy to rotate, so I think it’s a rubber that’s easy to stabilize and easy to bring into the rally! When using Tenergy, the average value of the amount of rotation of the ball when it is rotated is quite high and I feel that the performance is high, but I feel that the technology and impact to apply that rotation are required. On the other hand, I feel that the average value of the amount of rotation is low in the Omega 7 tour because it is easy to rotate. However, although it may be a ball that is easy for the opponent to take, it is easy to spin, so there are few mistakes in the game and it is stable anyway. And since the potential is high, the range of rotation amount is wide, and the rotation amount when hit with a very good impact is equal to or higher than Tenergy! Also, because the speed performance is high, it is easy to take the opponent’s time, and I think that it is easy to take the initiative even in the rally. It can be said that it is a rubber that can produce a powerful ball at the time of a chance in the rally orientation.

Each technology review

Forehand

Light hit
You can feel the hardness of the sponge. The hitting sound is also a high sound like a hard rubber.

Drive on long balls and rallies
I feel the ball go up. The sponge is hard, but I think it’s hard to feel it fall off.

Drive with open face
Since it is a rubber with high potential, it felt very good when I tried to open the surface and rotate and speed, and it seemed that I could achieve both rotation and speed.

Loop (top spin) drive against back spin
Since it is a very hard sponge, the amount of rotation of the loop drive is high and I think that it is easy to do a very high loop drive.

Speed drive against back spin
Since the sponge is hard, speed drive to hit with impact may be quite difficult. It is necessary to hit with a considerable impact.

Counter drive
I think it’s easy to do.

Serve
It takes a lot of rotation! Since it grips firmly, you can easily feel that strong rotation is applied.

Backhand

Light hit
It’s still hard. It’s also heavy, so I’m quite tired.

Drive on long balls and rallies
Surprisingly, I can hit it. It was a very good feeling. I think it’s easier to hit a strong ball, but it’s even easier to put in more stably.

Loop (top spin) drive against back spin 
It was easy to hit. It was fairly stable. I immediately felt that it was easy to enter even if I could not catch the ball in the middle of the racket.

Speed drive against back spin
It was difficult. I think the impact is overwhelmingly insufficient.

Curve / shoot drive
It bends, but I don’t think it’s as stretchy as the Rasanter R53.

Block
It’s not difficult to do, but the seat is easy to get caught, so it’s an impression that it took a lot of rotation.

Counter drive
It was easy to do. I think it will be easier to stabilize if you can catch the top of the ball.

Comparison with other rubbers (personal impressions)

Spin amount
 Tenergy 05 Hard > Tenergy 05 ≧ Omega VII Tour > Blue Storm Z1 Turbo

Speed
 Dignics 05 > Omega VII Tour > Tenergy 05

https://amzn.to/3r6ul0J

Review Dynaryz AGR

Expalanation

Dynaryz series is Joola’s latest rubber, which will be released in the spring of 2020. As of 2020, it is located in Joola’s latest high-end rubber. Joola is rather a famous manufacturer of large ball table tennis in Japan, and I think that many of you are familiar with it. However, Joola’s equipment is often mentioned when reading the World Table Tennis Kingdom. I imagined that there were many good products.
The rubber that katsuo000 tried this time is Dynalyz AGR. There are two types of dynamization, soft ACC and hard AGR. The naming is so cool that I don’t want to say “Dynaryz!”
Dynaryz uses a new technology sponge and sheet, which gives a good shot feeling! That was emphasized. I didn’t have much information about what kind of rubber it was, but I bought it with the expectation that it was not a bad rubber because of its performance value and price range.

Published performance value

Dynaryz is the highest-ranked rubber in Joola’s rubber category called premium, and the price is also the highest at 7,600 yen + tax. Will it be discounted to around 5,500 yen? It’s quite expensive. The Dynaryz AGR has better rotation and speed performance than the Rhyzer Pro, so I didn’t like it, but my expectations were high! You can think of Joola’s No. 1 spin tension rubber as the Dynaryz AGR!

Dynaize AGR pasting and weight

It wasn’t that heavy. Even with the ball, it was a softer rubber than the Rhyzer Pro 50.

Dynaryz AGR
    Spin tension
    Next Generation Hyper Bounce Sponge
    Advanced Surface Traction
    Made in Germany
・Sponge Thickness: 2.0 mm, Max
・Speed: 11
・Spin: 10
・Category: Premium
・Sponge stiffness: Hard
・7,600 yen + tax
・72 g (before cut) → 50 g (after cut)

The bite was better than I had imagined, and I was worried if I put it on to be honest. When I actually tried it, it ended up in a misery.

Three features of Dynaryz AGR

Feeling is Tenergy 80! Spin amount is Tenergy05!

The first thing I felt when I used it was, “Oh, this is a hard sponge, but it’s a rubber that bites into it!” And it looks like Tenergy! The ball is released a little early, so it feels like a Tenergy 80 hit. The person who received it said that it was a lively drive with a lot of rotation. The amount of rotation is a sensation, but I felt that there was something close to Tenergy 05!

As an aside, I imagine that German manufacturers have been developing rubber like Tenergy with the aim of overthrowing Tenergy. Anyway, it was a rubber that can be used even with a back that has a good bite and a relatively weak impact. The price is high, but I thought it was a very tenacious rubber! I think it’s cheaper than Tenergy, and I think it’s an ant considering its lifespan!

The ball is heavy even though it is easy to hit repeatedly with a light feel!

What I felt after using it was that it was easy to hit repeatedly! However, you said that the ball is heavy to some extent. I don’t think it’s that heavy in terms of shot feeling, but it seems that there are balls that are spinning more than I imagined because of the good bite. In the past, German-made rubber had the image of being able to put out a ball like a habit ball if it was hard and could be bitten into it, but I think it was difficult to hit repeatedly. However, Dynaryz AGR is easy to hit repeatedly! I think this is not a German rubber, but rather a rubber that has the characteristics of a Japanese rubber!

Satisfactory both spin and speed even in backhand!

Very well balanced rubber, easy to use in the fore and back! The fore of katsuo000 likes hard rubber, so if you use Dynaryz, I think it’s on the back side. I tried to hit the downward rotation loop drive with the backhand, but I noticed that the person who did the opponent was quite over-missed and the amount of rotation was higher than I imagined from the shot feeling. I think that the amount of rotation was about the same as Tenergy 80 or Tenergy 05! Also, the drive was very lively, and I felt that it could be expressed that the drive is easy to stretch with the amount of rotation, rather than being violent or rough. I think it’s a very high-performance rubber that is easy to handle but powerful!
The image of katsuo000 was a rubber that made Rasanter R48 a little harder. If you make it harder, it may look like Rasanter R53, but it’s not as hard as R53, and if you want more power than R48 but R53 is too hard, it may be just the right rubber.

Each technical review

Forehand

Light hit
It was 50 g, but it is soft. At the same weight, Dignics 09C and Tenergy 05 Hard, but the Dynalyz AGR was overwhelmingly easier to bite and handle.

Drive on long balls and rallies
It’s easy to bite in, so it’s easy to speed up, and it’s easy to hit a strong rotation drive because it gets caught firmly.

Drive with open face
It’s better to open the surface, but if you let it bite too much, I felt that the thicker sponge makes it easier to get a longer flight distance than I imagined.

Loop (top spin) drive against back spin
I was able to obtain a satisfactory amount of rotation even when using it in the foreground. Since it is good to pop out, it seems that a deep loop drive with a fast ball foot by rotation is more likely to be a weapon than a low, shallow and slow loop drive.

Speed drive against back spin
It was easy to hit because the speed drive was also easy to bite. Since it hits the board compared to Tenergy 05, if you try to speed up too much, it may not rotate and it may not be stable.

Curve / shoot drive
It was not so hard so it was a normal curve / shoot drive.

Block
Since the seat is strong, it was easy to do for the bite.

Counter drive
If the hitting point is too early, it will not be stable, so if you take a good distance and overwrite it, it will be stable.

Stop
I couldn’t cut it, but I was able to return it low.

Push
I couldn’t cut it, but it was possible to suppress it.

Back hand

Light hit
I was able to use it without any discomfort.

Drive on long balls and rallies
It was easy to rotate and very stable. Since the shot feeling is not a mad rubber, it was easy to hit repeatedly.

Loop (top spin) drive against back spin
Although it is easy to hit repeatedly, I was surprised at the amount of rotation. It’s a good rubber!

Speed drive against back spin
It’s a little difficult, but I think it will be stable if you practice because it bites well.

Block
It was easy to block meat balls because it bites well.

Stop
It doesn’t rotate, but it was easy to do.

Push
It doesn’t rotate, but it was easy to do.

Chiquita
I made a little too much bite and made some over mistakes, but once I get used to it, I think I can do it without any problems.

Comparison with other rubbers (individual impressions)

Spin amount
 Tenergy 05 ≧ Dynaryz AGR > Tenergy 80

Speed
 Tenergy 64 > Dynaryz AGR > Tenergy 80 > Tenergy 05

https://amzn.to/31OkZ04

Review Fastarc G-1

Explanation

The best-selling rubber in Japan. It’s neither Butterfly’s monster rubber, the Tenergy series, nor Dignics, which surpasses monster rubber. The best-selling rubber in Japan, it will be Nittaku’s Fastarc G-1! It can be said that it was too late to review, but I was finally able to try it out, so I will review it again.

Why is Fastarc G-1 the best-selling product in Japan?

There are three main reasons why this rubber is the best-selling rubber in Japan. The three reasons are as follows.

・Introduction of plastic balls
・Price increase of the Tenergy series (open price)
・Use of top players

・Introduction of plastic balls
With the introduction of plastic balls, the balls have become harder. When the ball was changed from 38 mm to 40 mm, it became harder to rotate, but it didn’t rotate anymore. Following the change from cell balls to plastic balls, the evaluation of hard and rotating rubber has risen. Fastarc G-1 is a hard and rotating rubber, so it can be said that it is a rubber that fits plastic balls. It can be said that the introduction of plastic balls has raised the evaluation of Fastarc G-1.

・Price increase of Tenergy series (open price)
Monster rubber and Tenergy series are now open price. This is a real price increase. Before the open price, the table tennis shop was able to benefit from a 20 to 30% discount on the list price, which was around 5,000 yen. However, Mr. Butterfly has become an open price, and now Tenergy has become an expensive rubber that costs more than 7,000 yen. It has become a rubber that selects the user again. It seems that the number of players exploring post-Tenergy has increased due to this influence. Certainly, when it costs 10,000 yen for one piece of rubber, it seems that many table people’s wallets seemed to be tough. The Fastarc G-1 has a list price of 6,000 yen + tax and pricing may have been just right. From this price, you can get a store discount at the table tennis shop, so you can actually buy it for less than 5,000 yen!

・Use of top players
And finally, it’s the usage record of top players. After all, it is Kasumi Ishikawa and Mima Ito of the Japan Women’s National Team. In addition, both boys and Masatoshi Morizono use Fastarc G-1 for Chiquita. It can be said that the fact that both male and female top players have a track record of use in this way has a very large advertising effect. It seems that Kasumi Ishikawa is not currently using it, but Mima Ito is using it on the fore side! (Rumors such as SNS say that Mima Ito is currently using the 50 ° Fastarc G-1, but he is using the Fastarc G-1 anyway). It is true that the fact that Mima Ito is using it has become a huge advertising effect and trust, and many tablemates have come to think that they want to use it or want to use it.

Fastarc series

I would like to touch on the origins of the Fastarc G-1 and other Fastarc series. According to Nittaku, Fastarc’s name is a coined word that combines the English words Fast and Arc! The rubber with the highest rotational performance in the Fastarc series is the Fastarc G-1.
Other Fastarc series have the same sponge hardness and speed type sheet grain shape, Fastarc P-1, and the sponge hardness is soft and the same type sheet grain shape as G-1. Fastarc C-1 is on sale, and Fastarc S-1 is a speed type sheet with a soft sponge hardness. There are not as many types as the Tenergy series, but it can be said that it is easy to pick up as a post-Tenergy because the explanation is easy to imagine on the pamphlet. Also, unlike the Tenergy series, the Fastarc series has different prices depending on the type, G-1 and P-1 are the highest, and C-1 and S-1 with soft sponge hardness are also happy that the price is set cheaply. Hey. If you feel that G-1 is too hard, you may want to change to C-1.
The G of Fastarc G-1 seems to be the G of Grip, and it is said that it is a rubber that “grips with a seat and draws an arc”.

Published performance value

Nittaku also sells the Hurricane series that uses seats made in China, and two of the Hurricane Pro III Turbo series and other Hurricane series that have become a hot topic in recent years. The rotation performance of the is remarkably high. Rubbers such as the Fastarc P-1 and Alhelg, which disappeared from the 2020 pamphlet, are more expensive than the Fastarc G-1 in terms of speed performance. It can be said that the rubber that is most often referred to as the balanced type is the standing position among the Nittaku rubbers of Fastarc G-1. Or is it the rubber with the highest rotational performance among spin tension rubbers?

Fastarc G-1 sticking and weight

Fastarc G-1
Tension Spin Sheet
Strong Sponge
・Speed: 15.00
・Spin: 12.50
・Sponge Thickness: 1.7 mm, 1.9 mm, 2.1mm, Max
・Sponge sttifness: 37.5 (German standard: 47.5)
・6,000 yen + tax
・70 g (before cut) → 48 g (after cut)

Three features of Fastarc G-1

If you can control it well, it will take a lot of rotation!

This rubber felt very good. After all, I felt that it would take a lot of rotation. I’m seriously thinking about using it for my job. Sweat. It took a lot of rotation! Serve was also able to make a downward rotation like the ball returns like Dignics 05! This is great! It will be a comparison with Dignics 05, but the ease of handling is overwhelmingly G-1, and the speed performance is better with Dignics 05. Also, while I felt the high performance of Dignics 05 for the ease of aligning the balls, I felt that the G-1 had a wide range of rotation. I felt once again that this difference is a part that must be noted when the opponent uses the G-1 in the game.

Chiquita is easy to do! Easy to control both spin type and speed type chiquita!

After all I felt that Chiquita was extremely easy to put in. You have plenty of time to grip the ball. I felt that the amount of rotation would drop a little, but the Fastarc G-1 was easier to do with Chiquita than the Dignics 05! I understand why Morizono uses it!

You can hit a drive with a wide range of spin!

As I mentioned in the first one, I think it’s a habit ball that seems to be German rubber or G-1. Even if I was driving in the same way, I felt that there was a considerable range of rotation amount depending on when I was able to apply rotation as much as I could and when I just put it in or bounced it. I felt that this has the effect of disturbing the opponent’s block angle by using the Fastarc G-1. Actually, I also felt that the block angle was easy to get out of order when the opponent was driving with G-1 in the game, but I felt that it was easy to hit such a drive!

Each technical review

Forehand

Light hit
I didn’t feel any discomfort. I felt that the hardness was quite similar to that of Dignics 05. I felt that it was a little hard and hard rubber compared to Tenergy.

Drive on long balls and rallies
When using the G-1, I felt that the lower the ball, the less the ball stretched. If it goes down, it will drive like playing, but I felt that it would be a drive that does not stretch and speed does not come out with such a rotation method. If you rotate it with a sheet like using adhesive rubber, or hit it like V> 15 Extra and make it bite into it, and then rotate it from the bite before you play it, you can hit a good drive with rotation. I felt that. Perhaps the G-1 has a Tenergy 05-like feel and a grip like an adhesive rubber, so I felt that it would be easier to drive even with a drive that captures only the seat and takes the plunge to rotate. I’m not used to driving when I bite into it and spin it, but I felt that V> 15 Extra is probably more likely to be a violent drive.
Also, because it is a hard rubber, I felt that the ball was released fairly quickly. In the front team, I think you can feel the speed of the ball because it is quite fast. On the other hand, when driving from the middle team and the apse, if you do not hit it fairly firmly, you may feel lack of power such as insufficient speed and insufficient rotation. On the contrary, if it doesn’t go down to that level, I felt that G-1 was better than Dignics 05.

Drive with open face
This is also easy to hit! It felt very good. It was quite difficult to put the amount of rotation on the speed drive, but it was easy to stabilize, so it felt very good!

Loop (top spin) drive against back spin
This was a pretty good feeling! I felt that you could drive with a very strong rotation. I think it’s a good rubber. In terms of the amount of rotation, I think it is at a level comparable to Tenergy 05 and Dignics 05. Probably, in plastic balls, the maximum value of the amount of rotation may be higher in G-1 than in Tenergy 05 due to the hardness of the sponge.

Speed ​​drive against back spin
I think the amount of rotation will drop, but it was very easy to hit. This was a strange feeling. The image of Tenergy is that the swing speed and angle are more severe. I think it’s because I’m not good at spinning with speed drive.

Curve / shoot drive
This didn’t bend as much as I expected. After all I felt the range of the amount of rotation.

Block
It was easy to do because I could grip the ball. Especially the block for speed drive was pretty easy to do!

Counter drive
I felt that it was a little more susceptible to the influence of the opponent’s drive because it was easy to spin. I felt that it was necessary to get used to this area.

Stop
It grips, so it was very easy to stop. nice one!

Push
It was good because it also grips. However, it seemed to be lighter if I took it easy.

Serve
I’m glad I was able to cut it firmly. It felt pretty good!

Back hand

Light hit
I’m glad I didn’t feel any discomfort here either! Rasanter R48 and Rasanter R53 were also good rubbers, but due to the difference in the grain shape of the sheet, it was easy to feel the ball coming off, and I felt that it was necessary to get used to it. However, I like the G-1 because it has a thick grain and a narrow grain shape between the grains, so you can hit the ball with the image of firmly gripping the ball and then releasing it, which gives you a sense of stability. Is good!

Drive on long balls and rallies
This was also very easy to do! In the case of Dignics 05, the speed and the amount of rotation are very high, but the appearance of the arch line and the trajectory of the ball change considerably depending on whether you hit it like playing or hitting it with rotation. With a backhand that tends to slow down the swing speed, it often fails to rotate the ball, so it’s really difficult to stabilize, isn’t it? Sweat. On the other hand, since there is no such thing in G-1, I felt that the return ball itself was very easy to do. However, I think that the ball quality is likely to be low. However, by using high-performance rubber such as Dignics 05 for the forehand, I felt that the difference in ball quality could be used as a weapon! This was also felt when using V> 15 Extra. I think the combination of Japanese rubber and German rubber is an ant!

Loop (top spin) drive against back spin
Very easy to hit! nice one~! It grips so it was easy to hit the ball as you imagined! By taking the plunge, I was able to put it on the opponent’s court without anxiety!

Speed drive against back spin
It’s also an easy-to-play rubber, so it was easier to do than Tenergy 05! Dignics 05 is also easy to get speed, and recently it has come in quite a bit, but maybe it is easier to handle than Dignics 05, so I feel that G-1 can enter even if the swing speed is slow!

Block
German rubber balls are easy to block, but loop drives such as the Dignics 09C are subject to rotation and have many over-misses. I felt that it was necessary to get used to this area. I don’t feel like the seat is losing, so I think you can get used to it.

Counter drive
I found it easier to do than Tenergy 05. I feel that the seat is strong.

Stop
This was also good! It will stop!

Push
It will expire! Is good! Because it grips firmly, it didn’t float and I liked the shot feeling!

Chiquita
It’s easy to do! It was great!

Comparison with other rubbers (individual impressions)

Spin amount
 Dignics 05 > Fastarc G-1 ≧ Tenergy 05

Ease of spin
 Tenergy 05 > Fastarc G-1 > V>15 Extra

Speed
 Dignics 05 > V>15 Extra > Fastarc G-1 > Tenergy 05

https://amzn.to/3nAoY8k

Review Tenergy 19

Explanation

We would like to review Butterfly (Tamasu)’s Tenergy 19 which is one of the highlights of the new products in the spring of 2021. Although it is still new, I would like to write about Tenergy 05 again.

The release of the world standard Tenergy 05 dates back to April 2008, about 13 years ago. Tenergy 05, which still wants the name of the world standard even after more than 10 years have passed due to the prohibition of post-processing with organic solvents, has become an existence that can not be talked about without it when thinking about table tennis. It has become commonplace for all-Japan championship rankers to have multiple players, regardless of gender, who use Tenergy 05, and it has become commonplace for competitors to catch up with Tenergy 05 and develop new products to overtake. At the moment, katsuo000 thinks that the rubber that is conscious of Tenergy 05 is Evolution MX-P (TIBHAR), Target Pro GT-H47 (cornilleau), and rotation performance with similar shot feeling. I think the Rasanter R48 (andro), which is similar to the Rasanter R48, and the Dynaryz AGC (joola), which has a similar shot feeling and rotation performance. In addition, it is compatible with wood plywood rackets and has similar rotation performance, and the counter performance is Q5 (mizuno) which can be said to exceed Tenergy 05 and Rasanter R53 (andro) which makes you feel the rotation performance higher than Tenergy. Even rubber that makes you feel that it exceeds Tenergy 05 has come to appear.
On the other hand, Butterfly will release Rosena, which is a low-priced version of Tenergy in April 2017, and Tenergy 05 Hard, which is a harder version of Tenergy 05 in November 2018, in April 2019. Dignics 05 has been released as a rubber that surpasses. Then, in March 2021, when the transition from tenergy to dignics was beginning to appear, the new tenergy, tenergy 19, was released again. The published performance value of this Tenergy 19 is a rubber with spin and speed performance of Tenergy 05 or higher, so after disseminating information, it became a hot topic on SNS and Youtube at once. What kind of strategy and customer needs did Butterfly, who has released a new product of Tenergy, decide to sell Tenergy 19? I don’t know the true meaning, but all the famous You Tubers are giving a test shot video here because it is a newTenergy. katsuo000 is completely unknown, and I think it will be a latecomer review when I post this review, but I would like to reiterate what katso000 felt, and I hope you enjoy including such content.

Top sheet

The characteristics of each rubber are different depending on the grain shape used for the top sheet. Up to now, there are 4 types of 05, 80, 64, 25 depending on the difference in sheet shape, and 2 types of 4 x 2 types depending on the hardness of the sponge. In addition, there are nine types of Tenergy, including Tenergy 05 Hard, which has a harder sponge to further emphasize the characteristics of Tenergy 05, which is highly used by top players. Each top sheet is sold with a key phrase, which is said to be “Rotation 05”, “Balance 80”, “Speed ​​64”, and “Front 25”. The 10th Tenergy 19 top sheet was released with the key phrase “Power 19”. The top sheet of this Tenergy 19 uses “development code No. 219” with a narrow gap between the tubs, which means that it is a rubber that has both speed and rotation and has a feeling of grasping the ball especially in the Tenergy. I think there will be the following types of Butterfly’s top sheets, including Dignics.

No. 05: 1.7 mm grain spacing is narrow. High rotation performance.
No. 25: The height of 2.65 mm grains is low. Easy to play on the table and counter.
No. 64: 1.7 mm wide grain spacing. High speed performance.
No. 180: 1.7 mm grain spacing is in the middle. The rotation and speed are well-balanced.
No. 209: The height of 1.5 mm grains is low. Achieves both adhesive strength and momentum at a high level.
No. 219: 1.5 mm grain spacing is narrow. It is easy to grab the ball well and put out power.

You can see that the top sheet has already exceeded 200, and we have been studying that much grain shape. Although the above mentions grains, there are three factors in grain shape: grain height, grain thickness, and grain spacing, which are probably 0.01 mm to 3.00 for grain thickness alone. I wonder if it’s about mm (300 types by itself). I don’t know how many combinations of grain height and sensation there are, but it seems that there are about 1000 types. I think that we are developing by aiming rather than sieving in detail and considering mass production technology. I definitely want to do this kind of examination, katsuo000, a science expert. I thought it would be fun.

Published performance value

After all, I think that the point of interest of Tenergy 19 is that it has a numerical value with performance exceeding Tenergy 05. I think that it is an amazing rubber that the rotation and speed are higher than the world standard Tenergy 05.

Easy-to-use technology

Radar charts are posted on Butterfly’s homepage for easy-to-use technologies for each Tenergy. I measured the ease of doing each technology with a measure, and made the numerical values ​​in the figure below.
Top spin slow drive
Speed drive
Counter drive
Play on the table
Block
Smash
Personally important items are loop drive, speed drive, bench play, block and counter drive. If the smash is not adhesive rubber, you will get used to it.

Looking at this chart, Tenergy 19 seems to be more difficult to drive and block than Tenergy 05. While the published performance value is high, it may be inferior to Tenergy 05 in terms of high quality drive.

Recommended blade combination

Combinations recommended by the manufacturer are also posted. I will post this as well. All of the following are quoted from Butterfly’s homepage.

Tenergy 19
・ Lin Yun-Ju Super ZLC
    Pursuing both speed and spin
・ Inner Force Layer ZLC
    Powerful play with an emphasis on rotation
・ Timo Boll ALC
    For all-round play in pursuit of power

Tenergy 19 with a very good ball holding is proposed to be combined with a ZLC racket and Timo Boll ALC with a tip center of gravity, which is easy to exert power among outer ALC. Certainly, the feel is soft, so the combination with the hard outer Super ZLC seems to be balanced. I also think that it will be suitable for outer ZLC, Timo Boll ZLC and Zhang Jike ZLC (Zhang Jike ZLC). I feel like I pushed for a new racket that will be released in 2021.

Pre-trial information from You tube

As for the performance when the information is transmitted on the net, the information of rubber located between Tenergy 05 and Dignics 05 is also transmitted, and it is receiving a lot of attention. As far as I watched the test shot video, I heard some opinions that it was more suitable for the back than the fore, and also that the amount of rotation was lower than that of Tenergy 05. I would like to review that in the words of katsuo000.

From the already available Youtube video Tenergy 19 test shot video, I think that the following is a brief summary of Tenergy 19.
Shot feeling: soft Tenergy 19 < tenergy 05 hard
Arc: strong Tenergy 19 > Tenergy 05 linear
Easy to spin: Tenergy 19 > Tenergy 05
Maximum spin amount: strong Tenergy 05 > Tenergy 19 weak
Based on these points, I would like to review katsuo000 as well.

Tenergy 19 weight and paste

The rubber weight of Tenergy 19 was about 47 g. It’s a little lighter than Tenergy 05 (48 g). Butterfly’s characteristic is that there are many high-performance and lightweight rubbers as a whole, and you can see that this time too, it is light and of high quality!

Tenergy 19
 High Tension
・Sponge thickness: Thick (1.9 mm), Extra thick (2.1 mm)
・Spin: 11.7
・Speed: 13.2
・Sponge stiffness: 36
・Open price: 8,900 yen + tax
・70 g (before cut) → 47 g (after cut)

I didn’t notice katsuo000, but the notation of Tenergy has changed. ↓ is Tenergy 05.

Three features of Tenergy 19

To be honest, it was a betrayed rubber in a good way. Especially when I used it in the foreground, the impression was quite good. Even though it was soft, the stop stopped and it was easy to counter, so I felt it was quite cheat. This unique feeling is exactly the Butterfly Quality that leads the world! Certainly I was a little dissatisfied with the amount of rotation, but it was a rubber that I could swing forward with confidence without feeling the anxiety of over-missing that is often felt with speed rubber and the feeling that the ball does not sink due to rotation!

It is easy to power drive the third ball a little forcibly!

It’s very difficult to hit, so it was easy to hit with swing speed and power without worrying about the amount of rotation of the ball. Students may not understand it now, but it feels like you are hitting the third ball with a rubber coated with an organic solvent, and you can use a speed drive (power drive) to forcefully hit the rubber. It was very pleasant to feel that! Also, as mentioned above, there was a sense of security that the speed drive would sink firmly and enter the table because it would rotate! I felt that this feeling did not exist in Tenergy 64 and Dignics 64.

Even though it is soft, the stop is stuck! It’s easy to counter!

Both the stop and the counter were very good. Rubber that feels soft tends to be affected by the rotation of the opponent at the stop and counter, but rather this Tenergy 19 is surprised that the stop is just right and the counter is easy to do! It’s really tenacious!

In top soin rally, the arch line is ugly!

By adopting the No. 219 sheet, which has a good bite, I felt that the trajectory became more aggressive in addition to the ease of handling! After drawing a very strong arc and entering the opponent’s court, I felt the ball jumping up like Dignics 09C and Dignics 05! This sometimes appears in Tenergy 05, but I think it will be difficult if you do not hit the ball in a fairly good position. On the other hand, with Tenergy 19, I was able to get this trajectory quite easily and it felt very good. It’s not just about speed, but I felt that the strong arc and the bouncing trajectory were the third feature of the new Tenergy 19!

Each technical review

Fore hand

Light hit
I didn’t feel any difference with a light hit. After all I feel the softness.

Drive in the rally
I didn’t feel that the speed drive that I hit in the rally was so good. It’s just normal. However, even with smash and meat, it is easy to get a long distance and it feels stable, so I felt that this is the characteristic of Tenergy 19. It feels like you can carry smashes and meat with power. I feel that this feeling has led to inspiration for the ease of hitting the third ball.

Drive with open face
The speed drive with the face open was pretty good as mentioned above. In addition, I’m glad that I felt like I could forcefully drive even if I got involved a little!

Loop (top spin) drive against back spin
I felt that even a difficult half-long ball was easy to make a high-quality loop drive. Rather than just attacking with the amount of rotation, it was easier to screw in with power (feeling that you can create the arc line of your own image with a swing and take it as it is).

Speed drive against back spin
This was the best. Although it is said that the rotation performance is better than Tenergy 05, the amount of rotation that comes from the shot feeling when hit with a seat feels a little weak, and it is undeniable that I feel dissatisfied with the amount of rotation compared to the usual Dignics 05. I didn’t, but I’m wondering if I should use Tenergy 19 for this speed power drive.

Block
It feels like a soft shot, but I didn’t feel that it was easily affected by the rotation of the opponent. In particular, I feel that soft Tenergy like Tenergy 05 FX is very susceptible to the rotation of the opponent, but I felt that it was not the case.

Counter drive
It’s easy to do. There was a feeling that the ball was sinking firmly. I felt that I could counter drive with confidence.

Stop
It’s easy to stop. I just played it more than I thought I would spin it. This area will be an arm.

Push
After all, I felt that Tenergy 05 and Dignics 05 had more rotation.

Flick
Since it is a rubber that is easy to handle, the way of hitting it was stable. Of course, I think it will be stable even when rotating.

Serve
A serve with a high amount of rotation was produced by applying rotation so as to hit it like Dignics 05. I didn’t feel it was difficult to put it out.

Back hand

Light hit
There was no particular discomfort with the light hit.

Drive in the rally
It was easy to drive. However, I felt that the quality of the ball was a little low.

Loop (top spin) drive against back spin
It was easy to do. It’s very grippy so it’s easy to lift. Its quality may be a little low.

Block
It was easy to do. I think it is not easily affected by spin.

Counter drive
It was easier to do counter meet than counter.

Stop
Easy to stop.

Push
I flew a little. I felt that Tenergy 05 was easier to do.

Chiquita
It was easy to get up, so it felt very good. I think it was as easy to do as VICTAS Triple Double Extra.

Comparison with other rubbers (individual impressions)

Spin amount
Tenergy 05 > Tenergy 19 > Tenergy 80

Speed
Tenergy 80 > Tenergy 19 > Tenergy 05

Ease of speed drive when biting
Tenergy 19 > Dignics 09C > Dignics 05

Ease of fore counter drive
Dignics 05 > Tenergy 19 > Tenergy 05

https://amzn.to/3bfK4p5

Review Blue Storm Z1 Turbo

Explanation

DONIC is a slightly minor manufacturer in Japan, but Swedish genius Jan-Ove Waldner and Jorgen Persson, and until last year Dimitrij Ovtcharov. It will be the manufacturer that the player has contracted. Ovcharov is a close friend and rival of Jun Mizutani! Recently, I imagine that it is a manufacturer that has been picked up by You Tuber “Goblinzu” in Kansai and is receiving a lot of attention. Goblin’s recommendation seems to be this Blue Storm Z1 turbo.

There are many DONIC rubbers named Blue, and there are currently 20 types.

・Blue Grip (Sticky) 5 kinds
・Blue Storm 7 kinds
・Blue Fire 9 kinds
・Acuda Blue 4 kinds

The blue storm I tried this time will be a speed rubber. It seems that the rotating rubber is blue fire.

Performance value

In the performance announced by Mr. DONIC, I converted +1 to 0.25 and-to 0.1 to create a diagram. As expected, the Z1 turbo is the latest rubber, so the spin and speed will be the best performance among DONIC’s rubbers except for the adhesive rubber. This is promising! Basically, all rubbers with a turbo have the same rotational performance, and it seems that the characteristic of the Blue Storm system is that the speed is fast.

Z1 turbo sticking and weight

Blue  Storm Z1 Turbo
・Sponge Thickness: 1.8 mm, 2.0 mm, MAX+
・Speed: 11
・Spin: 10+++
・Control: 6-
・Sponge stiffness: 50°
・Open price (about 5,000 yen)
・73 g (before cut) → 50 g (after cut)

Three features of lue Storm Z1 Turbo

In the rally of the upper rotation, it will not fall even if it is delayed!

The feature of the Blue Storm Z1 Turbo that I felt the most is that it does not fall at all even if it is delayed during the rally of the upper rotation. Therefore, it was possible to apply the minimum drive, and it was possible to rally very stably. The hardness of the sponge is 50 ° according to the German standard, but it bites very well and I felt it was about the middle hardness. I think that the power of the rubber will give you a high level of ability to respond even if you are passive and the reaction is delayed during the upper rotation rally!

The lowness of the arc line and speed is No. 1 in blue rubber!

The low arc line of the Brue Storm Z1 turbo, the speed of ball separation, and the high linearity were far higher than other blue rubbers! The first feature is that it is a rubber that bites well so that it will not fall even if it is delayed, so you can hit a drive with a very stable feeling, yet the drive has a low arch line, the ball separates quickly, and the straightness is good. The high price means that this is a back rubber that has the image of a back main battle type! It was a rubber that was very easy to speed up, and if you noticed just by being aware of putting it in, you could overwhelm the opponent in the rally, or you could turn the opponent behind and behind!

The seat is stiff and not easily affected by rotation!

As I felt with Blue Fire, the seat was stiff, so it was less affected by rotation than I expected, and it felt very good! Since it is not easily affected by rotation, it was quite easy to block and counter drive. Probably it is a stiff sheet, but the thickness is Max + and the thickness of the sheet is thin, so I imagine that it is a sheet that is easy to bite but has a core. There was a feeling that the ball was easy for the opponent to take, but it was a rally-oriented rubber that was stable and easy to handle.

Each technical review

Forehand

Light hit
I didn’t feel the hardness. The ball draws an arc, but I felt it was very low.

Drive on long balls and rallies
When I went down and tried to hit the drive, I strongly felt the low arc line. If it goes down, it feels like it will fall if you don’t hit it on the net a little. I didn’t feel that the ball would sink due to the amount of rotation, and I simply felt that the arch line was low.
Also, I was told by those who received that the drive was not taking at all. On the contrary, I received a comment that it is difficult to take. In a sense, it may be difficult for the drive to rotate. By combining the fore and back with an adhesive rubber or a spin-type tension rubber that often rotates, you may be able to expect a synergistic effect aimed at the difference in the amount of rotation of the drive.

Drive with open face
Since the arch line is low, it is easy for the ball to enter shallowly if it is a curve drive that involves it, and inevitably the surface is opened and it is often driven with a slight bump. I didn’t feel that it was easy to increase the amount of rotation because the surface was opened, or to rub it while hitting it, which is peculiar to adhesive.

Loop (top spin) drive against back spin
It was quite difficult. I had the impression that the number of net mistakes was more likely than I expected because the arch line was low.

Speed drive against back spin
This also has a low arch line, so I felt the need to lift it up.

Curve / shoot drive
I had the impression that I didn’t curve / shoot very much. I may be lacking in my ability, but I felt that the amount of rotation was a little weak.

Block
The block was easy to do. It was not easily affected by rotation, and it was easy to take from drive to meat knuckleballs.

Counter drive
In the foreground, I felt that the ball was released a little faster and I felt it was difficult, but it was generally easy to do.

Stop
It floated quite a bit. Also, I think the amount of rotation is small.

Push
 The speed push was easy.

Fore flick
This was easy to do. It was easier to do it closer to angle hitting than to apply rotation.

Backhand

Light hit
Is it really 50 °? I felt soft enough to feel.

Drive on long balls and rallies
It was easy to do. There was also a sense of stability because it draws an arc even when it is low.

Loop (top spin) drive against back spin
It was a little difficult. The arch line was too low and there were a lot of net mistakes.

Speed drive against back spin
It’s easy to do with a floating ball, but it was difficult with my own skill in the back.

Curve / shoot drive
I could drive sideways, but it didn’t turn much.

Block
It was easy to do. I think that it is quite easy to do because it is less affected by rotation and it bites firmly.

Counter drive
It was easy to do because it countered like a back hammeet. However, I imagine that it will be difficult to drop the hitting point.

Stop
It was not as easy as the fore, but it was easy to float.

Push
I couldn’t lower it, but I found it quite difficult to cut.

Chiquita
Chiquita, which is faster than I expected, was easy to do. Against vertical strong back spin chiquita was difficult.

Comparison with other rubbers (individual impressions)

Spin amout
 Blue Fire M1 Turbo > Tenergy 05 > Blue Fire JP01 Turbo > Blue Storm Z1 Turbo

In the performance table, it was hard to feel that it was a rubber with the same amount of rotation as the Blue Fire M1 Turbo. I think the Blue Fire will take overwhelming rotation.

Speed
 Dignics 64 > Tenergy 64 > Blue Storm Z1 Turbo > Tenergy 80

https://amzn.to/3hhLIqV

Review Evolution MX-P

Explanation

The Evolution series is a rubber series for top players of German table tennis equipment manufacturer TIBHAR. There are 6 types of Evolution series, 3 types of sponge hardness and 2 types of sheet type, and 3 types of sponge hardness x 2 types of sheet. Flexible (Flexible, FX) with the softest sponge hardness, Elastic (Elastic, EL) with intermediate altitude, Hard Maximum (Maximum, MX), Power type sheet (P) and Spin type slightly adhesive sheet (S) is not it. The Evolution MX-P (Evolution Maximum Power) reviewed this time will be a rubber like Tiver’s flagship rubber, which is also used by many top players.

Evolution MX-P is a rubber used by many top players who contract with Tiver, and is used by the following players.

・ Vladimir Samsonov (Belarus)
・ Paul Drinkhall (England)
・ Tazoe Hibiki (Japan)

Speaking of Belarusian Samsonov, he is a 44-year-old European “giant” who is still active. In his 40s, he is still active and features a very stable backhand and a tall and intense forehand drive, and his play style is centered on blocks and counters. He has been ranked number one in the world rankings many times in the past, and still has the ability to win top prizes in European competitions.
In addition, Drinkhall is England’s No. 2 young player, and is characterized by forehand drive and counter drive from Recibuchikita and the middle team. The Japanese team is suffering from England’s Drinkhall player in world groups.
In this way, the top European players have signed a contract with TIBHAR and are active on the front lines. TIBHAR is a German manufacturer, and although it is a little less well known in Japan, it can be said that it has a solid presence in Europe to support athletes.

Performance Value

I am sorry that it is very difficult to understand. Since the speed and spin performance of Evolution MX-P and Evolution MX-S are the same, they are plotted in the same place.

As you can see from the performance, you can see that the speed performance is high. Some sites use expressions like “10+”, but we have adopted the ones that are evaluated by three-digit numbers. After all, when reflecting the hardness of the sponge, I felt that I could understand what the performance of rubber corresponds to. In the German notation, if the sponge hardness is soft, the bite is good, so it is often thought that rotation will take place, so I think that it is necessary to be careful when comparing within the manufacturer.

MX-P sticking and weight

I pasted it on Zhang Jike ZLC as usual.

As an aside, the color of the sponge is similar to the Dignics series. If you look from the side, you can’t tell the difference unless you look at the rubber name.

Evolution MX-P
Spin tension OFF+
・Sponge Thickness:1.7/1.9/2.1 mm
・Speed:125
・Spin:120
・Control:80
・Sponge stiffness:45.7-47.7°
・6,000 yen + tax
・71 g (before cut) → 48 g (after cut)

In the past, when I put it on a racket with a large racket blade area, I remembered that it weighed about 50 g, which was surprisingly lighter than I expected. You may have a light individual with a standard weight. A hard type called MX-P 50 ° has also been released for MX-P, so if you want to use something heavy and hard, you can use MX-P 50 °.

Three features of Evolution MX-P

The ball holding and shot feeling is very similar to Tenergy 05!

It is easy to feel the ball holding when driving downwards or in a rally, and the shot feeling is exactly Tenergy 05! I felt that. It’s very easy to handle and I think many people like it. In addition, it is easy to rotate, and I felt that the response when hitting the ball and the amount of rotation are linked. Of course, the amount of rotation is still alive, and I think it will take a firm rotation.

Easy to play and meet, just rubber for the back!

I felt that the biggest difference from Tenergy 05 was the ease of playing. I felt that the Evolution MX-P 50 ° was also easy to play. After all, the MX-P sponge is not Tenergy’s Spring Sponge, so I feel that there will be a difference when it is applied thickly. It is MX-P that I felt that it was easy to reach the racket board when I hit it thickly. Therefore, I felt that it was a good feeling to use it for a bag that uses a lot of meat. I think the difficult part of Tenergy 05 is that it is difficult to meet, but MX-P is easy to meet and if you want to use both well, MX-P is recommended.

The sheet is stiff! It is not easily affected by rotation and has a long life!

MX-P is similar to Tenergy 05, but I felt the seat was a little stiff. Therefore, I felt that the MX-P is less susceptible to rotation than the Tenergy 05, and has a long life that bothers me with the Tenergy series. Although it is similar to Tenergy 05, it can be said that it is a part that can be said to be more advantageous than Tenergy 05.

Each technical review

Forehand

Light hit
I thought that there was no performance that would automatically rotate like Tenergy 05.

Drive on long balls and rallies
I felt that it was quite easy to hit the board when I let it bite into it. I don’t hate it, but I felt that the amount of rotation of the speed drive was a little insufficient.

Drive with open face
There is a feeling that it bites into the ball and wraps it tightly, so I felt that it was spinning to some extent.

Loop (top spin) drive against back spin
I felt it was very easy to do. I especially liked the feeling that it was easy to control the height and depth of the ball. Also, I think that the amount of rotation is not as much as Tenergy 05, but I felt that it was taking.

Speed drive against back spin
I felt that the speed drive itself would fit in, but I felt that the amount of rotation was a little insufficient.

Curve / shoot drive
Since it takes rotation, it bends firmly. I think the arch line is a little low.

Block
It was easy to do. It was my favorite shot feeling. It’s a little hard, so I think people who are not good at it are not good at it.

Counter drive
This was also easy to do. It was difficult to catch the counter drive during the ascending period, but I felt that it was easy to control when making the arc line by myself.

Stop
It stopped and felt better than I expected.

Push
This is also low. However, it may not be very sharp.

Service
Spin is good.

Backhand

Light hit
I didn’t feel that hard.

Drive on long balls and rallies
There was a feeling that it would enter stably even if it was driven with a slight speed drive.

Loop (top spin) drive against back spin
This was also easy to do. I felt that the amount of rotation was not that much, but it was good that there was a sense of stability.

Speed drive against back spin
This was also pretty easy to do. I think it’s because the bite is good.

Block
It was easy to stop.

Counter drive
I could hardly try it, but since I entered with the first ball, it is not difficult to do.

Stop
This also stops.

Push
It is low and easy to control.

Chiquita
It was easy to do. Since I have the ball, it was easy to spin firmly and prevent the next ball from being smashed.

Comparison with other rubbers (individual impressions)

Spin amunt
 Tenergy 05 > Evolution MX-P > Tenergy 05 FX

Speed
  Tenerg 80 ≧ Evolution MX-P > Tenergy 05

https://amzn.to/2EJLiv5

Review Vega X

Explanation

Korean table tennis maker XIOM is an up-and-coming maker, and it is famous for two types of rubber series, the Vega series with good cost performance and the Omega series of high-end models. In particular, Vega Europe is a rubber that has the three beats of cost performance, ease of handling, and performance, and has penetrated the beginner-intermediate class! Recently, Brazilian hard hitter Hugo Calderano has signed a contract with XIOM, and even after changing the equipment, the world tour ranking has been steadily raised to a single digit. The Hugo Hyper Axylium and Omega VII Tour used by Calderano will also be on the rise.

The rubber reviewed on this page is XIOM’s Vega X. The Vega X commemorates the 10th anniversary of the sale of Vega in 2009 and is touted as the greatest rubber in Vega history. The rubber design follows the sponge of Vega PRO, but it seems to match the top sheet that adopted the same cycloid system as the Omega VII series. A rubber that stands between Omega and Vega has a low price of 4,200 yen + tax, but according to the World Table Tennis Kingdom, the performance is in the 6,000 yen range (Fastarc G-1, Rakza X, Evolution MX-P, etc.) It is said that they can compete with each other. Actually, he wanted to make it higher than 4,200 yen, but he probably decided to lower the price further to 4,200 yen + tax in anticipation of YASAKA’s Rigan (3,700 yen + tax)! I think that the high performance of the table tennis kingdom was also oozing out in the review. I am reviewing what kind of rubber it is actually

Performance value

As mentioned in the explanation, although the speed and spin performance are inferior to the Omega series, it stands out in the Vega series and you can see that it is outstanding. On the other hand, the Vega Tour sold in the past has a higher published performance value than the Vega X, and the Vega Tour has a higher published performance value than the Omega V series. To be honest, I felt very good about the Vega X test hit this time, so I’m thinking of trying the Vega Tour again with the current equipment! I hope you can expect that review as well.

Vega X sticking and weight

I pasted it on Zhang Jike ZLC as usual.

Vega X
 Dynamic Friction
 Cycloid
 Carbo Sponge
・Sponge Thickness:1.8/2.0/max mm
・Speed:9.5
・Spin:11.0
・Sponge stiffness:47.5°
・4,200 yen + tax
・72 g (before cut) → 52 g (after cut)

After all, after all, XIOM’s rubber is heavy. However, with a ball or hitting a curtain, the rotation performance was very high and it felt very good!

3 features of Vega X

Even though it is easy to play, it has an outstanding ball holding and spin performance!

What I felt most when hitting a ball or hitting a curtain was the ball holding and the amount of rotation! This good hit feeling is also reproduced even if you hit it on the table, and when you think that you held the ball firmly and rotated it, you felt that you could hit the ball with the amount of rotation you expected, and it was a very pleasant test hit. !! Since I hold the ball firmly, I can control the ball firmly if I put up with it, but when I tried to play it as much as I wanted, I felt that the meat system would run as straight as I wanted! I felt it was very easy to use! The rotation performance is very high, and if you can use it properly, it will take about the same as Tenergy 05. However, I also felt that it was difficult to achieve rotation performance higher than Tenergy 05. Especially when used in the foreground, it was too soft and I felt a strong energy loss. However, it was easy to rotate, and it was very easy to serve and loop drive. I felt that this area was like Vega!

The balance between the hard sheet and the soft sponge is exquisite and easy to handle!

Obviously, the sheet was hard and the sponge was soft rubber, and it was a light feeling that did not remind me of 52 g. It is very easy to handle, and the direction of ease of handling is a good combination of rubber that makes it easy to put out high quality balls like Rasanter R48 and Rakza type that is easy to put on the table anyway. I felt like I was doing it.
I’m not good at backhand, but Vega X matched the backhand outstandingly! I intuitively felt that the factor was the perfect balance of hardness between the seat and the sponge. I have the impression that rubber with a hard sheet takes a lot of rotation, but I feel that it is difficult because it needs to be firmly inserted. In order to handle V> 15 Extra and Fastarc G-1 (Fastarc G-1) etc., it is necessary to hit it once and then rotate it with the image of rotating it. I felt that I couldn’t hit it like that and needed to get used to it. However, Vega X does not need such a way of hitting, and I felt that a good enough ball would come out with the image of hitting while rubbing with a Rakza type or Tenergy type sheet! This part feels very good and makes me feel the ease of handling and the sharpness that I can not think of as the first hit!

Convinced masterpiece! Is it the weight that is missed !?

With this high performance, 4,200 yen + tax is too cheap! It’s odd! I was a little worried that it was a little heavy at 52 g and that it was slippery with Tsuttsuki, but I really liked this ease of handling, high performance, and cost performance! The meaning of the word “masterpiece”, katsuo000, is convincing. I don’t think the weight is so important for a racket with a grip center of gravity like the Zhang Jike model, and it slips, but I felt it was within the permissible range.
Also of interest is the comparison with the Vega Tour. I haven’t used the Vega Tour in Zhang Jike ZLC, so I can’t make a simple comparison, but in the current image, the Vega X often slips a little, but it has a better ball holding than the Vega Tour and it doesn’t fly too much, so I’ll take the plunge. It’s an image that can be rotated. The Vega Tour was very similar to the Omega VII series and was a rubber that felt faster than holding and spinning. The published performance value is just the published value, and I feel that how much rotation is easy to apply on the table and how much it is applied are still different things.

Each technical review

Forehand

Light hit
It doesn’t feel like flying and is very easy to do. I also felt that it was too soft.

Drive on long balls and rallies
After all, the ball is shallow, and I felt that the ball would fall easily if I didn’t hit it a little. Especially in the case of inquiries, I also felt that the ball could not be flown unless it was attracted considerably. I think this area is a characteristic of soft and easy-to-use rubber. The rubber that felt the same softness was Rasanter R48, but R48 had a softer seat, I didn’t feel much power loss, and I think I didn’t feel that I couldn’t fly or fall. It may be said that R48 is the rubber that top players like.

Drive with open face
Sounds good! Since it is spinning, it fell firmly and the ball entered deep.

Loop (top spin) drive against back spin
I felt very good because I had a ball firmly. Even though it’s so easy to speed drive and meet, I honestly think that this ball holder is not another rubber! I felt that the drive had enough rotation!

Speed drive against back spin
Normally, it is often difficult to do speed drive when loop drive is easy, but as mentioned above, I did not feel this Vega X. This was a surprise!

Curve / shoot drive

Block
It was a good impression that the sheet was hard and I should block it with the image that I would go to overwrite the rotation from myself. I think it’s better to block in the front team so that it stretches a little at a high pitch.

Counter drive
It was easy to do because the seat was hard and it had a ball. Since the seat is hard, it is not easily affected by rotation, and even if you drop the hitting point firmly, it is easy to counter firmly and there is also the ease of doing that is peculiar to rubber with a ball!

Stop
It was slippery, but I was able to stop it. However, I think it is more stable if you do not slide it.

Push
I felt that push was sharp because it also took a turn. It is an impression that it is stable by rotation. It was a very good rubber with good bite but no push!

Service
I’m glad I was able to cut it firmly. It was a good feeling!

Backhand

Light hit
It was a little easy, but once I got used to it, there was no problem.

Drive on long balls and rallies
In the backhand, it was very easy to do with just the right hardness. It’s been a while since I’ve decided on such a backhand drive, and it’s been very pleasant!

Loop (top spin) drive against back spin
It was easy to do! This ball holding is irresistible! There was a sense of security!

Speed drive against back spin
Speed ​​drive is also included! Rubber with a ball is often too hard to hit speed drive, but I don’t know of any other rubber that can hit speed drive so comfortably. It’s odd!

Block
It was easy to put in, but it slipped a little.

Counter drive
It wasn’t as easy as the fore. This is an ant that needs to hone his arms, isn’t it.

Stop
It was good. It didn’t even pop out.

Push
It was easy to cut and make a chance. It felt very good.

Chiquita
It was easy to make an arc line and it was easy to do!

Comparison with other rubbers (individual impressions)

Spin amount
 Rasanter R48 ≧ Tenergy 05 ≧ Vega X > Evolution MX-P

Easy to spin
 Tenergy 05 FX ≧ Vega X ≧ Rasanter R48

Speed
 Rasanter R48 ≧ Vega X > Tenergy 05

https://amzn.to/3i6qw8F

レビュー Inner Force Layer ZLF(インナーフォースレイヤーZLF)

説明

 Inner Force Layer ZLF(インナーフォースレイヤーZLF)は2016年11月にButterfly(バタフライ)より販売されたラケットです。バタフライはカーボンなしの特殊素材として、過去にArylate(アリレート)をもちいたラケットを販売しており、有名なラケットとしてKey Shot(キーショット)というラケットがあるそうです。katsuo000もそのキーショットの派生と思われるBISIDE(バイサイド)というグリップに赤色のネームプレートの入ったラケットを使っていました。カーボンが入っていないので木材合板のように球持ちを感じやすく、特殊素材のアリレートがある分、安定感、特にバックハンドの安心感の高い名作だと思います。バイサイドもアウターにアリレートを配し、キーショットに近いラケットだと思います。これら木材合板系のラケットよりもスイートスポットが広くて安定感があって、カーボンありほどは飛ばないというラケットは実は昔から需要があるのだと思います。最近の他メーカーで挙げますと、XIOM(エクシオン)のHyper Axylium(ハイパーアクシリウム)などが近いのではないでしょうか。

 上述のとおり、アウターにカーボンなしの特殊素材を配したラケットはいくつかが挙げられますが、今回レビューするのはなんとカーボンなしの特殊素材をインナー位置に配したラケットになります。インナーフォースレイヤーシリーズの一本で、インナーにZLFを配したラケットになりますね。過去にバタフライからはInner Fore AL(インナーフォースAL)というラケットが販売されていたと思いますがその後継機といっても良いと思います。バタフライさんの特徴ともいえる特殊素材をもちいたラケットの一振りと言えるでしょう。

 このラケットは、回転性能が抜群で扱いやすいということで購入してみました。実際、粘着ラバーを貼ってみたところ、中陣が限界で後塵まで下がったらボールが弾まず打ち抜けないことが予想される位弾みません。そのかわり思い切り打っても十分台におさまる安心感と安定感の高い一振りになっています。少々威力不足は感じるかもしれませんが、それ以上に安心感と安定感の高い、まさになんでも入れることができる、というラケットがインナーフォースレイヤーZLFだと思います。

インナーフォースレイヤーZLFの特徴

抜群の操作性!ほとんどどんなラバーも回転をかけることができるようになる!

 ほとんど、どんなハードなラバーの性能も引き出せる非常にラバーを選ばないラケットになります。唯一あわないと結論が出せるのは、ディグニクスシリーズになると思います。バタフライさんの最新のラバーDignics 05(ディグニクス05)は極端に相性が悪いようで、球を持つ前に離れてしまう部分だけが非常に前面に出るように感じ、相性が悪いと感じました。一方でキョウヒョウなどの粘着ラバーをはってもドイツ製のシートの硬いラバーを貼っても扱いやすさのあるラケットだと思います。特に扱いやすいと感じる部分として、回転のかけやすさが挙げられます。思い切り回転をかけるとオーバーしてしまうようなサーブでも、このラケットなら弾まないので台におさまると感じました。このラケットならぜひチキータにも是非挑戦してほしい、と感じるラケットで、抜群の安定感と回転量でした。

弾まないので、サイドを切るコースが狙いやすい!

 アウターカーボンを使用しているとクロスの最も長いコースを狙って入る確率を上げたくなる、という心理があると思います。このインナーフォースレイヤーZLFでは、弾まないので、ボールが浅めに入りやすいんですね。その結果、サイドを切るようなコースを狙いやすくコースによってノータッチを狙えるようなラケットだと思います。クロスの打ち合いでのサイドを切るようなコースやストレートへの返球でも高い安心感と安定感を感じました。フルスイングしてストレートが狙えるのは非常に扱いやすいと思います。

木材合板ほどおされない

 木材合板ラケットと同等以上の扱いやすさ、回転のかけやすさがあるのに、特殊素材がアシストしてくれる分、ボールに負けないという特徴があると感じました。回転をかけやすいということは相手のボールの影響も受けやすい、ということだと思います。特に5枚合板系のラケットでは手に響きすぎるということは往々にしてあると思います。自分は結構苦手な打球感だったりします。相手の強烈なドライブにおされたりはしますが、手には響きすぎない特殊素材ありラケット特有の負けなさがあると感じました。この打球感は好みだとは思いますが個人的には好みの打球感です。逆に木材系で手にもっと響いてほしい、強打時のボールのブレや癖がもっと欲しい、と思うなら木材ラケットのほうが良いかもしれません。

おすすめのラバー組み合わせ(あくまでも個人の感想)

フォアラバー

バックラバー

各技術レビュー

フォアハンド系

軽打

ロングボールやラリーでのドライブ

面を開いたドライブ

対下回転に対するループドライブ

対下回転に対するスピードドライブ

カーブ/シュートドライブ

ブロック

カウンタードライブ

ストップ

ツッツキ

フォアフリック
 

バックハンド系

軽打

ロングボールやラリーでのドライブ

対下回転に対するループドライブ

対下回転に対するスピードドライブ

カーブ/シュートドライブ

ブロック

カウンタードライブ

ストップ

ツッツキ

チキータ

他ラケットとの比較(あくまでも個人の感想)

回転量
 インナーフォースレイヤーZLF > Fortius FT ver. D

回転のかけやすさ
 インナーフォースレイヤーZLF > Fortius FT ver. D

スピード
 Fortius FT ver. D > インナーフォースレイヤーZLF

https://amzn.to/3EbDnjH