The rubber reviewed on this page is from the French table tennis maker cornilleau. In Japan, juic is the distributor. Although it is not a manufacturer with a strong presence in Japan, Cornilleau’s racket rubber is not bad at all. Cornilleau was founded in 1946 and is a historic manufacturer that began developing competitive rubber and rackets in 2009 under former world champion Jean-Philippe Gatien (France). Currently, they have contracts with different manufacturers, but the world’s top fantasista Simon Gauzy (France) and the fastest two-handed Hugo Calderano (Brazil) have used Conyor’s equipment in the past. It seems that it was. For example, Conyor’s 9-plywood Gatien Conquest (Gatien Conquest, thickness 6.0 mm, 97 ± 5 g) and Target Pro series rubber to be reviewed this time are said to be mentioned. Also, I remember seeing an article in the World Table Tennis Kingdom that a business team belonging to the Japan League got a good impression of Cornilleau’s racket and rubber in the past. Even in table tennis navigation, there are some reviews that it has exceeded the monster rubber Tenergy, and I think that it is a rubber with very high expectations. In addition, this Target Pro series is said to be manufactured by the technology of Michelin, a tire maker famous for restaurant ratings.
Published performance value
By the summer of 2020, there are four Target Pro series. This time katsuo000 is trying out X51 and H47. The last number is sponge hardness, and you can choose from four types of hardness. It is very easy to understand that the speed performance changes depending on the difference in sponge hardness. The rubber that katsuo000 is paying attention to is the Target Pro XD series that was posted together. This Target Pro XD series is a rubber that has just recently been released. For katsuo000, I am interested in Target Pro XD 52.5, which seems to have the highest hardness. I would like to review it if it can be done within the year.
Target Pro GT-H47 sticking and weight
It’s a normal weight! It’s moderately soft to the touch and seems to be quite easy to handle. I think it’s a high-end rubber-like weight.
Target Pro GT-H47
Made in Germany
・Sponge Thickness: 2.0 mm, MAX
・Speed: 15.5
・Spin: 17.0
・Sponge stiffness: MH (47)
・6,800 yen + tax
・70 g 'before cut) → 47 g (after cut)
Three features of Target Pro GT-H47
Super honor student rubber without socks! A rubber just like Tenergy!
I felt the goodness of the first-class product in terms of ball bite, control, stability, spin performance, and speed performance! The ball has a good hold for its hardness, and it can be used well in the back! The arch line is a little low and tends to be a straight ball, and I felt that it was an aggressive rubber in a sense of stability. If you use it in the foreground, you can get a strong amount of rotation and withstand a strong impact, but on the other hand, it has a sufficient amount of rotation and speed even in the back, and it is easy to hit meat, so it is a very smooth rubber! If you are interested, why don’t you try it once.
Push, the stop stops firmly! Easy to do counter drive! Just an honor student!
On the contrary, when the hardness is soft, it is easy to reach the racket plate and it is easy to bounce. As a result, it may be difficult to make a tsutsuki or stop, but this Target Pro GT-H47 was very easy to make a tsutsuki or stop. Perhaps the sheet is strong, and the sponge is designed so that it is difficult to bite into a certain force or less, and it is easy to bite into a certain force or more. Therefore, if anything, it is a rubber that is stronger against the rally of the upper rotation than the downward rotation hit, and although it stops suddenly on the receive table, it is a rubber that gives a sense of stability and the amount of rotation as it becomes a rally. I felt that! I think it is a characteristic required for modern table tennis! It’s just an honor student rubber!
A rubber rally with a sense of stability!
Rather than a strong amount of rotation, I think that it is a rubber that competes with stability, ease of counter drive, and rally meetings! I don’t think it’s a rubber that competes with the power and habit of one shot. Compared to Tenergy 05, I feel that the amount of rotation is higher in Tenergy, but it is easy to handle, difficult to be affected by rotation, easy to counter drive, meet and smash, etc. I think that it is a rubber that can be handled in the same category as Tenergy 05! GT-H47 seems to be cheaper and has a longer life than Tenergy, so if you have no reason to have Tenergy 05 and you are choosing Tenergy, I recommend you to try GT-H47 once. increase.
Each technics review
Forehand
Light hit The impression was that it was neither too hard nor too soft.
Drive on long balls and rallies The bite is good. I didn’t feel like falling. On the other hand, I felt that the amount of rotation was a little insufficient in the foreground. Since the sponge is easy to bite into = soft, there was a part where people who used adhesive rubber for the fore felt that it was a little too soft and the amount of rotation was weak.
Drive with open face I didn’t feel like hitting the racket board, and I was able to fly while spinning, which was a very good impression. This part may be due to the sponge itself, not the hardness of the rubber. This part is a very important factor when hitting a speed drive, and I think that the feeling of falling tends to become stronger when it reaches the racket. Although it is a part of personal feeling, I would appreciate it if you could refer to it.
Loop (top spin) drive against back spin I felt that the loop drive could be released with the minimum amount of rotation and high quality. Therefore, I felt that it could be used for the foreground.
Speed drive against back spin It was very easy to do! Although it bites well, it does not reach the racket board, and there is a feeling that it can be rotated firmly and there was a sense of stability.
Curve / shoot drive It wasn’t that hard rubber, so it wasn’t harsh, but I was able to hit it with a curve / shoot. I thought that the lack of this good balance was like this rubber.
Block It was easy to do. For a strong drive, it felt like it was spinning, but overall it was easy to do. This was also a good feeling.
Counter drive I’m glad that the overwrite counter drive was easy to do.
Stop It was easy to stop. I didn’t feel like I was flying with Poyon.
Push I felt that I had a long time holding the ball because I could grip it firmly. It was easy to control. I think it will expire.
Serve It was good to be able to cut it firmly. I felt that the minimum amount of rotation could be obtained.
Backhand
Light hit I didn’t feel the hardness.
Drive on long balls and rallies Even if I hit it quickly, it took a drive without permission and it was a speed drive, but it was stable. It’s a good rubber!
Loop (top spin) drive against back spin I felt that there were many net mistakes, probably because the arc line was a little low. It may be an arm problem.
Speed drive against back spin This was easy to do on the contrary. It may be because it tends to be a meat type speed drive.
Block It was easy to do because it wasn’t affected by the rotation so much, even though it bite into it.
Stop It was easy to do.
Push It was good that this was also low. I also felt that I had a ball.
Chiquita It was very easy to do. I was able to do Chiquita with confidence.
Comparison with other rubbers (personal impressions)
Max spin amount Target Pro GT-X51 ≧ Tenergy 05 > Tenergy 80 > Target Pro GT-H47 > Tenergy 64
Ball holding Tenergy 05 ≧ Target Pro GT-H47 > Tenergy 80 Tenergy 05 > Target Pro GT-X51 > Tenergy 05 Hard
Speed Dignics 05 ＞ Tenergy 80 ≧ Target Pro GT-H47 > Tenergy 05 Dignics 05 ＞ Target Pro GT-X51 ≧ Tenergy 05 Hard > Tenergy 05
The rubber reviewed on this page is from the French table tennis maker cornilleau. In Japan, juic is the distributor. Although it is not a manufacturer with a strong presence in Japan, Cornilleau’s racket rubber is not bad at all. Cornilleau was founded in 1946 and is a historic manufacturer that began developing competitive rubber and rackets in 2009 under former world champion Jean-Philippe Gatien (France). Currently, they have contracts with different manufacturers, but the world’s top fantasista Simon Gauzy (France) and the fastest two-handed Hugo Calderano (Brazil) have used Conyor’s equipment in the past. It seems that it was. For example, Conyor’s 9-plywood Gatien Conquest (Gatien Conquest, thickness 6.0 mm, 97 ± 5 g) and Target Pro series rubber to be reviewed this time are said to be mentioned. Also, I remember seeing an article in the World Table Tennis Kingdom that a business team belonging to the Japan League got a good impression of Cornilleau’s racket and rubber in the past. Even in table tennis navigation, there are some reviews that it has exceeded the monster rubber Tenergy, and I think that it is a rubber with very high expectations. It is said that this Target Pro series is manufactured by the technology of Michelin, a tire maker famous for its restaurant rating.
Published performance value
By the summer of 2020, there are four Target Pro series. This time katsuo000 is trying out X51 and H47. The last number is sponge hardness, and you can choose from four types of hardness. It is very easy to understand that the speed performance changes depending on the difference in sponge hardness. The rubber that katsuo000 is paying attention to is the Target Pro XD series that was posted together. This Target Pro XD series is a rubber that was recently launched (September 2020). For katsuo000, I am interested in Target Pro XD 52.5, which seems to have the highest hardness. I would like to review it if it can be done by the end of the year! I expect Max to be a pretty good rubber!
Target Pro GT-X51 sticking and weight
The Target Pro GT-X51 feels like it’s packed! Still less than 50 g. I have a very high balance feeling!
Target Pro GT-X51
Made in Germany
・Sponge Thickness: 2.0 mm, MAX
・Speed: 16.0
・Spin: 17.0
・Sponge stiffness: H (51)
・6,800 yen + tax
・72 g (before cut) → 49 g (after cut)
Three features of Target Pro GT-X51
A rubber that adds speed and power to a sense of stability!
Target Pro GT-X51 inherits the stability of GT-H47 and feels more speed performance and power! What I especially felt the feature was the improvement of speed performance as shown in the published performance value! Of course, the rubber is harder to the touch when the GT-X51 is touched than the GT-H47, but the bite is very good like the GT-H47, and it is easier to handle than the rubber made in Germany with a hardness of 50 ° or more by other manufacturers. It stood out! Also, hard rubber tends to require impact to hit speed drive, and it tends to be a rubber that emphasizes rotation, but GT-X51 was hard but speed drive was easy to hit! I felt that the speed performance of GT-X51 was overwhelmingly higher than that of GT-H47, and the spin performance was slightly improved because the rubber was harder.
Just like the GT-H47, Tsuttsuki and the stop stop firmly! Easy to do counter drive!
Inheriting the features of GT-H47, GT-X51 also stopped at Tsuttsuki and stopped, and I felt that counter drive was easy to do! It’s very nice!
A rubber that competes with speed and power for a sense of stability!
I think the GT-X51 is a rubber that inherits the stability of the GT-H47 and competes with even greater speed and power! Compared to the high-end rubber of other manufacturers, I felt that the speed performance was characteristic, and it was a rubber like the overseas version Tenergy 80 (Tenergy 80) or the slightly hardened Tenergy 80 hard (?).
Each technics review
Forehand
Light hit It doesn’t feel hard at all in the fore hand.
Drive on long balls and rallies Like the GT-H47, it bite well and I didn’t feel it falling. Also, I think it makes up for the lack of rotation that I felt with the GT-H47. It’s a good rubber!
Drive with open face Like the GT-H47, I didn’t feel like hitting the racket board, and I was very impressed with the fact that I could fly while spinning. I think this feature makes it easier to hit the speed drive.
Loop (top spin) drive against back spin The loop drive was also good in rotation and quality. Therefore, I felt that it could be used for the foreground.
Speed drive against back spin It was very easy to do! Normally, I think it’s difficult to get hard, but it was easier than I imagined.
Curve / shoot drive Because I don’t feel the hardness, there is no excitement.
Block It was easy to do. Overall it was easy to do. This was also a good feeling.
Counter drive I’m glad that the overwrite counter drive was easy to do.
Stop It was easy to stop. I didn’t feel like I was flying with Poyon.
Push I felt that I had a long time holding the ball because I could grip it firmly. It was easy to control. It has expired.
Serve It was good to be able to cut it firmly. I felt that a sufficient amount of rotation could be obtained with the fore.
Backhand
Light hit I didn’t feel that much hardness in the back.
Drive on long balls and rallies It was stable even if I hit it quickly. However, since it is still hard, the back sometimes had a hardness and a drop due to insufficient impact. I think you can make up for it with enough practice.
Loop (top spin) drive against back spin The arc line is low, but I was able to apply enough rotation.
Speed drive against back spin I was quite surprised to see this. However, there is no weight.
Block It was easy to do because it wasn’t affected by the rotation so much, even though it bite into it.
Stop It was easy to do.
Push It was good that this was also low. I felt that I had a ball and it was easy to cut.
Chiquita It was very easy to do. I was able to do Chiquita with confidence.
Comparison with other rubbers (personal impressions)
Max spin amount Dignics 05 > Tenergy 05 Hard > Target Pro GT-X51 ≧ Tenergy 05 > Tenergy 80
Ball holding Tenergy 05 ≧ Target Pro GT-H47 > Tenergy 80 Tenergy 05 > Target Pro GT-X51 > Tenergy 05 Hard
Speed Dignics 05 ＞ Tenergy 80 ≧ Target Pro GT-H47 > Tenergy 05 Dignics 05 ＞ Target Pro GT-X51 ≧ Tenergy 05 Hard > Tenergy 05
Rhyzer Pro 45 is a Joola rubber, which seems to be a softened rubber of the Rhyzer Pro 50 that we have already reviewed. Both are located on Joola’s high-end rubber. In Japan, Joola may be a more famous manufacturer of large ball table tennis. However, Joola’s equipment is often mentioned as reading the World Table Tennis Kingdom. It probably reflects the fact that there are many good products. The catch phrase for the Rhyzer Pro 50 was a “sharp, pointed” rubber, but as the name implies, it was a heavyweight rubber with a 50 ° hard sponge. As for the shot feeling, it was close to Tenergy 05 Hard, it was a little easier to meet, and although the rotation performance was inferior, it was a very high performance rubber. In the Rhyzer series, Rhyzer 48 (riser 48), Rhyzer 43 (riser 43) and soft rubber, and Rhyzer Pro 45 (riser pro 45) that I tried this time are on sale. The Rhyzer Pro 50 felt very good, so I also tried the Rhyzer Pro 45 with great expectations.
Published performance value
The Rhyzer Pro 45 is slower than the Rhyzer Pro 50, but it has the same spin performance and is a very high rubber. The price is 6,800 yen + tax, which is a little high.
Rhyzer Pro 45 sticking and weight
Rhyzer Pro 45
Spin tension
Made in Germany
・Sponge Thickness: 2.0 mm, Max
・Speed: 8.5
・Spin: 9
・Category: Professional
・Sponge stiffness: Midium Hard
・6,800 + tax
・68 g (before cut) → 48 g (after cut)
The shot feeling was softer than I imagined, and I couldn’t handle it honestly.
Three features of Rhyzer Pro 45
The sponge is soft and the sheet is hard!
There may be individual differences, but it was a fairly soft rubber. The sponge is soft, but the sheet is stiff, and I definitely felt that it was a top specification. I found out at the stage of hitting the curtain, but I felt that it would not rotate unless I put it in the rubber and sponge. When I was able to bite it in well, it took a lot of rotation to feel good!
Blocks and counters are pretty easy to do!
Because the seat is hard, the blocks and counters were very easy to do. It’s easy to use a meat counter instead of a rotating counter! It felt pretty good and I was surprised! You can take it without considering the influence of rotation too much. I think it is a characteristic of rubber that is soft and the sheet is hard.
European type soft tension high performance rubber
I haven’t compared the soft tension so much, but I felt that it was a very high-performance rubber considering the rotation performance and the strength to compete with the opponent’s ball. I think there are soft tension rubbers such as Vega Euro, Omega VII Euro, and Tenergy 05 FX. Among them, the Rhyzer Pro 45 has a hard sheet, and I felt that it was different from other soft tension rubbers.
Each technics review
Forehand
Light hit I didn’t feel any discomfort. Because it is soft, I felt that it had a ball.
Drive on long balls and rallies I felt that it wasn’t spinning too much. If you don’t bite it firmly, it won’t rotate! However, it was very easy to control. Especially when used in the forehand, the control was very good.
Drive with open face Since the seat is strong, I couldn’t play it because of the hardness of the blade, no matter how strong it was. It’s a very strong rubber.
Loop (top spin) drive against back spin It was difficult. Because the sponge is soft, it was difficult to slip when trying to catch it thinly, or to hit it too thick and over.
Speed drive against back spin I think this is familiar, but it was very good. Speed drive is easy to hit!
Curve / shoot drive It is necessary to dig in a lot to apply rotation, so I was impressed with the curve drive and shoot drive when it went down.
Block It was very easy to do. The sponge is soft and the sheet is hard, so there were fewer net mistakes than I expected.
Stop It’s easy to stop, but when I tried to hit it with a sheet, the sponge was too soft and slipped several times.
Push It’s not inseparable, but I felt it was easy to skip when trying to cut it.
Serve I felt that the rotation was less than I expected.
Backhand
Light hit I felt the ball holding.
Drive on long balls and rallies It wasn’t bad. It was very easy to control, but I felt the ball didn’t sink.
Loop (top spin) drive against back spin It was difficult. I couldn’t handle it.
Speed drive against back spin I think it’s easy to hit, but I think it takes some getting used to.
Block It was easy to do. It was also a very good impression that the sheet was hard. It is recommended to use it in the back for blocking.
Counter drive The meat counter in the back was good. If you block it, it is more likely to be affected by rotation, so I felt that it would be better to apply some force to the ball by yourself, such as a meet or a drive.
Stop It was easy to do, but I slipped a lot. You need to get used to it.
Push I slipped it.
Chiquita It was harder than I expected. I felt that it was too soft to rotate and it was difficult to draw an arc.
Comparison with other rubbers (personal impressions)
Max spin amount Rhyzer Pro 50 ≧ Rhyzer Pro 45 ＞ Bryce Highspeed
そんなヒノキ系のラケットを豪快パワフルに扱うアルナ選手が、ラバーに使用するのが今回レビューするGEWOのNEXXUS EL PRO53（ネクサスELプロ53）になります！自分も基本的にWRMさんが発信してくれた情報程度にしか理解しておりません。「GEWO」をググりますと、WRMのサイトと、英語のサイトがヒットするのではないでしょうか。GEWOの用具について簡単に確認していきたいと思います。
性能表になります。表からわかることは、どのラバーを使っても高いスピン性能が得られる、悪くいうとどのラバーも大差がない、といったところでしょうか。実際、同時期に試打した、Nexxus XT Pro 50 Hard（ネクサスXTプロ50ハード）と比較しても打球感に大きな差を感じませんでした。情報を拝見して、確かにELは回転に、XTはスピードに特徴があると感じはしましたが、なかなか大きな違いをすぐに感じることが難しいと感じました。こういったラバーの比較をするときは前情報がかなり重要であると再認識した次第です。
一番いいと感じたのは、台へのおさまりです。相手の回転がわからなくても、ある程度打感と弾みのイメージで打つことで、相手のコートへコントロールしやすいと感じました。台上ドライブやチキータ、3球目ドライブやカウンターなど結構決まって気持ちよかったです！元WRMの下川さんがNexxus EL Pro 48（ネクサスELプロ48）へ変更したという情報もあったと思いますが、相手の台に意識しなくても容易に入れることができる感じをかなり感じました。ラリータイプの選手はこういったラバーがハマるのではないかと思います！
The Evolution series is a rubber series for top players of German table tennis equipment manufacturer TIBHAR. There are 6 types of Evolution series, 3 types of sponge hardness and 2 types of sheet type, and 3 types of sponge hardness x 2 types of sheet. Flexible (Flexible, FX) with the softest sponge hardness, Elastic (Elastic, EL) with medium altitude, Maximum (Maximum, MX) with hard sponge, Power type sheet (P) and Spin type hard sheet (S) is not it. The Evolution MX-S reviewed this time will be the rubber used by Belarus’s living legend Vladimir Samsonov. Speaking of Belarusian Samsonov, he is a 44-year-old European “giant” who is still active. In his 40s, he is still active and features a very stable backhand and a tall and strong forehand drive, and his play style is centered on blocks and counters. He has been ranked number one in the world rankings many times in the past, and still has the ability to win top prizes in European competitions. TIBHAR is a German manufacturer, and although it is a little less well known in Japan, it can be said that it has a solid presence in Europe to support athletes. Recently, it seems that Tazoe Hibiki, who belongs to Okayama Rivets, is using the Evolution MX-S in the foreground. The sheet is harder than MX-P, and it looks like a rubber with high spin performance from the name, so I reviewed it with great expectation!
Published performance value
I am sorry that it is very difficult to understand. Since the speed and spin performance of Evolution MX-P (Evolution MX-P) and Evolution MX-S (Evolution MX-S) are the same, they are plotted in the same place.
Some sites use expressions like “10+”, but we have adopted the ones that are evaluated by three-digit numbers. It seems that the actual spin performance is higher for soft rubber. Around this time, I would like to actually try it out and check it.
MX-S sticking and weight
Evolution MX-S
Spin type tension OFF+
・Sponge Thickness: 1.7/1.9/2.1 mm
・Speed: 125
・Spin: 120
・Control: 80
・Sponge Stiffness: 45.7-47.7°
・6,000 yen + tax
・74 g (before cut) → 50 g (after cut)
I didn’t feel that heavy, but it seems to be heavy. The performance value is the same as MX-P.
Three features of Evolution MX-S
The shot feeling is like Dignics!
I felt this rubber at the time of hitting the curtain, but I felt it was quite similar to Butterfly’s Dignics! I felt that this was a big discovery. From the conclusion, Dignics 80, which is easier to use, is the best! Compared to Dignics 05, it is overwhelmingly easy to handle, and it looks like Dignics 80, but Dignics 80 has the impression that it is a little easier to blow off. The MX-S was a rubber that had a very good impression on push and felt a cohesiveness without any graduation. The sheet is hard, but the sponge is like the same type of sponge as MX-P, so I felt the sponge bite well. I also felt that the goodness of the bite was like Tenergy.
Easy to push!
As I mentioned in the first one, push was a very good impression. The trajectory is very low and it is easy to make a push that does not let the opponent hit! I think it’s worth trying just for this reason! I felt it with MX-P, but it is easy to rotate, but I also felt that the rotation performance was inferior. I felt that this was the part I wanted. I think there was a review from World Rubber Market (WRM) that MX-S was recommended for chopper, but I was impressed with the ease of push.
The sheet is hard and easy to block and counter!
I expected it because the seat was hard, but after all the blocks and counters were quite easy to do. I think you can counter and block both the front team and the middle team. From the second and third features, it was a rubber that could be said to support Samsonov’s backhand push and block! I felt that it is also a rubber that can be easily sewn into the block thanks to the rubber that bites well for the hardness of the sheet.
Each technics review
Forehand
Light hit I didn’t feel any discomfort. At this stage, I didn’t really feel like Dignics.
Drive on long balls and rallies To be honest, I felt that the attack power was insufficient. The ball tends to be shallow, the amount of rotation seems to be a little weak, and the counter is also about. It was good that it was very easy to handle compared to Dignics 05. If anything, I think it will be good when you keep up with the other party’s drive!
Drive with open face This was good. I felt that it would be easier to hit if the racket was not Zhang Jike ZLC but a racket with a slightly thicker plate such as Timo Boll ALC. This area was more like MX-P or Tenergy.
Loop (top spin) drive against back spin It’s not bad, but I felt it wasn’t good. The amount of rotation may be a little weak. Maybe I’m not good at it and I should let it bite into the whole rubber more firmly. It’s easy to catch on a sheet, but I felt that the sponge was a little soft and I needed some tips to convey the rotation firmly.
Speed drive against back spin This was also good. It felt like I was hitting it with a feeling of playing rather than flying it by rotation. I feel that it is a way of hitting that will never enter in Dignix 05. Dignix is an image that goes straight to the net unless it is spun and flew. Sweat.
Block This was relatively easy to do. Blocking against speed drives was pretty easy!
Counter drive It was easy to do.
Stop As it grips, it was very easy to stop. nice one!
Push It was good because it also grips. However, it seemed to be lighter if I took it easy.
Serve It was good to be able to cut it firmly. It was a good feeling!
Backhand
Light hit The dignics-ness became apparent when used in the back. I think it’s because the sheet is hard.
Drive on long balls and rallies It was easy to do! It was a very good impression because it was easy to meet and drive. The grip is a little weak, so I felt that it required a lot of practice. I think it’s a very good rubber for backhand! If I wanted to use a hard rubber such as Dignics in the future, I thought it would be okay to use the current professional rubber.
Loop (top spin) drive against back spin I felt the speed of leaving the ball a little. Probably because the sheet is hard. It’s not impossible.
Speed drive against back spin It was good in the fore, but I felt it was difficult in the back. I think it’s an arm problem.
Block It was very easy to do. I felt the hardness to withstand the rotation.
Counter drive I felt it was easy to do. I feel that the seat is strong.
Stop This was also good! It will stop!
Push You can cut it! Is good! Since it grips firmly, it didn’t float and I liked the shot feeling! Right now, I want to take advantage of the difference in ease of handling and the amount of rotation, so I have Rakza X as my main job, but the problem with Rakza X is push, so it is difficult to become a high quality push, so I will actively do it from here. I felt the need to rotate it. I’m glad that the MX-S has a slightly high quality push in the auto!
Chiquita It’s easy to do! It was great!
Comparison with other rubbers (personal impressions)
The Evolution series is a rubber series for top players of German table tennis equipment manufacturer TIBHAR. There are 6 types of Evolution series, 3 types of sponge hardness and 2 types of sheet type, and 3 types of sponge hardness x 2 types of sheet. Flexible (Flexible, FX) with the softest sponge hardness, Elastic (Elastic, EL) with medium altitude, Maximum (Maximum, MX) with hard, Power type sheet (P) and Spin type slightly adhesive sheet (S) is not it. The Evolution MX-P 50 ° (Evolution Maximum Power 50 °) reviewed this time is a rubber like Tiber’s flagship rubber, which is also used by many top players.
Evolution MX-P is a rubber used by many top players who contract with Tiber, and is used by the following players.
Speaking of Belarusian Samsonov, he is a 44-year-old European “giant” who is still active. In his 40s, he is still active and features a very stable backhand and a tall and strong forehand drive, and his play style is centered on blocks and counters. He has been ranked number one in the world rankings many times in the past, and still has the ability to win top prizes in European competitions. Also, Drinkhall is England’s No. 2 young player, and is characterized by forehand drive and counter drive from Recibuchikita and the middle team. The Japanese team is suffering from England’s Drinkhall player in world groups. In this way, the top European players have signed a contract with TIBHAR and are active on the front lines. TIBHAR is a German manufacturer, and although it is a little less well known in Japan, it can be said that it has a solid presence in Europe to support athletes.
Published performance value
I am sorry that it is very difficult to understand. Since the speed and spin performance of Evolution MX-P (Evolution MX-P) and Evolution MX-S (Evolution MX-S) are the same, they are plotted in the same place.
You can see that the Evolution MX-P 50 ° is the fastest speed performance of any TIBHAR rubber. Also, the high rotation performance remains the same. For katsuo000, I feel that hard rubber takes more rotation, and hard rubber is more difficult to speed up. According to the German manufacturer’s published performance value, it is a soft rubber, so it is easy to rotate, so it is sometimes seen that the spin performance is high. I haven’t tried the Evolution EL-S, but since the MX-P 50 ° has a hard sponge, I think you can expect the rotation performance to exceed the published performance value. In fact, I felt that the rotation performance was high!
MX-P 50 ° sticking and weight
It has reached 200 g for the first time in a while. It’s pretty heavy.
Evolution MX-P 50°
Spin type tension OFF+
・Sponge Thickness: 2.1 mm
・Speed: 128
・Spin: 120
・Control: 75
・Sponge stiffness: 50°
・6,000 yen + tax
・78 g (before cut) → 54 g (after cut)
As for the impression of the attached racket, I felt it was so light that I could not feel it as 200 g. I’m not sure why this is because Zhang Jike ZLC has a center of gravity on the grip side, or MX-P 50 ° dares to make the grip side part with the name of the rubber heavier. It was a very strange impression as I had.
Three features of Evolution MX-P 50 °
Ball holding & shot feeling is very similar to Tenergy 05!
As I mentioned in the review on Evolution MX-P, it is very similar to the shot feeling of Tenergy 05. Perhaps this Evolution series was developed with reference to the Tenergy series. The Rasanter series, XIOM high-end rubber, and Omega series, which have high rotational performance, had a unique shot feeling even with German rubber, but these Evolution MX-P and Evolution MX-P 50 ° Is really similar to Tenergy 05. If you are looking for a rubber with a shot feeling similar to Tenergy, you can try it once.
High-quality rotation with a mad shot feeling
Since the sponge of Evolution MX-P 50 ° is hard, the amount of rotation during loop drive and service was very satisfactory. I think the MX-P 50 ° was more rotated than the MX-P. I think it’s an ant to choose 50 ° to get this amount of rotation.
With a 50 ° sponge, you won’t lose to your opponent’s ball!
I felt that the Evolution MX-P 50 ° will show its true value when it is a technology that strongly bites into the sponge, such as a counter for the opponent’s drive and a speed drive, while inheriting the MX-P’s uniqueness as it is. Even if the MX-P 50 ° is strongly bitten into the sponge, it does not easily give the shot feeling that it reaches the racket, and I felt that it was easy to drive while strongly biting into it. katsuo000 is linked to the feeling of losing or not losing to the ball, whether or not it reaches the board even if it bites into it. If you use a soft racket or rubber, it may bite too much and it may be difficult to make an arch line, but I felt that such a thing was less with MX-P 50 °. I think that the difference will come out when you bite hard with Tenergy 05 Hard, but I think that the same can be said for MX-P 50 °.
Each technics review
Forehand
Light hit I didn’t feel much hardness. In the first place, MX-P is also a reasonably hard rubber, so honestly I didn’t feel that MX-P 50 ° was difficult.
Drive on long balls and rallies You won’t lose. With the MX-P, when I tried to hit the speed drive, I felt that it was easy to reach the racket and the amount of rotation dropped, but with the MX-P 50 ° it was easier to achieve both rotation and speed.
Drive with open face If you open the surface, it will be easier to bite into the rubber, so I think that the MX-P 50 ° was more responsive to the drive than the MX-P.
Loop (top spin) drive against back spin Since it is a rubber that makes it very easy to feel the ball holding, it was easy to do a loop drive with a low and high rotation amount.
Speed drive against back spin This was also easy to do. Since it is easy to make an arc, I felt that even speed drive can be stabilized if there is an impact.
Curve / shoot drive Since it is a very straightforward rubber, I was able to straighten the curve drive and shoot drive, and it was not painful or good. Compared to MX-P, MX-P 50 ° had more ball rotation when it was driven into a curve.
Block I felt it was easier to do than I expected. However, since it is a sheet / grain shape that is easily affected by rotation, I also felt that it was affected by rotation. Compared to Tenergy 05, it was less affected and easier to do.
Counter drive It was very easy to do, but it was not easy to ignore the amount of rotation to some extent like Dignics 05 or V> 15 Extra, but the feeling of hitting the ball back and forth was very good. It was very good to go back half a step and overwrite the counter drive near the apex.
Stop It was easier to do than MX-P. The sponge is so hard that it doesn’t bounce.
Push This also settled low.
Fore flick Since it is hard, the ball separates quickly, so I felt that it would be easier to put it firmly on.
Backhand
Light hit I didn’t feel the hardness of 50 ° so much.
Drive on long balls and rallies When it came to driving, it was easy to feel the speed of leaving the ball.
Loop (top spin) drive against back spin It was a good shot feeling with a ball that can be handled even with a backhand.
Speed drive against back spin I felt that speed driving was difficult due to the lack of impact.
Block The influence of rotation was small and it was easy to do. It was my favorite shot feeling.
Counter Drive Because I had a ball, it was a little difficult to make adjustments, such as an over-miss when trying to spin, and a net mistake when trying to counter-drive with a slight meet.
Stop This was easy to do. I felt that the rotation was not so much.
Push It was easy to do, but the amount of rotation was small.
Chiquita It was very easy to do. The arch line was also just right.
Comparison with other rubbers (personal impressions)
Max spin amount Tenergy 05 Hard ＞ Evolution MX-P 50° ≧ Tenergy 05
XIOM’s high-end rubber series, Omega VII series, first Omega VII Pro, Omega VII Euro, Omega VII Asia, Omega VII Tour ( 4 types of Omega 7 Tour) were sold. Although it is a little heavy, the impression of the Omega 7 series is that it is easy to get a straight and speedy ball, but I felt that it was stable due to rotation. In addition, it is easy to imagine the features because it is named in the same way as the naming of the Vega series targeting beginners and intermediates. Europe, which uses a slightly soft sponge, which is common in the Vega series, professionals who use a sponge hardness of their choice for the top layer, Asia, which uses a slightly harder sponge, and the world’s highest peak world tour are inferior. The Omega 7 also follows the standing position of the rubber that I want to clearly convey that it is a tour that uses a hard sponge with a performance that does not. This Omega VII Hyper is the first rubber named Hyper in such an Exion rubber. This Omega 7 Hyper is touted as a rubber that is overwhelmingly easy to handle while having hardness and ball power like Chinese adhesive rubber. A rubber developed with reference to the Chinese rubber that is sweeping the world. The point is that it is a spin-type tension rubber like an adhesive rubber. Actually, when I opened it, the sheet was a normal spin tension sheet, but the sponge was extremely hard and the bubbles were quite small, so it was a sponge rubber that seems to be used for adhesive rubber.
Comparison of Omega VII Hyper and Tour, rubberized and weight
Omega VII Hyper
Omega VII Tour
I think it is easier to understand if you compare it with the image. You can see that the Omega 7 Hyper is a fairly dense and clogged sponge, although the bubbles are finer and not as good as the Hurricane. I’m sorry I couldn’t prepare the photos again, but the Omega 7 Hyper was thicker and shorter than the Omega 7 Tour. I think that the grain shape of this sheet is also the shape that can be seen with adhesive rubber.
The rubber weight of Omega 7 Hyper and MAX was 54g on Zhang Jike ZLC (Zhang Jike ZLC)! By the way, the rubber weight of Omega 7 Tour, MAX was 52 g. It’s pretty heavy!
Omega VII Hyper
DYNAMIC FRICTION
CYCLOID
CARBO SPONGE
・Speed: 13.0
・Spin: 14.0
・Sponge stiffness: 55
・7,000 yen + tax
・79 g (before cut) → 54 g (after cut)
Three features of Omega VII Hyper
The tabletop is outstandingly easy to do! Especially the fit of Chiquita is good!
Of course, the stop is short and easy to put down, but Chiquita was easier to do than that! I didn’t over-miss at all even if I tried to make a big turn. Since it can be rotated quickly, it also has a feeling of adding a sense of stability to Chiquita, which was a very good feeling. If Chiquita makes an over mistake, I think it’s an ant to try. There is a feeling that you can hit with adhesive rubber instead of Omega 7 Hyper, but with adhesive rubber, if you do not make the impact quite strong, you will often fall or just send a chance ball. Omega 7 Hyper was outstandingly easy to do as a rubber that can obtain stability and fit while maintaining a constant speed with spin type tension.
Although it is hard, it has a good bite and is easy to handle!
This may be true for the entire Omega 7 Series. To hit a ball with a tremendous amount of rotation that the opponent makes a mistake, it is necessary to have a certain impact, swing speed and how to use the body, but even if you hit it with a force of about 50% to 60%, it is easy to rotate, and any technology You can put it on the opponent’s court very stably! Any technology is made of rubber that is very easy to do. Even if the impact was weak in the back, the middle team back drive was easy to hit and there was a sense of stability. Also, the sponge is hard, so it was easy to meet. To put it badly, it may be a half-baked rubber, but personally, I want to drive and flick, I want to do blocks, I want to meet, I want to do counters, I want to do this and that too! I think that it is a very well-balanced rubber for those who say.
While maintaining speed comparable to the Omega 7 tour, further rotation and a sense of stability!
Compared to the Omega 7 Tour, it is not an adhesive rubber, so the speed was as fast as it was. Nevertheless, the Omega 7 Hyper had a sense of stability and the amount of rotation. Certainly, the speed drive was hard to bite, so it felt more difficult than the Omega 7 tour, but the speed of the drive in the rally was satisfactory. Still, there was a sense of stability, so it was a rubber that made it easy to feel a sense of security. The Omega 7 Tour seems to be a little quicker to get off the ball like the Tenergy 80, but the Omega 7 Hyper was a rubber closer to the Tenergy 05 Hard.
Each technics review
Forehand
Light hit I don’t really bounce. It’s a sticky shot feeling.
Drive on long balls and rallies The ball does not stretch, but it is easy to hit a ball that has been rotated. The amount of rotation is not as high as that of adhesive rubber, so halfway may be halfway. If you want stickiness and speed, you can say that.
Loop (top spin) drive against back spin It’s very easy to do. The sponge was hard, and it was easy to hit a low and shallow loop drive near the net. I don’t think the amount of rotation is low, but I felt that a little power was needed.
Counter drive It was easy to do.
Backhand
Counter drive It was pretty easy to get rid of and I was very impressed.
Stop The ball also stopped and it was easy to do.
Push Push was also easy to do. The ball grips, but I felt that skill was needed to cut it firmly.
Chiquita It was easy to do. There was a feeling that it settled down firmly when I took the plunge.
Comparison with other rubbers (personal impressions)
Max spin amunt Tenergy 05 > Omega VII Hyper > Omega VII Tour
Speed Omega VII Tour ≧ Omega VII Hyper > Tenergy 05 > Tenergy 05 Hard
MIZUNO, a major sports equipment brand, is a latecomer in the table tennis world, but in order to differentiate it from other table tennis manufacturers, we have taken on the challenge of co-developing rubber with Sumitomo Riko in the table tennis world. The jointly developed rubber is the Q series. Shortly after the launch of the Q3, the Q4 was launched. It is a series of rubber that has been a hot topic since Q3, and the background is the fact that Mizuno jointly developed with Sumitomo Riko from scratch to develop a rubber for top players. It would have been very challenging and inspiring to the table tennis world! Although katsuo000 is not familiar with table tennis rubber manufacturing, basically each table tennis manufacturer does not have a manufacturing factory, and specify the sheet material, sheet grain shape, sponge material, sponge hardness, etc. Most of them are outsourced to factories and manufacturers that can manufacture rubber. Therefore, it is not created from scratch, but the sheet material, grain shape, sponge material, and sponge hardness selected from the options. There will be many combinations, but the combinations required for trendy rubber will definitely be similar. Sumitomo Riko is a manufacturer that has not manufactured rubber until now, so it is clearly different from rubber made at other rubber factories. The rubber that seems to have been used as a reference in the joint development with Sumitomo Riko is probably the Monster Rubber, Tenergy series. Currently, there are three types of Q series sold, Q3, Q4, and Q5, but the Q4 that is being reviewed on this page is the rubber with the highest rotational performance. It’s a rubber that corresponds to Tenergy 05 in the Tenergy series.
Various information is posted on Mizuno’s homepage, so I quoted it.
Q4 has a grain thickness of 1.7 mm, which is the same thickness as the grain thickness of Tenergy. The distance between the grains is 0.58 mm, which is the narrowest in the Q series, and the shape is dense. Tenergy 05 is a rubber with a grain thickness of 1.7 mm, the distance between grains is the narrowest, and it is characterized by ball holding and high rotation amount, and Q4 is a grain very similar to Tenergy 05. It can be said that it is a shape. Also, probably, the Tenergy series does not change the seat thickness / grain height, while the Q series changes the seat thickness / grain height for each Q rubber. As a result, I think that the images of the Tenergy series and the Q series are quite different when compared in the series. In a nutshell, while the Tenergy series feels a difference in published performance values, I feel that none of the rubbers are too sharp, but in the Q series, each rubber has a strong individuality and is the same series, I felt that Q3, Q4, and Q5 each had a strong presence. Regarding Q4, in Q4, the sheet is 0.8 mm thicker and the grain is 0.95 mm lower than other Q rubbers. I think that this sheet is hot because the sheet that is popular in German rubber has a sheet thickness and grain thickness that goes against the thin shape. If anything, the grain shape with thick sheets and thick grains is the shape found in adhesive rubber. I would like you to see the contents of the trial hit to see what kind of characteristics this grain shape gives to Q4.
Published performance value
Published performance values exist in the GF series, but in the Q series, only figures and matrices exist. I quoted it from Mizuno’s homepage.
You can see that the Q series has higher speed and rotation performance than the GF series.
You can see that Q4 has a high arc line like Tenergy 05 and it is difficult to get a long distance.
The above figure is a fairly scientific figure, which is interesting for me personally, but difficult to understand. The rubber material used for rubber has viscoelasticity, so it is a diagram that quantifies how it responds to external forces. This figure seems to be the efficiency of the force that tries to return when the force is applied to the rubber. It seems that if it is hard, the energy loss will increase. Imagine that you probably make a graph like this for each rubber composition. I think we are deriving a rubber that is reasonably hard and properly energy efficient.
It’s easy to understand. It can be said that Q4 is a rubber that corresponds to 05 in Tenergy and Dignix. However, you can also see that they are not exactly the same. Probably, the Q series seems to have been developed in combination with Mizuno’s signature racket, Fortius FT or Fortius FT ver. D (Fortius FT ver. D), and it seems to be a rubber that goes well with wood-based rackets. The wood racket has a good ball holding and is easy to rotate, but the speed is a little slow and the arch line is high and it is easy to come out. I think that it is a rubber specification that compensates for the slow speed and high arc line.
Q4 pasting and weight
Continuing from Q3, Q4 also has a great amount of rubber warping. I think it’s under tension. It’s really amazing that it’s warped so far before it’s pasted. Like Q3, Q4 also has a unique rubber odor. Sweat.
Q4
Tension type (XL52/3)
Thick grain shape, narrowest between grains
・Sponge Thickness: middle (1.7 mm), thick (1.9 mm), extra thick (2.1 mm)
・Sponge stiffness: 47
・6,300 yen + tax
・66 (before cut) → 49 g (after cut)
It’s less than 50 g. I felt it was lighter than I expected.
Three features of Q4
Don’t fly! The drive is shallow and easy to enter!
Q4 has a shallow drive! For this reason, Q4 may feel like a very straight trajectory for some people. Compared to Q3, Q4 felt rather soft, and the adhesive rubber-likeness was a little understated. It is easy to lift the ball against the swing and I do not feel the height of the arc line, but I felt that the speed was rather fast because the flight distance did not come out any more and I entered shallowly and the anti-aircraft time was short. I’ve tried many rubbers so far, but it’s the first time that I have a unique feature like other rubbers! Katsuo000 doesn’t know the rubber that feels the speed because the ball is shallow and straight even though the arc line goes up like Q4. It was a very unique rubber!
Push, stop stops and counter drive is easy!
As with the Q3, the Q4 also had a perfect stop and the overwriting counter drive was a good impression. I felt it in Q5, so it can be said that it is a feature of the Q series. I think the Q series is an ant just because of the features of this Tsuttsuki / Stop and counter drive!
Easy to handle even though it has a strong amount of rotation!
Compared to Q3, Q4 is obviously softer and easier to use, yet I was able to apply a strong rotation! However, when used in the fore, the hardness is a little unsatisfactory for me personally, and there may be a back rather. I think it is a rubber that can produce a ball like a soft adhesive tension / hard spin type tension.
Each technics review
Forehand
Light hit I didn’t feel any discomfort. It smelled a little.
Drive on long balls and rallies Like Q3, Q4 was about to lose its drive. If you try to play a thick ball, it will bite so well that you will feel it hit the board immediately, and the stiffness of the entire rubber may be a little weak. Some people may feel that the rubber loses this. When I drive it by biting it, I feel that it hits the board immediately, so it is easy to get a long distance with Zhang Jike ZLC, but I felt that it is easy to make a speed drive with a weak rotation amount. This is why I felt that Q4 was not suitable for the foreground.
Drive with open face Although it is a hard rubber, I felt that it hit the racket board immediately. Like Q3, if you let Q4 bite too much, it will not rotate and it will be easy to make a mistake.
Loop (top spin) drive against back spin Q3 was also a high quality loop drive, but Q4 was also a high quality loop drive as expected. However, I also felt that a harder sponge would result in a stronger loop drive.
Speed drive against back spin As with the Q3, this also requires attention, and the speed drive at about half the speed and half the rotation became stable. However, Q4 is easy to rotate and soft, so I think it is relatively easy to do.
Curve / shoot drive Like Q3, I didn’t hit it very carefully, but it felt pretty good. It was better to get involved a little and drive a little like a curve drive, because the rotation is stronger and the ball is stable because of the lateral rotation.
Block This was as easy to do as Q3. I think this is because it is hard and not easily affected by the rotation of the other party.
Counter drive I’m glad that the overwrite counter drive was easy to do as well as Q3. Also, I felt that the counter drive was easier to get speed than I expected and I didn’t intend to put it out, so it would be a drive that I could aim for no touch.
Stop I’m glad it was easy to stop the ball. I think it is easier to stop than the hardness of the sponge.
Push It was good that this was also low. I think that it will take rotation if you stick it well.
Serve It was good to be able to cut it firmly. It took more rotation than Q3 and it felt very good.
Backhand
Light hit I didn’t feel that hard.
Drive on long balls and rallies It was surprisingly easy to do. I felt it was soft. I think that Q3 makes the sponge harder because the grains are easy to fall down, and Q4 makes the sponge softer because the grains are hard to fall down. There was a sense of stability, I drew an arch line and felt the speed, which was a very good impression.
Loop (top spin) drive against back spin It was very stable because I could hold the ball firmly and rotate it. It’s soft, so it’s good that the impact is less likely to occur.
Speed drive against back spin I think it will be easier to hit than Q3 if you practice.
Block It was easy to do because it was hard and not affected by rotation very much.
Stop It was easy to do. There was a net mistake because it stopped a little too much.
Push It was good that this was also low. I think it will expire in Q4.
Chiquita It’s really easy to do. You can go for a full turn.
Comparison with other rubbers (personal impressions)
Max spin amount Dignics 05 ＞ Q5 ≧ Tenergy 05 Hard ＞ Q4 ≧Tenergy 05 ＞ Q3 ≧ Tenergy 80
