• 2021.11.05

Review Tenergy 19

Explanation

We would like to review Butterfly (Tamasu)’s Tenergy 19 which is one of the highlights of the new products in the spring of 2021. Although it is still new, I would like to write about Tenergy 05 again.

The release of the world standard Tenergy 05 dates back to April 2008, about 13 years ago. Tenergy 05, which still wants the name of the world standard even after more than 10 years have passed due to the prohibition of post-processing with organic solvents, has become an existence that can not be talked about without it when thinking about table tennis. It has become commonplace for all-Japan championship rankers to have multiple players, regardless of gender, who use Tenergy 05, and it has become commonplace for competitors to catch up with Tenergy 05 and develop new products to overtake. At the moment, katsuo000 thinks that the rubber that is conscious of Tenergy 05 is Evolution MX-P (TIBHAR), Target Pro GT-H47 (cornilleau), and rotation performance with similar shot feeling. I think the Rasanter R48 (andro), which is similar to the Rasanter R48, and the Dynaryz AGC (joola), which has a similar shot feeling and rotation performance. In addition, it is compatible with wood plywood rackets and has similar rotation performance, and the counter performance is Q5 (mizuno) which can be said to exceed Tenergy 05 and Rasanter R53 (andro) which makes you feel the rotation performance higher than Tenergy. Even rubber that makes you feel that it exceeds Tenergy 05 has come to appear.
On the other hand, Butterfly will release Rosena, which is a low-priced version of Tenergy in April 2017, and Tenergy 05 Hard, which is a harder version of Tenergy 05 in November 2018, in April 2019. Dignics 05 has been released as a rubber that surpasses. Then, in March 2021, when the transition from tenergy to dignics was beginning to appear, the new tenergy, tenergy 19, was released again. The published performance value of this Tenergy 19 is a rubber with spin and speed performance of Tenergy 05 or higher, so after disseminating information, it became a hot topic on SNS and Youtube at once. What kind of strategy and customer needs did Butterfly, who has released a new product of Tenergy, decide to sell Tenergy 19? I don’t know the true meaning, but all the famous You Tubers are giving a test shot video here because it is a newTenergy. katsuo000 is completely unknown, and I think it will be a latecomer review when I post this review, but I would like to reiterate what katso000 felt, and I hope you enjoy including such content.

Top sheet

The characteristics of each rubber are different depending on the grain shape used for the top sheet. Up to now, there are 4 types of 05, 80, 64, 25 depending on the difference in sheet shape, and 2 types of 4 x 2 types depending on the hardness of the sponge. In addition, there are nine types of Tenergy, including Tenergy 05 Hard, which has a harder sponge to further emphasize the characteristics of Tenergy 05, which is highly used by top players. Each top sheet is sold with a key phrase, which is said to be “Rotation 05”, “Balance 80”, “Speed ​​64”, and “Front 25”. The 10th Tenergy 19 top sheet was released with the key phrase “Power 19”. The top sheet of this Tenergy 19 uses “development code No. 219” with a narrow gap between the tubs, which means that it is a rubber that has both speed and rotation and has a feeling of grasping the ball especially in the Tenergy. I think there will be the following types of Butterfly’s top sheets, including Dignics.

No. 05: 1.7 mm grain spacing is narrow. High rotation performance.
No. 25: The height of 2.65 mm grains is low. Easy to play on the table and counter.
No. 64: 1.7 mm wide grain spacing. High speed performance.
No. 180: 1.7 mm grain spacing is in the middle. The rotation and speed are well-balanced.
No. 209: The height of 1.5 mm grains is low. Achieves both adhesive strength and momentum at a high level.
No. 219: 1.5 mm grain spacing is narrow. It is easy to grab the ball well and put out power.

You can see that the top sheet has already exceeded 200, and we have been studying that much grain shape. Although the above mentions grains, there are three factors in grain shape: grain height, grain thickness, and grain spacing, which are probably 0.01 mm to 3.00 for grain thickness alone. I wonder if it’s about mm (300 types by itself). I don’t know how many combinations of grain height and sensation there are, but it seems that there are about 1000 types. I think that we are developing by aiming rather than sieving in detail and considering mass production technology. I definitely want to do this kind of examination, katsuo000, a science expert. I thought it would be fun.

Published performance value

After all, I think that the point of interest of Tenergy 19 is that it has a numerical value with performance exceeding Tenergy 05. I think that it is an amazing rubber that the rotation and speed are higher than the world standard Tenergy 05.

Easy-to-use technology

Radar charts are posted on Butterfly’s homepage for easy-to-use technologies for each Tenergy. I measured the ease of doing each technology with a measure, and made the numerical values ​​in the figure below.
Top spin slow drive
Speed drive
Counter drive
Play on the table
Block
Smash
Personally important items are loop drive, speed drive, bench play, block and counter drive. If the smash is not adhesive rubber, you will get used to it.

Looking at this chart, Tenergy 19 seems to be more difficult to drive and block than Tenergy 05. While the published performance value is high, it may be inferior to Tenergy 05 in terms of high quality drive.

Recommended blade combination

Combinations recommended by the manufacturer are also posted. I will post this as well. All of the following are quoted from Butterfly’s homepage.

Tenergy 19
・ Lin Yun-Ju Super ZLC
    Pursuing both speed and spin
・ Inner Force Layer ZLC
    Powerful play with an emphasis on rotation
・ Timo Boll ALC
    For all-round play in pursuit of power

Tenergy 19 with a very good ball holding is proposed to be combined with a ZLC racket and Timo Boll ALC with a tip center of gravity, which is easy to exert power among outer ALC. Certainly, the feel is soft, so the combination with the hard outer Super ZLC seems to be balanced. I also think that it will be suitable for outer ZLC, Timo Boll ZLC and Zhang Jike ZLC (Zhang Jike ZLC). I feel like I pushed for a new racket that will be released in 2021.

Pre-trial information from You tube

As for the performance when the information is transmitted on the net, the information of rubber located between Tenergy 05 and Dignics 05 is also transmitted, and it is receiving a lot of attention. As far as I watched the test shot video, I heard some opinions that it was more suitable for the back than the fore, and also that the amount of rotation was lower than that of Tenergy 05. I would like to review that in the words of katsuo000.

From the already available Youtube video Tenergy 19 test shot video, I think that the following is a brief summary of Tenergy 19.
Shot feeling: soft Tenergy 19 < tenergy 05 hard
Arc: strong Tenergy 19 > Tenergy 05 linear
Easy to spin: Tenergy 19 > Tenergy 05
Maximum spin amount: strong Tenergy 05 > Tenergy 19 weak
Based on these points, I would like to review katsuo000 as well.

Tenergy 19 weight and paste

The rubber weight of Tenergy 19 was about 47 g. It’s a little lighter than Tenergy 05 (48 g). Butterfly’s characteristic is that there are many high-performance and lightweight rubbers as a whole, and you can see that this time too, it is light and of high quality!

Tenergy 19
　High Tension
・Sponge thickness: Thick (1.9 mm), Extra thick (2.1 mm)
・Spin: 11.7
・Speed: 13.2
・Sponge stiffness: 36
・Open price: 8,900 yen + tax
・70 g (before cut) → 47 g (after cut)

I didn’t notice katsuo000, but the notation of Tenergy has changed. ↓ is Tenergy 05.

Three features of Tenergy 19

To be honest, it was a betrayed rubber in a good way. Especially when I used it in the foreground, the impression was quite good. Even though it was soft, the stop stopped and it was easy to counter, so I felt it was quite cheat. This unique feeling is exactly the Butterfly Quality that leads the world! Certainly I was a little dissatisfied with the amount of rotation, but it was a rubber that I could swing forward with confidence without feeling the anxiety of over-missing that is often felt with speed rubber and the feeling that the ball does not sink due to rotation!

It is easy to power drive the third ball a little forcibly!

It’s very difficult to hit, so it was easy to hit with swing speed and power without worrying about the amount of rotation of the ball. Students may not understand it now, but it feels like you are hitting the third ball with a rubber coated with an organic solvent, and you can use a speed drive (power drive) to forcefully hit the rubber. It was very pleasant to feel that! Also, as mentioned above, there was a sense of security that the speed drive would sink firmly and enter the table because it would rotate! I felt that this feeling did not exist in Tenergy 64 and Dignics 64.

Even though it is soft, the stop is stuck! It’s easy to counter!

Both the stop and the counter were very good. Rubber that feels soft tends to be affected by the rotation of the opponent at the stop and counter, but rather this Tenergy 19 is surprised that the stop is just right and the counter is easy to do! It’s really tenacious!

In top soin rally, the arch line is ugly!

By adopting the No. 219 sheet, which has a good bite, I felt that the trajectory became more aggressive in addition to the ease of handling! After drawing a very strong arc and entering the opponent’s court, I felt the ball jumping up like Dignics 09C and Dignics 05! This sometimes appears in Tenergy 05, but I think it will be difficult if you do not hit the ball in a fairly good position. On the other hand, with Tenergy 19, I was able to get this trajectory quite easily and it felt very good. It’s not just about speed, but I felt that the strong arc and the bouncing trajectory were the third feature of the new Tenergy 19!

Each technical review

Fore hand

Light hit
I didn’t feel any difference with a light hit. After all I feel the softness.

Drive in the rally
I didn’t feel that the speed drive that I hit in the rally was so good. It’s just normal. However, even with smash and meat, it is easy to get a long distance and it feels stable, so I felt that this is the characteristic of Tenergy 19. It feels like you can carry smashes and meat with power. I feel that this feeling has led to inspiration for the ease of hitting the third ball.

Drive with open face
The speed drive with the face open was pretty good as mentioned above. In addition, I’m glad that I felt like I could forcefully drive even if I got involved a little!

Loop (top spin) drive against back spin
I felt that even a difficult half-long ball was easy to make a high-quality loop drive. Rather than just attacking with the amount of rotation, it was easier to screw in with power (feeling that you can create the arc line of your own image with a swing and take it as it is).

Speed drive against back spin
This was the best. Although it is said that the rotation performance is better than Tenergy 05, the amount of rotation that comes from the shot feeling when hit with a seat feels a little weak, and it is undeniable that I feel dissatisfied with the amount of rotation compared to the usual Dignics 05. I didn’t, but I’m wondering if I should use Tenergy 19 for this speed power drive.

Block
It feels like a soft shot, but I didn’t feel that it was easily affected by the rotation of the opponent. In particular, I feel that soft Tenergy like Tenergy 05 FX is very susceptible to the rotation of the opponent, but I felt that it was not the case.

Counter drive
It’s easy to do. There was a feeling that the ball was sinking firmly. I felt that I could counter drive with confidence.

Stop
It’s easy to stop. I just played it more than I thought I would spin it. This area will be an arm.

Push
After all, I felt that Tenergy 05 and Dignics 05 had more rotation.

Flick
Since it is a rubber that is easy to handle, the way of hitting it was stable. Of course, I think it will be stable even when rotating.

Serve
A serve with a high amount of rotation was produced by applying rotation so as to hit it like Dignics 05. I didn’t feel it was difficult to put it out.

Back hand

Light hit
There was no particular discomfort with the light hit.

Drive in the rally
It was easy to drive. However, I felt that the quality of the ball was a little low.

Loop (top spin) drive against back spin
It was easy to do. It’s very grippy so it’s easy to lift. Its quality may be a little low.

Block
It was easy to do. I think it is not easily affected by spin.

Counter drive
It was easier to do counter meet than counter.

Stop
Easy to stop.

Push
I flew a little. I felt that Tenergy 05 was easier to do.

Chiquita
It was easy to get up, so it felt very good. I think it was as easy to do as VICTAS Triple Double Extra.

Comparison with other rubbers (individual impressions)

Spin amount
Tenergy 05 ＞ Tenergy 19 ＞ Tenergy 80

Speed
Tenergy 80 > Tenergy 19 > Tenergy 05

Ease of speed drive when biting
Tenergy 19 > Dignics 09C > Dignics 05

Ease of fore counter drive
Dignics 05 > Tenergy 19 > Tenergy 05

https://amzn.to/3bfK4p5
  • 2021.11.03

卓球王国 2021年12月号

Pick Up Product（ピックアッププロダクト）

・Moristo SP（モリストSP）/ Nittaku（ニッタク）
　今さら感もありますが、伊藤美誠選手の代名詞的なラバーで、近年は売れ筋ナンバーワンの常連的なラバーだそうです。katsuo000は知らなかったのですが、2002年発売当時は、「グルー効果内臓のスーパー表ラバー」だったそうです。プラスティックボールへ移行する中でスピード、回転、ナックルのバランスに優れた万能型のラバーとなったそうですね。これは勉強になりました。娘が本格的に卓球をするようになってくれたとしたら、モリストSPを7枚合板ラケットに貼って、表ソフトのボールを体験させてあげたいなーなんて思ったりします。

・Blue Storm PRO（ブルーストームPRO） / DONIC（ドニック）
　ドニックさん注目のラバー、ブルーストームの最上位ラバーの登場です！ドニックさんはいい意味でも悪い意味でも公表性能値がそこまでアテにならないので、とても気になるラバーです。もちろん発注しました！意外だったのが、今までオープンプライスのドニックさんが、このブルーストームPROでは7,800円 + 税とお高い値段をつけてきました。性能は非常に高いようで、速く試打したいラバーです。ドイツ製ラバーは、全体的にやや重いテナジーらしさのあるラバーが最近続々と発売されています。このブルーストームPROもテナジーらしいくい込みの良さを感じられるのではないかと期待しています。試打出来たら、ASAPでレビューしますので、よろしくお願い申し上げます。

余談 Dynaryz ZGR（ダイナライズZGR）って！？

　12月号ということで、今月号はクリスマスプレゼントがあります！そこに知らないラバーが！？その名もダイナライズZGRですね！10月発売の新ラバーのようです。卓球ナビには、既に情報が出ていました！

卓球ナビ：　https://takkyu-navi.jp/rubber/detail/863

ダイナライズAGRよりもさらに硬いダイナライズという立ち位置で良いように思います。ライゼンZGRも試打しましたが、良かったので早く打ちたいですね～。

  • 2021.11.02

2021/11/4～7 WTT Contender Lasko（ラシュコ）

WTTコンテンダー ラシュコ大会 11/1～11/7

　2021年11月上旬はコンテンダー ラシュコ大会が開催されます！You tubeでライブ配信されるやつですね！日本人選手の出場者を挙げさせていただきます。ちなみに既に本日11/1（月）から予選開始です！

WTTの大会サイト：　https://worldtabletennis.com/eventInfo?eventId=2503

You tubeチャンネル
World Table Tennis：　https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC9ckyA_A3MfXUa0ttxMoIZw

　ちなみに、11/1（月）に既に松島輝空選手が予選に出場し、勝利した模様です！本選にも是非出場してほしい！！

　（↓11/5更新）

　残念ながら、松島輝空選手は予選敗退となってしまったようです。一方、本選には神選手、木造選手、篠塚選手が出場です。是非頑張ってほしいです！

注目は中国選手と日本人の若手！

中国選手が出場！

　中国人選手が出場します。それだけでも見る価値ありですね！

・Lin Gaoyuan（林　高遠）選手
　ブレード：Lin Gaoyuan ALC（林高遠ALC）
　フォア：Hurricane（キョウヒョウ）（おそらく国狂）のブルースポンジ、硬度不明
　バック：Dignics 09C（ディグニクス09C）

・Liang Jingkun（梁　靖崑）選手
　ブレード：Alnado（アルネイド）？
　フォア：キョウヒョウ（仕様不明）
　バック：キョウヒョウ（仕様不明）

・Wang Chuqin（王　楚欽）選手
　ブレード：Viscaria（ビスカリア）
　フォア：キョウヒョウ（仕様不明）
　バック：キョウヒョウ（仕様不明）

日本男子は若手が出場！

　日本人男子は松島くんや愛工大の選手が出場です。これも楽しみですね！

・篠塚　大登 選手（愛工大名電高校）
　ブレード：Zhang Jike ALC（張継科ALC）
　フォア：Dignics 05（ディグニクス05）
　バック：Tenergy 05（テナジー05）

・松島　輝空 選手（星槎中学校）
　ブレード：Harimoto Tomokazu Inner Force ALC（張本智和インナーフォースALC）
　フォア：Dignics 09C（ディグニクス09C）
　バック：Dignics 05（ディグニクス05）

・神　巧也 選手（T.T.彩たま）
　ブレード：Ma Lin Extra Special（馬林エキストラスペシャル）
　フォア：翔龍（Flying Dragon）
　バック：翔龍（Flying Dragon）

・田中　佑汰 選手（愛知工業大学）
　ブレード：Inner Force Layer ALC（インナーフォースレイヤーALC）
　フォア：Dignics 05（ディグニクス05）
　バック：Dignics 05（ディグニクス05）

・木造　勇人 選手（愛知工業大学）

・谷垣　佑真 選手（愛工大名電高校）
　ブレード：Viscaria（ビスカリア）
　フォア：Dignics 05（ディグニクス05）
　バック：Dignics 80（ディグニクス80）

最終結果

男子シングルス
　優勝
　　Liang Jingkun（梁靖崑）選手（中国）
　準優勝
　　Kirill Gerassimenko（ゲラシメンコ）選手（カザフスタン）
　3位
　　Liu Dingshuo（劉丁碩）選手（中国）
　　Jon Persson（ジョン・パーソン）選手（スゥエーデン）

木造　勇人選手：ベスト8

男子ダブルス
　優勝
　　Lin Gaoyuan（林高遠）選手・Zhou Qihao（周启豪）選手（中国）
　準優勝
　　田中　佑汰選手・木造　勇人選手（日本）
　3位
　　Liang Jingkun（梁靖崑）選手・Wang Chuqin（王楚欽）選手（中国）
　　Laurenes Devos（ローレンス・デボス）選手・Olav Kosolosky（オラフ・コソロスキー）選手（ベルギー）

  • 2021.11.01

2021年 全日本大学総合選手権大会（個人の部）

ライブ配信がありました

　ライブ配信がある、ということでブログで取り上げたいと思いながら失念しておりました。涙。そして見たかったです。ラボライブさんでライブ配信あったようです。

ラボライブ：　https://labolive.com/

次回のライブ配信は、「内閣総理大臣杯2021年度日本卓球リーグプレーオフJTTLファイナル４」で、12/4（土）です。楽しみにしておきましょー！

ちなみに全日本大学総合選手権大会（団体の部）は動画がアップされていて見ることが可能のようです。

全日本大学総合選手権大会（団体の部）：　https://labolive.com/special/intercollegiate-games-2021?ordering=-published_at

結果

男子

優勝　戸上　隼輔 選手（明治大学）
　ブレード：　張継科ALC（Zhang Jike ALC）
　フォア：　Tenergy 05 Hard（テナジー05ハード）
　バック：　Tenergy 05（テナジー05）

準優勝　高見　真己 選手（愛知工業大）

3位　田原　彰悟 選手（愛知工業大）

3位　横谷　晟 選手（愛知工業大）

ベスト8　遠藤　碧人 選手（専修大）

ベスト8　出雲　卓斗 選手（明治大）

ベスト8　小野寺　翔平 選手（中央大）

ベスト8　宇田　幸矢 選手（明治大）
　ブレード：　Inner Force Layer ZLC（インナーフォースレイヤーZLC）（グリップはビスカリア）
　フォア：　Dignics 05（ディグニクス05）
　バック：　Dignics 80（ディグニクス80）

女子

優勝　黒野　葵衣 選手（早稲田大）

準優勝　木村　香純 選手（専修大）

３位　岡田　琴菜 選手（愛知工業大）

３位　中田　玲奈 選手（筑波大）

ベスト8　谷渡　亜美 選手（愛知工業大）

ベスト8　笹尾　明日香 選手（早稲田大）

ベスト8　大川　真実 選手（愛知工業大）

ベスト8　阿部　里歩 選手（國學院大）

  • 2021.10.31

Review Blue Storm Z1 Turbo

Explanation

DONIC is a slightly minor manufacturer in Japan, but Swedish genius Jan-Ove Waldner and Jorgen Persson, and until last year Dimitrij Ovtcharov. It will be the manufacturer that the player has contracted. Ovcharov is a close friend and rival of Jun Mizutani! Recently, I imagine that it is a manufacturer that has been picked up by You Tuber “Goblinzu” in Kansai and is receiving a lot of attention. Goblin’s recommendation seems to be this Blue Storm Z1 turbo.

There are many DONIC rubbers named Blue, and there are currently 20 types.

・Blue Grip (Sticky) 5 kinds
・Blue Storm 7 kinds
・Blue Fire 9 kinds
・Acuda Blue 4 kinds

The blue storm I tried this time will be a speed rubber. It seems that the rotating rubber is blue fire.

Performance value

In the performance announced by Mr. DONIC, I converted +1 to 0.25 and-to 0.1 to create a diagram. As expected, the Z1 turbo is the latest rubber, so the spin and speed will be the best performance among DONIC’s rubbers except for the adhesive rubber. This is promising! Basically, all rubbers with a turbo have the same rotational performance, and it seems that the characteristic of the Blue Storm system is that the speed is fast.

Z1 turbo sticking and weight

Blue  Storm Z1 Turbo
・Sponge Thickness: 1.8 mm, 2.0 mm, MAX+
・Speed: 11
・Spin: 10+++
・Control: 6-
・Sponge stiffness: 50°
・Open price (about 5,000 yen)
・73 g (before cut)　→　50 g (after cut)

Three features of lue Storm Z1 Turbo

In the rally of the upper rotation, it will not fall even if it is delayed!

The feature of the Blue Storm Z1 Turbo that I felt the most is that it does not fall at all even if it is delayed during the rally of the upper rotation. Therefore, it was possible to apply the minimum drive, and it was possible to rally very stably. The hardness of the sponge is 50 ° according to the German standard, but it bites very well and I felt it was about the middle hardness. I think that the power of the rubber will give you a high level of ability to respond even if you are passive and the reaction is delayed during the upper rotation rally!

The lowness of the arc line and speed is No. 1 in blue rubber!

The low arc line of the Brue Storm Z1 turbo, the speed of ball separation, and the high linearity were far higher than other blue rubbers! The first feature is that it is a rubber that bites well so that it will not fall even if it is delayed, so you can hit a drive with a very stable feeling, yet the drive has a low arch line, the ball separates quickly, and the straightness is good. The high price means that this is a back rubber that has the image of a back main battle type! It was a rubber that was very easy to speed up, and if you noticed just by being aware of putting it in, you could overwhelm the opponent in the rally, or you could turn the opponent behind and behind!

The seat is stiff and not easily affected by rotation!

As I felt with Blue Fire, the seat was stiff, so it was less affected by rotation than I expected, and it felt very good! Since it is not easily affected by rotation, it was quite easy to block and counter drive. Probably it is a stiff sheet, but the thickness is Max + and the thickness of the sheet is thin, so I imagine that it is a sheet that is easy to bite but has a core. There was a feeling that the ball was easy for the opponent to take, but it was a rally-oriented rubber that was stable and easy to handle.

Each technical review

Forehand

Light hit
I didn’t feel the hardness. The ball draws an arc, but I felt it was very low.

Drive on long balls and rallies
When I went down and tried to hit the drive, I strongly felt the low arc line. If it goes down, it feels like it will fall if you don’t hit it on the net a little. I didn’t feel that the ball would sink due to the amount of rotation, and I simply felt that the arch line was low.
Also, I was told by those who received that the drive was not taking at all. On the contrary, I received a comment that it is difficult to take. In a sense, it may be difficult for the drive to rotate. By combining the fore and back with an adhesive rubber or a spin-type tension rubber that often rotates, you may be able to expect a synergistic effect aimed at the difference in the amount of rotation of the drive.

Drive with open face
Since the arch line is low, it is easy for the ball to enter shallowly if it is a curve drive that involves it, and inevitably the surface is opened and it is often driven with a slight bump. I didn’t feel that it was easy to increase the amount of rotation because the surface was opened, or to rub it while hitting it, which is peculiar to adhesive.

Loop (top spin) drive against back spin
It was quite difficult. I had the impression that the number of net mistakes was more likely than I expected because the arch line was low.

Speed drive against back spin
This also has a low arch line, so I felt the need to lift it up.

Curve / shoot drive
I had the impression that I didn’t curve / shoot very much. I may be lacking in my ability, but I felt that the amount of rotation was a little weak.

Block
The block was easy to do. It was not easily affected by rotation, and it was easy to take from drive to meat knuckleballs.

Counter drive
In the foreground, I felt that the ball was released a little faster and I felt it was difficult, but it was generally easy to do.

Stop
It floated quite a bit. Also, I think the amount of rotation is small.

Push
　The speed push was easy.

Fore flick
This was easy to do. It was easier to do it closer to angle hitting than to apply rotation.

Backhand

Light hit
Is it really 50 °? I felt soft enough to feel.

Drive on long balls and rallies
It was easy to do. There was also a sense of stability because it draws an arc even when it is low.

Loop (top spin) drive against back spin
It was a little difficult. The arch line was too low and there were a lot of net mistakes.

Speed drive against back spin
It’s easy to do with a floating ball, but it was difficult with my own skill in the back.

Curve / shoot drive
I could drive sideways, but it didn’t turn much.

Block
It was easy to do. I think that it is quite easy to do because it is less affected by rotation and it bites firmly.

Counter drive
It was easy to do because it countered like a back hammeet. However, I imagine that it will be difficult to drop the hitting point.

Stop
It was not as easy as the fore, but it was easy to float.

Push
I couldn’t lower it, but I found it quite difficult to cut.

Chiquita
Chiquita, which is faster than I expected, was easy to do. Against vertical strong back spin chiquita was difficult.

Comparison with other rubbers (individual impressions)

Spin amout
　Blue Fire M1 Turbo > Tenergy 05 > Blue Fire JP01 Turbo > Blue Storm Z1 Turbo

In the performance table, it was hard to feel that it was a rubber with the same amount of rotation as the Blue Fire M1 Turbo. I think the Blue Fire will take overwhelming rotation.

Speed
　Dignics 64 > Tenergy 64 > Blue Storm Z1 Turbo > Tenergy 80

https://amzn.to/3hhLIqV
  • 2021.10.29

Review Evolution MX-P

Explanation

The Evolution series is a rubber series for top players of German table tennis equipment manufacturer TIBHAR. There are 6 types of Evolution series, 3 types of sponge hardness and 2 types of sheet type, and 3 types of sponge hardness x 2 types of sheet. Flexible (Flexible, FX) with the softest sponge hardness, Elastic (Elastic, EL) with intermediate altitude, Hard Maximum (Maximum, MX), Power type sheet (P) and Spin type slightly adhesive sheet (S) is not it. The Evolution MX-P (Evolution Maximum Power) reviewed this time will be a rubber like Tiver’s flagship rubber, which is also used by many top players.

Evolution MX-P is a rubber used by many top players who contract with Tiver, and is used by the following players.

・ Vladimir Samsonov (Belarus)
・ Paul Drinkhall (England)
・ Tazoe Hibiki (Japan)

Speaking of Belarusian Samsonov, he is a 44-year-old European “giant” who is still active. In his 40s, he is still active and features a very stable backhand and a tall and intense forehand drive, and his play style is centered on blocks and counters. He has been ranked number one in the world rankings many times in the past, and still has the ability to win top prizes in European competitions.
In addition, Drinkhall is England’s No. 2 young player, and is characterized by forehand drive and counter drive from Recibuchikita and the middle team. The Japanese team is suffering from England’s Drinkhall player in world groups.
In this way, the top European players have signed a contract with TIBHAR and are active on the front lines. TIBHAR is a German manufacturer, and although it is a little less well known in Japan, it can be said that it has a solid presence in Europe to support athletes.

Performance Value

I am sorry that it is very difficult to understand. Since the speed and spin performance of Evolution MX-P and Evolution MX-S are the same, they are plotted in the same place.

As you can see from the performance, you can see that the speed performance is high. Some sites use expressions like “10+”, but we have adopted the ones that are evaluated by three-digit numbers. After all, when reflecting the hardness of the sponge, I felt that I could understand what the performance of rubber corresponds to. In the German notation, if the sponge hardness is soft, the bite is good, so it is often thought that rotation will take place, so I think that it is necessary to be careful when comparing within the manufacturer.

MX-P sticking and weight

I pasted it on Zhang Jike ZLC as usual.

As an aside, the color of the sponge is similar to the Dignics series. If you look from the side, you can’t tell the difference unless you look at the rubber name.

Evolution MX-P
Spin tension OFF+
・Sponge Thickness：1.7/1.9/2.1 mm
・Speed：125
・Spin：120
・Control：80
・Sponge stiffness：45.7-47.7°
・6,000 yen + tax
・71 g (before cut)　→　48 g (after cut)

In the past, when I put it on a racket with a large racket blade area, I remembered that it weighed about 50 g, which was surprisingly lighter than I expected. You may have a light individual with a standard weight. A hard type called MX-P 50 ° has also been released for MX-P, so if you want to use something heavy and hard, you can use MX-P 50 °.

Three features of Evolution MX-P

The ball holding and shot feeling is very similar to Tenergy 05!

It is easy to feel the ball holding when driving downwards or in a rally, and the shot feeling is exactly Tenergy 05! I felt that. It’s very easy to handle and I think many people like it. In addition, it is easy to rotate, and I felt that the response when hitting the ball and the amount of rotation are linked. Of course, the amount of rotation is still alive, and I think it will take a firm rotation.

Easy to play and meet, just rubber for the back!

I felt that the biggest difference from Tenergy 05 was the ease of playing. I felt that the Evolution MX-P 50 ° was also easy to play. After all, the MX-P sponge is not Tenergy’s Spring Sponge, so I feel that there will be a difference when it is applied thickly. It is MX-P that I felt that it was easy to reach the racket board when I hit it thickly. Therefore, I felt that it was a good feeling to use it for a bag that uses a lot of meat. I think the difficult part of Tenergy 05 is that it is difficult to meet, but MX-P is easy to meet and if you want to use both well, MX-P is recommended.

The sheet is stiff! It is not easily affected by rotation and has a long life!

MX-P is similar to Tenergy 05, but I felt the seat was a little stiff. Therefore, I felt that the MX-P is less susceptible to rotation than the Tenergy 05, and has a long life that bothers me with the Tenergy series. Although it is similar to Tenergy 05, it can be said that it is a part that can be said to be more advantageous than Tenergy 05.

Each technical review

Forehand

Light hit
I thought that there was no performance that would automatically rotate like Tenergy 05.

Drive on long balls and rallies
I felt that it was quite easy to hit the board when I let it bite into it. I don’t hate it, but I felt that the amount of rotation of the speed drive was a little insufficient.

Drive with open face
There is a feeling that it bites into the ball and wraps it tightly, so I felt that it was spinning to some extent.

Loop (top spin) drive against back spin
I felt it was very easy to do. I especially liked the feeling that it was easy to control the height and depth of the ball. Also, I think that the amount of rotation is not as much as Tenergy 05, but I felt that it was taking.

Speed drive against back spin
I felt that the speed drive itself would fit in, but I felt that the amount of rotation was a little insufficient.

Curve / shoot drive
Since it takes rotation, it bends firmly. I think the arch line is a little low.

Block
It was easy to do. It was my favorite shot feeling. It’s a little hard, so I think people who are not good at it are not good at it.

Counter drive
This was also easy to do. It was difficult to catch the counter drive during the ascending period, but I felt that it was easy to control when making the arc line by myself.

Stop
It stopped and felt better than I expected.

Push
This is also low. However, it may not be very sharp.

Service
Spin is good.

Backhand

Light hit
I didn’t feel that hard.

Drive on long balls and rallies
There was a feeling that it would enter stably even if it was driven with a slight speed drive.

Loop (top spin) drive against back spin
This was also easy to do. I felt that the amount of rotation was not that much, but it was good that there was a sense of stability.

Speed drive against back spin
This was also pretty easy to do. I think it’s because the bite is good.

Block
It was easy to stop.

Counter drive
I could hardly try it, but since I entered with the first ball, it is not difficult to do.

Stop
This also stops.

Push
It is low and easy to control.

Chiquita
It was easy to do. Since I have the ball, it was easy to spin firmly and prevent the next ball from being smashed.

Comparison with other rubbers (individual impressions)

Spin amunt
　Tenergy 05 ＞ Evolution MX-P ＞ Tenergy 05 FX

Speed
　　Tenerg 80 ≧ Evolution MX-P ＞ Tenergy 05

https://amzn.to/2EJLiv5
  • 2021.10.28

Review Vega X

Explanation

Korean table tennis maker XIOM is an up-and-coming maker, and it is famous for two types of rubber series, the Vega series with good cost performance and the Omega series of high-end models. In particular, Vega Europe is a rubber that has the three beats of cost performance, ease of handling, and performance, and has penetrated the beginner-intermediate class! Recently, Brazilian hard hitter Hugo Calderano has signed a contract with XIOM, and even after changing the equipment, the world tour ranking has been steadily raised to a single digit. The Hugo Hyper Axylium and Omega VII Tour used by Calderano will also be on the rise.

The rubber reviewed on this page is XIOM’s Vega X. The Vega X commemorates the 10th anniversary of the sale of Vega in 2009 and is touted as the greatest rubber in Vega history. The rubber design follows the sponge of Vega PRO, but it seems to match the top sheet that adopted the same cycloid system as the Omega VII series. A rubber that stands between Omega and Vega has a low price of 4,200 yen + tax, but according to the World Table Tennis Kingdom, the performance is in the 6,000 yen range (Fastarc G-1, Rakza X, Evolution MX-P, etc.) It is said that they can compete with each other. Actually, he wanted to make it higher than 4,200 yen, but he probably decided to lower the price further to 4,200 yen + tax in anticipation of YASAKA’s Rigan (3,700 yen + tax)! I think that the high performance of the table tennis kingdom was also oozing out in the review. I am reviewing what kind of rubber it is actually

Performance value

As mentioned in the explanation, although the speed and spin performance are inferior to the Omega series, it stands out in the Vega series and you can see that it is outstanding. On the other hand, the Vega Tour sold in the past has a higher published performance value than the Vega X, and the Vega Tour has a higher published performance value than the Omega V series. To be honest, I felt very good about the Vega X test hit this time, so I’m thinking of trying the Vega Tour again with the current equipment! I hope you can expect that review as well.

Vega X sticking and weight

I pasted it on Zhang Jike ZLC as usual.

Vega X
　Dynamic Friction
　Cycloid
　Carbo Sponge
・Sponge Thickness：1.8/2.0/max mm
・Speed：9.5
・Spin：11.0
・Sponge stiffness：47.5°
・4,200 yen + tax
・72 g (before cut)　→　52 g (after cut)

After all, after all, XIOM’s rubber is heavy. However, with a ball or hitting a curtain, the rotation performance was very high and it felt very good!

3 features of Vega X

Even though it is easy to play, it has an outstanding ball holding and spin performance!

What I felt most when hitting a ball or hitting a curtain was the ball holding and the amount of rotation! This good hit feeling is also reproduced even if you hit it on the table, and when you think that you held the ball firmly and rotated it, you felt that you could hit the ball with the amount of rotation you expected, and it was a very pleasant test hit. !! Since I hold the ball firmly, I can control the ball firmly if I put up with it, but when I tried to play it as much as I wanted, I felt that the meat system would run as straight as I wanted! I felt it was very easy to use! The rotation performance is very high, and if you can use it properly, it will take about the same as Tenergy 05. However, I also felt that it was difficult to achieve rotation performance higher than Tenergy 05. Especially when used in the foreground, it was too soft and I felt a strong energy loss. However, it was easy to rotate, and it was very easy to serve and loop drive. I felt that this area was like Vega!

The balance between the hard sheet and the soft sponge is exquisite and easy to handle!

Obviously, the sheet was hard and the sponge was soft rubber, and it was a light feeling that did not remind me of 52 g. It is very easy to handle, and the direction of ease of handling is a good combination of rubber that makes it easy to put out high quality balls like Rasanter R48 and Rakza type that is easy to put on the table anyway. I felt like I was doing it.
I’m not good at backhand, but Vega X matched the backhand outstandingly! I intuitively felt that the factor was the perfect balance of hardness between the seat and the sponge. I have the impression that rubber with a hard sheet takes a lot of rotation, but I feel that it is difficult because it needs to be firmly inserted. In order to handle V> 15 Extra and Fastarc G-1 (Fastarc G-1) etc., it is necessary to hit it once and then rotate it with the image of rotating it. I felt that I couldn’t hit it like that and needed to get used to it. However, Vega X does not need such a way of hitting, and I felt that a good enough ball would come out with the image of hitting while rubbing with a Rakza type or Tenergy type sheet! This part feels very good and makes me feel the ease of handling and the sharpness that I can not think of as the first hit!

Convinced masterpiece! Is it the weight that is missed !?

With this high performance, 4,200 yen + tax is too cheap! It’s odd! I was a little worried that it was a little heavy at 52 g and that it was slippery with Tsuttsuki, but I really liked this ease of handling, high performance, and cost performance! The meaning of the word “masterpiece”, katsuo000, is convincing. I don’t think the weight is so important for a racket with a grip center of gravity like the Zhang Jike model, and it slips, but I felt it was within the permissible range.
Also of interest is the comparison with the Vega Tour. I haven’t used the Vega Tour in Zhang Jike ZLC, so I can’t make a simple comparison, but in the current image, the Vega X often slips a little, but it has a better ball holding than the Vega Tour and it doesn’t fly too much, so I’ll take the plunge. It’s an image that can be rotated. The Vega Tour was very similar to the Omega VII series and was a rubber that felt faster than holding and spinning. The published performance value is just the published value, and I feel that how much rotation is easy to apply on the table and how much it is applied are still different things.

Each technical review

Forehand

Light hit
It doesn’t feel like flying and is very easy to do. I also felt that it was too soft.

Drive on long balls and rallies
After all, the ball is shallow, and I felt that the ball would fall easily if I didn’t hit it a little. Especially in the case of inquiries, I also felt that the ball could not be flown unless it was attracted considerably. I think this area is a characteristic of soft and easy-to-use rubber. The rubber that felt the same softness was Rasanter R48, but R48 had a softer seat, I didn’t feel much power loss, and I think I didn’t feel that I couldn’t fly or fall. It may be said that R48 is the rubber that top players like.

Drive with open face
Sounds good! Since it is spinning, it fell firmly and the ball entered deep.

Loop (top spin) drive against back spin
I felt very good because I had a ball firmly. Even though it’s so easy to speed drive and meet, I honestly think that this ball holder is not another rubber! I felt that the drive had enough rotation!

Speed drive against back spin
Normally, it is often difficult to do speed drive when loop drive is easy, but as mentioned above, I did not feel this Vega X. This was a surprise!

Curve / shoot drive

Block
It was a good impression that the sheet was hard and I should block it with the image that I would go to overwrite the rotation from myself. I think it’s better to block in the front team so that it stretches a little at a high pitch.

Counter drive
It was easy to do because the seat was hard and it had a ball. Since the seat is hard, it is not easily affected by rotation, and even if you drop the hitting point firmly, it is easy to counter firmly and there is also the ease of doing that is peculiar to rubber with a ball!

Stop
It was slippery, but I was able to stop it. However, I think it is more stable if you do not slide it.

Push
I felt that push was sharp because it also took a turn. It is an impression that it is stable by rotation. It was a very good rubber with good bite but no push!

Service
I’m glad I was able to cut it firmly. It was a good feeling!

Backhand

Light hit
It was a little easy, but once I got used to it, there was no problem.

Drive on long balls and rallies
In the backhand, it was very easy to do with just the right hardness. It’s been a while since I’ve decided on such a backhand drive, and it’s been very pleasant!

Loop (top spin) drive against back spin
 It was easy to do! This ball holding is irresistible! There was a sense of security!

Speed drive against back spin
Speed ​​drive is also included! Rubber with a ball is often too hard to hit speed drive, but I don’t know of any other rubber that can hit speed drive so comfortably. It’s odd!

Block
It was easy to put in, but it slipped a little.

Counter drive
It wasn’t as easy as the fore. This is an ant that needs to hone his arms, isn’t it.

Stop
It was good. It didn’t even pop out.

Push
It was easy to cut and make a chance. It felt very good.

Chiquita
It was easy to make an arc line and it was easy to do!

Comparison with other rubbers (individual impressions)

Spin amount
　Rasanter R48 ≧ Tenergy 05 ≧ Vega X ＞ Evolution MX-P

Easy to spin
　Tenergy 05 FX ≧ Vega X ≧ Rasanter R48

Speed
　Rasanter R48 ≧ Vega X ＞ Tenergy 05

https://amzn.to/3i6qw8F
  • 2021.10.26

雑感 2021/10/25

10月もレビュワーノミネートいただきました！

　2021年10月期に投稿されたレビュー数は、先月と比べるとやや少なかったです。気持ちとしては、レビュー数の多い中で、レビュワーにノミネートするほうがもちろん嬉しいです。それでも今月もノミネートできて一安心に近い嬉しいを感じさせていただきました。どうもありがとうございます。

　10月のレビューはRevoldia CNF（レボルディアCNF）になります。
katsuo000のレボルディアCNFのレビュー
　WRMさんのレボルディアCNF：https://rubber.blog.jp/archives/52001728.html
　このブログにおけるレボルディアCNF：https://katsuo000.com/review_revoldia_cnf/

　もしよろしければ是非投票の方もよろしくお願い申し上げます！もちろん、投票はkatsuo000+のレビューに関係なく良いと感じたレビュー（およびレビュワー）へ投票してください！

投票は　→　　https://rubber.ocnk.net/form/132

　締め切り〆は2021年10月31日（日）までと短いですのでお早目に！

Twitterで、ラバーが当選しました！

　当選したのは、TIHBHAR（ティバー）さんのQuantum X Pro（クァンタムXプロ）になります！これはテンションがあがりました！クニヒロ卓球さんの笠松隆幸さんから連絡をいただき、即発送していただきました～！当たるんですね。正直都市伝説位レベルで、当たらないと感じていたのでもっともっとツイッターに真剣に時間を割こうと感じてしまいました。もちろん就業中はダメ絶対！

　クァンタムXプロは既に打たせていただいてます。中級者志向といいつつ、結構ディグニクスのようなシートの硬さも感じたラバーで、個性はないですが欠点もないラバーという印象です。久々にバックに使うのもいいなーと思っています。ティバーさんのラバーは非常に安定感が高いので、安定を求めて使おうかなと思っているところです。

クアンタムXプロのレビュー：　https://katsuo000.com/review_quantum_x-pro/

娘と卓球をはじめました～！

　自分のコロナワクチン接種２回がやっと終わり、娘とついに卓球場で卓球を開始しました！いやー娘もなかなか口が達者になって、緊張しつつもほぼ二人だけになるとぎゃーぎゃー騒いでくれたので嬉しかったです。もちろんはじめは難しくてすぐに飽きておもちゃが欲しいと言い出しましたが、その次の夜から、「とーちゃん、卓球やろー」というようになりました。家での卓球はただただ二人で羽子板のようにボールを打つだけですが、それでも本人が楽しんでいるようなので、OKだと思ってます。今は興味を持つことと無意識でも徐々にできるようになることを目指してますね。終わった後はできなかったことではなく、できたこと、空振りしても当てようとしたことをほめたりしているところです。
　途中飽きてしまったときに、自分から率先してボールを拾ってくれました。自分も小さいときはよくボールを拾ったことを思い出した次第ですね。ここから全てが始まるんだなーと感慨にふけってました。

Tornado King Power（トルネードキングパワー）がいい！

　既にレビュー済みですが、トルネードキングパワーが非常に良いです。やはり上板コトのラケットって回転のかかり方に＋アルファがあるように感じます。オメガVIIチャイナ影のループドライブを武器にしてくれるような気がして、トルネードキングパワーを使い込もうとしているところですね。このラケットはバックハンドが打てなくて諦めようと思っていたのですが、最近バックハンドも徐々に感覚がつかめるようになってきました。この感覚がわかるまでに２～３年はかかったと思います。学生のときにつかむことができていたらまた変わっていたのでしょうが、それよりもこの感覚を掴めたことを喜ぶべきとも思ってます。バックはディグニクスで、現在はラバーの試打以上にこのラケットでどのような卓球ができるかを探りたい気持ちが強いですね。レビューも継続させていただきますが、英語でのレビューや過去に試打したラケットラバーのレビューを挙げることがあと１か月程度続きそうです。ご覧になっていただいている方には少しつまらないかもしれませんが、ご容赦いただければ幸いです。

トルネードキングパワーのレビュー：　https://katsuo000.com/review_tornadoking_power/

  • 2021.10.25

レビュー Inner Force Layer ZLF（インナーフォースレイヤーZLF）

説明

　Inner Force Layer ZLF（インナーフォースレイヤーZLF）は2016年11月にButterfly（バタフライ）より販売されたラケットです。バタフライはカーボンなしの特殊素材として、過去にArylate（アリレート）をもちいたラケットを販売しており、有名なラケットとしてKey Shot（キーショット）というラケットがあるそうです。katsuo000もそのキーショットの派生と思われるBISIDE（バイサイド）というグリップに赤色のネームプレートの入ったラケットを使っていました。カーボンが入っていないので木材合板のように球持ちを感じやすく、特殊素材のアリレートがある分、安定感、特にバックハンドの安心感の高い名作だと思います。バイサイドもアウターにアリレートを配し、キーショットに近いラケットだと思います。これら木材合板系のラケットよりもスイートスポットが広くて安定感があって、カーボンありほどは飛ばないというラケットは実は昔から需要があるのだと思います。最近の他メーカーで挙げますと、XIOM（エクシオン）のHyper Axylium（ハイパーアクシリウム）などが近いのではないでしょうか。

　上述のとおり、アウターにカーボンなしの特殊素材を配したラケットはいくつかが挙げられますが、今回レビューするのはなんとカーボンなしの特殊素材をインナー位置に配したラケットになります。インナーフォースレイヤーシリーズの一本で、インナーにZLFを配したラケットになりますね。過去にバタフライからはInner Fore AL（インナーフォースAL）というラケットが販売されていたと思いますがその後継機といっても良いと思います。バタフライさんの特徴ともいえる特殊素材をもちいたラケットの一振りと言えるでしょう。

　このラケットは、回転性能が抜群で扱いやすいということで購入してみました。実際、粘着ラバーを貼ってみたところ、中陣が限界で後塵まで下がったらボールが弾まず打ち抜けないことが予想される位弾みません。そのかわり思い切り打っても十分台におさまる安心感と安定感の高い一振りになっています。少々威力不足は感じるかもしれませんが、それ以上に安心感と安定感の高い、まさになんでも入れることができる、というラケットがインナーフォースレイヤーZLFだと思います。

インナーフォースレイヤーZLFの特徴

抜群の操作性！ほとんどどんなラバーも回転をかけることができるようになる！

　ほとんど、どんなハードなラバーの性能も引き出せる非常にラバーを選ばないラケットになります。唯一あわないと結論が出せるのは、ディグニクスシリーズになると思います。バタフライさんの最新のラバーDignics 05（ディグニクス05）は極端に相性が悪いようで、球を持つ前に離れてしまう部分だけが非常に前面に出るように感じ、相性が悪いと感じました。一方でキョウヒョウなどの粘着ラバーをはってもドイツ製のシートの硬いラバーを貼っても扱いやすさのあるラケットだと思います。特に扱いやすいと感じる部分として、回転のかけやすさが挙げられます。思い切り回転をかけるとオーバーしてしまうようなサーブでも、このラケットなら弾まないので台におさまると感じました。このラケットならぜひチキータにも是非挑戦してほしい、と感じるラケットで、抜群の安定感と回転量でした。

弾まないので、サイドを切るコースが狙いやすい！

　アウターカーボンを使用しているとクロスの最も長いコースを狙って入る確率を上げたくなる、という心理があると思います。このインナーフォースレイヤーZLFでは、弾まないので、ボールが浅めに入りやすいんですね。その結果、サイドを切るようなコースを狙いやすくコースによってノータッチを狙えるようなラケットだと思います。クロスの打ち合いでのサイドを切るようなコースやストレートへの返球でも高い安心感と安定感を感じました。フルスイングしてストレートが狙えるのは非常に扱いやすいと思います。

木材合板ほどおされない

　木材合板ラケットと同等以上の扱いやすさ、回転のかけやすさがあるのに、特殊素材がアシストしてくれる分、ボールに負けないという特徴があると感じました。回転をかけやすいということは相手のボールの影響も受けやすい、ということだと思います。特に５枚合板系のラケットでは手に響きすぎるということは往々にしてあると思います。自分は結構苦手な打球感だったりします。相手の強烈なドライブにおされたりはしますが、手には響きすぎない特殊素材ありラケット特有の負けなさがあると感じました。この打球感は好みだとは思いますが個人的には好みの打球感です。逆に木材系で手にもっと響いてほしい、強打時のボールのブレや癖がもっと欲しい、と思うなら木材ラケットのほうが良いかもしれません。

おすすめのラバー組み合わせ（あくまでも個人の感想）

フォアラバー

バックラバー

各技術レビュー

フォアハンド系

軽打

ロングボールやラリーでのドライブ

面を開いたドライブ

対下回転に対するループドライブ

対下回転に対するスピードドライブ

カーブ/シュートドライブ

ブロック

カウンタードライブ

ストップ

ツッツキ

フォアフリック
　

バックハンド系

軽打

ロングボールやラリーでのドライブ

対下回転に対するループドライブ

対下回転に対するスピードドライブ

カーブ/シュートドライブ

ブロック

カウンタードライブ

ストップ

ツッツキ

チキータ

他ラケットとの比較（あくまでも個人の感想）

回転量
　インナーフォースレイヤーZLF　＞　Fortius FT ver. D

回転のかけやすさ
　インナーフォースレイヤーZLF　＞　Fortius FT ver. D

スピード
　Fortius FT ver. D ＞ インナーフォースレイヤーZLF

https://amzn.to/3EbDnjH
  • 2021.10.22

Comparison of high-end rubber from each manufacturer Weight edition

Compare side by side！

This time it will be the rubber weight. It seems that you have seen it a lot, and it will be one of the popular pages of this blog. Rubber is a rubber product, and it is said that individual differences occur even with rubber of the same thickness and color. It does not take the mean or standard deviation. I’m not sure because it’s just a note of the weight of the rubber that katsuo000 purchased. Even if there are individual differences, I think that it will be a certain index, so I would appreciate it if you could refer to it. m (_ _) m

By Brand

The standard high-end rubber from each manufacturer basically weighs around 48 g. Except for the front soft rubber, if the back soft rubber is lighter than 48 g, it will be easier to feel the rotation performance and energy loss. The heavier the rubber, the harder it is and the more likely it is to get a mad shot feeling! It doesn’t mean that it should be heavy, but I would like to comment on the rubber that attracts attention in each weight range, and the rubber that is easy to handle for its weight and has high performance!