English

Review Tenergy 05 FX

Explanation

We would like to review Tenergy 05 FX, one of Butterfly (Tamasu)’s signature rubbers. First of all, I would like to write about Tenergy again. The release of the world standard Tenergy 05 dates back to April 2008, about 13 years ago. Tenergy 05, which still wants the name of the world standard even after more than 10 years have passed due to the prohibition of post-processing with organic solvents, has become an existence that can not be talked about without it when thinking about table tennis. .. Considering the features of this Tenergy series as katsuo000 as of 2021, I think it will be as follows.

Features of the Tenergy series
・ High rotation performance
・ High speed performance
・ Light

I think that the characteristics of the Tenergy series as described above are largely due to Butterfly’s unique sponge. The sponge used in the Tenergy series is an orange sponge called Spring Sponge, and the bubbles in the sponge have a closed cell structure, and it seems that they are able to show high performance. This spring sponge is a technology that differentiates it from other competing table tennis makers with only Butterfly technology. While other competing table tennis makers basically outsource rubber manufacturing, Butterfly, despite being a table tennis maker, owns a sponge manufacturing factory and is trying to differentiate itself. Because of this spring sponge, Tenergy can produce high performance, but due to the fact that it costs research and development in addition to resale and counterfeiting, it has become an open price and it is almost double the price compared to other rubbers. It can be said that it is also a (bad) feature. However, there is no doubt that the usage rate of top players is high and it is the world standard.
In addition to Tenergy 05, which has the highest usage rate of the top players and high rotation performance, Tenergy 64, which has high speed performance due to the difference in the top seat, Tenergy 80, which has a good balance of spin and speed, There are 5 types of seats, including the Tenergy 25, which is strong against counters and front teams, and the Power Tenergy 19, which was released the other day. The explanation of each sheet is as follows.
 No. 05: The grain spacing of 1.7 mm is narrow. High rotation performance.
 No. 25: 2.65 mm grain height is low. Easy to play on the table and counter.
 No. 64: Wide grain spacing of 1.7 mm. High speed performance.
 No. 180: Medium grain spacing of 1.7 mm. The rotation and speed are well balanced.
 No. 219: The grain spacing of 1.5 mm is narrow. It is easy to grab the ball well and put out power.
As mentioned above, the characteristics of each top sheet are reflected, and there are key phrases such as “Spin 05”, “Balance 80”, “Speed 64”, “Front 25”, and “Power 19”. It is crowned.

About 13 years ago, after launching Tenergy 05 in April 2008, Butterfly launched Tenergy 25 in November 2008, Tenergy 64 in April 2009, and Tenergy in July 2010. 05 FX, Tenergy 25 FX in November 2010, Tenergy 64 FX in November 2011, Tenergy 80 in January 2013, 2014 Tenergy 80 FX in April 2017, Rozena in April 2017, Tenergy 05 Hard, which is a harder version of Tenergy 05 in November 2018, in April 2019. Dignics 05 has been released as a rubber that exceeds Tenergy. Then, in March 2021, when the transition from Tenergy to Dignics was beginning to appear, Tenergy 19 was put on the market. So far, there are 10 types of Tenergy. Each of them has been sold as a new product, and the fact that Tenergy 05 is still popular is a manifestation of completion and trust.

And I think that Tenergy 05FX is a world standard Tenergy that is easy to handle by combining the world standard Tenergy 05 with a soft spring sponge. As a back rubber for intermediate users, I think it is a very popular rubber for beginners’ first Tenergy.

Published performance value

Published performance values do not depend on the presence or absence of FX. At competitors’ manufacturers, rubber with a soft sponge has high rotational performance, but I feel like Butterfly’s claim that this is not the case. Actually, the soft sponge is easier to use, but it seems that it is difficult to get the maximum rotation amount and speed, but it may be that it is not impossible to get it. In that sense, Tenergy 05FX can be said to be a high-performance and easy-to-use rubber.

Easy-to-use technics

On Butterfly’s homepage, radar charts are posted about the technologies that are easy to do for each Tenergy. I measured the ease of doing each technology with a measure, and tried to show the numerical values in the figure below. Items
・ Ease of loop drive
・ Ease of hitting speed drive
・ Ease of counter drive
・ Easy to play on the table
・ Ease of blocking
・ Ease of smashing
It will be six. Personally important items are loop drive, speed drive, bench play, block and counter drive. If the smash is not adhesive rubber, you will be accustomed to hitting it.

I quoted from Butterfly’s homepage.

https://www.butterfly.co.jp/product/tenergy/

If you look at this chart, you can see that Tenergy 05FX is really at the center. There are few technologies that are difficult to do. It can be said that it is a rubber that can be recommended from beginners to intermediates if you do not consider the cost.

Recommended racket combination

Combinations recommended by the manufacturer are also posted. I will also post this. All of the following are quoted from Butterfly’s homepage. First, I tried arranging the Tenergy FX system.

Tenergy 05 FX
    ・Timo Boll ZLF
        For players seeking stable play
    ・Inner Force Layer ALC
        For learning various techniques
    ・Maze Advance
        For players who are not confident in their strength
Tenergy 80 FX
    ・Marcos Freitas ALC
        For playing in a well-balanced and wide area
    ・Timo Boll CAF
        For all-round play in pursuit of power
Tenergy 25 FX
    ・Timo Boll ZLC
        To players who want to use the opponent's play
Tenergy 64 FX
    ・Timo Boll TJ
        To junior players aiming for the top
    ・Maze Advance
        To players who use Tenergy for the first time

Basically, I felt that there were many phrases for beginners and intermediate users. Only the Tenergy 25FX has been proposed to be combined with the Timo Boll ZLC, and it seems that there are many combinations with a racket that is basically very easy to handle. Personally, I feel the intention of the manufacturer to feel the ease of handling and the fun of table tennis rather than the power. However, as a beginner, Tenergy makes the household account book cry. If my daughter wants to do that, I’ll cooperate. .. ..
It’s almost April, and if you want to step up or take on the challenge of Tenergy in a new environment, it is recommended to combine it with the Tenergy FX system as described above.

Tenergy 05 Hard
    ・Viscaria
        For all-round power play
    ・Inner Force Layer ALC
        For playing in the front middle team with an emphasis on rotation
    ・SK7 Classic
        To power hitters who prefer wood plywood rackets
Tenergy 05
    ・Zhang Jike ALC
        For all-round play without blind spots
    ・Harimoto Tomokazu Inner Force ZLC
        For aggressive play that emphasizes the rotation of the hit ball
    ・Inner Force Layer ALC
        For players who want the rotation and stability of the hit ball
Tenergy 19
    ・Lin Yun-Ju Super ZLC
        Pursuing both speed and spin
    ・Inner Force Layer ZLC
        Powerful play with an emphasis on rotation
    ・Timo Boll ALC
        For all-round play in pursuit of power
Tenergy 80
    ・Mizutani Jun ZLC
        For players aiming for technical play
    ・Tiago Apolonia ZLC
        To players aiming for solid play
    ・Inner Shield Layer ZLF
        For all-round cut play
Tenergy 25
    ・Mizutani Jun Super ZLC
        To players who want to use the opponent's play
    ・Inner Force Layer ALC.S
        To the players who make full use of rotation in the front team
Tenergy 64
    ・Matsudaira Kenta ALC
        For speedy play in the front team
    ・Inner Force Layer ZLF
        For players who use a lot of flat striking methods
    ・Petr Korbel
        For players who want to acquire the feeling of spinning

 Looking at Tenergy as a whole, Tenergy 64 is recommended for beginners and intermediates, Tenergy 25 is recommended for intermediate and advanced players in combination with the bouncing outer Super ZLC, and Tenergy 05 Hard and Tenergy 19 are recommended for advanced players and top players. It is an impression. The combination of Tenergy 25 and Jun Mizutani Super ZLC is not a story that started in 2021, but it is an impression that Butterfly has been proposing for a long time. It’s a pretty interesting combination.

Tenergy 05 FX Weight and Paste

The rubber weight of the Tenergy 05FX was about 46 g. It’s lighter than Tenergy 05 (48 g). Butterfly’s characteristic is that there are many high-performance and lightweight rubbers as a whole, and you can see that this time as well, it is light and of high quality.

Tenergy 05 FX
    High Tension
・Sponge thickness: thick (1.9 mm), extra thick (2.1 mm)
・Spin: 11.5
・Speed: 13.0
・Sponge stiffness: 32
・Open price (8,900 yen + tax)
・66 g (before cut) → 46 g (after cut)

Three features of Tenergy 05 FX

Bring it to your backhand!

It’s soft, so I brought it to my backhand anyway! The backhand speed drive of the third ball was very easy to hit! I felt that I could swing with great peace of mind because I could draw an arch line firmly by rotating. In addition, I felt that I could make a table tennis that would not lose even if I went down to the middle team or the apse because I could spin with the ball firmly even with a backhand that tends to have insufficient impact.

Even though it’s soft, it stops and it’s easy to counter!

Both the stop and the counter were very good. I was surprised that the counter drive was easy to do. I think it’s because of the ball holding due to the shape of the seat. With this performance, I think it’s easy to play sticky table tennis!

It’s FX, but it’s surprisingly hard!

I feel the softness because it is FX, but I felt the hardness more than I expected due to the influence of the shape of the sheet. It’s easy to handle, but I also feel the hardness, so I thought it was easy to drive. I felt that this hardness was a performance that matched modern table tennis.

Each technics review

Fore hand

Counter drive
It’s easy to do. I felt that I could overwrite it before it was affected by the rotation of the other party. This is high performance.

Stop
Easy to stop. I just played it when I tried to rotate it.

Push
It is a little harder to rotate than Tenergy 05.

Back hand

Light hit
I didn’t feel much difference from Tenergy 05 with a light hit.

Rally drive
It was easy to drive. The balls were easy to align and I felt very stable. I don’t think the power is that high.

Loop (top spin) drive against back spin
It was easy to do. There was a feeling that it came off a little, and I felt that the amount of rotation was low compared to Tenergy 05, but anyway, it was easy to lift, so I felt that I could drive at once.

Speed drive against back spin
This was pretty good. I didn’t need that much impact, and it was difficult for the opponent to predict the speed drive from the front backhand, so I felt it was quite easy to get points.

Block
I felt that it was affected by the rotation. Especially for katsuo000, I felt that it was a little difficult because I felt that the backhand was easier to block with a stiffer rubber. It is an impression that it is affected by heavy balls.

Counter drive
If anything, meat was easier to do.

Stop
It was easy to do.

Push
Because it is soft, it is easy to repel, so it is easier to rotate with Tenergy 05.

Chiquita
It was easy to get up, so it felt very good. The power may be small, but I think that the opponent does not like it if you put a horizontal rotation in the front team.

Comparison with other rubbers (personal impressions)

Spin amount
 Tenergy 80 > Tenergy 05 FX > Evolution MX-P

Speed
 Evolution MX-P > Tenergy 05 FX > Fastarc G-1

Ease of handling
 Rasanter R48 ≧ Tenergy 05 FX > Tenergy 19

https://amzn.to/3qHp9zO

Review Tenergy 05

Explanation

World Standard for all rubbers: Tenegy 05. Even now that the Dignics series has been sold by Butterfly as a rubber that exceeds Tenergy 05, the presence of Tenergy 05 is certain. One reason is that top players and players who contract with Butterfly are still using this rubber. Now that the rubber of the Dignics series has appeared, I would like to review the Tenergy series and what kind of rubber is the representative rubber in the Tenergy series, Tenergy 05.
Tenergy 05 was released in 2008, more than 10 years ago. At that time, the big rule change of completely banning speed glue had a strong impact. Tenergy 05 became a monster rubber by running up to the world standard in the tremor. Tenergy 05 and “spin tension” rubber have emerged under the rule that speed glue can no longer be used and the speed performance and spin performance of highly elastic rubber due to post-processing can no longer be drawn out. Even now, the ban on speed glue and the problem of using auxiliary agents for some players (rubber post-processing, which is prohibited by the rules) have not been solved, but even if speed glue cannot be used, high speed With its performance and spin performance, Tenergy 05 can be said to be a savior in the table tennis world. Coupled with the support of such an era, Monster Rubber was born.

Published performance value

What you can see from this performance diagram is that Tenergy 05 is one of the rubbers that has high performance in both rotation performance and speed performance. You can also see that there are only two rubbers, Dignics 05 and Dignics 80, that are superior to Tenergy 05 in terms of rotation performance and speed performance. Both rubbers have a harder sponge hardness than Tenergy 05, so it can be said that they are more difficult to handle than Tenergy 05. I think that this high-balanced performance is a feature of Tenergy 05.

As you can see from the figure that reflects the sponge hardness, the rubber with the highest spin performance when the sum of rotation and sponge hardness is 50 or less is Tenergy 05. It can be said that it is a rubber with excellent rotation performance while the sponge hardness is low.

Next, we will compare Tenergy 05 with other Tenergy. It is a quantification of the ease of use of the six technologies announced by Mr. Butterfly.
Speed drive x loop drive
Smash x counter drive
Block x tabletop

I’m a little closer to rotating technology, but you’ll find that all technologies are very easy to do. I’ve heard that the rubber conditions required by top players include the perspective that any technique can be performed without annoyance. Top players have all the options, so you don’t want to choose a tool that has any drawbacks or challenges. Also, you cannot overlook the fact that it can supplement the amount of rotation that is important in modern table tennis. In summary, it can be said that Tenergy 05 is a rubber with high rotational performance that can surely get above the average score with any technology.

Why Tenergy 05 instead of Dignics 05

As you can see from the performance table and figure, Tenergy 05 has a very balanced speed performance and spin performance. There are certainly rubbers with higher speed performance and spin performance than Tenergy 05, but it can be said that they are basically rubbers that have a harder sponge hardness than Tenergy 05 and that are easier to handle. In other words, even if it was released more than 10 years ago, Tenergy 05 is still favored by top players because of its comprehensive balance of high speed performance, high spin performance, high control performance, and ease of handling. It can be said that it is.
The Dignics series is also a very addictive rubber, and it cannot be said that the way of hitting that was in Tenergy 05 does not necessarily match the rubber of the Dignics series. On the contrary, Tenergy 05 has a part where you can feel the adaptability that you can take advantage of the characteristics of any swing. As an impression of katsuo000’s curtain test hitting, Tenergy 05 was able to feel a certain amount of rotation and speed even in the hitting method of opening the surface that matches the adhesive rubber and applying rotation while playing. I feel that this is largely due to the spring sponge. Compared to rubber from other manufacturers, which are said to have similar shot feelings, I feel that the feature of this Tenergy 05 that it can rotate and speed up with any hitting method is amazing. It is understandable that some of the top Chinese players used it.

Paste and weight of Tenergy 05

Tenergy 05
    High Tension
・Sponge thickness: middle (1.7 mm), thick (1.9 mm), extra thick (2.1 mm)
・Spin: 11.5
・Speed: 13
・Sponge stiffness: 36
・Open price (8,900 yen + tax)
・72 g (before cut) → 47 g (after cut)

I think Tenergy 05 is the heaviest of the butterfly rubbers, but it’s still a lightweight rubber that fits in the late 40g.

Three features of Tenergy 05

Drive rotation takes place without permission! Automatic performance!

It is said that there is an automatic performance that automatically rotates the drive as a point that seems to be Tenergy of Monster Rubber and Tenergy. In fact, I lent a racket with Tenergy to those who do not even have their own racket and can not hit the foreground. Those who don’t know how to drive or feel, remember that the ball grew strangely even though they were just pushing behind the ball. I felt, “Is this the automatic performance !?” I don’t really feel this benefit because the plastic ball is also hard and hard to rotate, but I think the word “automatic performance” is a word that shows that it is a rubber that is easy to rotate.

High spin performance!

As if you were driving with adhesive rubber, you can invite the opponent’s block over mistake with loop drive! The loop drive of Tenergy 05 is difficult to block, so I think it is necessary to check it firmly when exchanging the racket before the game. You can fly a pretty unpleasant ball. With high grip, it is easy to hit a low and shallow high quality loop drive, and it is difficult to take a counter for the hit loop drive. If I was using Tenergy 05, I would like to aggressively use the loop drive a lot to invite the opponent’s mistakes, or even after the loop drive, I would like to hit the speed drive etc. repeatedly to develop the subsequent rally in an advantageous way.
Of course, compared to Tenergy 05 Hard, it feels like it will fly a little, so I feel that the quality of the loop drive will deteriorate a little, but even with Tenergy 05, a sufficient amount of rotation can be obtained.

Light, easy to handle and high performance!

Of particular note is the light weight of less than 50 g with this rotational performance. I think there are many other rubbers that can produce heavy balls with the amount of rotation, but the rubber with excellent total balance such as ease of handling and lightness of less than 50 g, Tenergy 05 is still a unique rubber and the world standard. It can be said that it is a rubber of. Light rubber has the impression that the amount of rotation is insufficient and the ball tends to be light, but I think that it is rare to feel the lightness of the ball with Tenergy 05. It seems that the performance of Tenergy 05, which is light but takes rotation, can only be manufactured at a butterfly factory in Japan.

Each technics review

Fore hand

Light hit
It feels like the ball is lively from a light hit. Especially when it is freshly pasted, it gives an impression that a lively ball is easy to come out. I think it’s easy to feel that the arc of the ball is slightly out even with a light hit.

Drive on long balls and rallies
The drive is very easy to hit. The harder you hit, the easier it is for the ball to rise, so you’ll want to lay the racket down and hit a strong speed drive. You can hit the right drive just by lying down the racket surface and the rubber surface facing down. Compared to the Tenergy 05, the Tenergy 80 has a weaker grip, the ball separates faster, and the ball does not rise up, so it seems that the 80 is more likely to make a net mistake with the same swing. If you use 05, I think it is better to open the racket surface and hit the speed drive with the rubber facing down.

Drive with open face
Although I have already touched on it a little, it was very easy to hit the drive with the open side. I think this is a hidden feature of Tenergy 05. With rubber made in Germany, which is said to have a similar shot feeling to some Tenergy 05, I felt that it would fall if it was a drive with an open surface. I felt like I would just play it without gripping it. I think it’s easier to use with the backhand, but I like Tenergy 05 for the foreground!

Loop (top spin) drive against back spin
It is easy to hit a very strong loop drive. I think it is a technology that can demonstrate the high spin performance that is also a feature of 05! Since it is a rubber with a very rich grip, even if the swing speed is slow, by dropping the hitting point and swinging up while firmly biting into the sponge, I think that you can hit a low quality loop drive with a large amount of rotation. increase! Tenergy 05 is a rubber that has a high grip and feels like holding a ball, so if you get caught too much, it will be easier to aim at the counter drive using horizontal rotation, so it is also possible to firmly apply vertical rotation to a flat feeling. I think it’s a nice place for 05.

Speed drive against back spin
It was easier to hit the speed drive with the face open. It will be stable if you hit it with the image of spinning while hitting it. It may be said that the feature of Tenergy 05 is that you can apply a strong and strong rotation with this way of hitting.

Curve / shoot drive
In a curve drive, I think you hit it like getting involved, but then the ball is a little difficult to run. I had the impression that the shoot drive was easier to speed up.

Block
Personally, the block was a little difficult to do. Since the rubber is soft, it is easy to take balls such as smashes, but balls with rotation such as loop drive are easily affected by rotation and it was easy to over-miss. I think this is common with rubber with high rotational performance. Therefore, I think that it will be stable by making it a block that actively rotates by itself like an active block. I think that it is more stable to actively perform side spin block and active block that applies drive rotation

Counter drive
The rubber as a whole is soft, so I personally felt that it was difficult to counter drive in the front team. I think that you can hit a stable counter drive by stepping back a little and counter driving so as to overwrite the rotation firmly before and after the apex.

Stop
It’s quite soft, so it’s surprisingly bouncy. Also, it was easily affected by rotation, so I had the impression that I was careful.

Push
It was an impression that over mistakes would increase if you cut it because it bites unexpectedly.

Fore flick
It’s soft, so it was easy to flick on top.

Back hand

Light hit
I feel like I have a ball. However, there is also momentum, so it was easy for me to make many over mistakes with my swing.

Drive on long balls and rallies
A stable drive is easy to hit. I felt that a stable impact was necessary to hit the speed drive system.

Loop (top spin) drive against back spin
It’s very easy to hit. I think it’s easy to put in even if the swing is a little slow because there is a ball holding. I felt that it was better to be careful there because it tends to be insufficient in power.

Speed drive against back spin
Sometimes I hit it flat and hit it, and a surprising speed drive came in. Either way, I felt that a certain amount of solid impact was necessary to hit a stable drive. I don’t think I had the skill to use it in the backhand.

Curve / shoot drive
There were some people who disliked the backhand curve drive, and it became a scoring ability. Even so, I only entered several times in one game.

Block
Like the fore block, I felt it was susceptible to rotation. It was easy to suppress the power of the ball and block it by making sure to catch the top of the drive type ball. Actually, I think that the score rate will increase if you can make an active block, but I didn’t have that skill.

Counter drive
I didn’t have enough skill, and when I tried to counter drive, I made many over mistakes. I felt that a slightly harder rubber was easier to do.

Stop
It was easier to do because the back has a feeling. I couldn’t make a stop or push that I cut with a Tenagy rubber with a good sense of stability. I don’t have enough skill around here either.

Push
It was easy to squeeze at a certain level. It was difficult for me to cut firmly like Harimoto. I think it’s workmanship. Zhang Jike ZLC has a thin plate thickness of 5.5 mm, so it doesn’t bounce unexpectedly on the table. Since the shot feeling is hard, the ball can be released quickly, but it may be cut off with a minimum bite with the image that you can catch on the sheet.

Chiquita
Because you have a ball, it’s easier to over-miss than you think. I think it’s better to aim below than you think. Also, if you are in good shape and try to speed up, you will make a net mistake this time, so please be careful. Please be careful when you rotate firmly or when you play a speed type chiquita, as it will fall if you do not rotate it firmly at a considerable swing speed.

Comparison with other rubbers (personal impressions)

Spin amount
 Dignics 05 > Tenergy 05 Hard ≧ Tenergy 05 > Omega VII Tour

Speed
 Dignics 05 > Omega VII Tour > Tenergy 05

https://amzn.to/39Nh9q8

Review Tenergy 05 Hard

Explanation

Tenegy 05, the world standard for all rubbers. Tenergy 05, which reigns over the world standard, was sold in 2008 and has been around for more than 10 years. The ball has changed from celluloid to plastic ball, and top players have come to demand the power and performance of the ball and demand hard rubber within the range that can be handled. The published hardness of Tenergy 05 is 36 ° according to the Butterfly standard. Even with the high manufacturing technology and quality control of the butterfly, it seems that there are differences in weight and hardness due to individual differences in rubber. I hear that the top players are choosing the rubber of the weight and hardness that suits them from the manufactured rubber. Apparently, in recent years, there have been many requests from top players to use the hard Tenergy 05. I think that the talk has progressed from the desire of top players to use it to commercialization. Therefore, in 2018, 10 years after the sale of Tenergy 05, Tenergy 05 Hard, which literally has a harder sponge hardness than Tenergy 05, was sold. It uses a 43 ° sponge that is 7 ° harder than the 36 ° that was not found in other Tenergy series (Tenegy 25, Tenergy 64, Tenergy 80). It will be a rubber that the number of users of top players is increasing.

Published performance value

Unlike other companies, Butterfly does not announce the change in speed performance and spin performance even if the sponge hardness is changed. I imagine that the easy-to-use technology and the potential of rubber are different. For the rubber potential, look at the published performance values, not the sponge hardness. In other words, the potential speed performance and rotation performance are the same with Tenergy 05 FX, which uses Tenergy 05 hard and soft sponge. Depending on the manufacturer, it may be stated that the softer the sponge hardness, the higher the speed performance of the published value and the easier it is to control, but Mr. Butterfly has the impression that he is sticking to a different stance.

↓ The horizontal axis has sponge hardness + spin performance.

Easy-to-use technics

Butterfly’s pamphlet shows a chart of “ease of doing” in various technologies of each “Tenergy” under the title “Let’s find your” Tenergy “”. You can also check it on the “Tenergy” special page on the homepage. Looking at the pamphlet, I measured the ease of doing each technology with a measure, and tried to show the numerical values ​​in the figure below. Items
・ Ease of loop drive
・ Ease of hitting speed drive
・ Ease of counter drive
・ Easy to play on the table
・ Ease of blocking
・ Ease of smashing
It will be six. There are four personally important items: loop drive, speed drive, bench play, and block. It’s hard to hit the counter drive, and if the smash isn’t adhesive rubber, you’ll be used to it.

Looking at this chart, I think that Tenergy 05 hardware is good for drive technology. Blocking may still be difficult.

You can also see that Tenergy 64 is easy to use for smashes and blocks. I think the balanced rubber will end up being Tenergy 05 FX or Tenergy 80. I would like to actually try using Tenergy 05 hardware and review whether this chart applies, the shot feeling, whether it can be mastered, whether there is a difficult technique, etc.

Tenergy 05 Hard with rubber and weight

 Tenergy 05 Hard
    High Tension
    Spring Sponge
・Speed: 13
・Spin: 11.5
・Sponge stiffness: 43°
・Open price (8,900 yen + tax)
・76 g (before cut) → 52g (after cut)

Three features of Tenergy 05 Hard

05 Hard can be summarized in one word as “spin tension rubber close to adhesive rubber (Hurricane)”. And the rubber that supplements the speed that makes you feel dissatisfied with adhesive rubber becomes 05 hard. Then there are three features.

Adhesive rubber High quality loop drive that is as good as it is!

After all, 05 hardware is a loop drive! It will be a little longer, but let’s compare Tenergy 05 Hard with other rubbers.

vs Tenergy 05 & Dignics 05 & Dignics 09C

First, compare it with the same Butterfly rubber, Tenergy 05, Dignics 05, and Dignics 09C. Comparing Tenergy 05 Hard and Tenergy 05, I think that Tenergy 05 also has a strong enough rotation. However, compared to Tenergy 05, I think that 05 hardware can hit a loop drive with the same or more rotation amount, ball weight, and pressure. The weight and pressure of the ball and the expression become abstract. With Tenergy 05, over-misses occur depending on the amount of rotation, but with 05 Hard, in addition to over-misses due to the amount of rotation, net mistakes due to the difference in the amount of rotation of each ball, a stronger impact than Tenergy 05. I felt that the ball was clearly sharper than Tenergy 05, with a simple hitting mistake (such as hitting the racket corner or hitting my finger or arm) due to the pressure from the hitting sound that I could tell that I hit with. Next, I think that the Dignics series has a larger amount of rotation than the Dignics, but the 05 hard has a harder sponge, so I think it is easier to produce a low arc trajectory. Therefore, compared to Dignics 05 and Dignics 09C, I felt that the quality of the total loop drive of 05 hardware is higher in the total amount of rotation + low trajectory and shallowness. Also, because the sponge hardness is hard, compared to Tenergy 05, Dignics 05, and Dignics 09C, the 05 Hard has a slight change in the amount of rotation of the loop drive of each ball, and it looks like a habit ball. It should be noted that it is easy. I imagine that there are many users even among top players because of these characteristics.

vs Hurricane NEO III

Compared to Hurricane NEO III of Double Happiness Shanghai (DHS), which is a typical adhesive rubber, the sinking habit ball that seems to be a sticky rubber has a part in Hurricane NEO3. However, I felt that 05 hardware can be loop driven with a feeling that is quite close to adhesive rubber. In addition, Hurricane NEO3 will rotate and stabilize the speed drive by driving while opening the surface and hitting it. Even if I hit it in the same way as the Hurricane NEO3, I felt that it would rotate firmly on the 05 Hard (although the arc line was straight). Also, as described in the third feature, the speed drive from the middle team clearly had a part on the 05 Hard side. In conclusion, it can be said that 05 Hard is a rubber that can perform loop drive and downward rotation drive with a feeling quite similar to adhesive rubber, but can also drive from the middle team, which is disadvantageous with adhesive rubber.

vs V>15 Extra

Compared to VICTAS’V> 15 Extra, V> 15 Extra will rotate if you don’t rotate it so that it bites into the sponge even in a loop drive rather than driving with only the seat in the first place. It will be a difficult rubber. Therefore, using V> 15 Extra makes it a little harder to control the loop drive. I think that V> 15 Extra makes it easier to get speed and habit ball-likeness by rubbing while hitting even if you drop the hitting point, rather than doing a loop drive controlled shallowly and low. Therefore, it can be said that the types of drives that are easy to do are different. I think that the control of the loop drive and the amount of spin are outstandingly higher in 05 Hard.

vs Omega VII Tour & Omega VII Hyper

Compare with XIOM’s high-end rubbers, Omega VII Tour and Omega VII Hyper. The Omega 7 series is a rubber made in Germany, and it is a rubber that is easy to bite and handle for its heavy weight. Compared to 05 hardware, I think that Omega 7 Tour and Omega 7 Hyper have better overall ease of handling and speed during rallying. On the other hand, I think that the Max value of the rotation amount of the loop drive that draws out the potential of rubber is higher in 05 Hard.

vs Rasanter R53

Compare with andro’s red Rasanter R53. This R53 is a fairly high-performance rubber, and when compared only by the amount of rotation, it is the R53 that can draw out the amount of rotation equal to or more than 05 Hard. However, I felt that 05 Hard is easier to control the low and shallow trajectory required for loop drive. R53 has a slightly narrow grain shape and looks like a clogged shape, so it is a rubber that makes it easy to feel the ball coming off a little faster. It was a very high-performance rubber that was easy to make an arc even if the hitting point was dropped, and it was easy to put out a habit ball like R53, but it was a little difficult to loop drive with a slow, low and shallow trajectory.

vs Rhyzer Pro

Compare with Joola’s slightly older rubber, Rhyzer Pro. The riser pro had the feeling that it was possible to perform a loop drive with a feeling that was quite close to that of the 05 Hard. If you feel that the price of 05 Hard is high, I think there are quite a few riser pros. However, Riser Pro is shallow and easy to control when it bites only into the seat, but as soon as it bites into the sponge, it felt like it bounced more than I imagined. I felt that this area was different from 05 hardware. Also, I felt that the 05 Hard was better in terms of the amount of rotation and the ease of putting out.

Easy-to-stop tabletop Push & Stop

Push is very easy to do! There was a feeling of bitterness on the table that I could easily stop even if I slowed down the RBI or struck after the top. Thanks to this rubber, I often prevented the opponent from driving and took the initiative. If you are looking for a low and short tabletop like an adhesive rubber with a spin type tension rubber, I think it is 05 Hard.

Speed drive, which is difficult with adhesive rubber, is also Good

It was a drive from the middle team that made me feel like using 05 Hard as the main! At that time, I used Hurricane NEO3 for the fore, but I felt that it was difficult for the middle team drive to speed up due to the adhesive rubber, and it was often swung around. 05 I felt that I knew that if it was hard, I could rewind it from behind.

Each technics review

Fore hand

Light hit
I didn’t feel any discomfort when using it in the foreground.

Drive on long balls and rallies
It is easy to hit a sharp drive. Since the sponge is hard, it takes power to drive from the middle team, but 05 Hard has a feeling that it conveys that power firmly. I think there is little power loss.

面を開いたドライブ

Drive with open face
It was surprising, but even if you open the surface, it will take a firm drive. I thought it was peculiar to adhesive rubber and leopard, but even with 05 Hard, it had a pretty good rotation and it felt good. Because of this spin performance, I think that top Chinese players also use Butterfly’s rubber on the back side.

Loop (top spin) drive against back spin
I’ve already mentioned the details in the features section, but it feels pretty good. 05 Hard I think it is one of the merits. I think it is possible to aim for a score with a loop drive, and I think you can hit a high quality loop drive.

Speed drive against back spin
I felt it was not easy. After all, the sponge is hard, so it was difficult to bite into it, and it was difficult to apply drive rotation. In the chart table, speed drive was easy to get rid of, but it can be said that some technical skill or impact is required. By opening the surface and hitting the ball so as to make an arc at the time of impact, I think that speed drive will be easier.

Curve / shoot drive
Although it is a hard spring sponge compared to other high-end and hard rubber, it has a good bite, so it was easy to hit a curve / shoot drive with a curved trajectory. By using the opponent’s ball rather than going to spin from myself, when I spin while biting strongly into the sponge, the spin is stronger than I imagined and it felt good.

Block
It was better to hit the ball with an active block rather than hitting it flat. It is difficult to speed up because it depends on how you bite into it, but the stability of the arc line is truly tenacious. I think that it was evaluated that blocking is difficult in the chart table, but if you hit the ball so that you can catch it firmly on the ball, it will be stable and the sponge is hard so it is not easily affected by rotation and it was easy to do.

Counter drive
If anything, it was easier to do a counter drive that dropped the hitting point and applied my own rotation firmly. Since the bite is good, it was difficult to control the bite with a counter drive with a fast hitting point. If anything, Dignics was easier to counter.

Stop
It is as easy to do as mentioned in the features. It can be said that it is also a merit of using 05 Hard. Very low and shallow stops are possible.

Push
It’s low and shallow, and it’s easy to get rid of. I’m glad that it was easy to make a half-long push that just barely came out of the table. However, it is quite difficult to cut, and it is easier to rotate it by letting it bite into the sponge, but it was difficult to control.

Fore flick
I flick to put it on, but it was quite difficult to use 05 Hard because the ball was released quickly.

Serve
It was very easy to put out. I was impressed with the fast, back spin and top spin system serve. I think it’s easy to make a pattern by taking a long serve with a fast ball that you have to lift firmly, and counter-driving it in the back of the opponent or in the middle.

Back hand

Light hit
Because it is reasonably hard, it feels like it is easy to drop off as soon as the ball leaves. You need to get used to this feeling.

Drive on long balls and rallies
When I dropped the hitting point, it felt like it would take a lot of rotation, but I couldn’t keep up with my arm, and I mainly used a drive that was like playing. I think the good thing about Tenergy is that it still gets in.

Loop (top spin) drive against back spin
The loop drive in the backhand requires a lot of power. If you get used to it, you can hit a good drive, but if you don’t feel it in the first place, it may be tough.

Speed drive against back spin
Honestly, I didn’t feel like I could hit it properly. The backhand skill is insufficient.

Curve / shoot drive
When the hitting point was dropped, it was easier to hit a drive that bends more than I imagined.

Block
It was good that the ball stretched when I actively blocked. There was a sense of stability and it felt very good. This area is different for each person, and I think it is a part that cannot be imagined from the chart table. However, it may be a little difficult to hit flat.

stop
It is good because it is low and shallow. Sometimes push intention was a stop.

Push
As mentioned above. It was very good.

Chiquita
It was more difficult than I expected. If you let it bite into the sponge, it is easy to get a long distance, so there were quite a lot of over mistakes.

Comparison with other rubbers (personal impressions)

Spin amount
 Dignics 09C ≧ Dignics 05 > Tenergy 05 Hard ≧ Tenergy 05

Speed
 Dignics 05 > Dignics 09C ≧ Tenergy 05 Hard ≧ Tenergy 05

https://amzn.to/33erydi

Review Rakza X

Explanation

Rakza X is one of YASAKA’s high-end rubber series, Rakza series.

Speaking of contract players with YASAKA, Takuya Kami, who won the All Japan Championship second place in 2014, Mattias Falck (Sweden), who won the 2019 World Championship second place, won the World Cup four times as an advisor, and won the Athens Olympics. Ma Lin (China) is famous. There are also many contract players from Waseda University, including Fumiya Igarashi, who won the Kanto Student Championship, Asuka Sasao, who won the Junior Division of the All Japan Championship, and Yuko Kato, who won the second place in the Kanto Student Championship. Also, there are many sharp contract players with Aida Satoshi who is active in TT Saitama with a different back and forth cut man. It seems that Kami is currently using YASAKA’s adhesive rubber Shoryu. When he was a student, he used both Rakza 7 and Rakza X, the Non Slip Sheet reviewed on this page. You will be a player who has experience playing an active role.

The Rakza series is a very proven series, and in the olden days, the god player mentioned earlier used Rakza 7 when he won the All Japan Student Championship and Rakza X when he won the All Japan Championship runner-up. Also, in recent years, it seems that Ryoma Tezuka of Meitoku Gijuku High School, who is a heterogeneous player who makes heavy use of smash, used Rakuza X when he won the championship, and Ryoichi Yoshiyama of Aikodai Meiden used Rakuza 7 when he won the All Japan Junior Championship. It is not a minor rubber, but a rubber series that even top players can get enough results!

Rakza series

The Rakza series is YASAKA’s signature tension rubber series. All Rakza rubbers are Hybrid Energy type rubbers, which are “combined with the high grip and spin performance of high elasticity and high friction rubber, the high repulsion of tension rubber and the refreshing shot feeling”.
Similar to Butterfly’s Tenergy and Dignics series, the image of the hitting trajectory is posted on the YASAKA homepage and pamphlets. The rubber with the highest arc is the Rakza Z, which was sold in the spring of 2020. This is followed by Rakza X, Rakza 7 and Rakza 9. I think you can think of it as follows when it is compatible with the Dignics series.
 Rakza Z ⇄ Dignics 09C
 Rakza X ⇄ Dignics 05
 Rakza 7 ⇄ Dignics 80
 Rakza 9 ⇄ Dignics 64
The Rakza Z, which will be released in the spring of 2020, is an adhesive rubber, and it is in the same classification as the Dignics 09C. Is this a coincidence, isn’t it?

If you explain the Rakza series in detail, there are four types of Rakza rubber, each of which is different in detail. There are two types of Rakza Z, Rakza Z and Rakza Z Extra Hard. The Rakza X uses Non Slip Sheet (NSS) technology and is said to have a high grip that sets it apart from other Rakza. In terms of performance values, the amount of rotation is higher for Rakza 7 next to Rakza Z. And the fastest in the series is Rakza 9. Soft sponge is sold in two types, Rakza X and Rakza 7. The rubber series, which is very popular even though it has different parts in such small parts, is the Rakza series.
The Rakza X to be reviewed this time is a 05 series rubber among the butterfly rubbers, so I would like to check the amount of rotation and loop drive. It’s a rubber that seems to be close to my taste, so I’m really looking forward to it!

Published performance value

YASAKA’s signboard rubber, Mark V (Mark Five) series is also posted. It can be seen that Rakza X is content with spin performance and speed performance of No. 2 or less among YASAKA’s rubber. Rakza X has no sharp points in terms of performance, and it seems that it is more suitable to describe it as a well-balanced rubber. Nittaku’s Fastarc G-1 is also characterized by high grip, and the Hurricane series, which Nittaku also handles, is superior in terms of rotational performance, and speed performance. If so, Fastarc P-1 is higher. Like the Fastarc G-1, the Rakza X can be said to be a grip-oriented spin and speed balanced rubber.

Rakza X paste and weight

Rakza X
    "NSS-equipped rubber that does not lose to the rotation of the opponent"
    Hybrid Energy
・Speed: 11
・Spin: 13+
・Sponge Thickness: middle thick, thick, extra thick
・Sponge stiffness: 45-50°
・5,200 yen + tax
・71 g (before cut) → 50 g (after cut)

I pasted it using YASAKA’s Norisuke. At the time of hitting the curtain, it was a good impression rubber with a shot feeling that I seemed to like quite a lot, and it also took rotation easily! If it has a high grip, a good amount of rotation, and is as easy to use as the Rakza 7, I felt that it was quite possible and started the trial hit. As a result, it was a trial hit that did not make a big difference from the impression of hitting the curtain.

Three features of Rakza X

I decided to use the rubber on the back side of my main job! I will give you some features, but it was similar to Rakza 7 and easy to use. The shot feeling, grip power, and arch line are closer to Tenergy 05 and Dignics 05 than Rakza 7, so even if you unconsciously bang or rub it, it will fit on the table! I feel that the offensive and defensive powers are very well balanced. I am very happy to meet a satisfying rubber!

Easy to handle!

It has the same features as Ventus Extra (super Ventus) and Rakza 7, but it was easy to handle as expected! Of course, the direction of ease of handling is better than Rakza 7, and it will be a rubber that is easy to put on the opponent’s coat anyway! Comparing Rakza 7 and Rakza X, I felt that Rakza 7 is a rubber in the direction of Tenergy, and Rakza X is a rubber that feels hard and easy to feel like a German rubber! Also, as a point I like the most, compared to Rakza 7, Rakza X has a better impression that the ball sinks and the way the arc line comes out is closer to Butterfly’s Tenergy 05 and Dignics 05, so it can be used very comfortably. It was! Like Rakza 7, Rakza X was a rubber that was so easy to use that I thought I would use it in tomorrow’s game at a level where I didn’t have to search for habits. It’s a little hard, so I felt that the block was easy to fall off, but I think that if you get used to it, you can master it.
Also, like Rakza 7, it was hard to feel that the quality of the ball was so high. In order to improve the quality of the ball, I felt that it was necessary to firmly insert each ball into the entire rubber and then fly it while rotating it firmly. However, it was fun to be able to hit the chiquita, drive, and rally with a high degree of freedom that I wouldn’t expect to use for the first time!

Strong grip!

As a feature compared to Rakza 7, I felt that Rakza X had a very high grip. Of course, I felt that I had a ball with Rakza 7, but I felt that the ball was easy to fly, probably because the seat was quite soft. In the future, I’d like to somehow compare the grain-to-grain of the sheet, but apparently there was no big difference in thickness and spacing between Rakza 7 and Rakza X. The shape of the sheet is similar, but the transparency of the sheet is different, and I felt that Rakza 7 is transparent and soft, and Rakza X is a turbid and hard sheet. I felt that the hardness of the seat of Rakza X is just right, and I can grip and fly the ball to the last minute like Tenergy 05. Therefore, by using Rakza X, it is easy to hit a very high quality loop drive and Chiquita, and Chiquita also bends firmly! According to YASAKA’s announced performance value, Rakza 7 has better spin performance, but I felt that Rakza X was easier to hit with a spinning ball than Rakza 7! Rakza X responded firmly to the swing that I tried to rotate, and I felt that it was easy to hit a ball with a sharp rotation amount.

Easy to handle even in rallies!

Even in the exchange of fastballs in blocks and rallies, it was a good impression that it was easy to hit back firmly without losing the rotation of the opponent’s ball. I think this is also because the sheet is hard. Anyway, I felt that swinging is easier to stabilize, and trying to block only at an angle is more susceptible to the rotation of the opponent. I think that it will be stable if you raise it by applying some kind of rotation instead of just hitting it. I think it can be said that it is a rubber that is easy to make your own ball even with a weak force!

Each technics review

Fore hand

Light hit
It wasn’t hard to hit.

Drive on long balls and rallies
It was very good that both the method of rubbing with the sheet and the method of hitting it were stable! Personally, I felt that it was easier to hit a high-quality ball than Rakza 7.

Drive with open face
I felt the strength of the core that I could not lose even if I let Rakza X dig into it as well as Rakza 7. The strength of this core is the image of the strength that can be taken to the drive no matter how hard it is bitten. I found it easy to drive with a very open face. On the other hand, I think it is a characteristic of rubber, but I felt that the ball was not running as much as Rakza 7 in Rakza X. The speed performance is the same for both Rakza X and Rakza 7, but I felt that the ball stretched better with Rakza 7. This part is a part where tastes are quite different, and if you focus on growth, I think that Rakza 7 will grow more than Rakza X!

Loop (top spin) drive against back spin
Rakza 7 was good, but Rakza X was pretty good! I strongly felt the grip. I felt that it was hard to repel and it was easy to control the low and shallow loop drive. It was your favorite shot feeling!

Speed drive against back spin
I wrote in the item of drive with the face open, but it was very good. It was more stable than Rakza 7! However, I also felt that the ball was not growing. I think it’s a rubber that seems to have different likes and dislikes.

Curve / shoot drive
It is a rubber that can easily generate the amount of rotation if you hit it firmly and carefully, and I think that it will bend firmly on curves and shoots. Personally, I was impressed by the fact that the ball does not stretch as much as the Rakza 7, so the Rakza X bends more firmly on curves and shots. I think it’s easy to use as a weapon because it became a plastic ball and the ball became easier to bend sideways.

Block
I felt that it would drop a little compared to Rakza 7. However, I also felt that it was not easily affected by the rotation of the other party. I want a grip even in the block, but I felt the grip in the Fastarc G-1.

カウンタードライブ

Counter drive
The counter turned around and was easy to do.

stop
I felt it was hard to float and easy to do. However, I feel that the amount of spin is a little low.

Push
Like the stop, the amount of rotation was small, but it was not difficult to do.

Serve
It was a good impression to be able to rotate firmly. You can cut it! It was harder to bounce and easier to control than Rakza 7.

Back hand

Light hit
There was no strange feeling of strangeness of the other party.

Drive on long balls and rallies
It was a good impression with the drive. It was good that it was hard to overshoot even if I hit it hard. It’s also easy to rotate. It was a rubber that I felt was quite easy to use! I felt that this ease of handling would live in a rally!

Loop (top spin) drive against back spin
This was also very easy to do! Since it grips firmly, the sense of stability was level regardless of the amount of rotation!

Speed drive against back spin
This was also easy to do. It draws an arch line firmly, so it was easy to hit a drive that pierces the deep part of the opponent’s court! This will be a weapon!

Curve / shoot drive
You bent it by turning it sideways and raising it! As I wrote in the section on forehand technology, it bends well. I think this rubber is very good if you put in horizontal rotation to stabilize it!

Block
I felt it was a little easier to fall off.

Counter drive
It was a good impression that I entered quite a bit even if I touched it immediately. There was a feeling of being helped by the rubber.

Stop
Like the fore stop, the amount of rotation was small, but it was easy to do.

Push
Same as stop.

Chiquita
It was very good that it was stable by adding horizontal spin. Also, it is easy to rotate, so it was good to get a certain amount of rotation even if you hit it with just your wrist.

Comparison with other rubbers (personal impressions)

Spin amount
 Dignics 05 > Tenergy 05 > Rakza X > Rakza 7

Speed
 Dignics 05 > Rakza 7 ≧ Tenergy 80 > Rakza X ≧ Tenergy 05

https://amzn.to/3quO4HT

Review Rhyzen ZGR

Explanation

The Rhyzen series is Joola’s latest adhesive tension rubber, which will be released in the spring-summer 2021. Joola is located in the latest high-end adhesive rubber. Joola is rather a famous manufacturer of large ball table tennis in Japan, and I think many of you know that. Joola, who is not so much noticed, recognizes that the German-made rubber, Dynalyz AGR, which can be called the evolutionary post-Tenergy rubber of recent years, has been released relatively early. It may have been lost due to promotion etc., but it will be a noteworthy manufacturer. The evolutionary post-Tenergy rubber and its release date that katsuo000 thinks are shown below.

1. Rasanter: 2019 Autumn-Winter
2. Dynaryz AGR: 2020 Spring-Summer
3. Target Pro XD 52.5: 2020 Autumn-Winter
4. Evolution MX-D: 2021 Spring-Summer
5. Rhyzen ZGR: 2021 Spring-Summer
6. DNA Platinum XH: 2021 Summer-Autumn
7. DNA Dragon Grip: 2021 Summer-Autumn

There are some parts that are blurred by advertisements and promotions, and there are things that did not have an impact because Mr. Table Tennis Kingdom did not pick up, but when you check the release time, Joola feels that the release time is very early. Also, the DNA Platinum Dragon Grip has been released, but I think it is also noteworthy that it is the earliest adhesive tension rubber among the latest German rubber! What kind of rubber is Reisen ZGR?
The rubber Rhyzen ZGR that I tried this time is one of the two Ryzen series, and it is the harder one. The soft Rhyzen CMD is cheap and seems to be a rubber targeting a wide range of people. On the other hand, Rhyzen ZGR on this page has a sponge that is hard + and hard, spin performance is equivalent to Yola’s signature adhesive rubber, Golden Tango, and speed performance is Rhyzer Pro 45. It will be a very high performance rubber equivalent to. By the way, the golden tango has not been tried out yet, but it is a rubber that was taken up by Table Tennis Kingdom and WRM, and it is an image that it is a rubber that bounces while being sticky. I’m looking forward to the same rotation as the golden tango and faster speed. Also, when I read the pamphlet, I could expect that the Ryzen series would use the same new technology as the Dynaryz sponge and sheet, and would have high performance. The Dynaryz AGR is a rubber that looks like a Tenergy, and I think it is a rubber that can be classified as an evolutionary post-Tenergy, but it means that it uses the same technology as that rubber. There was almost no information about what kind of rubber it was, but I bought it with the expectation that it was not a bad rubber because of its performance value and price range.

Published performance value

Rhyzen ZGR is a professional rubber in the rubber category of Yola, and the price is 6,300 yen + tax. Will it be discounted to around 5,000 yen? It’s cheaper than Dynaryz! This is quite a point. The higher rotation performance and speed performance than the signboard rubber and golden tango are still noteworthy! At present, you can think of Joola’s rubber, which has the highest performance among adhesive rubbers, as Reisen ZGR!

It will be a hardness tester comparison. You can see that it is a harder rubber than Dynaryz AGR. Also, the difference between the seat side and the sponge side of shore a suggests that it is easier to handle than Dignics, though not as much as Tenergy. It also suggested that it is harder and more difficult to handle than the Dynaryz AGR. Compared with adhesive rubber, it seems to be a rubber that is considerably easier to handle than Dignics 09C.

Rhyzen ZGR pasting and weight

↑This white sheet is quite similar to the DNA Dragon Grip of Table Tennis Kingdom. Both are made in Germany and are probably manufactured in a nearby location (factory?).

It’s an adhesive tension rubber, so it’s a little heavy. Virtoso AC has a slightly larger blade area than the standard, so it tends to be heavy. However, when I followed the ball, it bounced quite a bit, and the adhesive strength of the sheet was only slightly adhesive, so I felt that it was not an adhesive rubber with a trowel, but rather a rubber closer to Dignics 09C.

Rhyzen ZGR
    Tacky tension
    Hard Balance Sponge
    Hyper Traction Surface (HS Traction)
    Made in Germany
・Sponge Thickness: 2.0 mm, Max
・Speed: 8.5
・Spin: 11
・Category: Professional
・Sponge stiffness: Hard+
・6,300 yen + tax
・73 g (before cut) → 53 g (after cut)

By the way, Joola’s package has been renewed and the sheet shape has been digitized. Below is the numerical value of the sheet shape of Dynaryz AGR. I compared it with Reisen ZGR.

The black one is the Rhyzen ZGR.
Rhyzen ZGR: HS Traction Balance Sponge hard+
grain thickness 1.5 mm, grain spacing 0.8 mm, grain height 0.7 mm
Dynaryz AGR: AS Traction Hyper Bounce Sponge hard
grain thickness 1.7 mm, grain spacing 0.6 mm, grain height 0.9 mm
The thicker the grains, the narrower the grain spacing, and the lower the grain height, the higher the rotation performance and the more sticky the sheet. I think that the Rhyzen ZGR has finer grains and wider grain spacing to improve speed performance, while lowering the grain height to make it more sticky.

Three features of Rhyzen ZGR

Bouncing adhesive tension!

The first thing I felt when I used it was, “Oh, this is a very bouncy adhesive rubber!” It’s not sticky at all. Looking at the seat shape, it has a tension-type shape. The hitting sound was high and it was a narrow table tennis field, so I thought that it was a tension rubber with a sense of speed comparable to Dignics 05. The rubber that I thought was close to me was Dignics 09C! Even considering the release date, I felt that Yola was conscious of the dig 09C when it was released.

However, although it bounces, I was able to do something that seems to be an adhesive rubber. This was very good. I felt that the lower rotation hit is easy to lift and hit, and the amount of rotation is also firmly applied. You said that it’s harder to get the balls together and it’s harder to block than Dignics 05. Since Virtoso AC is a thin inner carbon, I felt that it was a combination that was easy to handle and did not impair the rotational performance. Generally, adhesive rubber is good! It was a trial hit that I felt.

If you go this far, you can imagine a person who is good at guessing, but there is no such thing as a genuine habit ball like a leopard. Don’t buy it in the hope of stickiness. Instead, it is an adhesive tension rubber with higher speed performance than spin tension. I think you should recognize it as such an adhesive tension rubber and purchase it.

Can be used in the back if combined with a carbon racket!

It bounces a lot, so I felt that it could be used even in the back! In particular, it has a grip like adhesive rubber, and Chiquita and backhand drive may have been easier to do than Honestly Dignics 05. It may be because Dignics 05 is a strange rubber that is a little difficult to handle. I tried to block it, but I didn’t feel that it would fall even if I hit it flat, and that it would be too affected by the rotation of the opponent. I put it on the inner carbon racket this time, but I imagine that even the outer carbon racket can be handled if it can overcome the hardness and weight.

Counter drive is easy to do in spite of the good bite

I also changed the racket, and the ease of handling the equipment as a whole has moved in the direction of being easy to handle, and although it is a little difficult to make an objective comparison, the counter drive has entered more than I expected. It was a rubber with a good bite, so I thought it would be difficult, but it was a practice game because it settled down like an adhesive rubber, but I was happy that it became one of the scoring sources. It was an image that it was more stable to counter drive by removing the rotation axis than to overwrite the rotation of the other party directly.

Each technics review

Fore hand

Light hit
The shot feeling and momentum were comparable to those of spin-type tension rubber.

Drive on long balls and rallies
When the hitting point was dropped, it was easy to drive with a large amount of rotation due to the good biting.

Drive with open face
It seems to be an adhesive rubber, it was easier to speed drive by opening the surface for downward rotation hitting etc. The amount of rotation may not be a little.

Loop (top spin) drive against back spin
It popped out quite well, and I felt that it was easy to make a loop with a high trajectory like Dignics 05. Instead, the amount of rotation was also high.

Speed drive against back spin
I think it’s easier to open the face. I think it’s difficult to bring it if you get involved too much. However, it’s pretty good to bite in, so if you have the power, you can take it with you.

Curve / shoot drive
The speed was fast and the ball didn’t sink, so I didn’t get the impression that it would bend much.

Block
It was easy to do. Since the bite is good, there are many over mistakes, and I thought that it was not like an adhesive rubber.

Counter drive
At first, there were many over-misses, but it became stable by catching it a little.

Stop
The bite is better than I expected, so it may come to mind if you just hit it. Trying to cut will lower the trajectory, but it may be a little longer.

Push
It was good that the swing had a lower trajectory. I didn’t feel it would cut too much, probably because Dignics 05 was cut too much.

Fore flick
I could only play it, but I couldn’t play it. I think it will be more stable if it is rotated.

Back hand

Light hit
Even in the back, I didn’t feel any discomfort. It may be said that it is a slightly heavy spin type tension rubber.

Drive on long balls and rallies
It wasn’t bad, but when it went down, the speed slowed down a little because there was no power.

Loop (top spin) drive against back spin
It was easier than I expected. It may be in the back.

Speed drive against back spin
The back was easier to open, so it was easier to do because of the angle.

Block
I didn’t feel any discomfort. I think it’s because of the weight and hardness.

Push
I don’t have the impression that it will cut that much, but it was easy to do.

Chiquita
It was easy to do. Since it grips the ball, it was good that the overwrite system was especially easy to do.

Comparison with other rubbers (personal impressions)

Spin amount
 Dignics 09C ≧ Rhyzen ZGR ≧ Dignics 05 > Dynaryz AGR

Speed
 Dignics 05 > Dynaryz AGR > Rhyzen ZGR > Tenergy 05

Review Rhyzer Pro 50

Explanation

Rhyzer Pro is a rubber of Joola. Located in one of Joola’s high-end rubber. In Japan, Joola may be a more famous manufacturer of large ball table tennis. However, Joola’s equipment is often mentioned as reading the World Table Tennis Kingdom. It probably reflects the fact that there are many good products.
The catch phrase of Rhyzer Pro, the rubber that katsuo000 tried this time, is a “sharp and pointed” rubber! It uses a 50 ° hard sponge, making it a heavyweight rubber. In the Rhyzer series, Rhyzer 48, Rhyzer 43 and soft rubber, and Rhyzer Pro 45 are on sale, and this time Rhyzer Pro 50 is exactly the rubber for hard hitters.
What katsuo000 paid attention to was that the Rhyzer Pro 50 was reviewed in the table tennis kingdom as a rubber that matches the outer carbon. Does rubber with a hardness of 50 ° really match the outer carbon? As a person who mainly uses Zhang Jike ZLC, it’s quite anxious. Generally, the theory is to match hard rubber with soft rackets, wood and inner carbon. However, Joola sells a lot of outer carbon rackets. At Butterfly (Butterfly, Tamasu), Joola is still a manufacturer that sells a thick outer carbon racket type using cypress that has been discontinued. For example, Nobilis (3 + 2 outer PBO-C, plate thickness 7.1 mm) and Rossi Emotion PBO-C (5 + 2 inner PBO-C, plate thickness), which are thick with hinoki outer carbon. There are many rackets that are likely to have a long flight distance, such as 6.3 mm). I tried to see if the outer carbon racket and Rhyzer Pro 50 are really compatible.

Published performance value

The Rhyzer Pro 50 is the rubber with the highest speed and spin in the Rhyzer series. The price is 6,800 yen + tax, which is a little high.

Rhyzer Pro 50 sticking and weight

I felt the weight coming down. Personally, it’s the kind of rubber I like.

Rhyzer Pro 50
    Spin-focused tension
    Made in Germany
・Sponge thickness: 2.0 mm, Max
・Speed: 9.5
・Spin: 9
・Category: Professional
・Sponge stiffness: Hard
・6,800 yen + tax
・74 g (before cut) → 51 g (after cut)

The shot feeling is quite hard. It is a hard rubber like adhesive rubber.

Three features of Rhyzer Pro 50

Rubber like Tenergy 05 Hard!

The moment I hit the drive, I felt “Oh, Tenergy 05 Hard!” I’ve been using the 05 hardware for quite a long time, so I think I know the shot feeling quite a bit. Specifically, what kind of shot feeling is, like adhesive rubber, the shot feeling is hard and the sheet is strong, so it is a rubber that makes it easy to catch the ball with just the sheet. Even if you catch the ball with just the seat, it does not chip and it is a rubber that is easy to hook the ball firmly and rotate it. Also, if you let it bite into the sponge, the shot feeling will be different from Tenergy 05 Hard, but you can get a flight distance and speed, and it was easier to get speed than adhesive rubber. I felt that the amount of spin was close to that of Tenergy 05 Hard!

Certainly there are few over mistakes even with outer carbon rackets!

I didn’t really imagine what it means to be compatible with outer carbon rackets, but I found out by hitting it. If you use an outer carbon racket, it is easy to get a long distance, so over mistakes are likely to occur. However, with this Rhyzer Pro 50, there are few over mistakes and I felt that I could take the plunge from the receive drive!
The outer carbon racket is a racket that is easy to fly, so it is the receive that burns the most. I think it’s easy to over-miss with a receive, or if you’re afraid of an over-miss and you’re afraid to leave it, you’ll float and eat your opponent’s bang. However, with the Rhyzer Pro 50, everything fits on the table from the first receive drive, and push stopped perfectly, which was a very good feeling. Why doesn’t the flight distance come out? I felt that I would like this to be used by those who are in trouble using outer carbon. It was a great match with Zhang Jike ZLC!

Easy to do simple blocks like German rubber

Tenergy 05 and Tenergy 05 hard are easy to spin, so simple blocks are a little difficult because they are easily affected by rotation, but Rhyzer Pro 50 is less likely to be affected by the opponent’s ball even with simple blocks like German rubber. , It was very easy to hit the block. When I was using Tenergy 05 Hard, I was able to stabilize it by catching the ball a little and blocking it, but it was difficult to block. With Rhyzer Pro 50, it was very easy to block the . Also, the counter drive was not easily affected by the spin, so it was easy to do!

Each technics review

Fore hand

Light hit
I feel the hardness. It looks like an adhesive rubber, not a bouncy rubber.

Drive on long balls and rallies
The rubber is hard, but because it is a tension rubber that emphasizes spin, you can hit the drive with spin.

Drive with open face
Because it is a hard rubber, it is quite difficult to bite it. Unlike adhesive rubber and Tenergy 05, I felt it was easy to play. By that amount, it was easy to hit a speed drive close to meat.

Loop (top spin) drive against back spin
This was a very nice touch! I use loop drive as a score source, but I felt that Riser Pro 50 can hit a high quality loop drive that can be used even in games.

Speed drive against back spin
It was difficult to bite in, so it was a little difficult to stabilize. I think you can get used to it.

Curve / shoot drive
The ball is easy to enter shallowly, so if you take it sideways and rotate it sideways, it will bend quite unpleasantly. Sounds good. I feel that it is okay to review the horizontal rotation system technology as a plastic ball.

Block
Both the sheet and the sponge are hard, so it was easy to do for the bite.

Counter drive
If anything, the overwriting type counter drive was easy to do and the counter speed drive was difficult.

Stop
It was cut into pieces. Sounds good. It is easy to stop the ball and it has become a strong downward rotation even if it does not stop.

Push
You can cut it! I think it’s easy to move on to preparing for the next ball counter drive.

Fore flick
It was difficult because the rubber is hard. It may be better not to flick too much with hard rubber.

Back hand

Light hit
It’s a little hard.

Drive on long balls and rallies
Because it is elastic or elastic rubber, it is not necessary to hit it. The rest is my arm.

Loop (top spin) drive against back spin
If it’s not difficult, you can do a high quality loop drive!

Speed drive against back spin
It’s a little difficult. It’s an arm problem.

Curve / shoot drive
Since it is shallow and easy to enter, Chiquita is also easy to bend.

Block
It’s hard to bite in, but it was easy to do thanks to the sheet with a ball holder.

Counter drive
The counter drive in the back was not enough. It was difficult.

Stop
Sounds good! It was easy to do. It was as easy to do as Tenergy 05 Hard.

Push
I’m glad it took a turn.

Chiquita
I entered from the first ball without any discomfort. The impression is that it is too hard to fall off.

Comparison with other rubbers (personal impressions)

Spin amount
 Dignics 05 > Tenergy 05 Hard ≧ Rhyzer Pro 50 > Dynaryz AGR > Tenergy 80

Speed
 Dignics 05 > Dynaryz AGR > Tenergy 80 > Tenergy 05 ≧ Rhyzer Pro 50

Review Target Pro XD-52.5

Explanation

The rubber reviewed on this page is from the French table tennis maker Cornilleau, and will be the latest rubber in the Target Pro series to be sold in the fall of 2020. In Japan, juic is the distributor. Although it is not a manufacturer with a strong presence in Japan, Cornilleau’s racket rubber is not bad at all. Cornilleau is a historic manufacturer founded in 1946 and began developing competitive rubber and rackets in 2009 under former world champion Jean-Philippe Gatien (France). Currently, they have contracts with different manufacturers, but the world’s top fantasista Simon Gauzy (France) and the fastest two-handed Hugo Calderano (Brazil) have used Cornilleau equipment in the past. It seems that it was. For example, Cornilleau’s 9-plywood Gatien Conquest (Gatien Conquest, thickness 6.0 mm, 97 ± 5 g) and Target Pro series rubber to be reviewed this time are said to be mentioned. Also, I remember seeing an article in the World Table Tennis Kingdom that a business team belonging to the Japan League got a good impression of Cornilleau’s racket and rubber in the past. Even in table tennis navigation, there are some reviews that it has exceeded the monster rubber Tenergy, and I think that it is a rubber with very high expectations.

In addition, this Target Pro series is said to be manufactured by the technology of Michelin, a tire maker famous for restaurant ratings.

For the Target Pro series, we have reviewed the Target Pro GT-X51 (Target Pro GT-X51) and Target Pro GT-H47 (Target Pro GT-H47) in the past. These two pieces have a very good shot feeling, and the hardness is hard to break, making it a rubber that feels good and easy to handle. However, the amount of rotation was a little insufficient, and I felt that the target pro GT-H47 was inferior to the Tenergy 05, and the target pro GT-X51 had a high rotation amount but was difficult to handle. It was a fun rubber to touch because the color of the sponge differs depending on the hardness, and the ease of handling and the good shot feeling are outstandingly good.

Target Pro GT-X51:
Target Pro GT-H47:

After all, the post-Tenergy rubber in the early days was designed to obtain the amount of rotation by making the seat thicker than the Tenergy in order to increase the amount of rotation, or conversely to give up the amount of rotation and pursue the shot feeling. I think it has become. The evolutionary post-Tenergy rubber in recent years seems to be a high-performance rubber without impairing the amount of rotation and shot feeling by combining the technology that can make the seat thinner (probably a new sponge with good bite)! On the contrary, I think that the number of quirky balls (the amount of rotation of the balls is difficult to match) seen in German rubber is decreasing.
I think that this Target Pro XD-52.5 is also a rubber that is categorized as a post-tenergy tension rubber or an evolved Tenergy tension rubber that has appeared in recent years. It seems that the technology has advanced so that thin sheets can be adopted for Rasanter R53 and Rasanter R48, which are classified into the same post-Tenergy tension or evolutionary Tenergy tension in katsuo000. As for the new rubber in recent years, I think that rubber with thin sheets is appearing one after another!

Published performance value

It is clear that Target Pro XD-52.5 is a spin-type tension rubber with the highest spin performance and speed performance among Cornilleau rubbers. In addition, the hardness comparison by a hardness tester, which shows a certain degree of correlation with performance and ease of use, is shown below.

Again, Target Pro XD-52.5 is a little heavy, but the difference between the seat side value and the sponge side value of shore a is as large as Tenergy 05. High quality European rubber in recent years is heavy, but the difference in shore a is clearly larger than in the early post-Tenergy rubbers! Compared to Butterfly’s rubber, the lightness of Butterfly’s rubber stands out, but it can be said that the advantage of being heavy can be said to be the high quality European rubber in recent years. After all, it can be said that it is a rubber that is closer to Tenergy than Dignics.

Target Pro XD-52.5 Weight and Paste

It was the same cream-colored sponge as Target Pro GT-X51.

Target Pro XD-52.5 weighed 54 g. The total weight of the rubber is 73 g, so I thought it was heavy, but it’s still heavy, isn’t it? This time too, I put it on Virtuoso AC. The blade area is 158 x 150 mm, which is a little wider than the regular size of the butterfly (157 x 150 mm), so I think it can actually be as high as 53 g.

Target Pro XD-52.5
    Spin Tension
・Sponge thickness: thick (2.0 mm)、Extra thick (Max)
・Spin: 17.5
・Speed: 17.0
・Sponge stiffness: H (52.5)
・8,100 yen + tax
・73 g (before cut) → 54 g (after cut)

Three features of Target Pro XD-52.5

This time is also inner carbon. I felt it was easy to handle. Please note that the image may be different if it is attached to the outer carbon.

Outstanding speed performance and spin performance!

To be honest, I didn’t expect that much, but although it was heavy, it had outstanding speed and spin performance. I think that it may be attached to the inner carbon racket, but I was impressed with the speed and stability of the drive with the backhand, which is slightly inferior in technology. In terms of hitting the ball, the ball is not so long-lasting and pops out quickly, so I thought it would be like 80 as a seat shape. I think it’s a seat that can give speed more than the strength of holding a ball. At the first hit, I used it thinking “It’s easy to handle, but I’m a little dissatisfied with the amount of rotation and power?” He said, “It’s easy to handle, but it takes a lot of rotation!” And I was able to enjoy the very high performance!

DNA Platinum XH (STIGA): like Tenergy 05
Rasanter R53 (andro): like Tenergy 80
Evolution MX-D (TIBHAR): like Tenergy 64
Taerget Pro XD-52.5 (cornilleau): like Tenergy 80 New

I thought the R53 was like 80, but in terms of ease of handling, it outperformed the Target Pro XD52.5. On the contrary, I think that R53 is higher in the trolls and the pressure felt by the other party.

As an aside, it may be difficult to differentiate if it is a rubber that requires intermediate hardness, ease of handling and performance, but since it is the latest high-end rubber and it is a flagship rubber of each company, it is firmly differentiated even with a short trial hit. I felt like I was there. When looking for individuality, I felt that R53 and MX-D were DNA Plastic XH or Target Pro XD-52.5 if they wanted ease of handling and high rotational performance.

Easy to handle without feeling sponge stiffness: 52.5!

At first, I felt that it was a little heavy and difficult to operate, but I felt that it was easier to handle than I had imagined. In the past, I pasted Tenergy 80 FX on the outer carbon Lin Goyuan ALC and hit it repeatedly with the back, but although I could get speed and rotation amount, it was not very stable. On the other hand, it is easy to handle with inner carbon, but when I hit it with Target Pro XD-52.5 this time, I was surprised that it was extremely stable. The speed and rotation were very flexible and I felt comfortable. The speed performance was high, and at first I was worried that it would be over, but I felt that it was sinking by drawing an arch line more firmly than I felt. For example, if it is a Tenergy rubber, it will rotate, but it will be difficult to speed up due to its hardness, or if you play it, it will speed up but it will not rotate and it will not be stable. I felt it was symmetrical to what I felt at that time. I felt that it would be a new option as a back rubber!
In the block, I thought that it would be easily affected by the rotation of the opponent because of the good bite, but that was not the case. Probably because of the weight. It was very stable because it was heavy for biting. I felt that it would be a better option than Tenergy if I didn’t care about the weight!

Heavy and high rotation performance Tenergy 80

To summarize briefly, I felt that the Tenergy 80, which is heavy and has high rotational performance, is just the case. If you find the Dignics 80’s hardness to be difficult to use, the Target Pro XD-52.5 may be the better choice. Since it is heavy, it is suitable for the foreground, but by devising the rubber area, it is a rubber that can be used for the back as well!

Each technics review

Fore hand

Back hand

Comparison with other rubbers (personal impressions)

Comparison within evolutionary tenergy tension
Spin amount
Dignics 05 ≧ Q5 ≧ DNA Platinum XH ≧ Rasanter R53 > Rasanter R48 ≧ Evolution MX-D

Speed
Dignics 05 ≧ Evolution MX-D > Rasanter R53 ≧ Q5 ≧ Rasanter R48 > DNA Platinum XH

Review DNA Platinum XH

Explanation

We would like to review STIGA’s 2021 featured product, DNA Platinum XH. Speaking of STIGA, I think that Table Tennis player has a strong image of a long-established wood racket. The image of STIGA ≒ wood racket is quite strong for katsuo000. And the image is that you have a contract with the Chinese national team. Such STIGA released a new rubber in the summer of 2021! The name will be the DNA Platinum series! The DNA Pro series was already on sale. STIGA was particular about rubber made in Japan, but from the DNA Pro series to rubber made in Germany. Speaking of Made In Germany, the high-end rubbers of VICTAS and YASAKA are almost made in Germany. German rubber is often used by top players next to Butterfly’s Tenergy series, and STIGA’s DNA Pro series was also attracting attention because it was made in Germany! Although it is a very short period of time, I have used DNA Pro H, and I feel that the image is quite similar to Nittaku’s Fastarc G-1. You did. At that time, I hadn’t used G-1 yet, and I wanted to write a review about DNA Pro H again after various trial hits. After all, the new rubber came out first. Sweat. I would like to continue to review the latest rubber at As Soon As Possible (ASAP) so that this does not happen.
The DNA Platinum series that appeared this time was a high-end rubber, so it was a bullish price setting of 8,000 yen + tax. I felt that the technology of German-made rubber, in which post-Tenergy rubber (such as andro’s Rasanter R53) that exceeds Tenergy has appeared one after another in recent years, will be applied to this DNA platinum series as well. This is expected!

The world standard Tenergy 05 still wants the name of the world standard as of 2021, more than 10 years after its launch. Tenergy 05 has become an existence that cannot be talked about without it when thinking about table tennis. Considering the features of this Tenergy series as katsuo000 as of 2021, I think it will be as follows.

Features of the Tenergy series
・High spin performance
・High speed performance
・Light

Tenergy series can only be produced at Butterfly’s own factory, making it a rubber that differentiates it from other competing table tennis makers. While other competing table tennis makers basically outsource rubber manufacturing, Butterfly, despite being a table tennis maker, owns a sponge manufacturing factory and is trying to differentiate itself! Of course, I think that rubber manufacturers outsourced to overturn such a situation have also advanced technological development. I think that the early post-Tenergy rubber supplemented the rotation performance by thickening the seat in order to compete with the Tenergy series with high rotation performance.

Click here for the relationship between seat shape and performance: https://katsuo000.com/topsheet_shape/

I think early post-Tenergy rubbers were, for example, Fastarc G-1 and Rakza X, Evolution MX-P. For example, the Fastarc G-1 certainly has high spin performance and grip, but it is heavier than the Tenergy 05, and I think it will need a stronger impact to bite the ball. It can be said that one of the factors is that the sheet is thick.

I think this DNA Platinum series is a rubber that is categorized as a post-Tenergy tension rubber or an evolved Tenergy tension rubber in katsuo000. Instead of using a thick sheet like the post-Tenergy rubber in the early days as mentioned above, what a thin sheet is used! It seems that the technology has advanced so that thin sheets can be adopted for Rasanter R53 and Rasanter R48, which are classified into the same post-Tenergy tension or evolutionary Tenergy tension in katsuo000. The DNA Platinum series may have adopted similar technology! As a result of the advanced technology of the German factory, I imagine that high-performance rubber will continue to be sold from the German factory. I’m really looking forward to this!

The DNA Platinum Extra Hard reviewed on this page is the hardest rubber in the DNA Platinum series. Yu-san, a table tennis equipment specialist, was also pushing for extra hardware in the DNA Platinum series! Although it is a hard rubber of 52.5 ° according to German standards, I imagined that it is a rubber that is easy to handle because it is hard to break the hardness like Tenergy. The price setting of 8,000 yen also makes you feel the seriousness of STIGA! Let’s review it!

Published performance value

You can see that DNA Platinum Extra Hard is the highest performance spin tension rubber among STIGA rubbers! This is promising!

The hardness comparison by a hardness tester, which shows a certain degree of correlation with performance, is shown below.

Compared to Butterfly’s rubber, I felt that it was a rubber closer to Tenergy than Dignics. Tenergy 05 seems to be particularly close. However, it should be noted that the mass of rubber is heavier for DNA Platinum XH. In terms of weight, the butterfly rubber is light and very good.

DNA Platinum Extra Hard Weight and Paste

DNA Platinum Extra Hard was 53 g. I expected it, but it’s still heavy.

DNA Platinum XH
 High Tension
・Sponge thickness: MAX (2.3 mm)
・Spin: 140
・Speed: 168
・Sponge stiffness: 52.5
・8,000 yen + tax
・74 g (before cut) → 53 g (after cut)

Three features of DNA Platinum XH

Recently, I’ve been addicted to inner carbon, and I’m going to try out this rubber with inner carbon. It was nice that it was very easy to handle, but the comparison with the rubber so far may be a little sloppy. Thank you for your understanding.

Easy to handle and high spin performance that does not make you feel 52.5 °!

I imagined it would be more difficult to handle because it was extra hard, but I felt it was quite easy to handle because it was attached to the inner carbon. Also, since the difference between the sheet side hardness and the sponge side hardness of the hardness tester (Shore a) is close to Tenergy 05, I imagined that it would be good to bite in, but it was as easy to handle as Tenergy 05, and it took a lot of rotation. I felt the ease and high rotation performance. This sounds good!
Although it is a rotation performance, it was a good impression that the rotation was so good that the opponent could be swallowed by the downward rotation backhand drive. I’m not good at backhand, so it’s difficult to stabilize the rotation, but even with my backhand technology, I felt that DNA Platinum XH would be easy to rotate and would be a weapon against the opponent!

Because the grain of the sheet is thick, it has a stronger grip than R53!

I was surprised at the high rotation performance of the Rasanter R53, but I felt that the grain shape of the sheet of the R53 was slightly better than the Tenergy 80, not the Tenergy 05. In other words, it feels like the ball is coming off quickly after it has been bitten. On the other hand, the DNA Platinum XH is similar to the R53, but I felt that the grip was clearly better than the DNA Platinum XH! Imagine this is probably due to the thick grain design of the sheet. On the other hand, the R53 had a rougher feel to the ball in a good way, and I felt the ball was powerful, but the DNA Platinum XH made the ball a little shallower, and I felt that the ball was running, the ball was running, and the 2nd gear was a little quieter. See you. I think this is a trade-off performance, so I think it can’t be helped. Personally, I felt that the R53 was flashy, and the DNA Platinum XH was straightforward and had high rotational performance. If you can master R53, I feel that R53 is easier to play with a lot of humor, and DNA Platinum XH is less flashy, but it is easier to put out more than the user’s ability!

The best of Post Tenergy 05! Just heavy Tenergy 05!

Among the post-Tenergy rubbers in 2021, I felt that it was the closest rubber to Tenergy 05! Until then, I felt that the Rasanter R48 was in that position, but although the rotation performance was high, the shot feeling and grip feeling were not exactly the same as Tenergy 80, not Tenergy 05. The DNA Platinum XH this time is heavy, but the ease of grip obtained with thick grains is exactly close to Tenergy 05, and I felt that it is a rubber with similar performance in rotation amount. Even in comparison with the hardness tester, the value is quite close, and the rubber that can be said to be Tenergy 05 except for the weight was DNA Platinum XH! It’s a very good rubber and I think it’s a recommended rubber.

I also tried it with the inner carbon Reinforce AC this time, and it felt very good. Even considering STIGA’s products, I think that it is probably a rubber that is easy to fit in a wood racket. Mizuno’s Q5 is another rubber that I felt was not suitable for wood, but I think that the spin tension from the hard and adhesive rubber tends to be suitable for wood or inner carbon rackets. DNA Platinum XH will be a rubber that matches wood and inner carbon without leakage! Such rubber is often understood by the ease of overwriting loop drive with forehand, but DNA Platinum XH has a very low loop drive and abundant rotation amount, so it was easy to return. I really like these rubbers. I felt that it would be a very good option if I could overcome the weight!

Each technique review

Fore hand

Rally drive
You have the ball. I felt it was very easy to handle. I felt that this is the grain shape of the sheet that is close to the sheet structure of Butterfly 05.

Loop (top spin) drive against back spin
I felt high rotation performance.

Speed drive against back spin
It was easier to hit than I expected because the bite was good! I think speed drive is easier to hit than Dignics 05.

Block
I felt that it would take a little spin and power against.

Stop
It was easy to stop firmly.

Push
I felt it would run out.

Serve
The service was easy to put out and it was exhausted.

Back hand

Rally drive
It’s easy to hit because it has a ball. However, because the rubber is a little heavy, there was a lot of delay in swinging.

Loop (top spin) drive against back spin
It was extremely easy to do, and it took a lot of rotation, which made a good impression. It’s not that it’s a little lighter. I was happy to be able to indulge my opponent with a backhand drive!

Speed drive against back spin
This was also easy to do. I’m glad that there was a feeling of almighty.

Push
It was easy to spin.

Comparison with other rubbers (personal impressions)

Spin amount
 Dignics 05 > DNA Platinum XH > Tenergy 05

Speed
  Dignics 05 > DNA Platinum XH > Tenergy 05

Ease of handling
 Rasanter R48 > DNA Platinum XH> Rasanter R53

Comparison within evolutionary Tenergy tension
 Spin amount
  Dignics 05 > Q5 ≧ DNA Platinum XH ≧ Rasanter R53 > Rasanter R48 ≧ Evolution MX-D

 Speed
   Dignics 05 ≧ Evolution MX-D > Rasanter R53 ≧ Q5 ≧ Rasanter R48 > DNA Platinum XH

https://amzn.to/3rHUch7

Review Vega Tour

Explanation

Korean table tennis maker XIOM is famous for two types of rubber series, the Vega series with good cost performance and the Omega series, which is a high-end model. Actually, I feel that the racket has a strong presence. This is exactly the royal road, 5 plywood ALLROUND S (all round S, 5,000 yen + tax), 7 plywood EXTREME S (extreme S, 5,200 yen + tax), outer carbon Stradivarius (9,000 yen + tax) We sell Ice Cream AZX, Ice Cream AZXi, etc., which are not found in other manufacturers, while having good cost performance. And Brazilian hard hitter Hugo Calderano signed a contract with XIOM, and even after changing the equipment, the world tour ranking has risen to a single digit! The Hugo Hyper Axylium and Omega VII Tour used by Calderano are also soaring in popularity. Also, Korean iron wall block and Chiquita Jeoung Youngsik will be using Ice Cream AZXi and Omega VII Pro.

The Vega Tour will be reviewed on this page. It will be a rubber with a tour as the highest peak of the Vega series. Like the latest Vega X, this Vega Tour is an ERASTO FUTURA rubber that uses CYCLOID, DYNAMIC FRICTION, and CARBO SPONFE technologies. I think it is a rubber that sets it apart from the previous Omega V series and Vega series. Let’s talk about Xiom’s rubber and its technology.

・MAX AT 4
    Technology that applies maximum tension within the limits of official rules.

・ELASTO FUTURA
    Comprehensive technology installed in the Omega VII series, Vega Tour, and Vega X. Three special tunings of "CYCLOID", "DYNAMIC FRICTION", and "CARBO SPONGE" are integrated into one rubber, delicate ball touch, unparalleled grip, and epoch-making elasticity. Technology to realize.

・DYNAMIC FRICTION (DF)
    Rubber surface processing technology born from snow tires that exert sufficient friction even on snow. Technology that firmly grasps a plastic ball with a slippery surface and creates more rotational energy.

・CYCLOID
    With technology that increases the player's probability, the arc line of the ball is naturally high, reduces net mistakes in the block, and allows the ball to enter the opponent's court as deeply as possible, with a design that carefully calculates the ratio of rotation amount and flight distance. Technology that conveys high speed and powerful energy to the drive.

・CARBO SPONGE
    Technology to mix carbon particles in sponge. Technology that can interact with the top sheet with the force to firmly grasp the ball and the catapult effect.

・HYPER ELASTO
    A technology developed to replace the effect of speed glue, which was banned in 2008. Technology that realizes the shot feeling, hitting sound, flight distance, and rotational force as if used without speed glue. There are variations such as "IMB" with improved acceleration performance and "CST" that pursues the height of the arc line.

・TENSOR
    A technology developed by XIOM that gives a tension effect similar to speed glue. A technology that keeps the structure of rubber molecules taut and semi-permanently. With "TENSOR" rubber, you can easily speed up and spin a ball without using extra effort. Based on this technology, we added our own consideration and arrangement to complete the "HYPER ELASTO" technology.

・BIOS
    Like "TENSOR", it is a clean rubber manufacturing technology developed by XIOM. Technology that does not generate or mix substances that have an adverse effect on the environment or carcinogens during the manufacturing process. "BIOS" rubber thoroughly eliminates harmful substances, and anyone from manufacturing staff to players who use rubber can use it without worrying about the environment and health. A symbol of high performance and clean rubber.

The Vega X, Vega Tour, and Omega VII series are all rubbers with the same technical symbol, ELASTO FUTURA, and all rubbers are carbon sponge and dynamic friction, so the sponge is black. The seat is a dynamic friction (DF) specification seat and is made of rubber with grip.
The Vega Tour reviewed this time will be the rubber sold after the Omega VII series. Basically, I think that XIOM’s rubber has no problem with the following image.

Pro: A rubber that is the base of the series.
Euro: Soft and easy to handle.
Asia: Slightly harder than professionals, with an emphasis on rotation.
Tour: The most high-performance and difficult-to-handle rubber in the series that will satisfy top players.
Regarding the Vega Tour, what you should pay attention to is the cost performance (cospa)! The price of the Vega Tour is 4,500 yen + tax, which is about two-thirds of the price of the Omega 7 series, which is the same technology as the regular price of 7,000 yen + tax. There is also a discount at the table tennis shop, so it will be in the 3,000 yen range. Then, I would like to review it, including the differences from Vega X.

The Vega Tour is described in the pamphlet as follows:

Advent of King of Vega
    The series flagship product, Vega Tour, which broke the shell of the conventional Vega and appeared as a performance-piercing existence. The biggest feature is that it is equipped with the cycloid technology adopted in the Omega VII series, which is the highest peak of XIOM. The thin and supple top sheet sharpens the player's senses and constantly creates high-quality balls with high speed and high spin. Among them, the 45 degree medium soft sponge makes the shot feeling mild, so it does not lose the same friendliness as the conventional Vega series. The Vega Tour is the king of Vega who has dignity and strength but is kind. Its greatest advantage is that it can easily fly the ball due to its outstanding elasticity. If you use it on the fore side, for players who want to emphasize the power of one shot. If you use it on the back side, it is recommended for players who want to push their opponents in high pitch meetings. In either case, thanks to the top sheet that enables delicate touch, there is no worry about rotational techniques such as service, stop, and loop drive. The Vega Tour will be the best choice when middle class players with a certain level of control skills seek more power.

Published performance value

画像に alt 属性が指定されていません。ファイル名: OmegaVTDF.png

The Vega Tour is the highest performing rubber in the Vega series. Its high performance is higher than the published performance values of Vega X and Omega V Tour! Still, the sponge hardness is 45 degrees, which is softer than Vega X and Omega 5 Tour DF. It is a rubber crowned with a tour, and it can be said that the speed performance and spin performance are at a level comparable to Omega VII (Omega 7).

Vega Tour Paste and Weight

Vega Tour
    ELASTO FUTURA (CYCLOID, DYNAMIC FRICTION, CARBO SPONGE)
    TENSOR
    BIOS
・Sponge Thickness: 2.0 / max mm
・Speed: 12.0
・Spin: 12.0
・Sponge stiffness: 45.0°
・4,500 yen + tax
・70 g (before cut) → 48 g (after cut)

The weight was surprisingly light, 48 g! I think it’s a rubber that can be used for both the fore and back. I’m glad that this lightweight and performance comparable to the Omega 7 series.

Three features of Vega Tour

This is King of Vega! Easy to handle and high rotation performance!

The special feature of Vega Tour is that it has high performance even though it is a medium sponge of 45 °! The seat is soft and easy to handle, yet I really like the high rotation performance! I think that the rotation performance is at a level comparable to Tenergy 05 if it is in good condition. Since the rubber is soft, the arch line tends to be high, and it was a good impression that the rubber is soft but it rotates firmly. The softness is exquisite, and if it is softer, you will feel energy loss, and if it is harder, you will need swing speed. Compared to the series in which the Omega 7 series has a feature in speed, it can be said that the Vega Tour has a feature in rotational performance while adopting the same technology!
The similar rubber is Rasanter R48! The maximum rotation amount may be higher on the R48 that bites in more, but I felt that the cost performance and grip power were higher on the Vega Tour.

Rubber that is especially easy to drive!

Both the sheet and sponge were soft and easy to bite into, so it was easy to drive. Especially with a loop drive or a chiquita with a strong rotation, it was easy to hold the ball firmly and catch it thinly and it was stable and easy to do. Also, I’m glad I didn’t go too fast due to the speed of the ball coming off and the goodness of popping out. On the other hand, I personally felt that it was a little difficult to do with meat-based technology, and I felt that it was easy to drive and other rotations without permission like Tenergy 05 because it bites firmly. You may like this area, but I think it’s a rubber that suits the backhand of players who mainly think about driving and chiquita like boys, and the fore of female players who mainly think about driving.

Rubber with a softer sheet than other XIOM rubber

Vega X and Omega V Tour DF have DYNAMIC FRICTION technology applied to the seat, which makes the seat hard but grips the ball, but Vega Tour has dynamic friction. However, the sheet was soft and the sponge was a good rubber to bite into. I felt that this softness created high ease of handling and control performance. Still, I really like the fact that the rotation performance is equal to or better than the Vega X and Omega 5 Tour DF. The Vega X and Omega 5 Tour DF are rubbers that have lower arch lines and tend to have higher power and speed for smash and speed drive, but when used mainly in the back, the Vega Tour is safer for ease of handling and rotation performance. It was a rubber with a feeling!

Each technics review

Fore hand

Light hit
I felt that the softness was a little noticeable when used in the foreground.

Drive on long balls and rallies
Although it has a high sense of stability and spin performance, it cannot be denied that it lacks speed when compared to Dignics 05. The course control is good because it is soft, but I feel that it is too soft in the foreground.

Drive with open face
I felt a little lack of speed because it was soft. I feel energy loss.

Loop (top spin) drive against back spin
I felt a very strong ball holding. I think the soft arc line is also high. However, if it is the fore, I think that the harder it is, the stronger the amount of rotation can be obtained.

Speed drive against back spin
It was easy to hit because it was soft. I think the amount of rotation is small.

Block
It was a little susceptible to rotation. You need to get used to this area.

Counter drive
After all it is easy to be affected by rotation. I think that it is more stable to hit with the image that the arc line will be higher like counter drive with Tenergy 05. I think Vega X sometimes slipped, but I thought the Vega Tour was soft but less slippery.

Stop
It was easy to stop. Since the seat is strong, the rubber as a whole is soft, but it is a good rubber that is easy to stop!

Push
It was good without slipping. There is a feeling that it pops out a little, and I think the Omega 5 Tour DF is easier to cut.

Serve
It was easy to rotate. I think that it will take more rotation to insert it firmly than to cut it vertically.

Back hand

Light hit
I felt good with the ball firmly.

Drive on long balls and rallies
Even in the rally of the upper rotation, it was easy to drive like a loop drive. It was easy to hit a mountain ball slowly. I think that if you get used to it, you can speed up.

Loop (top spin) drive against back spin
It was as easy or better than the Omega 5 Tour DF.

Speed drive against back spin
It was easy to do because it was soft.

Cure / shoot drive
It is an impression that it bends like Vega X. I think that you can make mistakes by changing at hand by inserting horizontal rotation.

Block
After all it was easy to be affected by rotation. I think it’s easier to bite into smash and knuckle balls.

Counter drive
It was difficult. It’s a lack of practice.

Stop
It was easy to do despite its softness.

Push
Rather than cutting it, I liked the flowing and fast Tsuttsuki.

Chiquita
It was easy to make an arc and it was easy to do. It was good that horizontal rotation was easy to enter.

Comparison with other rubbers (personal impressions)

Spin amount
 Tenergy 05 ≧ Vega X ≧ Vega Tour ≧ Omega V Tour DF > Tenergy 80 FX

Ease of spin
 Tenergy 05 FX > Vega Tour > Vega X

Speed
 Vega X > Vega Tour > Hurricane NEO III

https://amzn.to/3an8pZO

Review Evolution MX-D

説明

We would like to review TIBHAR’s 2021 featured product, Evolution MX-D. Speaking of TIBHAR, it’s a German manufacturer contracted by Belarusian giant Vladimir Samsonov, who has finally announced his retirement! Recently, GC Foerster, who is one of a former Dutch national team players and was also a private coach of Jun Mizutani, is increasing his presence by selling TIBHAR on You Tube, and Bernadette Szocs, a beautiful Romanian player, also used TIBHAR’s blade and rubbers. Is the player famous? Slovenian Darko Jorgic, who made Tomokazu Harimoto stand out with a full set at the Tokyo Olympics, is also a TIBHAR contract player! Jorjic has often appeared in shake hands, which operates a table tennis video distribution service and application. It was impressive that he often appeared in the backhand that afflicted Harimoto under the guidance of former Aomori Yamada coach Takashi Itagaki.
It will be such a rubber of TIBHAR. If katsuo000 expresses the characteristics of TIBHAR’s rubber, it will be a rubber with good cost performance, good ball holding, and a very pleasant shot feeling and hitting sound. Although it has the demerit that the spin performance is a little low, it has a good shot feeling as a whole, it is easy to control the ball for its hardness, and there are many rubbers that make table tennis fun. The rubber used mainly by Samsonov as a high-end rubber is the Evolution series for top players. In the Evolution series, a total of 7 types of rubber were sold, with 3 types of hardness, 2 types of sheets, and 50 °, which is even harder only for MX-P. The three types of hardness are MX (maximum = approx. 47.5 °), EL (elastic = approx. 43 °), and FX (flexible = approx. 40 °). And the two types of sheets are P (power) and S (spin, slightly adhesive sheet). And the 8th type of rubber that appeared is Evolution MX-D, MX-D = Maximum Dynamic, which is reviewed on this page. This MX-D is explained on TIBHAR’s homepage as follows.

Fusion of MX-P and MX-S

The new Evolution, which is extremely popular in the world, is finally here. While maintaining the ease of use of the MX-P, which has both power and stability, the rotational power of the MX-S is fused. The super hybrid rubber, which is highly acclaimed by top professionals, will debut in the spring of 2021.

http://www.tibhar.jp/rubber.htm

In the past, katsuo000 has tried multiple Tiber’s rubbers. Of these, the Evolution MX-P is the most notable. The reason why the MX-P should be noted is that it has a similar shot feeling to that world standard, Tenergy 05! The Evolution MX-P was one of the best choices when the Tenergy series was inevitably expensive and had a short lifespan. The MX-D that appeared this time is the latest high-end rubber, so the price is 6,500 yen + tax, which is 500 yen higher than the 6,000 yen + tax of the Evolution series so far. It’s a fairly confident work, and in recent years post-Tenergy rubber (andro’s Rasanter R53 etc.) that exceeds Tenergy has been released one after another from Germany, so I also felt a lot of expectations for MX-D.

Tenergy series can only be produced at Butterfly’s own factory, making it a rubber that differentiates it from other competing table tennis makers. While other competing table tennis makers basically outsource rubber manufacturing, Butterfly, despite being a table tennis maker, owns a rubber manufacturing factory and develops its own technology to manufacture sponges. You’re trying to differentiate yourself! Of course, I think that rubber manufacturers outsourced to overturn such a situation have also advanced technological development. I think that the early post-Tenergy rubber supplemented the rotation performance by thickening the seat in order to compete with the Tenergy series with high rotation performance.

Click here for the relationship between seat shape and performance: https://katsuo000.com/topsheet_shape/

I think the early post-Tenergy rubbers are, for example, Fastarc G-1, Rakza X, Evolution MX-P. I think the MX-P was a popular rubber because it has a similar shot feel to the Tenergy 05. I think that the seat is thinner than the G-1, and the shot feeling is closer to the Tenergy 05 than the G-1. Also, the sponge is red, conscious of the orange sponge of the Tenergy series. I think the MX-P was developed in pursuit of shot feeling rather than performance.

I bought and tried the MX-D this time because I thought it was a rubber that was classified as a post-Tenergy tension rubber or an evolved Tenergy tension rubber in katsuo000. Apparently, instead of using a thick sheet like the post-Tenergy rubber of the early days, it seems that a thin sheet is used! It seems that the technology has advanced so that thin sheets can be adopted for Rasanter R53 and Rasanter R48, which are classified into the same post-Tenergy tension or evolutionary Tenergy tension in katsuo000. I felt that STIGA’s new DNA Platinum series also adopted similar technology. I imagine that MX-D is the result of similar technology without exception. As a result of the advanced technology of the German factory, I imagine that high-performance rubber will continue to be sold from the German factory. This is something I’m looking forward to as a tool reviewer!

The Evolution MX-D reviewed on this page is the hardest rubber in the Evolution series. Yu-san, a table tennis equipment specialist, also praised “D is good!”! Although it is a hard rubber with a hardness of 51.5 ° according to German standards, it can be imagined that it is a rubber that is easy to handle because it is hard to break the hardness like Tenergy. Let’s review it!

Published performance value

You can see that Evolution MX-D is a spin type tension rubber with the highest spin performance and speed performance among TIBHAR rubbers! In addition, the hardness comparison by a hardness tester, which shows a certain degree of correlation with ease of handling, is shown below.

Compared to Butterfly’s rubber, I think MX-D is a rubber that is closer to Dignics than Tenergy. This is because the difference in hardness between the shore a sheet and the sponge side is as small as that of Dignics. Rubber with a small difference in hardness tends to be more common in German tension rubber, and MX-D may be said to be a rubber finished like German tension as before while using the latest technology. What was surprising is that the hardness difference is larger than the Evolution MX-P 50 ° and Quantum X Pro! It may be a rubber that is easier to handle than I expected.

Evolution MX-D weight and paste

The Evolution MX-D weighed 53 g. I expected it, but it’s still heavy and sweaty.

Evolution MX-D
Spin Tension
・Sponge thickness: 1.9 mm, 2.1 mm
・Spin: 125
・Speed: 135
・Sponge stiffness: 51.5
・6,500 yen + tax
・76 g (before cut) → 53 g (after cut)

Three features of Evolution MX-D

This time is also inner carbon. I felt it was easy to handle. Please note that the image may be different if it is attached to the outer carbon.

The hitting sound is high and the ball is released quickly! And the feeling of running is strong!

Perhaps because it was a trial hit in a small place installed in a table tennis shop, I felt a sense of speed in the ball. It felt like I was hitting with outer carbon, which made me feel good. The hitting sound is very high, so it was fun to use! The arch line is low, and although it has a sense of speed, it has sunk firmly, so it is straight, but I think it is more stable than I expected.
I also felt the speed of leaving the ball. The bite is good, but I felt that the ball was released quite quickly, so I think this is probably due to the grain shape of the sheet. The grains are fine and the distance between the grains is wide. I think this is the part where you can understand your taste! As an image, I felt that the ball was released faster than the Rasanter R53, which I felt was like the Butterfly Tenergy 80, so it may be closer to the 64 series seat as an image. .. DNA Platinum XH (DNA Platinum Extra Hard) has a pretty grip and the seat feels like 05, and I also felt that each was separated. in short
DNA Platinum XH (STIGA): Similar to Tenergy 05
Rasanter R53 (andro): Similar to Tenergy 80
Evolution MX-D (TIBHAR): Similar t0 Tenergy 64 (little bit Tenergy 80)
about it. It is a rubber with similar hardness, but I felt that each characteristic has come out!

It was said that the rotation performance of MX-S and the ease of handling of MX-P, but I personally felt that it is a rubber that is differentiated by the position of 64-like rubber among the latest high-end rubber made in Germany. rice field. I felt that the spin performance was a little mature, but I felt that the speed performance was higher than R53. I think you can choose to supplement the speed of trendy inner carbon and wood rubber.

Good bite that does not make you feel 51.5 °!

While feeling the speed of leaving the ball, the bite was not a rubber that could not be handled better than I imagined. At 51.5 °, it seems to be as hard as an adhesive rubber, but I think it is not such a rubber, but a rubber that is easy to handle with a good sponge bite. Since the ball is released quickly, I felt that some people would use it on the back side as well.

As it is touted as a fusion of MX-P and MX-S, if you compare it with butterfly rubber, I think that it is a rubber like a fusion of Tenergy and Dignics! The sponge is a little difficult to handle because it has increased the strength of the seat while increasing the tenacity, but I think that it is a rubber that is easy to counter drive and if you use it well, you can get more rotation than before. I also see reviews that say that it became easier to handle by using it. Perhaps the sheet is thicker or stiffer and is also aimed at differentiating it from Tenergy 05 or MX-P. It’s an impression that whether or not you can handle it depends on how difficult it is to get into this hard sheet. Since the grain shape is thin and the grain spacing is a little wide, it is designed with the Butterfly grain shape of 80 or 64, which seems to supplement the speed performance. As a whole, it can be said that it is a rubber that has been firmly differentiated among the evolutionary Tenergy rubbers made in Germany these days. As mentioned above, although it is a rubber with 64 points, the rotation performance is the same as Tenergy 05, it is easy to counter drive because the seat is strong, and it is a rubber that can compete with the rotation performance of the adhesive rubber with counter + speed, I think. Just as France’s Simon Gauzy is rampaging on the Rasanter R53, for example, Paul Drinkhall, who is a Japanese killer player (Yuya Oshima and recently Mizuki Oikawa also lost), is also TIBHAR contract. I imagined that it would be possible for Slovenia’s Jorzic (winning Tomokazu Harimoto) and Slovenia’s player (winning the player) to rampage using the MX-D.

High spin performance

It was sometimes said that the MX-P had a slightly lighter ball, but the MX-D did not, but rather drew the arc when I wanted to. I also felt that push was easy to do, and that the ease and quality of push, which are the characteristics of MX-S, were inherited. At least, I felt the outstanding rotation performance of TIBHAR’s spin tension rubber, which was easy to feel dissatisfied with the spin performance until now! Anyway, the shot feeling is good, so it was good that the rotation performance was improved firmly while it was fun (the rubber corrects it even if you do not pay attention to the fine angle and swing). I felt that this area was like Tiber’s rubber.

Each technology review

Forehand

Drive on the rally
The speed is quite high and the sound is good! It feels good.

Loop (top spin) drive against back spin
I didn’t feel much spin.

Speed drive against back spin
Speed ​​drive feels good because it has a good bite!

Block
It was easier than I expected. It bites in, but it’s an image of canceling due to its weight and hardness.

Push
I felt that I could fly the ball while gripping it. At least I don’t think it felt like it was flying like Rasanter V47.

Serve
I felt that the amount of rotation was a little small and it was too soft.

Backhand

Drives on the rally
Since the ball is released a little early, I felt that a little skill was required. However, I was surprised that it was easy to handle for 51.5 °. If the ball is fast and you can hit it comfortably, there is MX-D!

Loop (top spin) drive against back spin
Although it entered, I felt that the amount of rotation was a little insufficient.

Speed drive against back spin
This was easy to do.

Push
It didn’t fly at all than I expected and it felt good. I’m glad I was able to make push quite aggressively.

Comparison with other rubbers (personal impressions)

Spin amount
 Dignics 80 > Evolution MX-D > Tenergy 05

Speed
  Dignics 64 > Evolution MX-D ≧ Dignics 05

Ease of handling
 Rasanter R48 > Evolution MX-D> Rasanter R53

Comparison within evolutionary Tenergy tension
 Spin amount
  Dignics 05 > Q5 ≧ DNA Platinum XH ≧ Rasanter R53 ≧ Evolution MX-D ≧ Tenergy 05

 Speed
   Dignics 05 ≧ Evolution MX-D > Rasanter R53 ≧ Q5 > DNA Platinum XH > Tenergy 05