レビュー

レビュー Rakza Z Extra Hard(ラクザZエキストラハード)

説明

 Rakza Z Extra Hard(ラクザZエキストラハード)をレビューします。このラバーはYASAKA(ヤサカ)の久々のハイエンドラバーであり、粘着テンションラバーになりますね!2020年Butterfly(バタフライ)が最新粘着テンションラバー、Dignics 09C(ディグニクス09C)を発売したタイミングで、ヤサカも追いかけるように発売したのがこのラクザZになります。ラクザZには硬度が2種類あり、約50°くらいのラクザZと、ヤサカのラバーの中でも一、二に硬い55°くらいのラクザZエキストラハードになります。本ページではラクザZエキストラハードをレビューします。このラバーのユーザーは早稲田大学卒業後、TT彩たまに入団した五十嵐 史弥選手、最近ではヤサカの看板選手でTT彩たまの神巧也選手になります。またYou Tuber、ごぶりんずのヤンマさんも使用中のようですね。

 ヤサカの契約選手といえば、2014年に全日本選手権準優勝した神巧也選手、2019年世界選手権準優勝のMattias Falck(マティアス ファルク、Sweden)選手、アドバイザーでワールドカップ優勝4回、アテネオリンピック優勝の馬琳(マリン、中国)選手が有名ですね。また関東学生選手権優勝の五十嵐史弥選手全日本選手権大会ジュニアの部優勝の笹尾明日香選手関東学生選手権準優勝の加藤結有子選手早稲田大学の契約選手も多いです。また異質の裏裏カットマンでTT彩たまで活躍中の英田理志選手と多数の尖がった契約選手が多いです。神選手は学生時代含めるとRakza 7 (ラクザ7)、Rakza X (ラクザX)、Rising Dragon (翔龍)、ラクザZエキストラハードとまさにヤサカのハイエンドラバーを順番に使い続ける選手ですね。トップ選手だけでなく、アマチュア選手でも多数の選手がラクザ7、ラクザX、翔龍は使用されており、非常に有名なラバーだと思います。ラクザZもあっという間に広がりそうです。

 Rakza(ラクザ)シリーズは非常に実績のあるシリーズで、古くは先ほど挙げました神選手が、全日本学生選手権優勝時にラクザ7を、全日本選手権準優勝時にラクザXを、使用されていますね。また、近年ではスマッシュを多用する異質なプレイヤーで明治大学の手塚崚馬選手が全中優勝時にラクザXを、愛工大名電の吉山僚一選手が2022年全日本ジュニア優勝時にラクザXとラクザ7を使用しています。決してマイナーなラバーではなく、トップ選手でも十分に結果が残せるラバーシリーズです!

Rakza(ラクザ)シリーズ

 Rakza(ラクザ)シリーズはYASAKAの看板テンション系ラバーシリーズになります。全てのラクザラバーがHybrid Energy(ハイブリッドエナジー)型ラバーであり、「高弾性高摩擦ラバーの高いグリップ力とスピン性能、テンション系ラバーの高い反発力と爽快な打球感を兼ね備えた」ラバーになりますね。
 Butterfly(バタフライ)のTenergy(テナジー)やDignics(ティグニクス)シリーズと同じように、打球軌道イメージがYASAKAのホームページやパンフレットに掲載されています。最も弧線の高いラバーが、2020年春に販売されたRakza Z(ラクザZ)になりますね。続いてRakza X(ラクザX)、Rakza 7(ラクザ7)、Rakza 9(ラクザ9)となります。ディグニクスシリーズに対応させると次のように考えて良いのだと思います。
 Rakza Z(ラクザZ) ⇄ Dignics 09C(ディグニクス09C)
 Rakza X(ラクザX) ⇄ Dignics 05(ディグニクス05)
 Rakza 7(ラクザ7) ⇄ Dignics 80(ディグニクス80)
 Rakza 9(ラクザ9) ⇄ Dignics 64(ディグニクス64)
2020年春新発売のラクザZは粘着ラバーであり、ちょうど同じタイミング発売のディグニクス09Cと類似の分類になりますね。これは偶然なのでしょうか、凄いですね。

 細かくラクザシリーズを説明していくと、4種類のラクザラバーが存在し、それぞれ細かく異なります。ラクザZには、ラクザZとRakza Z Extra Hard(ラクザZエキストラハード)の2種類が存在します。ラクザXは、Non Slip Sheet(ノンスリップシート、NSS)技術が採用されていて、他のラクザと一線を画す、高いグリップ力を持つそうです。性能値で見た場合には回転量はラクザZの次にラクザ7の方が高い値になっていますね。そしてシリーズ最速となるのがラクザ9になります。またスポンジが柔らかいソフトはラクザXとラクザ7の2種で販売されています。このように細かい部分で異なる部分を有しながらも非常に人気の高いラバーシリーズがラクザシリーズということになりますね。
 今回レビューするラクザZ EHは、バタフライのラバーの中ではディグニクス09C系のラバーということで、ラクザZ EHの粘着テンションラバーとしての性能を確認していきたいと思います。

ラクザZエキストラハードの性能

 偶然でしょうが、性能値を数値化して比較するとラクザZ EHはラクザ7ソフトと同等の位置になりました。硬度も反映するともちろん、ラクザZ EHが最もスピン値が出るラバーといえるでしょう。一方で翔龍よりもスピードはでますが、ラクザZ EHはラクザ7やラクザXの方がスピードが出ることがわかります。このあたりはやはり粘着ラバーの特徴といえるでしょう。

 続いて硬度計比較です。

 ラクザZエキストラハードは重さはかなり重い一方で硬さはテナジー05なみの硬さという結果になりました(shore c sheetの結果より。)。ただしYASAKAのラバーは硬度の割にくい込みが良い、ということもないので、感覚的にはディグニクス09Cと同程度には硬いと感じるのがラクザZエキストラハードになります。
 また特徴的なのが、shore aのシート側とスポンジ側の差で、要はシート側の方が柔らかく、スポンジ側の方が硬いのがラクザZということがわかります。ディグニクス09Cやスピン系テンションラバーと言われるラバーは、シート側が硬く、スポンジ側が柔らかいというのがセオリーのようですが、ラクザZや中国製のキョウヒョウはスポンジが硬くシートが柔らかいというのが粘着ラバーの特徴といえるのかもしれません。シートが柔らかいことでループドライブの質を高くしやすい印象がありますので、ラクザZエキストラハードには、ループドライブの良さを期待できそうですね!

ラクザZエキストラハードの貼りと重量

 ちょっとわかりにくいのですが、ラクザZエキストラハードのスポンジは気泡がかなり入ったスポンジです。この気泡の多さはまるでスピン系テンションラバーのようですね。(黒いスポンジはOmega VII China Ying(オメガVIIチャイナ影)になります。)ディグニクス09Cも気泡は確認できますが、かなり気泡が細かいです。またキョウヒョウはほとんど気泡が確認されないようなスポンジですね。このあたりがラバーの違いとして現れそうだと感じました。

 貼ったラケットはキョウヒョウ301になります。インナーラケットですね。やはりドイツ製粘着テンションンは全体的に弾むので味を出すならインナーカーボンが最適だと思います。またはラクザZエキストラハードであれば、ヤサカの契約選手のように木材合板でしょうか。7枚合板のMa Lin Extra Special(馬林エキストラスペシャル)などはかなりオススメになりますね。
 また粘着感は、ディグニクス09Cやドイツ製粘着テンションラバーと比べると、強いです。翔龍と比べると同等か、少しラクザZエキストラハードの方が弱いかな、って感じました。ディグニクス09Cや最近のドイツ製粘着テンションのシートが全然粘着らしさがない中で、ラクザZエキストラハードは強い粘着を感じるのは粘着ユーザーとしては嬉しかったです。

Rakza Z Extra Hard(ラクザZエキストラハード)
 「ハードスポンジ搭載でよりパワフルな攻撃が可能に」
 ラクザZの回転力に優れる粘着性トップシートにさらにハードなスポンジを組み合わせる事で、より高い威力を生み出すことを可能にしました。強いインパクトで打球した時でもエネルギーをロスする事なく正確にボールへ伝えます。トップ選手も満足するパワープレーが可能なハードヒッター向けのラバーです。
 Hybrid Energy(ハイブリッドエナジー)
・Speed:11-
・Spin:14+
・Sponge Thickness: 特厚
・Sponge硬度:52〜57°
・5,500 円 + 税
・77 g(切断前) → 55 g(キョウヒョウ301に貼って)

ラクザZエキストラハードの3つの特徴

粘着の良いところとテンションの良いところどり!そしてラクザZエキストラハードは扱いやすい!

 ラクザZエキストラハードは、重量は重いものの、粘着ラバーの良いところとスピン系テンションラバーの良いところを足したようなラバーで、扱いやすいと感じました!粘着ラバーらしく、前陣はしっかり回転をかけたり上書きがしやすいと感じました。上書きツッツキやストップは簡単に質高くできると感じましたしループドライブは回転量というよりは低くしやすくて、こちらも質が高いと感じました。一方で中陣からのドライブの疾走感がかなり強く、粘着ラバーにあるような減速は感じませんでした。まさに粘着とスピン系テンションラバーの良いところを1つにまとめたような粘着テンションラバーでした。
 また特徴として、スポンジに気泡が多く、55°前後の硬度ということで、昨今の60°級の粘着テンションラバー(Blue Grip C1(ブルーグリップC1)やオメガVIIチャイナ影など)と比較すると扱いやすさがバツグンに際立っていました。このラバーの指針はキョウヒョウなどの中国製粘着ラバーに対抗する、というよりもあくまで粘着ラバーとテンションラバーの良いところどりをしようとしたラバーだと感じました。その中でスポンジ硬度を硬くし、粘着ラバーの良さがより前へ出やすくしたラバーだと思います。非常に良い意味で差別化されたラバーだと思います。

スポンジが硬く、カウンタードライブがしやすい!

 シートの方が柔らかいラバーではありますが、そもそもスポンジ硬度が硬いのでそもそも相手の回転量の影響は受けにくいと感じました。またくい込みが良いのに飛距離はそこまで出やすいわけでもないので非常にカウンタードライブがしやすいと感じました。このラバーの良い点だと思います。自分の技量にもよるのかもしれませんが、同じくらいの硬度で同じようにカウンタードライブのおさまりが良いと感じたのはRhyzen ZGR(ライゼンZGR)ですね。ライゼンZGRの方が粘着の嫌らしさが小さくスピン系テンションに近いイメージで打てると感じるところはありましたがどちらもカウンタードライブはかなりやりやすいラバーでした。個人的にフォアに使うならラクザZエキストラハード、バックに使うならライゼンZGRの方があうと感じました。翔龍でも同じようになれればカウンタードライブのおさまりは良いと思いますが、自分が購入した翔龍はかなり軽い個体で使いやすいですが、ラバーそのものが硬いプラボールに対し負けやすそうな印象を受けました。ラクザZエキストラハードの方が今のプラボールにあっていると思います。

しっかりくい込ませると粘着ラバーらしい重いドライブが打てる!

 ライゼンZGRとの比較になってしまいますが、ラクザZエキストラハードは思い切りくい込ませてドライブを打った時に非常に粘着らしいボールが出ていると実感ができるラバーでした。この部分は非常に良いと感じました。一方でライゼンZGRは粘着ラバーらしいボールは出せているようでしたが、打球感はスピン系テンションラバーに近い打球感でしたので、打球感とボールのイメージのギャップが強いと感じました。このあたりは好みが分かれそうな気がします。どちらにしてもかなり強くくい込ませて初めて粘着ラバーらしい重いドライブが打てる感じがありましたので、ラクザZエキストラハードはフォアで使用することがオススメになります。

各技術レビュー

フォアハンド系

軽打
 違和感なしです。

ロングボールやラリーでのドライブ
 弾みますね。スピン系テンションラバーから移行しても違和感ないと思います。ただし重いラバーでもあるので、そのあたりは注意をした方がいいかもしれません。キョウヒョウ301も重いラケットなのですが、そのわりには扱いやすいと感じたので、ラクザZエキストラハードの扱いやすさを感じました。

面を開いたドライブ
 ラクザZエキストラハードやその他の粘着テンションラバーでもそうですが、面を開いてぶつけてから回転をかけた方がいいボールが行きますね。面をそこまで開かなくても、ラクザZはスピン系テンションラバーのように使ってもいいボールが行くところも特徴として良いところだと思います。

対下回転に対するループドライブ
 これよかったです。くい込みが良いのでかなり打球点をおとしたり引き付けてもコントロールしやすいと感じました。回転量はその分低いかもしれません。

対下回転に対するスピードドライブ
 やりやすかったです。多分他の粘着テンションラバーよりも明らかにスピードが出しやすいし疾走感があると感じました。

カーブ/シュートドライブ
 スピードがある分、少し曲がり方が弱いと感じました。

ブロック
 やりやすかったです。ラバー全体でくい込みが良いのでボールを持てると感じました。

カウンタードライブ
 カウンターもしやすいラバーでした。何よりおさまりがいいのが気に入りました。

ストップ
 しっかり止まると感じました。

ツッツキ
 止めるつもりがなければ、しっかり切ることが出来て良かったです。

フォアサーブ
 しっかり回転をかけることができて好印象でした。切れますね!少し弾みやすいのでそこだけ気になりましたが、慣れればしっかり切れたサーブが出せると感じました。

バックハンド系

軽打
 やや硬いです。

ロングボールやラリーでのドライブ
 ダメではないのですが、やや難しいです。自分の技量ではラバーのポテンシャルを出し切ることが難しいと感じました。もちろん球持ちのあるラバーですので扱えないこともないのでしょうが、自分には技量不足を強く感じました。

ストップ
 止めやすかったです。

ツッツキ
 切りやすかったです。シートが粘着性のため、ライゼンZGRよりも切りやすいと感じました。

他ラバーとの比較(あくまでも個人の感想)

回転量
 Dignics 05 ≧ Rakza Z Extra Hrd > Tenergy 05

スピード
 Dignics 05 > Rakza Z Extra Hard > DNA Dragon Grip

https://amzn.to/3JABmQX
https://amzn.to/3gBfDvx

レビュー Evolution EL-S(エヴォリューションEL-S)

説明

 TIBHAR(ティバー)さんの注目ラバー、Evolution EL-S(エヴォリューションEL-S)をレビューさせていただきます。TIBHAR(ティバー)といえば、引退しても僕らの伝説ベラルーシの巨人Vladimir Samsonov(ブラディミル サムソノフ)選手が契約するドイツメーカーになります。あと最近では、元オランダ代表、水谷隼選手のプライベートコーチも経て、You Tubeでティバーを売り込みまくるG.C. Foerster(フォースター)さんや、ルーマニアの美人選手Bernadette Szocs(スッチ)選手もティバー契約の選手ですね。東京オリンピックで張本智和選手をフルセットで粘り勝って存在感を際立たせたスロベニアのDarko Jorgic(ヨルジッチ)選手もティバーの契約選手です!

 そんなティバーさんのラバーの一つ、エヴォリューションEL-Sをレビューします。ハイエンドラバーとして契約選手が多く使用するラバーがEvolution(エヴォリューション)シリーズになります。現在Evolution(エヴォリューション)シリーズは最新最高性能のMX-D、硬度3種×シート2種=6種類とMX-Pの50°を足して全部で8種類のラバーが販売されています。2021年に発売された最新MX-Dは明らかに他のEvolutionシリーズのラバーと一線を画すようなラバーになっています。そちらについてはレビューを挙げていますので、是非そちらをご覧ください。
  Evolution MX-D(エヴォリューションマキシマムダイナミック)のレビュー
   : https://katsuo000.com/review_evolution_mx_d/
 Evolutionシリーズに戻り、硬度の種類3種とは、MX(マキシマム=約47.5°)、EL(エラスティック=約43°)、FX(フレキシブル=約40°)になります。そしてシートの種類2種とは、P(パワー)とS(スピン、微々粘着シート)になります。このページでレビューするのは、硬度が約43°でEL(エラスティック)、つまり中間硬度のスポンジに微々粘着シートを組み合わせたEL-S(エラスティックスピン)のレビューになります。EL-Sはヒットラバーで、TIBHARさんも11年ぶりに雑誌卓球王国にカラー広告を出したそうですね。プラボールが硬くなって、中間硬度のラバーは主にバック側に貼ることが多くなった現在、バック側ラバーに非常に最適なラバーがEL-Sになると思います。TIBHARさんのホームページに掲載されているEL-Sの情報を確認してみましょう。

Evolution EL-S
●最新世代のノンスリップシート
●再度搭載!弾性アップに繋がる気泡の粗いミディアムスポンジ
 長い球持ち、回転量、耐久性に富んだMX-S系のシートに、MX-Sでは搭載されなかった、シリーズ最大の特徴である気泡の粗いスポンジを中間硬度で採用しています。その結果、「ボールが重くなる」というノンスリップラバーの本領をいかんなく発揮してくれます。前中陣において幅広くプレーの質を上げられるラバーが出来ました。EL-Sで”エボリューション”を体感してください。

http://www.tibhar.jp/rubber.htm

 エヴォリューションのMX-PとMX-Sは、硬度が45.7~47.7°と同硬度なのですが、実際に使ってみるとMX-Sの方がシートが硬いためにより硬く感じると思います。これと同様に、EL-PとEL-Sを比較すると硬度がEL-P:42.4~44.4°に対し、EL-S:43.8~45.8°と公表の硬度も硬くなっています。このあたりもドイツ製スピンテンションラバーらしさを感じられると思います。

性能値

 公表性能値を比較してみましょう。

 *Evolution MX-P(エヴォリューションMX-P)とEvolution MX-S(エヴォリューションMX-S)のスピード、スピン性能が同値であるため、同じ場所にプロットされています。EL-Sはなんと、MX-SやMX-Pよりもスピン性能が高いラバーでスピンテンション系ラバーの中ではMX-Dの次にスピン性能が高いラバーになります。これはかなり期待ができるラバーといえるでしょう!続いて硬度計での硬度比較です。

 中間硬度ということでテナジー05はもちろん、MX-P、MX-Sよりもあきらかに柔らかいですね。シートは硬い感じです。今後も触れると思うのですが、このEL-Sは、Joola(ヨーラ)さんのRhyzer Pro 45(ライザープロ45)、Rasanter R45(ラザンターR45)などのラバーにかなり近いと感じました。これらのラバーの共通点はミドル硬度のスポンジで、シートが硬いラバーになりますね。

EL-Sの貼りと重量

 いつものようにZhang Jike ZLC(張継科ZLC)に貼りました。

Evolution EL-S(エヴォリューションEL-S)
 回転系テンション OFF+
・Sponge Thickness:1.7/1.9/2.1 mm
・Speed:123
・Spin:122
・Control:85
・Sponge硬度:43.8-45.8°
・6,000円 + 税
・73 g(切断前) → 49 g(張継科ZLCに貼って)

 中間硬度のラバーのわりには重たいという印象です。

Evolution EL-Sの3つの特徴

シートもスポンジもボールをめちゃめちゃ持つ!

 シートが微々粘着系シートということで、触って粘着を感じるわけではありませんが引き攣れが非常に良いと感じました。またスポンジへのくい込みがとても良いのでラバー全体でもっちりボールを持ってくれると感じるラバーでした。ハードなラバーだとこの球持ちの時間が非常に短いのでドライブを打った時の球離れも早く感じますが、中間硬度のラバーは全体的に球持ちが非常に長いのでその球持ちの時間で相手のタイミングを狂わせることが出来る位ボールの球持ちを感じさせてくれるのがEL-Sでした。また先述の同じような中間硬度かつシートが硬いラバーであるR45やライザープロ45と比較するとEL-Sは、球持ちと弧線の高さに特徴を感じました。R45やライザープロ45は全体的に柔らかさの中にミートのしやすさ弾きの良さがあるのですが、EL-Sが最も球持ちと回転性能を意識したラバーだと感じました。またこれだけの球持ちがあるラバーですので、回転量も抜群に高いと感じました。

バックでもフォアでもオススメできるラバー

 中間硬度のラバーはやはりバック向きというのが一般的だと思います。このEL-Sも例にもれずバックで使うのに非常にオススメしやすいラバーでした。チキータやバックハンドドライブは弱くてゆっくりスイングでも持ち上がり相手コートに入れやすいと感じました。また他の中間硬度で柔らかいラバーの中でもシートのグリップ力が強いのでツッツキが浮きにくいと感じました。この当たりも好感触でした。
 個人的に感じたのが、フォアでも使えるという感覚でした。他のR45やライザープロ45と比べるとEL-Sがやや硬く球持ちが良いこともあってフォアでも十分にオススメできるラバーだと感じました。フォアにオススメできる点というのは、EL-Sは球持ちの良さから得られるサーブの回転量、ドライブのしやすさ、特に打球点を落とした時の弧線の出しやすさがあるからですね。フォアで使っていても非常にイメージ通りにドライブができて良かったです。コースを狙いやすく丁寧でラリー志向な卓球を目指すのにも良いと感じました。

TIBHARのラバーらしく、ミートもイケるし弾みもある!

 回転をかけやすいのに、いざミートや弾き強めに打ってみると、思ったより飛距離が出ると感じました。このあたりはTIBHARらしいと感じましたね。扱いやすいのにミートや弾きはかなり強烈です。ただバタフライのラバーや粘着ラバーではないので、ミート系や弾き気味に打つと回転量が落ちるというのは感じました。おさまらずに飛んで行ってしまう感じがありますね。ただ慣れるとTIBHARの選手のようにノータッチエースを取りまっくたり、カウンターも決めやすいのだと思います。

各技術レビュー

フォアハンド系

軽打
 特に違和感なかったです。

ロングボールやラリーでのドライブ
 少し柔らかすぎてエネルギーロスを感じました。普段は50°かそれ以上のラバーを使っているので、当然なのかもしれません。ボールが浅く入りやすいですね。中間硬度のラバーを使うときはさらにじっくりボールを引き付けた方がエネルギーロスが減るような気がします。また思い切りドライブをたたき込もうとすると、どうしても回転量の低さを感じました。ただスピードは抜群に出るので引き合いや中陣からのしのぎあいは楽しくなるラバーだと思います。またかなりギリギリまで引き付けることができるし、弧線も作りやすいラバーですので、逆をついたりネット際に落としたり、とドライブで技巧的に攻めることがしやすいラバーかもしれません。

面を開いたドライブ
 くい込み過ぎ、というのが第一印象ですが、シートのグリップ力のおかげか、面を開いてもドライブはしやすかったです。非常に回転量が多くてしっかりボールが沈ませることが出来ると感じました。

対下回転に対するループドライブ
 安心感のある打球感とネット際に落とすループドライブがやりやすいと感じました。インパクトを強くしてもボールが飛び出ないので、かなり質の高いループドライブがやりやすいと感じました。これだけでもマズマズ武器にできると思います。この点がかなり好感触でした。

対下回転に対するスピードドライブ
 個人的にはやりにくいと感じました。自分の打ち方だとスピードを出し過ぎてボールが沈まないんですよね。もう少し面を開いてぶつけながらもしっかり回転をかけるような打ち方をしないと相手のコートに安定して入れられないと感じました。ただこの打ち方だとエネルギーロスも感じると思うので、ぶつけ打ちならEvolutionのMX系の高硬度のスポンジのラバー(MX-P、MX-S、MX-D)の方がいいボールが打てると思います。あとは、ミドル硬度ということでこすり打ちでスピードドライブする方法もあると思います。ただし最大スピードは落ちるかもしれません。

カーブ/シュートドライブ
 ボールを浅くコントロールしやすいので曲げやすいと思います。

ブロック
 これは比較的やりやすかったです。ただし相手の回転の影響も受けやすいとも感じました。このあたりは好みがでそうです。

カウンタードライブ
 少しくい込みが良いので回転をかけかえそうとすると抑え込みにくいかもしれません。ミート系の方がいいかもしれません。

ストップ
 
シートのおかげか止めやすかったです。飛び出しが少ないのは好感触でした。切れなくはないと思います。

ツッツキ
 こちらも浮きにくいですが少し、ボールは軽そうでした。

フォアサーブ
 しっかり切ることができて良かったです。

バックハンド系

軽打
 柔らかいので、ついつい厚く当てて弾いてしまいやすいと思いました。中間硬度のラバーってこういうところが難しいですよね。

ロングボールやラリーでのドライブ
 ディグニクス05やテナジー05と比較すると弧線が出にくいので、下がると難しいと感じました。でも硬いラバーと比べるとスイングスピードは遅くて、弱い力でも簡単にドライブはかかるので安定感と安心感は非常に感じますね。

対下回転に対するループドライブ
 安定感ありました。よかったです。ただし、回転量の最大値は低いかもしれません。これは自分のバックハンドドライブの技量不足かもしれません。個人的には相手のボールをギリギリまで引き付けられるのはバックハンドでは嬉しい点だなと感じました。

対下回転に対するスピードドライブ
 フォア以上に難しいと感じました。ここはさらに腕不足を感じました。

ブロック
 非常にやりやすかったです。ミート系のボールもブロックしやすいですね。

カウンタードライブ
 ライザープロ45でも感じましたがミート気味のカウンターが良かったです。

ストップ
 浮かずやりやすかったです。EvolutionシリーズはSタイプのシートが好みですね。

ツッツキ
 切れなくはないですが最大限切ろうとするとかなり難しい印象でした。カットマンのように打球点を落とした方が切りやすいと思います。

チキータ
 やりやすいです。弱い力で入れやすいですね。威力は低めです。

他ラバーとの比較(あくまでも個人の感想)

回転量
 Evolution MX-D > Evolution EL-S ≧ Quantum X Pro

回転のかけやすさ
 Tenergy 05FX > Evolution EL-S > Evolution MX-S

スピード
 Quantum X Pro > Evolution EL-S > Tacky rubber (such as Hurricane)

https://amzn.to/3paZiCt

Review DNA Dragon Grip

Explanation

We would like to review the German-made adhesive tension rubber, STIGA’s DNA Dragon Grip, which is a hot topic in the streets. In recent years, the quality of German-made rubber has improved remarkably, and the number of German-made adhesive tensions has increased. I would like to compare them.

DNA will be Stiga’s high-end rubber series. To date, there are three types, all of which are Stiga’s first German-made rubber series. DNA Pro series, DNA Platinum series, and this DNA Dragon Grip. Only the DNA Dragon Grip is an adhesive tension rubber, and the other DNA series are basically spin tension rubbers. Until the release of the DNA series, Stiga sold and handled rubber made in Japan. Such Stiga will release a high-end rubber made in Germany, the first of which will be the DNA Pro series. DNA Pro is a rubber that seems to be the original German spin tension rubber, and it was very similar to the best-selling rubber Fastarc G-1 in Japan. And the second release last year is the DNA Platinum series. This is very popular and has been highly rated by table tennis YouTubers (Goblin’s) and other reviewers. katsuo000 also reviewed DNA Platinum Extra Hard as a good impression rubber.

The DNA Platinum series was a rubber very similar to Butterfly’s Tenergy 05. The grain shape of the sheet is thick and has a characteristic of spin system, and it was a rubber that feels quite good to bite even when combined with the 52.5 ° extra hard sponge (XH). Tenergy 05 is also a rubber that feels good in the hardness, but this DNA Platinum series is also a rubber series that is very good at biting into the indicated hardness, and it is a hard rubber that can be easily bitten, so the amount of rotation It will be terrible. It is a sponge that is not similar to the butterfly spring sponge, but it makes you feel that German technology is evolving. Is the feeling of use about 47 ° with the hardness of the German standard? I feel that it is the closest rubber to Tenergy 05 among the post-tenergy rubbers.

And the DNA Dragon Grip was released in quick succession. Recently, we have entered the era of adhesive rubber group male division, and each company has released adhesive tension. I would like to review what kind of rubber the DNA Dragon Grip is.

I can only tell you how amazing it is, but I would like to touch on the technology. First of all, DNA Platinum and DNA Dragon Grip are said to have adopted technologies such as Longer Trajectory, Direct Power Hit Effect, and Power Sponge Cells. Perhaps a new sponge called the Power Sponge Cell will perform like the Tenergy 05 to show similar performance to the Butterfly Spring Sponge.

・Longer Trajectory
・Direct Power Hit Effect
・Power Sponge Cells

In addition, the DNA Dragon Grip uses a technology called C Touch Tensor. The phrase “C-Touch” is the technology used in the seats of DONIC’s Blue Grip C1 and I imagine it’s probably similar. I quoted the explanation about C Touch Tensor from the STIGA site. ↓

C Touch Tensor

Adhesive top sheets provide exceptional grip and a high level of control on serve and receive. The newly installed sponge was developed based on AI (artificial intelligence) and advice from top players. By digitally analyzing the data, we identified the important characteristics of the material, and made the strong rotation amount and high control performance of the adhesive top sheet coexist with the powerful speed of the new sponge.

https://stigasports.jp/product/dna-%e3%83%89%e3%83%a9%e3%82%b4%e3%83%b3-%e3%82%b0%e3%83%aa%e3%83%83%e3%83%97%e3%80%8855%e3%80%89/

Published performance value

You can clearly see that the DNA Platinum series has improved rotational performance compared to the previous DNA Pro series. And you can see well that the adhesive tension rubber with higher spin performance from the DNA platinum series becomes the DNA dragon grip. Next is a comparison with a hardness tester.

As you can see from this figure, DNA Pro H, DNA Platinum XH, and DNA Dragon Grip are as hard as Tenergy 05. Of course, the German-made rubber STIGA rubber is heavier, and the butterfly rubber is lighter, which is also a characteristic of the result.

Finally, the difference between the hardness on the sheet side and the hardness on the sponge side is plotted. Katsuo000 feels that the larger this value is, the easier it is to handle or bite into the rubber. I have included Tenergy 05 as an index, but you can see that Tenergy 05 is a rubber that is very easy to handle and easy to rotate because it has a good hardness and is very easy to handle. On the other hand, the DNA Dragon Grip seems to have specifications that are conscious of Dignics 09C, and the hardness difference between the seat side and the sponge side is close. The difference between the seat side and the sponge side is smaller than that of Dignics 09C, and I think it is a rubber that is difficult to bite into. However, the value of shore c itself is harder in Dignics 09C, so its influence may be stronger. (For adhesive rubber, the difference in hardness between the sheet side and the sponge side is not a very good index, and I feel that it is easier to understand if you compare purely by hardness. What kind of comparison is good in the future? I would like to think about it.)

DNA Dragon Grip sticking and weight

DNA Dragon Grip
・Speed: 132
・Spin: 146
・Control: 80
・Sponge Thickness: Max (2.3 mm)
・Sponge stiffness: 55.0°
・6,600 yen + tax
・74 g (before cut) → 52 g (after cut)

I pasted it using YASAKA’s Norisuke. After all it is heavy! By the way, I pasted the racket on my favorite WRM 970XX-KLC recently. This racket is an inner Kep1er carbon racket with a 5.7 mm thin plate, a hard upper plate dyeing material, and the lightest among Chinese rackets. The cost performance is very good (5,980 yen + shipping fee for sale), so it is recommended.

By the way, the sheet doesn’t feel very sticky. Recent German adhesive tension rubber does not have the sticky feeling of the sheet like Chinese adhesive rubber. The smell is a little peculiar, but compared to Chinese adhesive rubber, it is a level that even people who do not know table tennis do not mind. If it is not sold as an adhesive tension rubber, it will be difficult to recognize it as an adhesive rubber in the first place. Of course, the performance has the characteristics of adhesive rubber!

3 features of DNA Dragon Grip

Adhesive rubber that bites in with a light force!

As you can see from the results of the hardness comparison, it was a rubber with a very light force, which was hard enough to hit by hand, and it was easy to put out a sticky ball. First of all, regarding the hardness, it was a rubber that bites well and is easy to handle compared to the adhesive rubber made in China. The bite is too good and you may even feel like a spin tension rubber. The sponge is a hard sponge that is even harder than DNA Platinum XH and has fewer bubbles, but I didn’t feel that hard. In the review of Karahashi Takukyu Yoyogi store, it was also reviewed that the DNA Dragon Grip can add vertical rotation with a small force without making a big swing when used in the back, and it can get points. If you want strong rotation even with such a weak force, I think the DNA Dragon Grip is a very good option.

A seat that emphasizes ball holding and rotation rather than Rakza Z

The characteristic of DNA Dragon Grip is that the seat is thick and the grain shape is low and thick, that is, the seat shape is characterized by the rotation performance that is adopted for the spin type tension rubber that emphasizes rotation. The sheet of the DNA Platinum series also had a sheet shape similar to Tenergy 05. On the other hand, the sponge is not as hard as other super-hard adhesive rubbers and feels more biting than I expected. Of course, there are multiple German tension rubbers of the same hardness, such as Omega VII China Guang from XIOM, Blue Grip C2 from DONIC, and VICTAS. Examples include Triple Extra. For this comparison, I mentioned Rakza Z Extra Hard, which has already been tested to some extent and has the same hardness. I hope it can be compared with other adhesive tension rubbers, but I haven’t. The Rakza Z XH is symmetrical compared to the DNA Dragon Grip, and the overall weight of the rubber is heavier than the DNA Dragon Grip, while the sponge has a lot of bubbles and the sheet is rather thin and the sheet is thin and Tenergy 80 (Tenergy 80). It has a shape like a speed tension rubber such as 80) or Tenergy 64. It was an adhesive rubber because it was heavy and hard as a whole, and it was a rubber that was somewhat like a speed tension rubber. The DNA Dragon Grip has a symmetrical design guideline compared to the Rakza Z XH, and I felt a great difference in its rubber design. The DNA Dragon Grip has a seat and grain shape similar to that of a spin-type tension rubber specializing in rotation like Tenergy 05, but the sponge is a sponge that is not too hard. It was a well-balanced rubber like between the adhesive rubber and spin tension, which is perfect when you want more spin performance than DNA Platinum XH.

It’s easy to bite in and handle, but it’s also easy to get rid of habits (misleading by the amount of rotation)!

Although it is not completely comparable to the rubber mentioned above, I think that the DNA Dragon Grip is probably classified as a habit ball (or easy to make mistakes due to the amount of rotation) rubber side even in the hardness of 55 °. I will list the same degree of hardness again.

 ・Omega VII China Guang (XIOM) 55°
 ・Blue Grip C2 (DONIC) 55°
 ・Rakza Z Extra Hard (Yasaka) 52~57°
 ・Triple Extra (VICTAS) 55°
 ・Dignics 09C (Butterfly) 44° (Butterfly standard)
 ・Hybrid K3 (TIBHAR) 53°
 ・Hybrid K1J (TIBHAR) 52.5°
 ・Blue Grip R1 (DONIC) 50°
 ・Rakza Z (Yasaka) 47~52°
 ・Rising Dragon (Yasaka) 47~52°

There are rubbers that I have used and rubbers that I have not used, but among the above, DNA Dragon Grip was a rubber that was easy to get a habit (misleading due to the amount of rotation). For example, even if I drive in a state close to hand-striking without wearing shoes, I felt that the rotation and the way the ball bounces and flies from the table will change. I think that this amount of rotation and habit is the performance you want if you use adhesive rubber! Personally, I felt that it was a rubber that could make mistakes with the amount of rotation more than the Rakza Z XH and the Dignics 09C (of course, the Rakza Z XH is faster than the Rakza Z XH and the Dignics 09C is better if you want ease of handling in addition to speed. I think). Please refer.

Each technology review

Fore hand

Light hit
There was no discomfort with the momentum like tension rubber. At least I don’t think I feel like I don’t fly like a leopard.

Drive on long balls and rallies
I felt it was a little soft. Compared to the spin type tension rubber, there was an impression that the ball enters a little shallower because the arc line is very easy to come out. It grips the ball very well, so it is easy to spin. I personally like the one that is a little harder, but it may be easier to use if you want to speed up. Since the sponge hardness is 55 °, I felt it was soft, but I didn’t lose to the opponent’s ball.

Drive with open face
Even if I opened the surface, it would rotate firmly and sink, so it was very good. This area was just like an adhesive rubber. Also, I felt that the drive would be stable because it would sink by rotation if it was rubbed without opening the surface in the opposite direction due to the shape of the seat.

Top spin (loop) drive against back spin
Since it grips firmly, I was able to hit a drive with abundant rotation. However, it is not a rubber that is hard and does not bounce like a leopard, so I felt a little power loss. I felt that it was shallow and low and easy to control.

Speed drive against back spin
Even if I hit it like rubbing, I was able to hit the speed drive and the impression was good. However, since it is an adhesive rubber, I felt that the ball would run better if I hit it with the surface open. I think that hitting like rubbing will increase from the opponent’s court.

Curve / shoot drive
I felt that the ball would bend well when it was curved or shot because the ball entered shallowly. The course is also easy to aim for.

Block
I felt that it was a little susceptible to rotation. Instead, it was easy to block balls such as smashes.

Counter drive
It was easy to bite in firmly and rotate, and it fits well and it was easy to counter drive. Is it really an adhesive rubber?

Push / stop
I felt that it took some getting used to cutting because the bite was a little too good. Since it is an adhesive rubber, it was very easy to do without popping out.

Serve
It was easy to rotate firmly. However, I felt that it was softer than the Omega VII China shadow and that it popped out a little better.

Back hand

Light hit
After using it in the fore, I tried using it in the back, but as I imagined, I felt it was easy to use in the back. With a sponge hardness of 55 °, the weight is certainly as heavy as 50 g, but I felt that it was easier to handle than Chinese adhesive and could be used in the back without any discomfort.

Drive on long balls and rallies
I felt a sense of stability because I held the ball firmly. I also felt that the ball was a little slow to leave. I also felt that impact was needed to speed up from the middle team.

Top spin (loop) drive against back spin
It was very easy to do. I felt that I could make a loop drive with just the right hardness and a sense of stability. Also, because it grips the ball firmly, I felt that it could be lifted even if the hitting point was dropped.

Speed drive against back spin
I felt that the speed was a little mature because I had a good ball. I also felt this in DNA Platinum. 

Block
I felt that it was easily affected by rotation for its hardness. It wasn’t that difficult.

Counter drive
It was easy to do. I felt the feeling of holding a ball more than Dignics 05, so it was easy to feel that I had a counter drive.

Push / stop
Since it is an adhesive rubber, it will not float. However, since the sponge has a good bite, I felt that it was easy to overshoot if I was not careful about the touch.

Chiquita
It was easy to do. It was easy to rotate!

Comparison with other rubbers (personal impressions)

Spin amount
 Omega VII China Ying > DNA Dragon Grip > Dignics 05

Speed
 Dignics 09C ≧ Rakza Z Extra Hard > Rhyzen ZGR > DNA Dragon Grip > Hurricane NEO III

https://amzn.to/3uIlJ5A
https://amzn.to/3gFuF3i

レビュー NEXXUS XT PRO 50

説明

 今年1発目にレビューした、Gewo(ゲオ)NEXXUS EL Pro 53(ネクサスELプロ53)に引き続き、本ページではNEXXUS XT Pro 50(ネクサルXTプロ50)をレビューします。こちらのラバーは今や卓人で知らない人がいないのではないかと思われる卓球ネットショップ、WRMさんで購入できるラバーになります。katsuo000もGewoについてはWRMさんを通じて知った方です。ラバーの種類が多くて安価というのが特徴でしょうか。卓球ナビさんでもレビューが挙がっていますので参考にしていくと良いと思います。GEWOはドイツの卓球用具メーカーで、有名な契約選手はナイジェリアのQuadri Akinade Aruna(クアドリ・アルナ)選手になりますね。アルナ選手はGEWOと契約する前は、joola(ヨーラ)の契約選手でそのころからヒノキ系合板のラケットを使ってパワフルで豪快なラリーを展開する選手でした。アルナ選手の目立った戦績は、リオオリンピックでドイツの皇帝ティモ・ボル(Timo Boll)選手に勝利してベスト8に、昨年の世界卓球2021ヒューストンでもベスト8と、大きな大会で挙げていることがわかると思います。ちなみに、最近では皇帝ティモ・ボル選手もPrimorac Carbon(プリモラッツカーボン)というヒノキ系カーボンラケットを使用するようになりました。時代の変化を感じますね。

 アルナ選手が使用するラバーは先日レビューしたNEXXUS EL PRO53(ネクサスELプロ53)になりますが、双璧としてGewoが扱うのが、本ページでレビューするNEXXUS XT PRO 50(ネクサスXTプロ50)になります。自分も基本的にWRMさんが発信してくれた情報程度にしか理解しておりません。「GEWO」をググりますと、WRMのサイトと、英語のサイトがヒットするのではないでしょうか。GEWOの用具について簡単に確認していきたいと思います。

 まず、GEWOの最新の裏ソフトラバーは「CODEXX」シリーズと「NEXXUS」シリーズになります。「CODEXX」シリーズは最近流行りのドイツ製粘着テンションであり「NEXXUS」シリーズがスピン系テンションラバーになりますね。CODEXXシリーズは今後試打予定ですので、そちらで確認するとして、本ページではNEXXUSシリーズについて確認していきます。

NEXXUS(ネクサス)シリーズ

 英語の情報を拝見しますと、色々と書かれていますが、「NEXXUS」のEL系がスピン重視、XT系がスピード重視のラバーシリーズになるようです。

 性能表になります。表からわかることは、どのラバーを使っても高いスピン性能が得られる、悪くいうとどのラバーも大差がない、といったところでしょうか。実際、同時期に試打した、NEXXUS EL Pro 53 Hard(ネクサスELプロ53ハード)とNexxus XT Pro 50 Hard(ネクサスXTプロ50ハード)を比較しても、正直大きな差を感じらせませんでした。ネット上の情報を拝見して確かにELは回転に、XTはスピードに特徴があったなー、と後日試打の記憶から感じたくらいです。

 ちなみにWRMさんで手に入るのは、「Nexxus」のELシリーズとXTシリーズ、および粘着ラバーの「Codexx」シリーズで、「SuperSelect」はまだ扱っていないようです。最新のSuperSelectシリーズはカラーラバー自由化後の商品で緑も扱っており、こちらも気になった次第ですね。

 それでは硬度計での比較になります。

 Shore cの硬度を比較してみましょう。Nexxus XT Pro 50(ネクサスXTプロ50)はTenergy 05(テナジー05)よりも重くて柔らかいことがわかると思います。このことから、ネクサスXTプロ50は硬度の割にくい込みが良く、シートの粒形状は、粒細め、粒間隔広めの、いわゆるスピード性能に特徴のあるラバーだと言えそうなことが想像できますね。重量はテナジー05よりも重く、ディグニクス09Cと同等となる点も要チェックです。

 次にshore aのシート側、スポンジ側の硬さの差になります。shore aのシート側からとスポンジ側からの硬度差を確認すると、ディグニクス05と同等となりました。この値が小さいほどスピン系テンションラバーでは扱いが難しくなる傾向を確認していますが、そもそもshore cの比較でテナジー05よりも柔らかい結果を得ていますので、扱いにくさは感じにくいといえるでしょう。実際、手で触ってみるとネクサスXTプロ50ハードは、全体的に柔らかく感じました。ドイツ製のスピンテンションラバーにあるようなシートの強い(ないし厚い)ラバーではなく、日本製のスピンテンションに近いと感じました。もちろんラバー全体の張りやテンションはやや弱いのですが、その部分はラバーの貼り方で補える可能性もあるので、全体的に日本ぽくしたドイツ製テンションラバーに感じました。

NEXXUS XT Pro 50の貼りと重量

NEXXUS XT Pro 50 Hard(ネクサスXTプロ50ハード)
・Speed: 132
・Spin: 121
・Control: 85
・Sponge Thickness: 2.1 mm, maXXimum
・Sponge stiffness: 50°
・4,200 円 + 税
・74 g (切断前) → 50 g(ヴィルトゥオーソACに貼って)

 YASAKAののり助さんを使って貼りました。ネクサスELプロ53ハード同様に想定より軽いと感じましたね。50°のハードラバーですが50 gと想定外に軽いと感じました。

NEXXUS XT Pro 50 Hardの3つ特徴

扱いやすい!適当に振っても相手の台におさまる!

 相手の回転がわからなくても、ある程度打感と弾みのイメージで適当にふるだけで相手のコートへおさまりよく返球できると感じました。チキータ、カウンタードライブ、カウンターブロックなど結構決まって気持ちよかったです!元WRMの下川さんもこの無意識感について言及していたと思いますが、相手の台に意識しなくても容易に入れることができる感じをかなり感じました。ラリータイプの選手はこういったラバーがハマるのではないかと思います!とにかく非常に扱いやすかったです。チキータ、カウンタードライブと、難しい技術を難なくこなせるラバーでした。長く使っても、この適当にスイングして適当に入る感じが継続できるのであれば練習時間を割けない選手にはかなり魅力的なラバーではないかと思います。さらにこの扱いやすさと安さ(4,200円+税)ですので、人によってはかなり魅力的だと思います。

弧線が低くてスピード感がある!

 Nexxus EL Pro 53は回転量を得やすくて、ループドライブで相手をふかせることが容易でしたが、こちらのNexxus XT Pro 50はボールのスピード感を感じました。弧線が低くて、相手の時間を奪えているのか、よく角っていたことが印象的でした。ボール自身に怖さはあまりなかったと思います。この扱いやすさと台へのおさまり、そして相手の時間を奪える、とややチート感すら感じました。練習量が不足している人には扱いやすさも含めてこちらのNexxus XT Pro 50をおすすめします。ループドライブなどをあまりやらないバックに貼って、相手のボールをいなしつつ、フォアで決める、という戦型にはまるのではないかと感じました。

相手の回転の影響を受けにくい

 Nexxus EL Pro 53と比較すると相手の回転に対しより鈍感になっていると感じました。回転に対し鈍感ということはラリー志向の選手にはかなり魅力的なラバーだと思います。それでいて、中陣からのドライブはしっかりスピードが出るので相手にプレッシャーもかけることのできるラバーでもありました。アルナ選手がどのような考えで使用しているかわかりませんが、GEWOのラバーは明らかにラリー志向だと思います。扱いやすさという点でYASAKAのRakza(ラクザ)シリーズも非常に扱いやすいラバーがラインナップしている印象がありますが、ラクザシリーズ以上に扱いやすくてラリー志向というのがGEWOのラバーの特徴であり良い点だと思いました!

各技術レビュー

フォアハンド系

軽打
 特に違和感ありません。結構弾むと感じました。また弧線が直線的で沈みにくいとも感じました。 

ロングボールやラリーでのドライブ
 やはり柔らかさを感じ、くい込み過ぎて板に当たると感じました。また弧線が低くてボールが想像以上に伸びるので、打球点を落としにくいとも感じました。自分ももうアラフォーなので動けないのもあるのですが、打球点は落とせるなら落とせるラバーが好みです。そういう意味ではこのNexxus XT Pro 50はスピード重視のラバーといえるでしょう。

面を開いたドライブ
 打てなくはないですが、思ったよりボールが沈まないかもしれません。オーバーが目立ちました。 

対下回転に対するループドライブ
 できなくはなくて、むしろしっかりできました。ただし、回転量は低そうでした。 

対下回転に対するスピードドライブ
 くい込みがいいので、打球点を落とさず打てればかなり良かったですね。この辺りはさすがスピード重視タイプです。

ブロック
 やりやすかったです。相手の回転の影響を受けにくいのでやりやすかったです。絶妙なシートのくい込みとスポンジの硬さなのだと思います。

カウンタードライブ
 やりやすかったです。どちらかというとミート系のカウンターに近かったですが結構決まって驚きました。

ツッツキ
 少し浮く印象がありました。

フォアサーブ
 切れますが、少し回転量に不安を感じました。

バックハンド系

軽打
 結構弾むと感じました。ラバー全体として柔らかいからだと思います。またボールが思ったよりも飛距離が出ると感じました。

ロングボールやラリーでのドライブ
 前陣から中陣で〇で、後陣からだと打点を落とすのでどうしてもスピードは出しにくいと感じました。回転でボールが沈む感じではないので、イメージとしては、相手のコートの浅いところに落とすイメージで打った方がいいと感じました。

対下回転に対するループドライブ
 しっかり打てれば打てますがやや威力は低いと感じました。威力重視のラバーではないので仕方ないと思います。

対下回転に対するスピードドライブ
 打ちやすかったです。マッドなラバーではなく軽快に打てるラバーなので一発は決めやすいと思います。ただし触れば簡単に入るような軽いボールだと思います。 

ブロック
 やりやすかったです。ただなぜ入ったのかわからない、とも感じました。この無意識感が良いと感じました。

カウンタードライブ
 やりやすかったです。どちらかというとボールの弾道にあわせてミートした方が良いと思います。

ツッツキ
 少し浮きやすく、切りにくかったです。このあたりが許容できるかが、ポイントかもしれません。 

チキータ
 やりやすかったです。相手のサーブの種類や回転がわからなくても簡単に入ってしまう感じがあって良かったです。こういうラバーもありだと感じました。

他ラバーとの比較(あくまでも個人の感想)

回転量
 Nexxus EL Pro 53 Hard > Nexxus XT Pro 50 >Bryce Highspeed

スピード
 Bryce Highspeed > Nexxus XT Pro 50 > Nexxus EL Pro 53 Hard

Review Rasanter R50

Explanation

andro sells rubber that feels outstanding rotation performance among German-made rubber. For katsuo000, if you can’t use Butterfly’s Tenergy series or Dignics series, you can be sure that you’ll use andro’s signature rubber, the Rasanter series. The reason is that the Lazanta series has high rotational performance! Considering the price, I think it is a very good series. It’s been a long time late today, but we’ll be reviewing the original Rasanter sign, the Rasanter R50!
Speaking of andro, the stylish apparel and the green color of the rubber sponge always give off a unique presence. Players contracted with andro include Simon Gauzy, who has defeated Jun Mizutani at the 2017 Table Tennis World Cup and China’s Xu Xin (Xu Xin, China) at the 2019 World Championship. (Simon Gauzy, France) and Akifumi Hamakawa, who entered the 2019 All Japan Championship as a ranker. Also, in recent years, you have contracted with table tennis club coaches from all over Japan, and the coach who has participated in the All Japan Championship, who is also indebted to katsuo000, has also contracted with andro. I think this area is strategic.

From Rasant to Rasanter

andro was selling the characteristic green sponge rubber Rasant series (Rasant Grip, Rasant Power Grip), Rasant Power Sponge, which was sold as a signboard until 2016. The 6 types of Rasant Power Sponge, Rasant Beat, Rasant Turbo, and Rasant have all been discontinued, and a new lineup called Rasanter has been launched in 2017. The Razanter series is a new flagship rubber that uses the same green sponge as the Razant series. The Lazanta series includes the R series, which has high rotational performance and makes it easy to make arcs, and the V series, which has high rotational performance and high speed performance, and is sold with a number that reflects the hardness of the sponge attached after R or V. In addition, ahead of other German manufacturers, it will be a rubber lineup equipped with a technology called Ultra Max, which has a sponge thickness of 2.3 mm. This technology seems to have been applied to top players before that, and it is a rubber that makes the seat thinner than the current one and makes the sponge thicker by that amount. There is an international rule that the thickness of rubber, including the adhesive layer, should be 4.0 mm or less, so it is necessary to make the sheet thinner in order to make the sponge thicker. It is said that rubber with a thin seat and a thick sponge is easier to get rotation, speed and flight distance, and it is easier to get the performance to receive top players. However, thinning the sheet is prone to manufacturing variations, and it seems that it was not widely available before that. Probably the latest technology could increase productivity, and as a result, it became possible to produce rubber with a thin sheet and thick sponge at a low price, and it seems that it was sold to the general market. This technology is not sold to the general public by Butterfly’s rubber, which sells the Tenergy series, which is the world standard for leading table tennis equipment in Japan and around the world. As of 2020, Butterfly has the thickest sponge, with a sponge thickness of 2.1 mm. In recent years, the number of rubbers made by other German manufacturers or made in Germany with thin sheets and thick sponges, so-called rubber thickness Max, is increasing.
Up to now, 8 types of Razanter have been sold, 6 types for the R series and 2 types for the V series.

Rasanter series

The Razanter series has a naming like the series in which the sponge hardness can be finely selected with the rotating R and the speed V, but when I actually tried it, it was different from my imagination. Apparently, the hardness of the sponge was changed, and the shape of the seat was also changed, so the shot feeling, performance, and easy-to-use technology were different. Furthermore, although the V series is certainly fast, it is not a rubber specialized for speed because it takes a lot of spin tension and rotation. katsuo000 has tried out R53, R48, R50, R47, V47 and R42, and would like to summarize the comparison in the future. I would like to comment here that the grain shape of the R53, R48, and R50 sheets is a little thin and the grain shape feels a little quick to separate from the ball. Compared to Dignics 05 and Tenergy 05, I think that the grain shape of the sheet makes it hard to feel the ball holding. On the other hand, the sheet is soft and the sponge has a good bite, so I think that it is a rubber that feels like holding a ball when it bites into the whole rubber. Initially launched in 2017, there were six types: R50, R47, R42, R37, V47, and V42. Furthermore, in October 2019, the R53 equipped with Energy Cell technology was newly released, and in May 2020, the R48 also equipped with Energy Cell technology was newly released. Currently, andro’s flagship rubber is R53 and R48.

Recently, I think that the R53 and R48 of the red Razanter are the focus of attention in the Lazanta series. We have already created a review, so we hope you will read it as well.

Published performance value

It is a comparison of performance values announced by andro. Is it characteristic that andro adds an item called control in addition to speed and spin? After all, R53 and R48 with energy cells have high performance and you can see that they are the current signboard rubber (as of September 2020)!

The R50 has also been used by Simon Gauzy in the past, and I think the first one I used after signing with andro was the R50. I feel that there are many reviews that this rubber also has speed and flight distance. In fact, it had a German-made rubber feel, not the heavy hardness of adhesive rubber or Omega VII Hyper. To put it simply, the R50 was designed to have the same level of rotational performance as the R47, and I had the impression that the remaining performance was a rubber with speed performance. The Razanter series are not rubbers with different hardness, but are probably developed with their own concepts. I think the R50 is a rubber that seeks speed performance such as meat while maintaining an arch trajectory. It is only clear that R47 and R50 are not related to Tenergy 05 and Tenergy 05 Hard. If you don’t know the Lazanta series at all, you may think that R47, R48, R50, and R53 have different hardness, but it’s not just a difference in hardness! I would like to summarize the above points at the time of this review and the review of R47. Thank you for your cooperation.

R50 paste and weight

Rasanter R50
    UM Tension (Tensor Bios UM)
    For 40+ Plastic Ball
・Sponge Thickness: 1.7 mm, 2.0 mm, ULTRAMAX (2.3 mm)
・Speed: 120
・Spin: 122
・Control: 80
・Sponge stiffenss: 50
・6,200 yen + tax
・72 g (before cut) → 51 g (after cut)

Three features of Rasanter R50

R50 is easier to bite than R47!

The grain shape of the sheet was different between R47 and R50, and R50 seemed to be finer and wider than R47. Therefore, I felt that R50 was easy to bite into the entire rubber. As a result, R50 is easy to use meat technology, and I think it is easy to hit speed drive even if it goes down! However, since the sponge is hard, even if it bites into it, the ball will last for a short time and the ball will come off quickly.
From here, it is arbitrary and prejudiced, but while many rackets of Mr. andro are thick rackets, they do not have special materials such as carbon, so considering that the design of rubber will also speed up. It seems that it was designed. For other Lazanta series, I felt that there was no rubber designed with the concept of maximizing ball holding and rotation performance at the expense of speed performance. As a result, I think that the rubber of the Razanter series has many balanced grain shapes that are close to the grain shape 80 of the butterfly sheet. And I thought that R50 goes well with andro’s racket. Specifically, I thought that R50 is a rubber that goes well with plywood rackets. If you match it with a plywood racket, the hard shot feeling and spiky feeling of R50 will be round and soft, and I think that you can supplement the speed performance that is easy to feel if it is insufficient.
It’s a little digression, but I think the rubber that I felt similar was Q5 or Q3, and the rubber that made Q5 feel softer was R50.

Of course, the rotation performance is high! Equivalent to or better than R47!

R50 felt high rotation performance like R47. The R47 that I tried earlier has very high rotation performance and I felt the rotation performance comparable to Tenergy 05. I felt that the R50 also had high rotational performance, but I felt that it was at the same level as the R47. R47 was a rubber that was very hard and felt the hardness derived from the grain shape like Tenergy 05. Therefore, I felt that it is easy to rotate with a sheet even among German rubber, and it is easy to obtain high rotation performance. On the other hand, R50 feels the hardness of the sponge, but since the sheet is soft in grain shape, it is easy to bite into it, and I think that it is a rubber that bites into the whole rubber and spins. The rotation performance is high for the soft sheet, and I felt that it was easy to draw an arc. I felt that katsuo000 was good for speed drive and meet, and I felt that the speed ball was more stable than I expected. I think it depends on how you use it, but I think that the speed ball with a sense of stability with the minimum rotation and arch line is a feature of the R50 rally. Depending on the user, I think that you can also find a feature by taking advantage of the rotation performance and continuing to hit a heavy drive while dropping the hitting point a little!

Push and stop are good to stop!

It was a rubber that was easy to fly because of the momentum and flight distance, but on the other hand, it was easy to stop and stop. It was difficult to cut it, but I think it is clearer than V47 and easier to stop than R48. I think that very important performance, push, and stop are reasonable performance.

Each technics review

Forehand

Light hit
Because of ULTRAMAX, I didn’t feel the hardness of the light hit.

Drive on long balls and rallies
If anything, speed drive is easy to do. I felt it was easy to play. Maybe the order of the rough balls
Rough R53 > R50 > R47 > R48 > V47 Beautiful
It is an image. R48 is a rubber that is more beautiful than a rough ball because it is very easy to bite into it despite the hardness of the sponge. You may feel that R47 is harder. R53 is the hardest, but R50 also has a similar hardness. Probably the R50 has the most speed drive seat shape among the R47, R50, R48 and R53. Therefore, I think that R50 will be quieter than R53 in terms of roughness.

Drive with open face
The sponge was so hard that I didn’t expect it to hit the racket right away. It was good.

Loop (top spin) drive against back spin
I felt that the ball holding was a little short and it was difficult to control the loop drive.

Speed drive against back spin
On the contrary, I think that this is fine if it is in the foreground. I think it’s easy to do.

Curve / shoot drive
I think R53 is more addictive and bends more. The R50 is easy to bite into, but it is a hard rubber, so I think it is easier to handle it if you use a drive with a little lateral rotation to master it!

Block
I felt that it was quite susceptible to rotation.

Counter drive
If anything, overwrite type counter drive is easy to do.

Stop
I’m glad it was easy to stop the ball.

Push
It was good that this was also low.

Serve
It was good to be able to cut it firmly. It was a rubber that could secure enough rotation amount of my rubber.

Backhand

Light hit
It’s hard, but I was surprised that it went unexpectedly.

Drive on long balls and rallies
It was easy to become a speed drive. I was also told that it didn’t rotate much. On the other hand, if it’s a back, I think it’s an ant. I think you can also aim for a gap with the fore.

Loop (top spin) drive against back spin
It was a little difficult. Sometimes I dropped it due to swing speed and lack of impact.

Block
Since the seat is soft, I think it is easily affected by rotation.

Stop / Push
It was easy to do. It was good that this was also low.

Chiquita
The flight distance was a little too long and over mistakes were conspicuous.

Comparison with other rubbers (personal impressions)

Max spin amount
 R53 > Tenergy 05 Hard > R50 ≧ R47 ≧ R48 > Tenergy 05 ≧ V47

Speed
 V47 > R53 ≧ R50 > R48 > R47 > Tenergy 05 > Tenergy 05 Hard

https://amzn.to/3n2Sggg

Review Rasanter V47

Explanation

Among the rubber made in Germany, the Rasanter series of andro feels outstanding rotation performance. andro always has a unique presence with stylish apparel and rubber colors. I think andro has clearly become more prominent in Japan in recent years. The reasons for this include Simon Gauzy (Simon Gauzy, France), who has defeated Jun Mizutani at the 2017 Table Tennis World Cup and Xu Xin (Xu Xin, China) at the 2019 World Championship. , I think there is a fact that the equipment used by Akifumi Hamakawa, who entered the 2019 All Japan Championship as a ranker, is andro.

Frome Rasant to Rasanter

andro was selling the characteristic green sponge rubber Rasant series (Rasant Grip, Rasant Power Grip), Rasant Power Sponge, which was sold as a signboard until 2016. The 6 types of Rasant Power Sponge, Rasant Beat, Rasant Turbo, and Rasant have all been discontinued, and a new lineup called Rasanter has been launched in 2017. The Lazanta series is a new flagship rubber that uses the same green sponge as the Razant series. The Razanter series has the R series, which has high rotational performance and makes it easy to make arcs, and the V series, which has high speed performance in addition to rotational performance. I am. In addition, ahead of other German manufacturers, it will be a rubber lineup equipped with a technology called Ultra Max, which has a sponge thickness of 2.3 mm. This technology seems to have been applied to top players before that, and it is a rubber that makes the seat thinner than the current one and makes the sponge thicker by that amount. There is an international rule that the thickness of rubber, including the adhesive layer, should be 4.0 mm or less, so it is necessary to make the sheet thinner in order to make the sponge thicker. It is said that rubber with a thin seat and a thick sponge is easier to get rotation, speed and flight distance, and it is easier to get the performance to receive top players. However, thinning the sheet is prone to manufacturing variations, and it seems that it was not widely available before that. Probably the latest technology could increase productivity, and as a result, it became possible to produce rubber with a thin sheet and thick sponge at a low price, and it seems that it was sold to the general market. This technology does not seem to be in the rubber of Butterfly, which sells the world standard Tenergy series, which leads table tennis equipment in Japan and the world, and even though Butterfly is still extra thick, the sponge thickness is 2.1 mm. It remains. In recent years, other German manufacturers are increasing the number of rubber sheets with thin sheets and thick sponges.
To date, eight types of Razanter have been sold, six for the R series and two for the V series.

Rasanter series

The Razanter series has a naming like the series in which the sponge hardness can be finely selected with the rotating R and the speed V, but when I actually tried it, it was different from my imagination. Apparently, the hardness of the sponge was changed, and the shape of the seat was also changed, so the shot feeling, performance, and easy-to-use technology were different. Furthermore, although the V series is certainly fast, it is not a rubber specialized for speed because it takes a lot of spin tension and rotation. katsuo000 has tried out R53, R48, R50, R47, V47 and R42, and would like to summarize the comparison in the future. I would like to comment here that the grain shape of the R53, R48, and R50 sheets is a little thin and the grain shape feels a little quick to separate from the ball. Compared to Dignics 05 and Tenergy 05, I think that the grain shape of the sheet makes it hard to feel the ball holding. On the other hand, the sheet is soft and the sponge has a good bite, so I think that it is a rubber that feels like holding a ball when it bites into the whole rubber.
Initially launched in 2017, there were 6 types: R50, R47, R42, R37, V47, V42. Furthermore, in October 2019, the R53 equipped with Energy Cell technology was newly released, and in May 2020, the R48 also equipped with Energy Cell technology was newly released. Currently, andro’s flagship rubber is R53 and R48.
Recently, I think that the R53 and R48 of the red Lazanta are the focus of attention in the Razanter series. We have already created a review, so we hope you will read it as well.

Published performance value

andro’s published performance value comparison. Is it characteristic that andro adds an item called control in addition to speed and spin? After all, R53 and R48 with energy cells have high performance and will be a hot rubber!

Take a look at the R53 reviews and you’ll be faster! However, in terms of published performance values, V47 is supposed to be faster. I have already tried R53, R48, R50, R47, V47, so I can understand it, so I will comment. I think V47 is faster than R53 in simple speed. I think V47 is faster than you can feel because it has a very straight trajectory. In particular, the V47’s midfield drive has the impression that it is quite fast. On the other hand, the R53 draws an arch line very strongly, so it gives the impression that the ball is slower than it feels. I think V47 is numerically faster for the ball to reach the opponent’s platform. I think this is largely due to the straight trajectory. The fastest rubber in the Razanter series, I think it’s the V47!

V47 sticking and weight

I had cut 70 g before cutting, but it was heavier than I expected. In fact, I think it’s a speed rubber that takes a lot of rotation.

Rasanter V47
     UM Tension (Tensor Bios UM)
    For 40+ Plastic Ball
・Sponge Thickness: 1.7 mm, 2.0 mm, ULTRAMAX (UM)
・Speed: 121
・Spin: 119
・Control: 88
・Sponge stiffenss: 47°
・6,200 yen + tax
・69 g (before cut)  → 48 g (after cut)

Three features of Rasanter V47

Tension rubber that takes advantage of speed tension and spin tension

Like a spin type tension rubber, it has more grip and rotation performance than I expected, so the serve and loop drive were of higher quality than I imagined! To be honest, I didn’t think that the rotation performance was so high! I think that the rotation performance is probably as good as Tenergy 80 and Tenergy 05 FX! Still, in the rally of the upper rotation, the speed drive which is quite close to the meat became stable! I think the first feature of V47 is that it is a rubber that has both speed performance and spin performance! As for the image of katsuo000, it was very nice to use it by rotating it rather than punching it because speed was added to the sense of stability.

No.1 speed performance and straight trajectory in Rasanter!

As mentioned in the explanation, V47 has higher speed performance than R53 and R48 using the latest energy cell technology! Even in terms of published performance values, V47 is supposed to have higher speed performance. In fact, the V47 has a very straight trajectory, so I felt that a smash-like speed drive would bang. I think it’s pretty aggressive.

It bites well, and although it is a spin type tension, it is easy to do half volley, connection, and block!

Since it bites well, it was easy to block the meat-type balls and connect the half-volley-type balls. If you use meat more than a drive, I think it’s pretty easy to handle!
This rubber was a little damaged by the name, and I felt that it would be better to use it thinking that it was a spin tension rather than a speed rubber, because it would make the best use of its performance. I would like to recommend it to those who are using Tenergy 05 and are looking for a rubber that has good cost performance and wants speed without reducing the amount of rotation too much.

Each technics review

Forehand

Light hit
I don’t feel the hardness so much. I think R47 with the same hardness feels harder.

Drive on long balls and rallies
The drive that left it to the speed performance rather than the amount of rotation was a good feeling. It is possible to drive at a high speed so that you can aim for no touch. I think this speed performance is comparable to the Omega VII series.

Drive with open face
The bite was good, so it felt pretty good in the foreground. The drive was easy to hit with little force.

Loop (top spin) drive against back spin
I feel that the arch line is a little low, but the fore has enough grip and high quality loop drive was possible enough.

Speed drive against back spin
Speed drive Against back spin was more difficult than I expected. It seems that it is a rubber that is easily affected by rotation because it bites well, so I think it is necessary to hit it firmly with your body.

Curve / shoot drive
Since the arch line is low, I didn’t have the impression that it would bend much.

Block
It’s soft, so it was pretty easy to block against meat balls. On the other hand, the block for the loop drive is a little susceptible to rotation, so I felt that it was necessary to use technology to squeeze or overwrite the rotation.

Counter drive
It was a good feeling to catch it in the ascending period without dropping the hitting point and drive like a meat. When I try to overwrite it, I get the impression that the flight distance is too long.

Stop
The stop bites in quite well, so I had to catch it only with the seat.

Push
Like the stop, push was easy to float.

Fore flick
Because it is soft, I can hold the ball, so I felt it was easy to hit at an angle.

Serve
Amount of spin was not so high. Although, the speed was enough to fast.

Backhand

Light hit
I think it’s a little stiff when used in the backhand.

Drive on long balls and rallies
I was impressed with the speed system, not the rotation system.

Loop (top spin) drive against back spin
It bites in more than I expected, so I felt that I could do a loop drive of the minimum quality.

Speed drive against back spin
On the contrary, speed drive was quite difficult. I think the impact is insufficient.

Curve / shoot drive
I didn’t have the impression that it was straight and curved.

Block
It was easy to block against meat balls. It was difficult to block against a loop drive.

Counter drive
I felt it was easier to counter than R48. Counter meet was also easy to do.

Stop
Like the forestop, it was easy to float.

Push
This was also easy to float.

Chiquita
We have a fairly aggressive and speedy Chiquita.

Comparison with other rubbers (personal impressions)

Max spin amount
 R53 > Tenergy 05 ≧ V47 > Tenergy 64

Speed
 Tenergy 64 > V47 > R53 > Tenergy 05

Review Rasanter R42

Explanation

Among the rubber made in Germany, the Rasanter series of andro feels outstanding rotation performance. After all rotation performance is a very important item for me, and that is why I wanted to understand the difference between the Lazanta series. This is because I felt the difference in grain shape when using it with R53, R48, R50, R47, and V47. It seems that R53 and R48 have the same grain shape, but R47 and R50 have different grain shapes, and I felt that they were rubbers with very different impressions. Then I was wondering what kind of rubber R42 is. I would like to emphasize that this Razanter series is not just a minor change rubber with a different hardness!
andro always has a unique presence with stylish apparel and rubber colors. I think andro has clearly become more prominent in Japan in recent years. The reasons for this include Simon Gauzy (Simon Gauzy, France), who has defeated Jun Mizutani at the 2017 Table Tennis World Cup and Xu Xin (Xu Xin, China) at the 2019 World Championship. , I think there is a fact that the equipment used by Akifumi Hamakawa, who entered the 2019 All Japan Championship as a ranker, is andro.

Published performance value

The R42 actually has the same spin performance as the V47. As mentioned in the review of V47, V47 is not a rubber specialized for speed performance, but it has a certain level of spin performance (Tenergy 80?), And then the speed performance of Razanter Series 1. It will be a high balance rubber with. For katsuo000, I think Tenergy 80 and Dignics 80 will be a rubber that balances spin performance and speed performance, especially the ease of hitting meat, with softness, but V47 is the hardness of the sponge. While giving spin performance, it is an image of a rubber specializing in speed drive rather than meat by biting into the seat. I don’t think there is a similar rubber in Butterfly rubber. Mr. Butterfly sells many rackets with higher speed performance than other companies, so it may be an image of supplementing speed with rackets. Compared to Butterfly, andro’s racket has many thick blades as a whole, and the lineup is a little small, so even though it is said that it is a rubber with high speed performance so that it can be combined with andro’s racket. Imagine that you are selling a rubber that has speed performance in high spin performance.

In other words, R42 has the same spin performance as V47, so you can see that the spin performance is not low at all. As for the standing position of R42, it may be said that it is a rubber like Tenergy 05FX. However, unlike the Tenergy 05FX, the Lazanta series has an Ultra MAX (UM) specification with a thin sheet and a thick sponge. I would like to review what kind of rubber this UM specification R42 is.

R42 sticking and weight


Rasanter R42
    UMテンション (Tensor Bios UM)
    For 40+ Prastic Ball
・Sponge Thickness: 1.7 mm, 2.0 mm, ULTRAMAX (UM)
・Speed: 116
・Spin: 119
・Control: 93
・Sponge stiffness: 42°
・6,200 yen + tax
・66 g (before cut) → 47 g (after cut)

Is it heavier than I expected? It’s soft to the touch!

Three features of Rasanter R42

Overwhelming ease of handling! Easy speed drive to straight!

The ease of handling was perfect. It was really easy to use! I think the power of the drive itself is low, but I didn’t feel like making a mistake anyway. I felt this was the number one advantage! Anyway, if you want to reduce mistakes, I think it’s a good rubber!
Personally, I felt the depth of the rubber when the ball was bitten by Ultramax (UM). I hit it hard because I had a deep pocket, and even if the ball bite into the rubber, it was hard to reach the racket, and the feeling that I could drive instead of meat was a very good feeling. It may be the number one advantage of UM!

Surprisingly stop / push is low!

Next, I would like to make a special mention of how easy it is to stop and stop. I felt it was hard to float! I didn’t feel the amount of rotation, but it was low and low, and the point that I could stop was a soft rubber, but it felt very good. Although the V47 has high spin performance, I felt that it was a little easier to float, so I thought that the R42 would also float, but on the contrary, I was surprised that the R42 fits well.

Easy to block with medium hardness!

Naturally, it’s a soft rubber, so the block fits nicely. Especially for meat type balls, it was very easy to do because it was insensitive to the ball.

Each technics review

Forehand

Light hit
I felt it was extremely soft.

Drive on long balls and rallies
You may feel some energy loss. It’s that soft.

Drive with open face
It’s easy to do because it bites into it. I felt that it was a little meaty, but I felt that even if it bites sharply, it will rotate firmly due to the strength of the rubber.

Loop (top spin) drive against back spin
I didn’t feel like making a mistake, but on the other hand it may be a little less powerful. However, the open competition may be enough.

Speed drive against back spin
It was very easy to hit. It may be a cheat for intermediate players and open games. It is quite easy to divide the course and you may be able to play with it at speed.

Curve / shoot drive
I felt the amount of rotation was a little weak, but when I made it bite firmly by the inquiry of the drive, I felt a reasonable amount of rotation.

Block
It’s easy to become a baseball, but it was easy to do.

Counter drive
Since there is a core, the counter drive is also affected by rotation, but it is not impossible.

Stop
It was easier to settle than V47!

Push
Like the stop, it fits better than the V47!

Backhand

Light hit
It was easy to do.

Drive on long balls and rallies
It’s easy to do at all. It was easy to get a little meaty.

Loop (top spin) drive against back spin
It’s easy to do, but it’s soft, so I think that the amount of rotation will increase if you let it bite into the sponge a little rather than using a sheet. It may be difficult to control it shallowly and low.

Speed drive against back spin
It was harder than I expected. I may not be able to master it in the back yet.

Block
It was as easy to do as the fore!

Counter drive
It may be a little difficult because it is easily affected by rotation.

Stop / push
The fit is good! It was a very good feeling.

Chiquita
It was very easy to do because the ball is easy to draw an arc. After all it is easy to feel the ease of over-missing, so please be careful only there.

Comparison with other rubbers (personal impressions)

Max spin amount
 R53 > R48 ≧ Tenergy 05 > R42

Speed
 R53 > R42 ≧ Tenergy 05

https://amzn.to/2ZWsbFM

レビュー Golden Tango(ゴールデンタンゴ)

説明

 Joola(ヨーラ)さんのGolden Tango(ゴールデンタンゴ)のレビューになります。Joolaさんは2021年に粘着テンションラバー、Rhyzen ZGR (ライゼンZGR)を発売していて、既に試打レビュー済みなので、本レビューでは、ライゼンZGRと比較しながらゴールデンタンゴをレビューしていきたいと思います。ライゼンZGRは最新の粘着テンションラバーで2021年春-夏発売のラバーでした。ライゼンZGRはスピン系テンションラバーのような弾みとスピードを持ちながら球持ちもしっかりあって、かつカウンタードライブなどの技術でおさまりの良い粘着テンションラバーで非常に好感触のラバーでした。実は、その好感触のライゼンシリーズ以前から粘着ラバーをヨーラは取り扱い販売していました。ヨーラの粘着と言えばTango(タンゴ)シリーズが有名だったそうです。本ページでは、そんなタンゴシリーズの中からGolden Tango(ゴールデンタンゴ)を試打レビューさせていただきます!
 ちなみに、懸賞で当たったDynaryz ZGR(ダイナライズZGR)という2021年冬発売の最新ラバーも試打予定です。ダイナライズZGRについてはレビュー時に詳細を記載しますが、katsuo000の認識がずれていました。Dynaryz(ダイナライズ)シリーズはDynaryz AGR(ダイナライズ)を試打レビュー済みで、同じシリーズでかつ粘着テンションラバーという情報だけを聞いていたので、ライゼンZGRよりもさらにスピン系テンションよりのラバーがダイナライズZGRかな、と想像しておりました。実際のところは、どうやらダイナライズZGRは57.5度のハードスポンジ搭載で、Omega VII China Ying(オメガVIIチャイナ影)やBlue Grip C1(ブルーグリップC1)に近い方向性のラバーではないかと思います(ラバーを貼った後の重量が方向性を暗に物語ってました笑)。現在オメガVIIチャイナ影を愛用するkatsuo000はダイナライズZGRの試打が楽しみですね。ちなみにダイナライズシリーズは、おそらく今後ヨーラさんの看板ラバーシリーズになると思われます。ヨーラのパンフレットでは、硬度はハード+~ミディアムといった形容詞表現でわかりにくいですがWRMさんでは、硬度が数字で記載されていてわかりやすいですね。以下のようになりますのでご参考ください。
 Dynaryz ZGR(ダイナライズZGR): 57.5度
 Dynaryz AGR(ダイナライズAGR): 50.0度
 Dynaryz ACC(ダイナライズACC): 47.5度
 Dynaryz CMD(ダイナライズCMD): 42.5度
 Golden Tango(ゴールデンタンゴ): 54.0度
 Golden Tango PS(ゴールデンタンゴPS): 50.0度

ライゼンZGRのスポンジの硬度情報はないのですが、自前の硬度計で測定して確認予定です。試打の体感硬度的にはライゼンZGRはくい込みを結構感じましたので、50.0~55.0度位に位置し、ダイナライズZGRがヨーラのラバーの中でも最高硬度になると思います。
 WRMさんはダイナライズシリーズを全て取り扱うことにしたようです。WRMさんが取り扱うラバーは扱いやすさ、性能の高さ、コスパ、などから総合的に選んでいる印象で、万人にオススメしやすいラバーが多いです。ハイエンドラバーシリーズのダイナライズシリーズを取り扱うことは意外でしたが、WRMさんとしてはダイナライズシリーズを性能面とコスパの点で高く評価したのではないかと想像しますね。ちなみに、ダイナライズAGRはテナジー80のようなラバーでこれまたかなり好感触でした。

 だいぶ余談ばかりになってしまいました。ゴールデンタンゴに戻ります。ゴールデンタンゴは卓球王国さんやWRMさんでも取り上げられていたラバーで、粘着らしさがありながら弾むラバー、という位置づけで間違いないと思います。まずは、パンフレットからゴールデンタンゴの紹介文は以下になります。

ヨーラ ゴールデン タンゴ

 ヨーラのレジェンドラバー「タンゴ」の名前を継承した「ゴールデン タンゴ」は、粘着性トップシートと54度テンションスポンジの組合せで、中国製ラバーに代表される様な粘着性ラバーの良さを最大限に活かしたヨーラ最新の粘着テンションラバーです。 

2021年ヨーラのパンフレットから

 ドイツ硬度基準で54度となると、最近は60度のラバーも発売されているのでそこまで硬くないイメージになりますでしょうか。もちろん発売された当時はかなりハードなスポンジのイメージになったと思いますね。ちなみに試打予定はありませんが、Golden Tango PS(ゴールデンタンゴPS)というスポンジ硬度を少し柔らかくしたラバーもあります。ゴールデンタンゴPSは、スポンジ硬度50度のPower Sponge(パワースポンジ、PS)を採用したスピード性能の高い粘着テンションラバーになります。

 卓球王国のゆうさんのゴールデンタンゴに関するレビューページを見つけましたので紹介させていただきます。
  卓球王国ゆうセレクション: https://world-tt.com/ps_pr/012/
当時、ドイツ製粘着テンションラバーはVICTAS(ヴィクタス)のVS>401およびVS>402 Double Extra(VS>402 ダブルエキストラ)ぐらいしかない時代だったそうです。今やドイツ製粘着テンションは戦国時代のようになっていますけどね。粘着ラバーとしての評価はトップクラスに弾み、打ち方に関わらず回転がかかり、使いこなすまでにそこまで時間を要さない、という評価をされていました。是非ご参考ください。

 今年ついに引退を発表された日野自動車の岩崎栄光さんは、粘着ラバーで日本リーグで活躍していた選手になります。卓球王国の企画で岩崎さんがゴールデンタンゴおよびゴールデンタンゴPSについて試打レビューされていますので、その情報を引用させていただきます。

岩崎栄光選手のゴールデンタンゴのレビュー

クセ球とスピードの融合
 スピード重視のスポンジと粘着トップシートの相性が良い。かなりハードなスポンジだが、強いインパクトで打った時のスピード感は抜群。ヨーラが誇る粘着革命。

 「硬くて少し重いので上級者用だと思いますが、性能は素晴らしいですね。これだけ硬くて粘着があるとボールが浅くなりがちですが、かなり飛距離も出てすごいと思いました。軽く打つだけだとネットミスが怖いですが、しっかり打てると強ドライブ、ループドライブともに質が高く、ストップの質もかなり良かったです。球の重みも相当ありました。ラバーが硬いので、使い手は選ぶと思います。コントロールが少し難しいので台に入れることに集中する必要があるでしょう。そうするとボールが深かったり、浅かったり、球質がばらつくので、結果的にいやらしさに繋がると思います。

翔龍(Rising Dragon)との比較(試打当時の岩崎栄光選手は翔龍を使用)
 スピード: +2
 強ドライブのスピン: +2
 ループドライブのスピン: +2
 カウンタードライブ: +1
 ツッツキ&ストップの質: +2
 コントロール(扱いやすさ): +1
 球の重み: -2
 重量約50 g(157 × 150 mmのラケットにMAXを貼った時の目安)

卓球王国より

岩崎栄光選手のゴールデンタンゴPSのレビュー

使いやすくなった『ゴータン』
 「ゴールデンタンゴ」と同じトップシートにスピン系テンションスポンジを合わせた。柔らかく使いやすく調整されている。

 かなり柔らかくて食い込みが良いので、打たれるボールは優しい。そのため粘着らしさは少なく、テンション系に近いと思いました。このラバーもテンション系の打ち方のほうがボールが伸びると思います。テンションユーザーの船本さんの方が良いボールが出ていましたね。『翔龍』に比べて使いやすいのは確実ですが、特別なスピードもスピンも出しやすいわけではなくて、クセ球も少ないと思いました。粘着らしさを出したいならノーマルな『ゴールデンタンゴ』のほうが合っています。相手もあまり嫌がってはくれませんでした。

翔龍(Rising Dragon)との比較(試打当時の岩崎栄光選手は翔龍を使用)
 スピード: 0
 強ドライブのスピン: -1
 ループドライブのスピン: -2
 カウンタードライブ: 0
 ツッツキ&ストップの質: -1
 コントロール(扱いやすさ): -1
 球の重み: +1
 重量約50 g(157 × 150 mmのラケットにMAXを貼った時の目安)

卓球王国より

 ということで、ゴールデンタンゴはクセも出せるにのにスピードも出せるラバーとして紹介されていることがよくわかると思います。上級者向けという言葉がありますので、自分では扱いきれない可能性はおいておいて試打させていただきました。

性能値

 公表性能値を比較してみましょう。

 ゴールデンタンゴはカテゴリーではプロフェッショナルに位置するラバーになります。価格は5,800円 + 税になります。割引されて4~5,000円くらいになりますでしょうか。性能が高ければ非常にコスパの良いラバーといえますね。ゴールデンタンゴはライゼンZGRのスピードを落として、同等の回転性能という位置になります。

 硬度計比較になります。数値としては、ゴールデンタンゴはライゼンZGRよりも硬い結果となりました。バタフライラバーと比較するとTenergy 05(テナジー05)よりも硬くて、ディグニクス系よりは柔らかいというのがゴールデンタンゴの硬さになります。
 また今回異例レベルで特徴的な値は、シート側の硬さとスポンジ側の硬さの差です。スピン系テンション、特にドイツ製のスピン系テンションラバーはシートが厚くてシート側が硬い傾向にあります。最近のラバーでいうとDignics 05(ディグニクス05)やEvolution MX-D(エボリューションMX-D)などはシートが硬いです。ゴールデンタンゴは明らかにシート側が柔らかく、スポンジ側が硬いラバーでした!ここまでシートが柔らかいと相手の回転の影響は受けるものの、球持ちが良く硬さの割に扱いやすいことが想像できますね。実際触ってみるとシート側がかなり柔らかく、実測の硬度以上に扱いやすさを感じるラバーだと感じました。

ゴールデンタンゴの貼りと重量

 今回はインナーカーボンラケットのRein Force AC(リーンフォースAC)に貼りました。パッケージは旧パッケージになります。

 最近、ヨーラさんはパッケージを新調しました。ゴールデンタンゴはこんな感じです。新↓

旧パッケージの裏側です。

↑ゴールデンタンゴ(旧パッケージ)には、粘着ラバー保護シートが入ってました。保護シートは粘着性はなくホコリがつくことを防ぐ程度のものになります。ないよりは絶対にあった方がいいもので、普段スピン系テンションばかり使用している人で準備を忘れていても助かる仕様ですね。(新パッケージの場合ついているのか不明ですので、よろしくお願いします。)

 シートの曇り具合が粘着ラバーらしいですね。ライゼンZGRと比較するとゴールデンタンゴの方が昔ながらの粘着、中国製粘着ラバーに近い外観だと思いました。特にシートの粘着ですが、ライゼンZGRはほとんど粘着感がないのに対し、ゴールデンタンゴはまずまずの粘着を感じました。

Golden Tango(ゴールデンタンゴ)
 粘着テンション
 Made in Germany
・Sponge Thickness: 2.0 mm、Max
・Speed:7.0
・Spin:11.0
・Category:Professional
・Sponge硬度:Hard
・5,800円 + 税
・72 g(切断前) → 51 g(リーンフォースACに貼って)

 ヨーラは、新パッケージになってから粒形状についての情報も示してくれるようになりました。ダイナライズやライゼンにはそれぞれ最新のシートやスポンジが採用されていて、凄い感じになっています。一方、ゴールデンタンゴのシートやスポンジについて特別な説明や名前はないようです。ライゼン、ダイナライズ、ゴールデンタンゴの粒形状は以下のようになりますね。
 Rhyzen ZGR: 粒太さ 1.5 mm、粒間隔 0.8 mm、粒高さ 0.7 mm
 Dynaryz AGR: 粒太さ 1.7 mm、粒間隔 0.6 mm、粒高さ 0.9 mm
 Golden Tango: 粒太さ 1.7 mm、粒間隔 0.6 mm、粒高さ 0.9 mm
シートの粒は、粒が太いほど、粒間隔が狭いほど、粒高さが低いほど、回転性能が高く粘着っぽくなります。ゴールデンタンゴはダイナライズと同じ粒形状で粒はヨーララバーの中では最も標準的な粒形状のようです。粒間隔も狭いですが、その分粒高さが、高い設計になっていて、くい込みや球持ち、扱いやすさを付与しているといえるでしょう。

Golden Tangoの3つの特徴

シートが柔らかくて、バックでも使えるくらい扱いやすい!

 やはりシートの柔らかさからバックハンドでも十分に使える位、球持ちと回転量が得やすいと感じました。絶妙なシートとスポンジの硬さで、シートは柔らかいですが、その分スポンジはハードなので回転をしっかりかけることができました。粘着ラバーですので、スピン系テンションラバー以上に回転に特徴は欲しいところだと思います。ゴールデンタンゴの回転量はテナジー05以上だと思いました。安定感のチキータやバックハンドドライブが打ちやすかったです!
 これならスピン系テンションラバーユーザーが試しに粘着を使いたいと思ってもスムーズに移行できそうだと思いました。

まさにスピードと粘着の融合!

 ライゼンZGRは50~55°くらいで、同タイプラバーは例えばRakza Z(ラクザZ)、DNA Dragon Grip(DNAドラゴングリップ)、Omega VII China Guang(オメガVIIチャイナ光)、Blue Grip C2(ブルーグリップC2)、Hybrid K1J(ハイブリッドK1J)などでしょうか。どのラバーも粘着ラバーとスピン系テンションラバーの中間的な位置として開発されたようなラバーで、スピード性能をそこまで落とさないようにしつつ、スピン系テンションラバーよりも高いスピン性能を持たせたようなラバーだと思います。これらのラバーと同様にゴールデンタンゴはまさにスピードと粘着の融合といえるでしょう。岩崎さんのレビューにもあるように、このゴールデンタンゴはスピードと粘着の融合というのが非常にあうと思いました。当時、回転性能でテナジー05を上回るようなラバーは少なく、それでいてテンションなみのスピードも出せて、台上は止まる。まさに粘着とスピードの融合という表現があうと思いました。
 ライゼンZGRと異なる点は、まさに打球感の部分でしょうか。打球感はゴールデンタンゴの方がシートが柔らかい分、柔らかいと感じると思います。バックハンドで使うならゴールデンタンゴの方がブロックで変に落ちることもなくて使いやすいのではないかと思います。その分、シートだけで打つ技術ではゴールデンタンゴの方が滑ったり、慣れが必要かもしれません。また硬く感じる分、ボールの揃いにくさはライゼンZGRの方があるようにも感じましたね。揃いにくさを癖球というなら、癖球らしさはライゼンZGRの方が上だと思いました。

1つの粘着テンションの選択肢。シートが柔らかいラバーが好きならゴールデンタンゴはあり!

 ゴールデンタンゴはスポンジ硬度54°、ライゼンZGRは50~55°くらいで先ほども挙げているように類似のラバーは多数あります。これらのラバーの中でもゴールデンタンゴは非常にシートが柔らかいラバーと言えると思います。シートが柔らかい粘着ラバーが好み、と感じるならこのゴールデンタンゴは魅力的だと思います。個人的にはシートが柔らかいと、扱いやすい、ブロックがしやすい、回転をかけやすい、チキータや台上ドライブがやりやすいというメリットがある一方で、相手の回転の影響を受けやすい、回転のMax値を出すのにパワーが必要、などなどのデメリットが挙げられると思います。これらの特徴を把握して購入することをオススメします。Nittaku(ニッタク)製のキョウヒョウ3などを使用していてもっとスピードが欲しい、中陣での打ち合いにスピードが欲しいと思うならゴールデンタンゴはありではないでしょうか。

各技術レビュー

フォアハンド

軽打
 違和感はありませんでした。

ロングボールやラリーでのドライブ
 少しパワーロスを感じました。くい込みが良すぎるんでしょうね。普段使うラバーよりももっとボールを引き付けてあげる必要があると感じました。またここまで食い込みが良いと多分ラケットは木材系ではなく1本芯の通ったようなラケット、ファイバーなりカーボンなりインナーでも良いので入っているラケットの方が威力が出しやすいと思います。

面を開いたドライブ
 粘着ラバーらしく面を開いた方が威力が出ると感じました。くい込みもあるので打ちやすいですね。粘着ラバーの打ち方を覚えるという意味でも良いラバーかもしれません。

対下回転に対するループドライブ
 結構飛び出す印象です。ここはキョウヒョウのようなコテコテ粘着ラバーの方が低くて浅いいいループドライブが打ちやすいと思います。

対下回転に対するスピードドライブ
 めちゃめちゃ打ちやすいですね。ゴールデンタンゴの一つの特徴だと思います。是非3球目や4球目を狙い打ってください。

カーブ/シュートドライブ
 スピードが乗る分、やや曲がりは弱いと感じました。

ブロック
 やりやすかったです。相手の回転の乗ったドライブ、重いボールは、その威力を受けやすいですが、しっかり腰を落としてブロックしてあげることで入れやすいと思います。

カウンタードライブ
 良かったです。くい込みが良いことを想定してしっかり寝かせる必要がありますが、スポンジが硬い分以外とおさまりと沈み込みが良かったです。

ストップ
 当然ですがやりやすかったです。個人的にはもっと止まってほしいところでしたが十分合格点でした。

ツッツキ
 きれますね。もっと上板の硬いラケットとあわせることで切りやすくなるのではないかと感じました。

フォアフリック
 少し難しかったです。ラケットラバーに対し、どこまで厚く当ててどこまでくい込ませて弾くかイメージしながらなれる必要はあると思いました。

サーブ
 もちろん切れていました。少しくい込むので飛び出しが良いと感じました。

バックハンド系

軽打
 バックの方が好感触でした。小さい力で回転がかけやすいかったです。

ロングボールやラリーでのドライブ
 ボールの伸びを感じました。ハードな粘着テンションラバー、スピンアートと比べるとボールの伸びや弾みはゴールデンタンゴの方が良いですね!ラリーでも打球点を落としてドライブがしやすくて良かったし、安心して振り切れる感じがありました。

対下回転に対するループドライブ
 良かったです。ボールをグリップしていることを強く感じました。また相手がふかすようなドライブがしやすかったです。

対下回転に対するスピードドライブ
 回転で沈む感じがあり、スピードドライブがしやすかったです。この点で、バックで使うのはありだと感じました。

ブロック
 違和感ありませんでした。シートがくい込むからだと思います。少し回転の影響は受けやすいと感じました。

ストップ
 良く止まりました。

ツッツキ
 粘着ラバーなので切れますね。良いですね。

チキータ
 やりやすかったです。回転系のチキータが特にいいですね。一発威力の高いスピード系チキータは難しいと思います。

他ラバーとの比較(あくまでも個人の感想)

回転量
 Dignics 09C > Golden Tango > Tenergy 05

スピード
 Rhyzen ZGR > Golden Tango > Hurricane III

https://amzn.to/3gJwY5D

Review Rasanter R47

Explanation

andro sells rubber that feels outstanding rotation performance among German-made rubber. For katsuo000, if you can’t use Butterfly’s Tenergy series or Dignics series, you can be sure that you’ll use andro’s signature rubber, the Rasanter series. The reason is that the Rasanter series has high rotational performance! Considering the price, I think it is a very good rubber series. It’s been a long time late today, but we’ll be reviewing the original Rasanter sign, Rasanter R47!
Speaking of andro, the stylish apparel and the green color of the rubber sponge always give off a unique presence. Players contracted with andro include Simon Gauzy, who has defeated Jun Mizutani at the 2017 Table Tennis World Cup and China’s Xu Xin (Xu Xin, China) at the 2019 World Championship. (Simon Gauzy, France) and Akifumi Hamakawa, who entered the 2019 All Japan Championship as a ranker. Also, in recent years, you have contracted with table tennis club coaches from all over Japan, and the coach who has participated in the All Japan Championship, who is also indebted to katsuo000, has also contracted with andro. I think this area is strategic.

From Rasant to Rasanter

andro was selling the characteristic green sponge rubber Rasant series (Rasant Grip, Rasant Power Grip), Rasant Power Sponge, which was sold as a signboard until 2016. The 6 types of Rasant Power Sponge, Rasant Beat, Rasant Turbo, and Rasant) have all been discontinued, and a new lineup called Rasanter has been launched in 2017. The Rasanter series is a new flagship rubber that uses the same green sponge as the Rasant series. The Rasanter series includes the R series, which has high rotational performance and makes it easy to make arcs, and the V series, which has high rotational performance and speed performance, and is sold with a number that reflects the hardness of the sponge attached after R or V. In addition, ahead of other German manufacturers, it will be a rubber lineup equipped with a technology called Ultra Max, which has a sponge thickness of 2.3 mm. This technology seems to have been applied to top players before that, and it is a rubber that makes the seat thinner than the current one and makes the sponge thicker by that amount. There is an international rule that the thickness of rubber, including the adhesive layer, should be 4.0 mm or less, so it is necessary to make the sheet thinner in order to make the sponge thicker. It is said that rubber with a thin seat and a thick sponge is easier to get rotation, speed and flight distance, and it is easier to get the performance to receive top players. However, thinning the sheet is prone to manufacturing variations, and it seems that it was not widely available before that. Probably the latest technology could increase productivity, and as a result, it became possible to produce rubber with a thin sheet and thick sponge at a low price, and it seems that it was sold to the general market. This technology is not sold to the general public in Butterfly’s rubber, which sells the Tenergy series, which is the world standard for leading table tennis equipment in Japan and around the world. As of 2020, Butterfly has the thickest sponge, with a sponge thickness of 2.1 mm. In recent years, the number of rubbers made by other German manufacturers or made in Germany with thin sheets and thick sponges, so-called rubber thickness Max, is increasing.
Up to now, 8 types of Rasanter have been sold, 6 types for the R series and 2 types for the V series.

Rasanter series

The Rasanter series has a naming like the series in which the sponge hardness can be finely selected with the rotating R and the speed V, but when I actually tried it, it was different from my imagination. Apparently, the hardness of the sponge was changed, and the shape of the seat was also changed, so the shot feeling, performance, and easy-to-use technology were different. Furthermore, although the V series is certainly fast, it is not a rubber specialized for speed because it takes a lot of spin tension and rotation. katsuo000 has tried out R53, R48, R50, R47, V47 and R42, and would like to summarize the comparison in the future. I would like to comment here that the grain shape of the R53, R48, and R50 sheets is a little thin and the grain shape feels a little quick to separate from the ball. Compared to Dignics 05 and Tenergy 05, I think the grain shape of the sheet makes it harder to feel the ball holding. On the other hand, the sheet is soft and the sponge has a good bite, so I think that it is a rubber that feels like holding a ball when it bites into the whole rubber. Initially launched in 2017, there were six types: R50, R47, R42, R37, V47, and V42. Furthermore, in October 2019, the R53 equipped with Energy Cell technology was newly released, and in May 2020, the R48 also equipped with Energy Cell technology was newly released. Currently, andro’s flagship rubber is R53 and R48.

Recently, I think that the R53 and R48 of the red santer are the focus of attention in the Rasanter series. We have already created a review, so we hope you will read it as well.

Published performance value

It is a comparison of performance values announced by andro. Is it characteristic that andro adds an item called control in addition to speed and spin? After all, R53 and R48 with energy cells have high performance and you can see that they are the current signboard rubber (as of September 2020)!

R47 was a rubber used by Hamakawa in the past. To put it simply, the shot feeling of the R47 is the most similar to Tenergy 05 (Tenergy 80? For some people) in Rasanter, and I got the impression that it is the rubber that feels the hardness due to the grain shape of the sheet most. .. The Lazanta series are not rubbers with different hardness, but are probably developed with their own concepts. I think the R47 is an andro version of Tenergy 05-like rubber that was developed with Tenergy 05 in mind. By the way, just because R47 looks like Tenergy 05, R50 is not a rubber close to Tenergy 05 Hard! The difference in the numbers is more than the hardness of the sponge, so the concept has changed, so I think it’s better not to choose just the hardness. If you don’t know the Lazanta series at all, you may think that R47, R48, R50, and R53 have different hardness, but it’s not just a difference in hardness! In this R review, I would like to touch on the above points as well. Thank you for your cooperation.

R47 sticking and weight

Rasanter R47
    UM Tension (Tensor Bios UM)
    For 40+ Plastic Ball
・Sponge Thickness: 1.7 mm, 2.0 mm, ULTRAMAX (2.3 mm)
・Speed: 119
・Spin: 121
・Control: 85
・Sponge stiffness: 47
・6,200 yen + tax
・70 g (before cut) → 49 g (after cut)

It was just 49 g as expected. It’s just the right weight! Will it be 50 g depending on individual differences? Still, I think the weight has a good balance between power and ease of use!

Three features of Rasanter R47

I wanted to use R47 compared to R50 for katsuo000. The R50 isn’t bad either, but I felt it was a little better than the speed performance. R47 and R48 are hard to compare, but if you want a habit ball or a rough ball, I think that R47 is easier to obtain than R48.

Of course, the rotation performance is high! Equivalent to or better than Tenergy 05!

R47 has very high rotation performance and I felt the rotation performance comparable to Tenergy 05! R47 is a rubber that has a hard sheet and feels the hardness derived from the grain shape like Tenergy 05. Therefore, I felt that it is easy to rotate with a sheet even among German rubber, and it is easy to obtain high rotation performance. Personally, I felt that the amount of rotation could be obtained by making the sponge a little harder, but I felt that the R47 is a rubber that can achieve both speed while obtaining a high level of rotation!

Among Rasanters with a sponge hardness of 47 or more, it has the best ball holding and is easy to control the loop drive!

Personally, I felt that R47 was the closest to the grain shape of Tenergy 05 in Razanter. Therefore, I found the R47 to be the easiest to control the loop drive. When I tried to catch the ball firmly with just the seat, I felt that the ball would be stable because it would hold well and rotate well. It was a rubber that I felt easy to rotate not only in the loop drive but also in the technology to apply rotation such as push, Stop, Chiquita!

Push / stop also stops!

The sponge was Ultramax (UM), but I didn’t feel it bounced that much. If I caught the ball firmly with the seat, it was easy to stop and stop. I think it’s easier to stop than V47.

Each technics review

Forehand

Light hit
I didn’t feel it was that hard.

Drive on long balls and rallies
The order of the rough balls
Rough R53 > R50 > R47 > R48 > V47 normal
It is an image. Compared to V> 15 Extra, I think V> 15 Extra will be on the left side of R50. V> 15 Extra is a soft sponge, but I think it’s a rubber that can produce a fairly rough ball. If V> 15 Extra is awkward, you want a squiggly line, or you want rotational performance, we recommend the Rasanter series. R50, R47, and R48 are easy to handle, and if you want roughness and rotation performance, it’s R53. I think the R47 is a rubber with a very good balance of ball rotation, power, roughness, ease of handling, and speed. Therefore, it may be said that the rubber reflects the user’s arm as it is.

Drive with open face
Both the seat and the sponge were strong, and I didn’t feel like hitting the racket. It was good.

Loop (top spin) drive against back spin
The control of the loop drive was good. Loop drive was the easiest to do in the Razanter series.

Speed drive against back spin
It was a little difficult. It needs a good impact.

Block
Because the sponge is soft, I felt that it was easily affected by rotation.

Counter drive
If anything, overwrite type counter drive is easy to do.

Stop
I’m glad it was easy to stop the ball.

Push
It was good that this was also low.

Serve
It was good to be able to cut it firmly. It was a rubber that could secure enough rotation amount of my rubber.

Backhand

Light hit
It’s reasonably hard. I think you can get used to it.

Drive on long balls and rallies
I felt that it was easy to spin because I could grasp the ball firmly.

Loop (top spin) drive against back spin
Sometimes the swing speed was too slow and it dropped. It’s a lack of technology.

Block
The Razanter series is not as good as Tenergy 05 when blocking, but I think it is easily affected by rotation.

Stop / push
It was easy to do. It was good that this was also low.

Chiquita
The flight distance was a little too long and over mistakes were conspicuous.

Comparison with other rubbers (personal impressions)

Max spin amount
 R53 > Tenergy 05 Hard > R50 ≧ R47 ≧ R48 > Tenergy 05 ≧ V47

Speed
 V47 > R53 ≧ R50 > R48 > R47 > Tenergy 05 > Tenergy 05 Hard

https://amzn.to/3n2Sggg

Review Omega VII Pro

Explanation

Korean table tennis maker XIOM is an up-and-coming maker, and is famous for two types of rubber series, the Vega series with good cost performance and the Omega series of high-end models. The high-end rubber series Omega series is currently mainly composed of two series, V (five) and VII (seven). Brazilian hard hitter Hugo Calderano has signed a contract with XIOM, and even after changing the equipment, the world tour ranking has risen to a single digit! The Hugo Hyper Axylium and Omega VII Tour used by Calderano are also soaring in popularity. In addition, Korean iron wall block and Jeoung Youngsik of Chiquita are also using Ice Cream AZXi and Omega VII Pro reviewed on this page.

The Omega VII Pro reviewed on this page is the first rubber sold in the Omega VII series. The feature of the Omega VII series is the “unprecedented hitting speed” derived by Artificial Intelligence (AI), in contrast to the rubber specialized for rotation of the Omega V (Omega 5) of the previous series. Become. Of course, the Omega 7 Series has made it possible to drive at unprecedented speed while maintaining the amount of rotation that top players are satisfied with. Due to the higher rotation and speed, the price of all Omega 7 series is 7,000 yen + tax, which is the most expensive rubber of XIOM.

Let’s talk about XIOM’s rubber and its technology.

・MAX AT 4
    Technology that applies maximum tension within the limits of official rules.

・ELASTO FUTURA
    Comprehensive technology installed in the Omega VII series, Vega Tour, and Vega X. Three special tunings of "CYCLOID", "DYNAMIC FRICTION", and "CARBO SPONGE" are integrated into one rubber, delicate ball touch, unparalleled grip, and epoch-making elasticity. Technology to realize.

・DYNAMIC FRICTION
    Rubber surface processing technology born from snow tires that exert sufficient friction even on snow. Technology that firmly grasps a plastic ball with a slippery surface and creates more rotational energy.

・CYCLOID
    It is a technology that increases the probability of the player, the arc line of the ball is naturally high, reduces net mistakes in the block, and the ball enters the opponent's court as deeply as possible. , Technology that conveys high speed and powerful energy to the drive.

・CARBO SPONGE
    Technology to mix carbon particles in sponge. Technology that can interact with the top sheet with the force to firmly grasp the ball and the catapult effect.

・HYPER ELASTO
    A technology developed to replace the effect of speed glue, which was banned in 2008. Technology that realizes the shot feeling, hitting sound, flight distance, and rotational force as if used without speed glue. There are variations such as "IMB" with improved acceleration performance and "CST" that pursues the height of the arc line.

・TENSOR
    A technology developed by XIOM that gives a tension effect similar to speed glue. A technology that keeps the structure of rubber molecules taut and semi-permanently. With "TENSOR" rubber, you can easily speed up and spin a ball without using extra effort. Based on this technology, we added our own consideration and arrangement to complete the "HYPER ELASTO" technology.

・BIOS
    Like "TENSOR", it is a clean rubber manufacturing technology developed by XIOM. Technology that does not generate or mix substances that have an adverse effect on the environment or carcinogens during the manufacturing process. "BIOS" rubber thoroughly eliminates harmful substances, and anyone from manufacturing staff to players who use rubber can use it without worrying about the environment and health. A symbol of high performance and clean rubber.

The Vega X that has already been reviewed, the Vega Tour that will be reviewed next time, and the Omega 7 Pro that will be reviewed this time will all be rubber equipped with the same technical symbol, ELASTO FUTURA. Therefore, since all rubbers are carbon sponge and dynamic friction, it can be said that the sponge is black and the seat is a dynamic friction specification seat with grip.

The pamphlet describes Omega 7 Pro as follows.

A luxurious combination of flexibility and determination
    The slightly softer top sheet makes it easier to grab the ball. It enables free spin shots and unrivaled control shots, no matter how difficult the situation. In addition, a 47.5 degree high repulsion sponge fires the ball like a bullet. A fastball that doubles the energy of the swing runs through the opponent's court. I want flexibility, but I don't want to sacrifice deciding power. It is this Omega VII Pro that faithfully fulfills the wishes of such a luxurious player.
And if top-level players use the Omega VII Pro, I would recommend it to the back side. In the backhand of modern table tennis, it is necessary to take the initiative with Chiquita on the table, win in the high-speed rally of the front team, bounce off the opponent's powerful drive attack at the rising counter, etc., but Omega VII Pro Will produce better performance than expected in all of them. Since the flight distance is also increased, it is easy to regain the power drive from the place where it was lowered to the apse. With Omega VII Pro, your backhand is <godified>.

Published performance value

Omega 7 Pro is a standard rubber of the high-end rubber series for top players, Omega 7 series, so you can see that it has very high performance. Compared to Vega Tour and Vega X, the performance is overwhelmingly high, and you can see that it is also released as a high-end series.
However, as for the point that katsuo000 felt, in terms of the quality of rotation, the weight of the ball, and the power, the Omega 7 Pro certainly feels high performance, but I feel the difference as much as the price and published performance value. The impression of Omega 7 Pro, Vega Tour, and Vega X is that there is no such thing. All rubbers use ELASTO FUTURA technology, and even if the hardness is different, the impression is quite close. The Vega Tour may be a little too soft for the fore, but I was able to get a ball that was somewhat satisfying with any rubber in the fore, and I felt that the best rubber would change depending on the level of the back. rice field.
The final general comment will be written again after the review of the Vega Tour, so thank you.

Omega 7 Pro sticking and weight

Omega VII Pro
    ELASTO FUTURA ≒(DYNAMIC FRICTION × CYCLOID × CARBO SPONGE)
・Sponge Thickness: 2.0, max mm
・Speed: 12.5
・Spin: 12.5
・Sponge stiffness: 47.5°
・7,000 yen + tax
・67 g (before cut) → 49 g (after cut)

It wasn’t heavier than I expected. XIOM’s rubber can be heavy, but I was surprised that it was lighter than I expected.

Three features of Omega VII Pro

A sponge with a good bite that does not feel 47.5 °!

I think that the rubber of Omega 7 Pro and Omega 7 series basically uses a sponge that bites in quite well, and it is hard to feel the hardness as hard as it is. In fact, I gripped the ball quite a bit on the 55 ° Omega 7 tour, and I felt it was easy to spin. The Omega 7 Pro this time is also 47.5 ° by German standard, but it was a rubber that bites much better than other 47.5 ° rubbers (Evolution MX-P, V> 15 Extra, etc.). The goodness of this bite is the goodness of the bite, which is reminiscent of Rasanter R48. However, while the R48 was able to hit a light speed drive, it also obtained a high amount of rotation, but I felt the lightness of the ball as a hit feeling. Compared to R48, Omega 7 Pro emphasizes speed as in the concept, but as it is a rubber with the same amount of rotation and power, it is easy to get speed but the shot feeling is quite mad, it is more rigid than light. It is a rubber with such specifications that the drive is likely to hit. (However, whether or not the Omega 7 Pro can hit a really heavy power drive and whether or not it can be used depends on the user’s arm, and if it can not be a hard hit with strong impact and power, there is also the impression that it will be a light ball. did.)
Rubber with good bite is often easily affected by the rotation of the opponent, but Omega 7 Pro and Omega 7 Tour have the impression that it is easy to block and counter. Because the whole rubber is strong, it feels like it can be hit back by the whole rubber. The feeling that this rubber as a whole is not defeated is a unique feature of the Omega 7 series that other manufacturers’ rubbers do not have, and if you place importance on it, I felt that the price was reasonable.

High speed, grip feeling that does not suit speed!

Omega 7 Pro still felt that the speed of the ball was quite fast. There was a sense of speed that the block became a counter without permission, and since the counter is easy to do, it is easy to hit back, and I think that it has many elements necessary for modern table tennis. Also, the serve was a good impression, and it was easy to put out a serve with a sense of speed like slipping. Of course, it grips firmly, so the amount of rotation was also firmly applied. It was easy to prevent the opponent’s Chiquita and receive drive.
Also, rubber that is easy to speed up is often easy for push to go wild or float, but it seems to be a spin type tension, and push and stop are easy to stop firmly, which was a good impression. Although the number of rubbers with such characteristics has been increasing in recent years, the Omega 7 Pro and Omega 7 series are still differentiated and made us feel high performance.

Compared to the Vega X and Vega Tour, the Omega 7 Pro felt like hitting a ball heavier than speed. Not only is it fast, but it also feels like you can grip the ball firmly, and the amount of rotation is not small, which is a very interesting rubber. If you want only speed, there are rubbers such as Bryce Highspeed, but at Bryce Highspeed, it is difficult to make a high quality loop drive, so if you do not put it low on the net, you will have to turn the counter. It will be easy. The rubber of Omega 7 Pro and Omega 7 series can be said to be a rubber that can give a characteristic speed while being a rubber that can hit a heavy loop drive, depending on the arm. I think that it is a specification preferred by top players as a high-end rubber.
However, it also requires technical skills to master it. It’s not like anyone can hit a heavy drive, but you need the appropriate skill and power.

As a general comment, it is a balanced type of rotation and speed (like 80), a rubber of rally thinking rather than power

As mentioned in the Omega 7 Tour, the Omega 7 Pro was a rally-thinking rubber rather than a power-oriented rubber because it can rotate and speed. I think Omega 7 Pro is a rubber that can beat the opponent’s drive and deciding ball with blocks and counters in the rally, and connect it to your own drive and repeated hits. Compared to tours and hypers, it feels softer and feels like a rubber that can be used in the back.
I think that the singing phrase, “unprecedented hitting speed”, depends on how you feel. It can be regarded as an almighty rubber with high speed performance and rotation performance. The speed drive has a slightly difficult impression compared to other rubbers with high speed performance, and the loop drive with a high rotation amount is also a little unsatisfactory compared to other spin type tension rubbers, it feels like a halfway rubber.

Each technics review

I slipped quite a bit during the trial hit. The impression is that the Omega 7 series changes the sponge hardness with a similar sheet and sponge, but the sponge of Omega 7 Pro may be too soft. In this case, Omega VII Tour or Omega VII Asia may be more reassuring. The coach who participated in the All Japan Championship also said that the professionals used a little in the trial hit and quit immediately, so they immediately used the Omega 7 Tour or Omega V Tour DF (Omega 5 Tour DF). I imagine the Omega 5 Tour DF is pretty good, especially considering the specs in the cost performance and foreground.
Also, as the product description such as pamphlets says, “If top-level players use Omega VII Pro, I would like to recommend it on the back side”, Omega 7 Pro seems to be on the back side. It seems that top player Jeoung Young-sik also uses it for his backhand. In addition, unfortunately I tried it again this time with Zhang Jike ZLC and outer carbon, but when I tried it with Fortius FT ver. D, which is a light wood + special fiber racket, the power of the backhand is insufficient. , I had the impression that I could make up for the lack of speed. I imagine that Omega 7 Pro is a rubber that can compensate for the lack of power of the backhand of inner carbon and wood rackets, especially the lack of speed.

Forehand

Light hit
The ball is fast, isn’t it? Perhaps the number one reason you feel fast is because of the low arc.

Drive on long balls and rallies
The shot feeling is close to Tenergy 05, which is a very good feeling, but I was a little dissatisfied with the amount of rotation for that. Also, when driving from the middle team, I felt that the ball would run, but I was a little dissatisfied with the power and amount of rotation. It’s usually Dignics 05, so I think it’s easy to get a strict evaluation. If you want to make a comparison, you’ll need to make a comparison on the Omega VII Tour or Omega VII Hyper. It will be decided when you can already take a no-touch course, but for the speed of the ball, it seems that the ball is very easy to take, and there is an impression that the block or counter drive is easily returned. did. On the other hand, I felt the strength and ease of hitting the opponent’s ball during the upturn rally. Although it does not go to Tenergy, I also felt that it was a reliable rubber in the upper rotation rally.

Drive with open face
I didn’t feel like the sponge was losing. However, I felt that the amount of rotation was a little low.

Loop (top spin) drive against back spin
It was a good feeling because I had a ball firmly. I think that it has a high amount of rotation and a heavy drive, but I felt that it was a little lacking in power for the shot feeling.

Speed drive against back spin
It’s easier to hit than Tenergy 05, but it still has a mad feel, and it feels more like an adhesive rubber than exhilarating.

Curve / shoot drive
It was easy to insert the horizontal rotation, and I had the impression that it would bend firmly.

Block
The seat of the Omega 7 Pro is not that hard, but it was easy to block against the drive. Of course, the counter was easy and very interesting. I think that you can swing around by blocking so that you can stretch a little at a high pitch in the front team.

Counter drive
The seats aren’t stiff, but the counter drive was easy to do. It was a little bit good, so it wasn’t uncommon for me to spin around, but overall I felt that I could hit the ball back with the entire rubber.

Stop
It was easy for the speed of the ball.

Push
I sometimes slipped, but it was easy to do the straight Tsuttsuki. It was a little difficult to rotate.

Serve
It was good that it was easy to serve with speed.

Backhand

Light hit
It was a little easy, but once I got used to it, there was no problem.

Drive on long balls and rallies
The hardness was just right for the backhand. However, I also felt that it was a little mad.

Loop (top spin) drive against back spin
It was a little difficult. It was easy to do in the foreground, so I think it lacks technical skills.

Speed drive against back spin
It was a feeling that it would be an aggressive speed drive with a drive that emphasizes rotation with a fast RBI. Speed drive with a strong impact was a little difficult.

Curve / shoot drive
I had the impression that Chiquita also bends considerably.

Block
It was easy to do. However, I slipped a little.

Counter drive
It was easy to do. I think it’s a good rubber.

Stop / Push
It was good. It didn’t even pop out. It was easier to hit a straight line faster than cutting.

Chiquita
It was easy to make an arc and it was easy to do!

Comparison with other rubbers (personal impressions)

Max spin amount
 Rasanter R48 ≧ Tenergy 05 ≧ Vega X > Omega VII Pro ≧ Evolution MX-P

Ease of spin
 Tenergy 05 FX ≧ Omega VII Pro ≧ Vega X ≧ Rasanter R48

Speed
 Rasanter R48 ≧ Omega VII Pro ≧ Vega X > Tenergy 05

https://amzn.to/3jqaXJq